1887
image of Exploring the role of segmental accuracy in the intelligibility, comprehensibility, and foreign-accentedness of
Spanish-accented English
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the impact of segmental characteristics of Spanish-accented English on pronunciation ratings by international listeners. The speech of 60 Northern Peninsular Spanish users of English was recorded and 42 segmental characteristics were analysed per talker. The samples were then rated by 330 international listeners for intelligibility, comprehensibility, and foreign-accentedness. The data yielded insights into the pronunciation difficulties faced by the speakers, based on which a Segmental Accuracy Score (SAS) was calculated, which showed a negative correlation with foreign-accentedness and positive correlations with comprehensibility and intelligibility. The findings also suggested that SAS was better associated with subjective assessments than with more objectively gauged intelligibility. Additionally, different aspects of pronunciation predicted the dependent variables to varying degrees with aspiration emerging as the best predictor. The implications underscore the importance of segmental accuracy in pronunciation instruction for improved international communication, while offering empirical evidence potentially useful for curricular design.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.25035.pie
2026-02-26
2026-03-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alkire, T., & Rosen, C.
    (2010) Romance languages. A historical introduction. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511845192
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845192 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barrass, J. P., Baffoe-Djan, J. B., Rose, H., & Boggs, J. A.
    (2020) Intelligibility and comprehensibility of Korean English speakers’ phonological features in lingua franca listening contexts. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, (), –. 10.18823/asiatefl.2020.17.1.8.124
    https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2020.17.1.8.124 [Google Scholar]
  3. Barrera-Pardo, D.
    (2022) Testing the Lingua Franca Core: The intelligibility of flaps. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, (), . 10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100313
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100313 [Google Scholar]
  4. Beijering, K., Gooskens, C., & Heeringa, W.
    (2008) Predicting intelligibility and perceived linguistic distance by means of the Levenshtein algorithm. Linguistics in the Netherlands, , –. 10.1075/avt.25.05bei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.25.05bei [Google Scholar]
  5. Benoît, C., Grice, M., & Hazan, V.
    (1996) The SUS test: A method for the assessment of text-to-speech synthesis intelligibility using Semantically Unpredictable Sentences. Speech Communication, (), –. 10.1016/0167‑6393(96)00026‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(96)00026-X [Google Scholar]
  6. Berry, J.
    (2004) Control of short lag VOT (voice-onset time) for voiced English stops. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, (), . 10.1121/1.4782396
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4782396 [Google Scholar]
  7. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
    (2025) Praat. Doing phonetics by computer [computer software]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brennan, E. M., & Brennan, J. S.
    (1981a) Accent scaling and language attitudes: Reactions to Mexican American English speech. Language and Speech, (), –. 10.1177/002383098102400301
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098102400301 [Google Scholar]
  9. (1981b) Measurements of accent and attitude toward Mexican-American speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, (), –. 10.1007/BF01076735
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01076735 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brosch, C.
    (2015) On the conceptual history of the term lingua franca. Apples — Journal of Applied Language Studies, (), –. 10.17011/apples/2015090104
    https://doi.org/10.17011/apples/2015090104 [Google Scholar]
  11. Brown, A.
    (1988) Functional load and the teaching of pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.2307/3587258
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587258 [Google Scholar]
  12. Chyung, S. Y., Roberts, K., Swanson, I., & Hankinson, A.
    (2017) Evidence-based survey design: The use of a midpoint on the Likert scale. Performance Improvement, (), –. 10.1002/pfi.21727
    https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21727 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cicchetti, D. V.
    (1994) Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, (), –. 10.1037/1040‑3590.6.4.284
    https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cruttenden, A.
    (2008) Gimson’s pronunciation of English. Hodder Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Crystal, D.
