1887
image of The influence of linguistic and cognitive background on word stress processing in an unknown language
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Individual differences in working memory and musical aptitude, as well as task complexity are crucial in predicting the performance of word stress perception in a second language (L2). The present study investigated the interactive effects of these factors with the listeners’ first language. French and German listeners, both without knowledge of Spanish, performed stress-related tasks in Spanish, as well as musical and working memory tests in their L1. Besides confirming the impact of L1, our findings better define the influence of working memory and musical aptitude on L2 stress perception by specifically tapping into the central executive component of working memory, objectively assessing musical aptitude, and considering task complexity as a moderating factor in the relationship between the inter-individual factors and L2 stress perception. Our findings are also the first to demonstrate task-specific performance differences between French and German listeners, possibly reflecting differential cognitive and perceptual mechanisms depending on L1.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.23028.sch
2024-06-28
2024-07-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alexander, J. A., Wong, P. C., & Bradlow, A. R.
    (2005) Lexical tone perception in musicians and non-musicians. INTERSPEECH 2005 – Ninth European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Lisbon, Portugal, September 4–8 2005, –. 10.21437/Interspeech.2005‑271
    https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2005-271 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aliaga-García, C., Mora, J. C., & Cerviño-Povedano, E.
    (2011) L2 speech learning in adulthood and phonological short-term memory. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, vol.(), . 10.2478/psicl‑2011‑0002
    https://doi.org/10.2478/psicl-2011-0002 [Google Scholar]
  3. Avanzi, M., Schwab, S., Dubosson, P. & Goldman, J.-P.
    (2012) La prosodie de quelques variétés de français parlées en Suisse romande. InA. C. Simon (Ed.), La variation prosodique régionale en français (pp.–). Bruxelles: De Boeck/ Duculot. 10.3917/dbu.cathe.2012.01.0089
    https://doi.org/10.3917/dbu.cathe.2012.01.0089 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M.
    (2008) Mixed effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, , –. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 [Google Scholar]
  5. Baddeley, A.
    (1992) Working memory. Science, (), –. 10.1126/science.1736359
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1736359 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2000) The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, , –. 10.1016/S1364‑6613(00)01538‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2 [Google Scholar]
  7. Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G.
    (1974) Working memory. InG. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory. Vol. 8 (pp.–). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Baddeley, A., Gathercole, S., & Papagno, C.
    (1998) The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review, , –. 10.1037/0033‑295X.105.1.158
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.158 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, (), –. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  10. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
    (2011) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. [Computer Software]. www.praat.org
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chang, C. B., & Kwon, S.
    (2020) The contributions of crosslinguistic influence and individual differences to nonnative speech perception. Languages, (), . 10.3390/languages5040049
    https://doi.org/10.3390/languages5040049 [Google Scholar]
  12. Chartrand, J. P., & Belin, P.
    (2006) Superior voice timbre processing in musicians. Neuroscience letters, (), –. 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.06.053
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2006.06.053 [Google Scholar]
  13. Crespo, M.
    (2011) The effects of task complexity on L2 oral production as mediated by differences in working memory capacity. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Barcelona.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Darcy, I., Park, H., & Yang, C.-L.
    (2015) Individual differences in L2 acquisition of English phonology: The relation between cognitive abilities and phonological processing. Learning and Individual Differences, , –. 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.04.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.04.005 [Google Scholar]
  15. Degrave, P.
    (2020) Music training and the use of songs or rhythm: Do they help for lexical stress processing?International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1515/iral‑2019‑0081
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2019-0081 [Google Scholar]
  16. Delattre, P.
    (1938) L’accent final en français: accent d’intensité, accent de hauteur, accent de durée. The French Review, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (1969) An acoustic and articulatory study of vowel reduction in four languages. International Review of Applied Linguistics and Language Teaching, , –. 10.1515/iral.1969.7.4.295
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1969.7.4.295 [Google Scholar]
  18. Diependaele, K., Lemhöfer, K., & Brysbaert, M.
    (2013) The word frequency effect in first- and second-language word recognition: a lexical entrenchment account. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, ():–. 10.1080/17470218.2012.720994
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.720994 [Google Scholar]
  19. Dogil, G., & Williams, B.
    (1999) The phonetic manifestation of word stress. InH. van der Hulst (Eds.), Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe (pp.–). Berlin, New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197082.1.273
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197082.1.273 [Google Scholar]
  20. Dupoux, E., Pallier, C., Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Mehler, J.
    (1997) A destressing ‘deafness’ in French?Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1006/jmla.1996.2500
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.2500 [Google Scholar]
  21. Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S., & Sebastián-Gallés, N.
    (2001) A robust method to study stress “deafness”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, (), –. 10.1121/1.1380437
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1380437 [Google Scholar]
  22. Dupoux, E., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Navarrete, E., & Peperkamp, S.
    (2008) Persistent stress ‘deafness’: The case of French learners of Spanish, Cognition, (), –. 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  23. Egeland, J.
