1887
image of Acceptability in Danish and Finnish L2 speech
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

L2 pronunciation research has mainly focused on linguistic dimensions of speech, such as and . However, successful L2 communication also involves social dimensions, like or . Moreover, L2 pronunciation research has mostly examined L2 English. This study addresses these gaps by examining how Finnish and Danish L1 speakers evaluate L2 speech comprehensibility, acceptability (operationalized as language switching and suitability for occupation), and pleasantness in their respective languages, as well as relationships between these dimensions.

In Finnish, acceptability items were intercorrelated, and more strongly correlated to pleasantness than to comprehensibility. In the Danish data the two acceptability items were not intercorrelated. A statistically significant difference also emerged for acceptability in terms of language switching: Finnish L1 raters scored acceptability lower than Danish L1 raters. These results suggest that acceptability ratings are not only linguistic judgments, but also reflections of social inclusion, which may present differently in different contexts.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.25032.tul
2026-06-12
2026-07-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Boersma, P. & Weenink, D.
    (2020) Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.1.35. Available at: www.praat.org/ (Retrieved30 November 2020)
  2. Bouchard, R. E., Carranza, M. A., & Moffie, R. W.
    (1977) Reactions toward varying degrees of accentedness in the speech of Spanish-English bilinguals. Language and Speech, (), –. 10.1177/002383097702000308
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383097702000308 [Google Scholar]
  3. de Leeuw, J. R., Gilbert, R. A., & Luchterhandt, B.
    (2023) jsPsych: Enabling an Open-Source Collaborative Ecosystem of Behavioral Experiments. Journal of Open Source Software, (), . 10.21105/joss.05351
    https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05351 [Google Scholar]
  4. Derwing, T. & Munro, M.
    (2015) Pronunciation fundamentals. Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. Language Learning & Language Teaching. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/lllt.42
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.42 [Google Scholar]
  5. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
    (2009) Comprehensibility as a factor in listener interaction preferences: Implications for the workplace. Canadian Modern Language Review, (), –. 10.3138/cmlr.66.2.181
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.66.2.181 [Google Scholar]
  6. Dragojevic, M., & Goatley-Soan, S.
    (2020) Americans’ attitudes toward foreign accents: Evaluative hierarchies and underlying processes. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, (), –. 10.1080/01434632.2020.1735402
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1735402 [Google Scholar]
  7. Education First
    Education First (2025) EF English Proficiency Index 2025: Denmark. https://www.ef.com/assetscdn/WIBIwq6RdJvcD9bc8RMd/cefcom-epi-site/fact-sheets/2025/ef-epi-fact-sheet-denmark-english.pdf (Retrieved29 April 2026)
  8. Giles, H.
    (1970) Evaluative reactions to accents. Educational Review, (), –. 10.1080/0013191700220301
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0013191700220301 [Google Scholar]
  9. Gluszek, A., & Dovidio, J. F.
    (2010) Speaking with a nonnative accent: Perceptions of bias, communication difficulties, and belonging in the United States. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, (), –. 10.1177/0261927X09359590
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09359590 [Google Scholar]
  10. Grasz, S.
    (2023) Finnish, the Most Difficult Language to Learn? Four German-Speaking Migrants’ Ways of Getting Access to the Finnish Language in the North of Finland. InM. Frick, T. Räisänen, & J. Ylikoski (Eds), Language Contacts and Discourses in the Far North (pp.–. Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑42979‑8_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42979-8_6 [Google Scholar]
  11. Heikkola, L. M., Toivola, M., Kim, J., & Saloranta, A.
    (2024) Kielivalinnat ja kielenvaihtaminen ensikielisten ja ei-ensikielisten suomenpuhujien keskusteluissa — Kyselytutkimus: Language choices and language switching in conversations between L1 and L2 Finnish speakers — A survey. AFinLA-teema, , . 10.30660/afinla.132056
    https://doi.org/10.30660/afinla.132056 [Google Scholar]
  12. Holmen, A.
    (2025) Danish language legislation and de facto language policies, Current Issues in Language Planning, (), –. 10.1080/14664208.2024.2326335
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2024.2326335 [Google Scholar]
  13. Höder, S.
    (2016) Dänische Phonetik im Kontrast zu norddeutschen Ausgangsvarietäten beim schulischen Zweitspracherwerb. Kieler Arbeiten zur skandinavistischen Linguistik. 10.21941/publ/1323
    https://doi.org/10.21941/publ/1323 [Google Scholar]