    (2003) English as a global language. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486999
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486999 [Google Scholar]
  16. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
    (1997) Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263197001010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001010 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2009) Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication. Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1017/S026144480800551X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480800551X [Google Scholar]
  18. (2015) Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 Teaching and Research. John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.42
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.42 [Google Scholar]
  19. Deterding, D.
    (2013) Misunderstandings in English as a lingua franca: An analysis of ELF interactions in South-East Asia. De Gruyter, Inc. 10.1515/9783110288599
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110288599 [Google Scholar]
  20. Doel, R. v. d.
    (2007) International intelligibility in EIL. Asian EFL Journal (Busan), (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Dörnyei, Z.
    (2007) Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Eberhard, D. M., Simons Gary, F., & Fennig, C. D.
    (Eds.) (2021) Ethnologue: Languages of the world. (24th ed.). SIL International.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Eckman, F. R.
    (1977) Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1977.tb00124.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00124.x [Google Scholar]
  24. European Commission
    European Commission (2011) Lingua franca, chimera or reality?. Publication Office of the European Union.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Flege, J. E.
    (1987) The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, , –. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)30537‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30537-6 [Google Scholar]
  26. Flege, J. E., & Eefting, W.
    (1987) Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics, (), –. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)30538‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30538-8 [Google Scholar]
  27. Flege, J. E., Bohn, O., & Jang, S.
    (1997) Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, (), –. 10.1006/jpho.1997.0052
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0052 [Google Scholar]
  28. Fuse, A., Alloggio, K., & Yang, S.
    (2024) Listener factors related to the perception of accented speech. Communication Disorders Quarterly, (), –. 10.1177/15257401231183648
    https://doi.org/10.1177/15257401231183648 [Google Scholar]
  29. Gómez González, M. d. l. A., & Sánchez Roura, T.
    (2016) English pronunciation for speakers of Spanish. De Gruyter. 10.1515/9781501510977
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501510977 [Google Scholar]
  30. Gómez-Lacabex, E., & Roothooft, H.
    (2023a) Pronunciation anxiety, pronunciation-related views and pronunciation learning actions of EMI and English major students. Research in Language, (), –. 10.18778/1731‑7533.21.4.01
    https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.21.4.01 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2023b) Pronunciation in EMI: Conceptualization, interlocutor anxiety and attitudes towards lecturer speech. Journal of Multilingual Theories and Practices, (), –. 10.1558/jmtp.23508
    https://doi.org/10.1558/jmtp.23508 [Google Scholar]
  32. Grondelaers, S., van Hout, R., & van der Harst, S.
    (2015) Subjective accent strength perceptions are not only a function of objective accent strength. Evidence from Netherlandic Standard Dutch. Speech Communication, , –. 10.1016/j.specom.2015.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2015.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hammond, R. M.
    (2001) The sounds of Spanish: Analysis and application. Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Hillenbrand, J., Getty, L. A., Clark, M. J., & Wheeler, K.
    (1995) Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, (), –. 10.1121/1.411872
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.411872 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hualde, J. I.
    (2014) Los sonidos del español. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Iribarren, M. C.
    (2005) Fonética y fonología españolas. Síntesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Isaacs, T., & Thomson, R. I.
    (2013) Rater experience, rating scale length, and judgments of l2 pronunciation: Revisiting research conventions. Language Assessment Quarterly, (), –. 10.1080/15434303.2013.769545
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2013.769545 [Google Scholar]
  38. Isaacs, T., & Trofimovich, P.
    (2012) Deconstructing comprehensibility. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263112000150
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000150 [Google Scholar]
  39. Jenkins, J.
    (2000) The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. (2002) A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an international language. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/23.1.83
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.1.83 [Google Scholar]
  41. Jeong, H. J., Thorén, B., & Othman, J.
    (2017) Mutual intelligibility of Malay- and Swedish-accented English: an experimental study. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.17509/ijal.v7i1.6857
    https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i1.6857 [Google Scholar]
  42. Joto, A., Nagase, Y., & Funatsu, S.
    (2007) Effect of VOT on intelligibility of English voiceless stops produced by native speakers of Japanese. Paper presented at thePTLC 2007: Phonetics Teaching and Learning Convention, London, United Kingdom.