    (2015) Measuring working memory with digit span and the Letter-Number Sequencing subtests from the WAIS-IV: Too low manipulation load and risk for underestimating modality effects, Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, (), –, 10.1080/23279095.2014.992069
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2014.992069 [Google Scholar]
  24. Engle, R. W., & Kane, M. J.
    (2004) Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. In: B. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Vol. 44 (pp.–). New York: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Flege, J. E.
    (2009) Give input a chance. InT. Piske, & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input matters in SLA (pp.–). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Garde, P.
    (1968) L’accent. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Gordon, E.
    (1989) Advanced measures of music audition. Chicago: GIA Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Honbolygó, F., Kóbor, A., & Csépe, V.
    (2019) Cognitive components of foreign word stress processing difficulty in speakers of a native language with non-contrastive stress. International Journal of Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1177/1367006917728393
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006917728393 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hualde, J. I.
    (2012) Stress and rhythm. InJ. I. Hualde, A. Olarrea & E. O’Rourke (Eds.), The handbook of Hispanic linguistics (pp.–). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 10.1002/9781118228098.ch8
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118228098.ch8 [Google Scholar]
  30. Inceoglu, S.
    (2019) Individual differences in L2 speech perception: The role of phonological memory and lipreading ability. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. www.jstor.org/stable/45286637. 10.1111/modl.12591
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12591 [Google Scholar]
  31. Ivanova, M., Neubert, C. M., Schmied, J., & Benedixen, A.
    (2023) ERP evidence for Slavic and German word stress cue sensitivity in English. Frontiers in Psychology, . 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1193822
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1193822 [Google Scholar]
  32. Jansen, N., Harding, E., Loerts, H., Başkent, D., & Lowie, W.
    (2022) The relation between musical ability and sentence-level intonation perception: A meta-analysis comparing L1 and non-native listening. Proc. Speech Prosody 2022, –, 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2022‑145
    https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2022-145 [Google Scholar]
  33. Jessen, M., Marasek, K., Schneider, K., & Clahssen, K.
    (1995) Acoustic correlates of word stress and the tense/lax opposition in the vowel system of German. Proc. Int. Congress Phonetic Sci, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Knight, R. A., & Hawkins, S.
    (2013) Research methods in speech perception. InM. J. Jones & R. A. Knight (Eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Phonetics (pp.–). London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781472541895
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472541895 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kolinsky, R., Cuvelier, H., Goetry, V., Peretz, I., & Morais, J.
    (2009) Music training facilitates lexical stress processing. Music Perception, (), –. 10.1525/mp.2009.26.3.235
    https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2009.26.3.235 [Google Scholar]
  36. Lacheret-Dujour, A., & Beaugendre, F.
    (1999) La prosodie du français. Paris: CNRS éditions.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Léon, P.
    (2007) Phonétisme et prononciations du français. Paris: Armand Colin.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Llisterri, J., Machuca, M. J., Ríos, A., & Schwab, S.
    (2014) El acento en contexto: datos acústicos. InY. Congosto Martín, M. L. Montero Curiel, & A. Salvador Plans (Eds.), Fonética experimental, educación superior e investigación Vol. I (Experimental phonetics, superior education and investigation) (pp.–). Madrid: Arco/Libros.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Llompart, M.
    (2021) Lexical and phonetic influences on the phonolexical encoding of difficult second-language contrasts: Insights from nonword rejection. Frontiers in Psychology, , 659852. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.659852
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.659852 [Google Scholar]
  40. MacKay, I. R. A., Meador, D., & Flege, J. E.
    (2001) The identification of English consonants by native speakers of Italian. Phonetica, , –. 10.1159/000028490
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000028490 [Google Scholar]
  41. Marques, C., Moreno, S., Luís Castro, S., & Besson, M.
    (2007) Musicians detect pitch violation in a foreign language better than nonmusicians: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, (), –. 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1453
    https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1453 [Google Scholar]
  42. Mielicki, M. K., Koppel, R. H., Valencia, G., & Wiley, J.
    (2018) Measuring working memory capacity with the letter–number sequencing task: Advantages of visual administration. Applied Cognitive Psychology, , –. 10.1002/acp.3468
    https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3468 [Google Scholar]
  43. Mooshammer, C., & Geng, C.
    (2008) Acoustic and articulatory manifestations of vowel reduction in German. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, , –. 10.1017/S0025100308003435
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100308003435 [Google Scholar]
  44. Muntendam, A., van Rijswijk, R., Severijnen, G. & Dijkstra, T.
    (2022) The role of stress position in bilingual auditory word recognition: Cognate processing in Turkish and Dutch. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, –. 10.1017/S1366728922000037
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728922000037 [Google Scholar]
  45. Nieuwenhuis, R., Pelzer, B., & te Grotenhuis, M.
    (2012) Tools for detecting influential data in mixed effects models. The R Journal, (). URLhttps://journal.r-project.org/archive/2012-2/RJournal_2012-2_Nieuwenhuis~et~al.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Ortega-Llebaria, M., & Prieto, P.
