1887
image of Measuring filler particles in speech fluency

Abstract

Filler particles (FPs) are used as indicators of fluency in second language (L2) speech research, yet their diverse phonetic exponents and their multifunctionality pose significant methodological challenges. This study critically examines the operationalization and measurement of FPs within the domain of utterance fluency. In order to better capture the multifaceted role of FPs, the domain of filler fluency is proposed alongside established categories such as speed, breakdown, and repair fluency. This study employs both static and dynamic approaches to critically evaluate FP measures in spontaneous, task-based L1–L2 dialogues involving 24 speakers. Static analyses show how the definition of FPs and how they are annotated affects the outcome of FP measurements. The dynamic, time-series methods explored here incorporate section-wise analyses, cumulative FP frequency trajectories, and sliding window techniques to capture intra-individual variability in FP use, revealing patterns that static averages often overlook.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.25048.bel
2026-05-04
2026-06-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/jslp.25048.bel/jslp.25048.bel.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.25048.bel&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Baker, Rachel & Valerie Hazan
    2011 DiapixUK: Task materials for the elicitation of multiple spontaneous speech dialogs. Behavior Research Methods(). –. 10.3758/s13428‑011‑0075‑y
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0075-y [Google Scholar]
  2. Belz, Malte
    2017 Glottal filled pauses in German. InRobert Eklund & Ralph L. Rose (eds.), Proceedings of DiSS 2017 (TMH-QPSR), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 2021Die Phonetik von äh und ähm: Akustische Variation von Füllpartikeln im Deutschen. Berlin: J.B. Metzler. 10.1007/978‑3‑662‑62812‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62812-6 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2023 Defining filler particles: A phonetic account of the terminology, form, and grammatical classification of “filled pauses”. Languages(). 10.3390/languages8010057
    https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8010057 [Google Scholar]
  5. Belz, Malte, Miriam Müller & Christine Mooshammer
    2023 How consistent are nonnative speakers in their usage of filler particles when talking to native speakers?InProc. Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech (DiSS) Workshop 2023, –. ISCA. 10.21437/DiSS.2023‑11
    https://doi.org/10.21437/DiSS.2023-11 [Google Scholar]
  6. Belz, Malte & Carolin Odebrecht
    2022 Abschnittsweise Analyse sprachlicher Flüssigkeit in der Lernersprache: Das Ganze ist weniger informativ als seine Teile. [Section-by-section analysis of linguistic fluency in learner language: The whole is less informative than its parts]. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik(). –. 10.1515/zgl‑2022‑2051
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zgl-2022-2051 [Google Scholar]
  7. Belz, Malte, Simon Sauer, Anke Lüdeling & Christine Mooshammer
    2017 Fluently disfluent? Pauses and repairs of advanced learners and native speakers of german. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research(). –. 10.1075/ijlcr.3.2.02bel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.3.2.02bel [Google Scholar]
  8. Betz, Simon
    2020 Hesitations in Spoken Dialogue Systems. 10.4119/UNIBI/2942254
    https://doi.org/10.4119/UNIBI/2942254 [Google Scholar]
  9. Boersma, Paul & David Weenink
    2023 Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. www.praat.org/
  10. Boomer, Donald S. & Allen T. Dittmann
    1962 Hesitation pauses and juncture pauses in speech. Language and Speech(). –. 10.1177/002383096200500404
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383096200500404 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bosker, Hans Rutger, Anne-France Pinget, Hugo Quené, Ted Sanders & Nivja H. de Jong
    2013 What makes speech sound fluent? The contributions of pauses, speed and repairs. Language Testing(). –. 10.1177/0265532212455394
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532212455394 [Google Scholar]
  12. Braun, Angelika, Nathalie Elsässer & Lea Willems
    2023 Disfluencies revisited — are they speaker-specific?Languages(). . 10.3390/languages8030155
    https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8030155 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bullock Oliveira, Maggie & Bianca Sell
    2022 PDF and PSD files of DiapixGEtv picture materials –German version adapted to elicit tense vowels. 10.5281/ZENODO.6510724
    https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.6510724 [Google Scholar]
  14. Chambers, Francine
    1997 What do we mean by fluency?System(). –. 10.1016/S0346‑251X(97)00046‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00046-8 [Google Scholar]
  15. Clark, Herbert H. & Jean E. Fox Tree
    2002 Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition(). –. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(02)00017‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00017-3 [Google Scholar]
  16. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe 2001Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Cucchiarini, Catia, Helmer Strik & Lou Boves
    2002 Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency: Comparisons between read and spontaneous speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America(). –. 10.1121/1.1471894
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1471894 [Google Scholar]
  18. Di Napoli, Jessica
    2020Filled pauses and prolongations in Roman Italian task-oriented dialogue. In Laughter and other non-verbal vocalisations workshop. Bielefeld University. https://www.isca-archive.org/lw_2020/dinapoli20_lw.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Dingemanse, Mark
    2020 Between sound and speech: Liminal signs in interaction. Research on Language & Social Interaction(). –. 10.1080/08351813.2020.1712967
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1712967 [Google Scholar]
  20. Dumont, Amandine
    2018 Fluency and disfluency: A corpus study of non-native and native speaker (dis)fluency profiles. Université catholique de Louvain dissertation.