  43. Jurado-Bravo, M. Á.
    (2021) Exploring the use of Levenshtein distances to calculate the intelligibility of foreign-accented speech. InG. Kristiansen, K. Franco, S. De Pascale, L. Rosseel & W. Zhang (Eds.), Cognitive Sociolinguistics Revisited (pp.–). Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110733945‑013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110733945-013 [Google Scholar]
  44. Kachru, B. B., Kachru, Y., & Nelson, C. L.
    (2006) The handbook of World Englishes. Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Kang, O., Thomson, R. I., & Moran, M.
    (2018) empirical approaches to measuring the intelligibility of different varieties of English in predicting listener comprehension. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12270
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12270 [Google Scholar]
  46. Keating, P. A.
    (1984) Phonetic and phonological representation of stop consonant voicing. Language, (), –. 10.2307/413642
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413642 [Google Scholar]
  47. Kermad, A., & Bogorevich, V.
    (2022) Using statistical transformation methods to explore speech perception scale lengths. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, , –. 10.32038/ltrq.2022.29.05
    https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2022.29.05 [Google Scholar]
  48. Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y.
    (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, (), –. 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 [Google Scholar]
  49. Kornder, L., & Mennen, I.
    (2021) Listeners’ linguistic experience affects the degree of perceived nativeness of first language pronunciation. Frontiers in Psychology, , . 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717615
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717615 [Google Scholar]
  50. Kulas, J. T., & Stachowski, A. A.
    (2013) Respondent rationale for neither agreeing nor disagreeing: Person and item contributors to middle category endorsement intent on Likert personality indicators. Journal of Research in Personality, (), –. 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.01.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.01.014 [Google Scholar]
  51. Levenshtein, V.
    (1966) Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals. Soviet Physics Daklady, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Levis, J.
    (2005) Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.2307/3588485
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588485 [Google Scholar]
  53. (2020) Revisiting the intelligibility and nativeness principles. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, (), –. 10.1075/jslp.20050.lev
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.20050.lev [Google Scholar]
  54. Lieberman, P., & Blumstein, S. E.
    (1988) Speech physiology, speech perception, and acoustic phonetics. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165952
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165952 [Google Scholar]
  55. Luchini, P. L., & Kennedy, S.
    (2013) Exploring sources of phonological unintelligibility in spontaneous speech. International Journal of English and Literature, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Magen, H. S.
    (1998) The perception of foreign-accented speech. Journal of Phonetics, (), –. 10.1006/jpho.1998.0081
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1998.0081 [Google Scholar]
  57. Mauranen, A.
    (2012) Exploring ELF. Academic English shaped by non-native speakers. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. McCrea, C. R., & Morris, R. J.
    (2005) The effects of fundamental frequency level on voice onset time in normal adult male speakers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, (), –. 10.1044/1092‑4388(2005/069)
    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2005/069) [Google Scholar]
  59. (2006) Voice onset time for female trained and untrained singers during speech and singing. Journal of Communication Disorders, (), –. 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2006.10.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2006.10.004 [Google Scholar]
  60. McCullough, E. A.
    (2013) Acoustic correlates of perceived foreign accent in non-native English [Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1374052897
  61. Mennen, I., Reubold, U., & Mayr, R.
    (2023) The contribution of temporal cues to perceived nativeness in the native speech of English migrants to Austria. Paper presented at the20th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS 2023, Prague, Czech Republic, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Mora, J. C.
    (2021) Assessing L2 vowel production gains after high-variability phonetic training: acoustic measurements vs. perceptual judgements. Paper presented at the3rd International Symposium on Applied Phonetics (ISAPh 2021), Tarragona, Spain, –. 10.21437/ISAPh.2021‑2
    https://doi.org/10.21437/ISAPh.2021-2
  63. Mora, J. C., & Rochdi, Y.
    (2016) Phonological awareness in Spanish-English inter-phonology: the case of spirantization. InA. M. Fernández-Planas (Ed.), 53 reflexiones sobre aspectos de la fonética y otros temas de lingüística (pp.–). Universitat de Barcelona.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Mora, J. C., Rochdi, Y., & Kivistö-de Souza, H.