    (2009) Perception of word stress in Castilian Spanish: The effects of sentence intonation and vowel type. InM. Vigário, S. Frota, & M. J. Freitas (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology. Interactions and interrelations (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/cilt.306.02ort
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.306.02ort [Google Scholar]
  47. Ortega-Llebaria, M., Gu, H., & Fan, J.
    (2013) English Speakers’ perception of Spanish lexical stress: Context-driven L2 stress perception. Journal of Phonetics, , –. 10.1016/j.wocn.2013.01.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2013.01.006 [Google Scholar]
  48. Ortín, R., & Simonet, M.
    (2023) Perceptual sensitivity to stress in native English speakers learning Spanish as a second language. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, (), –. 10.16995/labphon.7978
    https://doi.org/10.16995/labphon.7978 [Google Scholar]
  49. Prabhu, N. S.
    (1987) Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Quilis, A.
    (1981) Fonética acústica de la lengua española. Madrid: Gredos.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. (1999) Tratado de fonética y fonología españolas (2nd ed.). Madrid: Gredos.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2022) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URLhttps://www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Robinson, P.
    (2001) Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, , –. 10.1093/applin/22.1.27
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.27 [Google Scholar]
  54. Rossi, M.
    (1979) Le français, langue sans accent. Studia Phonetica, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Satori, M.
    (2021) Effects of working memory on L2 linguistic knowledge and L2 listening comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S0142716421000345
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716421000345 [Google Scholar]
  56. Schwab, S., & Calpini, N.
    (2018) Expertise musicale et perception de variations de F0 en L1 et en L2. Revue française de linguistique appliquée, (), –. 10.3917/rfla.231.0015
    https://doi.org/10.3917/rfla.231.0015 [Google Scholar]
  57. Schwab, S., & Dellwo, V.
    (2017) Intonation and talker variability in the discrimination of Spanish lexical stress contrasts by Spanish, German and French listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, , –. 10.1121/1.5008849
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5008849 [Google Scholar]
  58. (2019) Music and L2 prosody: the role of musical aptitude on the discrimination of stress contrasts. Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia, August 5–9, 2019, Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. (2021) Explicit versus non-explicit prosodic training in the learning of Spanish L2 stress contrasts by French listeners. Journal of Second Language Studies. 10.1075/jsls.21017.sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.21017.sch [Google Scholar]
  60. Schwab, S., Kamber, J., Etter, F., Mouthon, M., Rogenmoser, L., Jost, L. B., & Annoni, Jean-Marie
    . (accepted). Swiss French and Swiss German speakers learning word stress in Spanish: An experimental study. InE. Glaser, J. Kabatek, & B. Sonnenhauser Eds. Sprachräume der Schweiz / Espaces linguistiques suisses / Language spaces in Switzerland / Spazi linguistici della Svizzera. Tübingen: Narr/Francke.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Suzukida, Y.
    (2021) The contribution of individual differences to L2 pronunciation learning: Insights from research and pedagogical implications. RELC Journal, (), –. 10.1177/0033688220987655
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220987655 [Google Scholar]
  62. Tremblay, A.
    (2009) Phonetic variability and the variable perception of L2 word stress by French Canadian listeners. International Journal of Bilingualism, , –. 10.1177/1367006909103528
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006909103528 [Google Scholar]
  63. Tremblay, A., Broersma, M., Zeng, Y., Kim, H., Lee, J., & Shin, S.
    (2021) Dutch listeners’ perception of English lexical stress: A cue-weighting approach. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, (), –. 10.1121/10.0005086
    https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0005086 [Google Scholar]
  64. Wechsler, D.
    (2008) Wechsler adult intelligence scale – Fourth Edition (WAIS – IV). San Antonio, TX: NCS Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Wen, Z., & Li, S.
    (2019) Working memory in L2 learning and processing. InJ. W. Schwieter, & A. Benati (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of language learning (pp.–). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108333603.016
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108333603.016 [Google Scholar]
  66. Xie, X., & Myers, E.
    (2015) The impact of musical training and tone language experience on talker identification. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, (), –. 10.1121/1.4904699
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4904699 [Google Scholar]
  67. Zhang, X., Cheng, B., Zou, Y., Li, X., & Zhang, Y.
    (2023) Cognitive factors in nonnative phonetic learning: Impacts of inhibitory control and working memory on the benefits and costs of talker variability. Journal of Phonetics, , 101266, 10.1016/j.wocn.2023.101266
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2023.101266 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.23028.sch
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.23028.sch
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error