  21. Fillmore, Charles J.
    1979 On fluency. InCharles J. Fillmore, Daniel Kempler & William S-Y. Wang (eds.), Individual differences in language ability and language behavior, –. New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑255950‑1.50012‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-255950-1.50012-3 [Google Scholar]
  22. Foster, Pauline, Alan Tonkyn & Gillian Wigglesworth
    2000 Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics(). –. 10.1093/applin/21.3.354
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.354 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gilquin, Gaëtanelle & Sylvie de Cock
    2013 Errors and disfluencies in spoken corpora: Setting the scene. InGaëtanelle Gilquin & Sylvie de Cock (eds.), Errors and disfluencies in spoken corpora (Benjamins Current Topics), –. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.52.01gil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.52.01gil [Google Scholar]
  24. Götz, Sandra
    2013Fluency in native and nonnative English speech. Vol.. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/scl.53
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.53 [Google Scholar]
  25. Guz, Ewa
    2015 Establishing the fluency gap between native and non-native speech. Research in Language(). –. 10.1515/rela‑2015‑0021
    https://doi.org/10.1515/rela-2015-0021 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hartsuiker, Robert J. & Lies Notebaert
    2010 Lexical access problems lead to disfluencies in speech. Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie)(). –. 10.1027/1618‑3169/a000021
    https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000021 [Google Scholar]
  27. Housen, Alex, Folkert Kuiken & Ineke Vedder
    2012 Complexity, accuracy and fluency: Definitions, measurements and research. InAlex Housen, Folkert Kuiken & Ineke Vedder (eds.), Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency (Language learning and language teaching), –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.32.01hou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32.01hou [Google Scholar]
  28. Jessen, Michael
    2012Phonetische und linguistische Prinzipien des forensischen Stimmenvergleichs. Vol. (LINCOM Studies in Phonetics). München: LINCOM.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. de Jong, Nivja H.
    2016 Predicting pauses in L1 and L2 speech: The effects of utterance boundaries and word frequency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching(). 10.1515/iral‑2016‑9993
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-9993 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2018 Fluency in second language testing: Insights from different disciplines. Language Assessment Quarterly(). –. 10.1080/15434303.2018.1477780
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2018.1477780 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2023 Fluency in speaking as a dynamic construct. Language Teaching Research Quarterly. –. 10.32038/ltrq.2023.37.09
    https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2023.37.09 [Google Scholar]
  32. de Jong, Nivja H., Rachel Groenhout, Rob Schoonen & Jan H. Hulstijn
    2015 Second language fluency: Speaking style or proficiency? Correcting measures of second language fluency for first language behavior. Applied Psycholinguistics(). –. 10.1017/S0142716413000210
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716413000210 [Google Scholar]
  33. de Jong, Nivja H., Margarita P. Steinel, Arjen Florijn, Rob Schoonen & Jan H. Hulstijn
    2012 The effect of task complexity on functional adequacy, fluency and lexical diversity in speaking performances of native and non-native speakers. InAlex Housen, Folkert Kuiken & Ineke Vedder (eds.), Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency (Language learning and language teaching), –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.374434. 10.1075/lllt.32.06jon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32.06jon [Google Scholar]
  34. Kahng, Jimin
    2020 Explaining second language utterance fluency: contribution of cognitive fluency and first language utterance fluency. Applied Psycholinguistics(). –. 10.1017/S0142716420000065
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716420000065 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kjellmer, Göran
    2003 Hesitation. In defence of ER and ERM. English Studies(). –. 10.1076/enst.84.2.170.14903
    https://doi.org/10.1076/enst.84.2.170.14903 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kosmala, Loulou & Ludivine Crible
    2022 The dual status of filled pauses: Evidence from genre, proficiency and co-occurrence. Language and Speech(). –. 10.1177/00238309211010862
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309211010862 [Google Scholar]
  37. de Leeuw, Esther
    2007 Hesitation Markers in English, German, and Dutch. Journal of Germanic Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S1470542707000049
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1470542707000049 [Google Scholar]
  38. Lennon, Paul
    1990 Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning(). –. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1990.tb00669.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00669.x [Google Scholar]
  39. Levelt, Willem J. M.
    1983 Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition(). –. 10.1016/0010‑0277(83)90026‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90026-4 [Google Scholar]