    (2014) Mimicking accented speech as L2 phonological awareness. Language Awareness, (), –. 10.1080/09658416.2013.863898
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2013.863898 [Google Scholar]
  65. Mott, B.
    (2005) English phonetics and phonology for Spanish speakers. Universitat de Barcelona.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Moyer, A.
    (1999) Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263199001035
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199001035 [Google Scholar]
  67. Munro, M. J.
    (2008) Foreign accent and speech intelligibility. Phonology and Second Language Acquisition (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.36.10mun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.36.10mun [Google Scholar]
  68. (2011) Intelligibility: Buzzword or buzzworthy?Paper presented at the2nd Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference, Iowa State University, United States, –.
  69. Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
    (1995) Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1995.tb00963.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x [Google Scholar]
  70. (2020) Foreign accent, comprehensibility and intelligibility, redux. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, (), –. 10.1075/jslp.20038.mun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.20038.mun [Google Scholar]
  71. Munro, M. J., Derwing, T. M., & Morton, S. L.
    (2006) The mutual intelligibility of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263106060049
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060049 [Google Scholar]
  72. Nathan, G. S.
    (1987) On second-language acquisition of voiced stops. Journal of Phonetics, (), –. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)30583‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30583-2 [Google Scholar]
  73. Nelson, C. L., & Smith, L. E.
    (1985) International intelligibility of English: directions and resources. World Englishes, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.1985.tb00423.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1985.tb00423.x [Google Scholar]
  74. O’Neal, G.
    (2015a) ELF intelligibility: the vowel quality factor. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, (), –. 10.1515/jelf‑2015‑0026
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jelf-2015-0026 [Google Scholar]
  75. (2015b) Interactional intelligibility: the relationship between consonant modification and pronunciation intelligibility in English as a Lingua Franca in Japan. Asian Englishes, (), –. 10.1080/13488678.2015.1041871
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2015.1041871 [Google Scholar]
  76. Ortega-LLebaria, M.
    (1997) An explanatory intelligibility test for Spanish accented English [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Indiana University.
  77. Pérez Cañado, M. L., & Lancaster, N. K.
    (2017) The effects of CLIL on oral comprehension and production: a longitudinal case study. Language, Culture, and Curriculum, (), –. 10.1080/07908318.2017.1338717
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2017.1338717 [Google Scholar]
  78. Pérez-Ramón, R., García Lecumberri, M. L., & Cooke, M.
    (2022) Foreign accent strength and intelligibility at the segmental level. Speech Communication, , –. 10.1016/j.specom.2022.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2022.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  79. Pietraszek, M.
    (2024a) Associating speaker variables with English pronunciation ratings in Spanish tertiary education. Porta Linguarum, , –. 10.30827/portalin.vi41.27083
    https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi41.27083 [Google Scholar]
  80. (2024b) “The sun was rising”: A new elicitation paragraph for English pronunciation research and assessment. InD. Martín González & P. Román Porras (Eds.), English linguistics meets the 21st century (pp.–). Dykinson.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. (2024c) Voiced obstruent mispronunciations in advanced English speakers: A qualitative study of intelligibility breakdowns. InD. Martín González & P. Román Porras (Eds.), English linguistics meets the 21st century (pp.–). Dykinson.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. (2025a) Intelligibility benefits and attitudinal disadvantages? The listener’s mother tongue and level as variables affecting the pronunciation ratings of Spanish speakers’ English. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. 10.1177/13621688251368651
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688251368651 [Google Scholar]
  83. (2025b) Live or leave! Vowel quality and vowel length in the intelligibility of international English. InA. Henderson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference English Pronunciation: Issues and Practices (EPIP 8) (pp.–). HAL Open Science. 10.1016/j.nrl.2025.501922
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrl.2025.501922 [Google Scholar]
  84. Quilis, A., & Fernandez, J. A.
    (2003) Curso de fonética y fonología españolas. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Rallo Fabra, L., & Jacob, K.
