1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
  4. Volume 11, Issue 3
  5. Article
Volume 11, Issue 3
  • ISSN 2215-1931
  • E-ISSN: 2215-194X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The role of age in second-language acquisition has provoked much debate and research, especially with respect to pronunciation. However, little emphasis has been placed on acquisition between early adulthood and middle age. We examined combined speaking and listening proficiency scores from 1,992 immigrants to Canada with ages of arrival (AOA) ranging from 15 to 50 and a mean of 5 years of Canadian residence. Eleven diverse L1 groups were represented, and proficiency was measured via the Canadian Language Benchmarks (CLB) assessment tool. Mixed-effects statistical modelling indicated a strong negative relationship between AOA and CLB test scores. In general, older learners were less likely to obtain higher test scores, with the effect varying across L1 groups. In contrast, no evidence emerged of a meaningful relationship between length of residence and proficiency scores.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.25021.mun
2025-09-01
2026-03-10

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jslp.25021.mun
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K.
    (2009) Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59(2), 249–306. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00507.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00507.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Andringa, S.
    (2014) The use of native speaker norms in Critical Period Hypothesis research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(3), 565–596. 10.1017/S0272263113000600
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000600 [Google Scholar]
  3. Anisef, P., Sweet, R., Adamuti-Trache, M., & Wayland, S. V.
    (2012) Explaining self-reported language proficiency gains of immigrant women. Government of Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/corporate/reports-statistics/research/explaining-self-reported-language-proficiency-gains-immigrant-women.html
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  5. Birdsong, D.
    (2018) Plasticity, variability and age in second language acquisition and bilingualism. Frontiers in Psychology, 91, Article 81. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00081
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00081 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bongaerts, T., Mennen, S., & van der Slik, F.
    (2000) Authenticity of pronunciation in naturalistic second language acquisition: The case of very advanced late learners of Dutch as a second language. Studia Linguistica, 54(2), 298–308. 10.1111/1467‑9582.00069
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9582.00069 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cabanda, E.
    (2020) “We want your nurses!”: Negotiating labor agreements in recruiting Filipino nurses. Asian Politics and Policy, 12(3), 404–431. 10.1111/aspp.12547
     https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.12547 [Google Scholar]
  8. Centre for Canadian Language Benchmarks
    Centre for Canadian Language Benchmarks (2012) Canadian Language Benchmarks: English as a second language for adults. Citizenship and Immigration Canada.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Christensen, R.
    (2023) ordinal-Regression Models for Ordinal Data. R package version 2023.12–4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ordinal
  10. Citizenship and Immigration Canada Research & Evaluation Branch
    Citizenship and Immigration Canada Research & Evaluation Branch (2005) Facts and figures 2004: Immigration overview — permanent and temporary residents. Government of Canada.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. De Bot, K., & Schrauf, R. W.
    (2009) Introduction. InK. De Bot & R. W. Schrauf, Eds., Language development over the lifespan (pp.1–16). Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. DeKeyser, R., Alfi-Shabtay, I., & Ravid, D.
    (2010) Cross-linguistic evidence for the nature of age effects in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(3), 413–438. 10.1017/S0142716410000056
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716410000056 [Google Scholar]
  13. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
    (2013) The development of L2 oral language skills in two L1 groups: A seven-year study. Language Learning, 63(2), 163–185. 10.1111/lang.12000
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12000 [Google Scholar]
  14. Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., Mulder, M. & Abbott, M.
    (2010) An examination of the Canadian Language Benchmark data from the Citizenship Language Survey. Ottawa, ON: Citizenship and Immigration Canada.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Flege, J. E.
    (1984) The detection of French accent by American listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76(3), 692–707. 10.1121/1.391256
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.391256 [Google Scholar]
  16. Flege, J. E., & Bohn, O-S.
    (2021) The revised speech learning model (SLM-r). InR. Wayland (Ed.), Second language speech learning (pp.3–83). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108886901.002
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108886901.002 [Google Scholar]
  17. Flege, J. E., & Liu, S.
    (2001) The effect of experience on adults’ acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(4), 527–552. 10.1017/S0272263101004041
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101004041 [Google Scholar]
  18. Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R.
    (1995) Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(5), 3125–3134. 10.1121/1.413041
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.413041 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fox, J., & Weisberg, S.
    (2019) An R companion to applied regression (3rd Edition). Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Granena, G., & Long, M. H.
    (2013) Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research, 29(3), 311–343. 10.1177/0267658312461497
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312461497 [Google Scholar]
  21. Grose-Fifer, J.
    (2024) Brain and behavior. [Open Educational Resource] CUNY. https://pressbooks.cuny.edu/psy320/. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Hakuta, K., Bialystok, E., & Wiley, E.