  14. Höder, S. & Krämer, P.
    (Eds.) (2025) Nachbarsprachen — Sprachnachbarn. Mehrsprachigkeit und Sprachpolitik in Deutschlands Grenzregionen. Border Studies. Cultures, Spaces, Orders. Nomos. 10.5771/9783748932567
    https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748932567 [Google Scholar]
  15. Isaacs, T., & Trofimovich, P.
    (2012) Deconstructing comprehensibility: Identifying the linguistic influences on listeners’ L2 comprehensibility ratings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263112000150
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000150 [Google Scholar]
  16. Jespersen, A., & Hejná, M.
    (2021a) Hvordan får vi danskerne til at tale dansk med os? En analyse af sprogskift i interaktioner mellem danskere og udlændinge. [How do we get Danes to talk with us? An analysis of language switching in interactions between Danes and foreigners.] MUDS 18, Aarhus.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kirilova, M.
    (2004) Danskernes holdninger til fremmed accent: et uerkendt lillebrorkompleks?Københavnerstudier i tosprogethed, . andetsprogsforskning.ku.dk/forskning/koebenhavnerstudier_i_tosprogethed_/manuskripter/Bind_37_-_CB_Dabelsteen_og_JS_Arnfast_-_Taler_de_dansk.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kristiansen, T.
    2009 The macro-level social meanings of late-modern Danish accents. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: –. 10.1080/03740460903364219
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03740460903364219 [Google Scholar]
  20. Kuronen, M., & Tergujeff, E.
    (2018) L1 listeners’ perception of L2 pronunciation: Effect of prosody on accentedness ratings in Swedish. AFinLA-e: Soveltavan Kielitieteen Tutkimuksia, (), –. 10.30660/afinla.73138
    https://doi.org/10.30660/afinla.73138 [Google Scholar]
  21. Laitinen, M., Leppänen, S., Rautionaho, P., & Backman, S.
    (2023) Englanti Suomen kansalliskielten rinnalla : kohti joustavaa monikielisyyttä. Valtioneuvoston kanslia. Valtioneuvoston selvitys- ja tutkimustoiminnan julkaisusarja 2023:. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-383-055-4
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lee, J., Kim, D. J., & Park, H.
    (2019) Native listener’s evaluations of pleasantness, foreign accent, comprehensibility, and f lue ncy in the speech of accented talkers. InJ. Levis, C. Nagle, & E. Todey (Eds.). Proceedings of the 10th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference, pp.–.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lehto, L. -M., Toivola, M., Saloranta, A., Kim, J., & Heikkola, L. M.
    (forthcoming). Ensikielisten suomenpuhujien tulkinnat ei-ensikielisten reaktioista kielenvaihtamistilanteissa. [Native Finnish speakers’ interpretations of non-native speakers’ reactions in language-switching situations.] Puhe ja kieli.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lehto, L. -M.
    (2023) Englanti kielivalintana Suomessa asuvien ulkomaalaistaustaisten henkilöiden diskursseissa. Virittäjä, (). 10.23982/vir.107906
    https://doi.org/10.23982/vir.107906 [Google Scholar]
  25. Levis, J.
    (2016) The interaction of research and pedagogy. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, (), s.–. 10.1075/jslp.2.1.001lev
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.2.1.001lev [Google Scholar]
  26. Lippi-Green, R.
    (2012) English with an Accent: Language, Ideology and Discrimination in the United States (2nd edn). Routledge. 10.4324/9780203348802
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203348802 [Google Scholar]
  27. Moyer, A.
    (2013) Foreign accent: The phenomenon of non-native speech. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511794407
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511794407 [Google Scholar]
  28. Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
    (2001) Modeling perceptions of the accentedness and comprehensibility of L2 speech the role of speaking rate. Studies in second language acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263101004016
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101004016 [Google Scholar]
  29. Munro, M. & Derwing, T.
    (1995) Foreign Accent, Comprehensibility, and Intelligibility in the Speech of Second Language Learners. Language Learning, , –. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1995.tb00963.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x [Google Scholar]
  30. Pedersen, I.L.
    (2003) Traditional dialects of Danish and the de-dialectalization 1900–2000. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Peterson, E. & Beers Fägersten, K.