    (2015) Does CLIL enhance oral skills? Fluency and pronunciation errors by Spanish-Catalan learners of English. InM. Juan-Garau, & M. Salazar Noguera (Eds.), Content-based Language Learning in Multilingual Educational Environments (pp.–). Spinger. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑11496‑5_10
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11496-5_10 [Google Scholar]
  86. Rojczyk, A.
    (2019) Perception of the English voice onset time continuum by Polish learners. The Acquisition of L2 Phonology (pp.–). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847693761‑006
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847693761-006 [Google Scholar]
  87. Ryan, E. B.
    (1973) Subjective reactions toward accented speech. InR. W. Shuy, & R. W. Fasold (Eds.), Language Attitudes: Current Trends and Prospects. Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Sewell, A.
    (2017) Functional load revisited. Reinterpreting the findings of ‘lingua franca’ intelligibility studies. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, (), –. 10.1075/jslp.3.1.03sew
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.3.1.03sew [Google Scholar]
  89. Shah, A. P.
    (2019) What makes Spanish-accented English sound Spanish-accented? Acoustic Measures and Listener Cues. International Journal of Linguistics, (), . 10.5296/ijl.v11i6.15815
    https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v11i6.15815 [Google Scholar]
  90. Simms, L. J., Zelazny, K., Williams, T. F., & Bernstein, L.
    (2019) Does the number of response options matter? Psychometric perspectives using personality questionnaire data. Psychological Assessment, (), –. 10.1037/pas0000648
    https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000648 [Google Scholar]
  91. Sola Prado, A.
    (2011) Las aproximantes [β, δ, γ] del español en habla espontánea. Phonica, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Szpyra-Kozłowska, J.
    (2015) Pronunciation in EFL instruction. A Research-Based Approach. Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Taherdoost, H.
    (2019) What Is the best response scale for survey and questionnaire design: Review of different lengths of rating scale / attitude scale / Likert scale. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), (), –. https://hal.science/hal-03741841
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Thomson, R. I., & Isaacs, T.
    (2022) Evaluations of foreign accented speech: Subjective bias or speech signal characteristics?Theoretical and Practical Developments in English Speech Assessment, Research, and Training (pp.–). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑98218‑8_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98218-8_3 [Google Scholar]
  95. Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T.
    (2012) Disentangling accent from comprehensibility. Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728912000168
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000168 [Google Scholar]
  96. Veiga-Pérez, C.
    (2017) Spanish teenager’s pronunciation of English as a second language. Revista De Educación De La Universidad De Granada, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Walker, R.
    (2010) Teaching the pronunciation of English as a lingua franca. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Wang, H.
    (2007) English as a lingua franca: Mutual intelligibility of Chinese, Dutch and American speakers of English. LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Wieling, M., Bloem, J., Mignella, K., Timmermeister, M., & Nerbonne, J.
    (2014) Measuring foreign accent strength in English. Language Dynamics and Change, (), –. 10.1163/22105832‑00402001
    https://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-00402001 [Google Scholar]
  100. Wrembel, M.
    (2008) The impact of voice quality resetting on the perception of a foreign accent in third language acquisition. Paper presented at theNew Sounds 2007: Fifth International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech, Florianópolis, Brazil, –.
  101. Zampini, M. L.
    (1996) Voiced stop spirantization in the ESL speech of native speakers of Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S0142716400007979
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400007979 [Google Scholar]
  102. Zielinski, B. W.
    (2008) The listener: No longer the silent partner in reduced intelligibility. System, (), –. 10.1016/j.system.2007.11.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.11.004 [Google Scholar]
  103. Zoghbor, W. S.
    (2018) Teaching English pronunciation to multi-dialect first language learners: The revival of the Lingua Franca Core (LFC). System, , –. 10.1016/j.system.2018.06.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.06.008 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.25035.pie
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.25035.pie
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error