  40. Lickley, Robin J.
    2001 Dialogue moves and disfluency rates. InITRW on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech (DiSS’01), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 2015 Fluency and disfluency. InMelissa A. Redford (ed.), The Handbook of Speech Production, –. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 10.1002/9781118584156.ch20
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584156.ch20 [Google Scholar]
  42. Lintunen, Pekka, Maarit Mutta & Pauliina Peltonen
    2020 Defining fluency in L2 learning and use. InPekka Lintunen, Maarit Mutta & Pauliina Peltonen (eds.), Fluency in L2 Learning and Use (Second Language Acquisition), –. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Lüdeling, Anke, Christine Mooshammer, Robert Lange, Bianca Sell & Megumi Terada
    2023 Corpus of Non-Native Addressee Register (CoNNAR): Version 1. Medien-Repositorium. https://rs.cms.hu-berlin.de/phon
    [Google Scholar]
  44. MacGregor, Lucy J., Martin Corley & David I. Donaldson
    2010 Listening to the sound of silence: disfluent silent pauses in speech have consequences for listeners. Neuropsychologia(). –. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.024
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.024 [Google Scholar]
  45. Muhlack, Beeke, Jürgen Trouvain & Michael Jessen
    2023 Distributional and acoustic characteristics of filler particles in German with consideration of forensic-phonetic aspects. Languages(). . 10.3390/languages8020100
    https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8020100 [Google Scholar]
  46. O’Connell, Daniel C. & Sabine Kowal
    2005 Uh and um revisited: Are they interjections for signaling delay?Journal of Psycholinguistic Research(). –. 10.1007/s10936‑005‑9164‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-005-9164-3 [Google Scholar]
  47. O’Shaughnessy, Douglas
    1992 Recognition of hesitations in spontaneous speech. InICASSP-92, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol., –. 10.1109/ICASSP.1992.225857
    https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.1992.225857 [Google Scholar]
  48. Peltonen, Pauliina
    2017 Temporal fluency and problem-solving in interaction: An exploratory study of fluency resources in L2 dialogue. System. –. 10.1016/j.system.2017.08.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.08.009 [Google Scholar]
  49. 2018 Exploring connections between first and second language fluency: a mixed methods approach. The Modern Language Journal(). –. 10.1111/modl.12516
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12516 [Google Scholar]
  50. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2023R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Wien.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Rasoloson, Janie Noëlle
    1994Interjektionen im Kontrast: Am Beispiel der deutschen, madagassischen, englischen und französischen Sprache. Vol. (Arbeiten zur Sprachanalyse). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Rendle-Short, Johanna
    2004 Showing structure: Using um in the academic seminar. Pragmatics(). –. 10.1075/prag.14.4.04ren
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.14.4.04ren [Google Scholar]
  53. Riazantseva, Anastasia
    2001 Second language proficiency and pausing: A study of Russian speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition(). –. journals.cambridge.org/article_S027226310100403X. 10.1017/S027226310100403X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310100403X [Google Scholar]
  54. Riggenbach, Heidi
    1991 Toward an understanding of fluency: A microanalysis of nonnative speaker conversations. Discourse Processes(). –. 10.1080/01638539109544795
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539109544795 [Google Scholar]
  55. Roettger, Timo B.
    2019 Researcher degrees of freedom in phonetic research. Laboratory Phonology(). . 10.5334/labphon.147
    https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.147 [Google Scholar]
  56. Rose, Ralph L.
    2015 Um and uh as differential delay markers: The role of contextual factors. InRobert Eklund (ed.), Proceedings of Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech (DiSS), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Saito, Kazuya, Meltem Ilkan, Viktoria Magne, Mai Ngoc Tran & Shungo Suzuki
    2018 Acoustic characteristics and learner profiles of low-, mid- and high-level second language fluency. Applied Psycholinguistics(). –. 10.1017/S0142716417000571
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716417000571 [Google Scholar]
  58. Segalowitz, Norman
    2010Cognitive bases of second language fluency (Cognitive science and second language acquisition series). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203851357
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203851357 [Google Scholar]
  59. 2016 Second language fluency and its underlying cognitive and social determinants. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching(). . 10.1515/iral‑2016‑9991
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-9991 [Google Scholar]
  60. Seyfeddinipur, Mandana, Sotaro Kita & Peter Indefrey
    2008 How speakers interrupt themselves in managing problems in speaking: Evidence from self-repairs. Cognition(). –. 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  61. Shadrova, Anna, Pia Linscheid, Julia Lukassek, Anke Lüdeling & Sarah Schneider
    2021 A challenge for contrastive L1/L2 corpus studies: large inter- and intra-individual variation across morphological, but not global syntactic categories in task-based corpus data of a homogeneous l1 German group. Frontiers in psychology. . 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.716485
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.716485 [Google Scholar]