    (2023) English in the Nordic countries : Conclusions. InE. Peterson & K. B. Fägersten (Eds), English in the Nordic Countries : Connections, Tensions, and Everyday Realities (pp.–. Routledge, 10.4324/9781003272687‑14
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003272687-14 [Google Scholar]
  32. Pilott, M.
    (2016) Migrant Pronunciation. What do Employers find Acceptable?Doctoral Dissertation. Victoria University of Wellington.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Ritzau, U., & Øhrstrøm, C.
    (2018) “Danish is really hard, don’t worry about it.”: Voksne indlæreres forestillinger om dansk som et særlig svært sprog. Nordand — Nordisk tidsskrift for andrespråksforskning, (), –. 10.18261/issn.2535‑3381‑2018‑01‑02
    https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2535-3381-2018-01-02 [Google Scholar]
  34. Rubin, D. L.
    (1992) Nonlanguage Factors Affecting Undergraduates’ Judgments of Nonnative English-Speaking Teaching Assistants. Research in Higher Education, (), –. JSTOR. 10.1007/BF00973770
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00973770 [Google Scholar]
  35. Ruuska, K.
    (2020) At the nexus of language, identity and ideology: Becoming and being a highly proficient second language speaker of Finnish [Doctoral dissertation, Jyväskylän yliopisto]. https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/72334
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Scotson, M.
    (2020) Korkeakoulutetut kotoutujat suomen kielen käyttäjinä: Toimijuus, tunteet ja käsitykset [Doctoral dissertation, Jyväskylän yliopisto]. https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/71523
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Takeuchi, J. D.
    (2023) Code-switching as linguistic microaggression: L2-Japanese and speaker legitimacy. Multilingua, (), –. 10.1515/multi‑2021‑0069
    https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2021-0069 [Google Scholar]
  38. Teló, C., Trofimovich, P., & O’Brien, M. G.
    (2022) Disentangling professional competence and foreign accent. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, (), –. 10.1075/jslp.22013.tel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.22013.tel [Google Scholar]
  39. Tergujeff, E.
    (2012) The English Pronunciation Teaching in Europe Survey: Finland. Apples — Journal of Applied Language Studies, (), –. https://apples.journal.fi/article/view/97831
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Thomson, R.
    (2018) Measurement of Accentedness, Intelligibility, and Comprehensibility. In: Kang, Okim & April Ginther (Hgg.), Assessment in second language pronunciation, –. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Thomson, R. I., & Derwing, T. M.
    (2015) The Effectiveness of L2 Pronunciation Instruction: A Narrative Review, Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amu076
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu076 [Google Scholar]
  42. Thomson, R. I., & Isaacs, T.
    (2022) Evaluations of Foreign Accented Speech: Subjective Bias or Speech Signal Characteristics?In: InA. Jarosz, & V. Sardegna (Eds.), Theoretical and practical perspectives on English pronunciation teaching and research, pp.–. Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑98218‑8_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98218-8_3 [Google Scholar]
  43. (2022) Evaluations of Foreign Accented Speech: Subjective Bias or Speech Signal Characteristics?. In: Sardegna, V. G., Jarosz, A. (Eds.), Theoretical and Practical Developments in English Speech Assessment, Research, and Training. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑98218‑8_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98218-8_3 [Google Scholar]
  44. Toivola, M.
    (2011) Vieraan aksentin arviointi ja mittaaminen Suomessa. [The assessment and measurement of foreign accent.] Dissertation. University of Helsinki. Available at: urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-10-7217-8 (Retrieved2 July, 2025)
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Tulaja, L.
    (2020a) Dänische L2 Aussprache von Lernern mit Deutsch als Ausgangssprache. Fehler und Fehlerschwere. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Kiel.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. (2020b) Exploring acceptability: L1 judgements of L2 Danish learners’ errors. InKang, Okim (Hgg.). Proceedings of the 11th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching conference. Northern Arizona University, September 2019 Ames, IA: Iowa State University, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Välimäki, M., Pitkänen, V., Niemi, M. K., & Veijola, R.
    (2023) Kansainväliset osaajat ja Suomi: Mielikuvat, kotiutuminen, työelämä ja tuen tarpeet: Kansainvälisten osaajien Suomi -tutkimushankkeen loppuraportti. E2 Tutkimus. hdl.handle.net/10138/358429
/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.25032.tul
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.25032.tul
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: Danish ; acceptability ; Finnish ; L1 raters ; L2 speakers ; pleasantness
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error