    (2003) Critical evidence: A test of the critical-period hypothesis for second-language acquisition. Psychological Science, 14(1), 31–38. 10.1111/1467‑9280.01415
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.01415 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hartshorne, J. K., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Pinker, S.
    (2018) A critical period for second language acquisition: Evidence from 2/3 million English speakers. Cognition, 1771, 263–277. 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.007 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kozar, O. & Yates, L.
    (2019) Factors in language learning after 40: Insights from a longitudinal study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 57(2), 181–204. 10.1515/iral‑2015‑0113
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2015-0113 [Google Scholar]
  25. Levelle, K. & Levis, J.
    (2014) Understanding the impact of social factors on pronunciation: Insights from learners. InMoyer, A. & Levis, J. (Eds.), Social dynamics in second language accent, (pp.97–118). Walter de Gruyter Inc. 10.1515/9781614511762.97
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511762.97 [Google Scholar]
  26. Long, M. H.
    (1980) Inside the “black box”: Methodological issues in classroom research on language learning. Language Learning, 30(1), 1–42. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1980.tb00149.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1980.tb00149.x [Google Scholar]
  27. (1990) Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(3), 251–285. 10.1017/S0272263100009165
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009165 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lüdecke, D.
    (2018) ggeffects: Tidy Data Frames of Marginal Effects from Regression Models. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(26), 772. 10.21105/joss.00772
     https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00772 [Google Scholar]
  29. Marinova-Todd, S. H., Marshall, D. B., & Snow, C. E.
    (2000) Three misconceptions about age and L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 34(1), 9–34. 10.2307/3588095
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3588095 [Google Scholar]
  30. Moyer, A.
    (2009) Input as a critical means to an end: Quantity and quality of experience in L2 phonological attainment. InT. Piske & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input matters in SLA (pp.159–174). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847691118
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691118 [Google Scholar]
  31. Muñoz, C. & Singleton, D.
    (2011) A critical review of age-related research on L2 ultimate attainment. Language Teaching, 44(1), 1–35. 10.1017/S0261444810000327
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000327 [Google Scholar]
  32. Munro, M. (Miles), & Mann, V.
    (2005) Age of immersion as a predictor of foreign accent. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26(3), 311–341. 10.1017/S0142716405050198
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716405050198 [Google Scholar]
  33. Oyama, S.
    (1976) A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5(3), 261–283.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Piske, T., MacKay, I. R., & Flege, J. E.
    (2001) Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29(2), 191–215. 10.1006/jpho.2001.0134
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0134 [Google Scholar]
  35. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2024) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 〈https://www.R-project.org/〉.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Schepens, J. J., van Hout, R. W., & van der Slik, F. W.
    (2023) Linguistic dissimilarity increases age-related decline in adult language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45(1), 167–188. 10.1017/S0272263122000067
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000067 [Google Scholar]
  37. Spiliopoulos, G., & Cuban, S.
    (2025) Filipino migrant and returned nurses resisting and adapting to the pressures of becoming “ideal migrants”. Journal of International Migration and Integration. 10.1007/s12134‑024‑01225‑x
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-024-01225-x [Google Scholar]
  38. Thomson, R. I., Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
    (2024) How long can naturalistic L2 pronunciation learning continue in adults? A 10-year study. Language Awareness, 33(2), 201–223. 10.1080/09658416.2023.2227559
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2023.2227559 [Google Scholar]
  39. Tracy-Ventura, N., Huensch, A., Katz, J., Mitchell, R.
    (2025) Is second language attrition inevitable after instruction ends? An exploratory longitudinal study of advanced instructed second language learners. Language Learning, 75(1), 42–76. 10.1111/lang.12665
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12665 [Google Scholar]
  40. van der Ploeg, M., Keijzer, M., & Lowie, W.
    (2025) Language pedagogies and late-life language learning proficiency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 63(1), 303–340. 10.1515/iral‑2023‑0079
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2023-0079 [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang, W.
    (1999) Age and second language acquisition in adulthood: The learning experiences and perceptions of women immigrants. TESL Canada Journal, 16(2), 1–19. 10.18806/tesl.v16i2.715
     https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v16i2.715 [Google Scholar]
  42. Wickham, H.
    (2016) ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑24277‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4 [Google Scholar]
  43. Yates, L., & Kozar, O.
    (2017) Expanding the horizons of age-related research: A response to the Special Issue ‘Complexities and Interactions of Age in Second Language Learning: Broadening the Research Agenda.’ Applied Linguistics, 38(2), 258–262. 10.1093/applin/amv031
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv031 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.25021.mun
Loading
Age still matters after early adulthood
Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 11, 423 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.25021.mun
/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.25021.mun
/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.25021.mun
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): critical period; L2 speaking and listening; research methods

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error