  62. Shriberg, Elizabeth E.
    1994 Preliminaries to a theory of speech disfluencies. Berkeley: University of California Unpublished dissertation.
  63. Silber-Varod, Vered, Daphna Amit & Anat Lerner
    2020 Tracing changes over the course of the conversation: A case study on filled pauses rates. InProceedings of the 10th international conference on speech prosody, –. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2020‑154
    https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2020-154 [Google Scholar]
  64. Silber-Varod, Vered, Mária Gósy & Anat Lerner
    2021 Is it a filler or a pause? a quantitative analysis of filled pauses in Hebrew. InAlexey Karpov & Rodmonga Potapova (eds.), Speech and Computer, vol. 12997 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), –. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑87802‑3_57
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87802-3_57 [Google Scholar]
  65. Skehan, Peter
    2009 Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics(). –. 10.1093/applin/amp047
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047 [Google Scholar]
  66. Suzuki, Shungo & Judit Kormos
    2020 Linguistic dimensions of comprehensibility and perceived fluency: an investigation of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language argumentative speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition(). –. 10.1017/S0272263119000421
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000421 [Google Scholar]
  67. Swerts, Marc
    1998 Filled pauses as markers of discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics. –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00014‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00014-9 [Google Scholar]
  68. Tabari, Mahmoud Abdi & Mark D. Johnson
    2025 Rethinking fluency in task-based L2 writing: A critical examination of product- and process-based measures. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics(). . 10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100225
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100225 [Google Scholar]
  69. Tavakoli, Parvaneh
    2011 Pausing patterns: differences between L2 learners and native speakers. ELT Journal(). –. 10.1093/elt/ccq020
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq020 [Google Scholar]
  70. 2016 Fluency in monologic and dialogic task performance: Challenges in defining and measuring L2 fluency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching(). –. 10.1515/iral‑2016‑9994
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-9994 [Google Scholar]
  71. Tavakoli, Parvaneh & Peter Skehan
    2005 Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. InRod Ellis (ed.), Planning and Task Performance in a Second Language, –. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/lllt.11.15tav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.11.15tav [Google Scholar]
  72. Tavakoli, Parvaneh & Clare Wright
    2020Second language speech fluency. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108589109
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108589109 [Google Scholar]
  73. Terada, Megumi, Bianca Sell, Robert Lange, Miriam Müller & Malte Belz
    2024 Documentation and annotation guidelines of connar. Register Aspects of Language in Situation, –. 10.18452/27898
    https://doi.org/10.18452/27898 [Google Scholar]
  74. Tottie, Gunnel
    2015 Turn management and the fillers uh and uhm. InKarin Aijmer & Christoph Rühlemann (eds.), Corpus Pragmatics, –. Cambridge, U. K.: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Trofimovich, Pavel, Sara Kennedy & Josée Blanchet
    2017 Development of second language French oral skills in an instructed setting: A focus on speech ratings. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics(). –. 10.7202/1042675ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/1042675ar [Google Scholar]
  76. Trouvain, Jürgen, Ludivine Crible, Malte Belz, Simon Betz, Štefan Beňuš, Lorraine Baqué, Marina Cantarutti, Jessica Di Napoli, Ivana Didirková, Maria Machuca, Lucia Mareková, Oana Niculescu, Pauliina Peltonen, Aurelie Pistono, Loredana Schettino, Vered Silber-Varod & Simon Williams
    2025 On variability in the identification and labelling of disfluencies — preliminary results from 23 annotations of the same data. InProc. 12th edition of the Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech Workshop (DiSS 2025), –. 10.21437/DiSS.2025‑12
    https://doi.org/10.21437/DiSS.2025-12 [Google Scholar]
  77. Ulbrich, Christiane
    2024 Phonetic accommodation on the segmental and the suprasegmental level of speech in native-non-native collaborative tasks. Language and Speech(). –. 10.1177/00238309211050094
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309211050094 [Google Scholar]
  78. Walker, Esther J., Evan F. Risko & Alan Kingstone
    2014 Fillers as signals: Evidence from a question–answering paradigm. Discourse Processes(). –. 10.1080/0163853X.2013.862478
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2013.862478 [Google Scholar]
  79. Wesolek, Sarah, Malte Belz & Christine Mooshammer
    2022 Wrocław Dialogue Corpus (WroDiaCo): Version 2.1. Medien-Repositorium. https://rs.cms.hu-berlin.de/phon
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Wickham, Hadley, Romain François, Lionel Henry, Kirill Müller & Davis Vaughan
    2023 dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. R package version 1.1.1. https://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=dplyr
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Winkelmann, Raphael, Klaus Jaensch, Steve Cassidy & Jonathan Harrington
    2020 emuR: Main Package of the EMU Speech Database Management System.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.25048.bel
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.25048.bel
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: spontaneous speech ; filled pause ; fluency ; filler particle ; sliding window ; disfluency
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error