1887
image of Examining the relationship between speech rhythm, fluency measures and comprehensibility ratings in L2 English speech
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between speech rhythm, utterance fluency, and native listeners’ perceptions of comprehensibility and fluency in second language (L2) English. Eighty-two advanced Spanish–Catalan bilingual learners of English completed a spontaneous speaking task, from which temporal rhythm measures (including durational variability metrics and vowel reduction measures) and fluency measures (speed, breakdown, and repair) were extracted. Speech samples were rated for comprehensibility and fluency by L1 English listeners. Correlational and regression analyses revealed that while rhythm and fluency measures did not consistently relate to one another, both independently contributed to listeners’ ratings. In addition, vowel reduction ratios were stronger predictors of ratings than traditional durational variability metrics. These findings suggest that rhythm and fluency constitute partially independent constructs that both shape global speaking proficiency perceptions. Pedagogically, the results highlight rhythm as a promising instructional target for enhancing learners’ fluency and comprehensibility.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.25052.fra
2026-02-17
2026-03-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abercrombie, D.
    (1967) Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Algethami, G., & Hellmuth, S.
    (2024) The development of rhythm metrics in L2 English by L1 Arabic speakers. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, (), –. 10.1075/jslp.21017.alg
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.21017.alg [Google Scholar]
  3. Arvaniti, A.
    (2012) The usefulness of metrics in the quantification of speech rhythm. Journal of Phonetics, (), –. 10.1016/j.wocn.2012.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2012.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  4. Behrman, A., Ferguson, S. H., Akhund, A., & Moeyaert, M.
    (2019) The Effect of Clear Speech on Temporal Metrics of Rhythm in Spanish-Accented Speakers of English. Language and Speech, (), –. 10.1177/0023830917737109
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830917737109 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bosker, H. R., Pinget, A.-F., Quené, H., Sanders, T., & de Jong, N. H.
    (2012) What makes speech sound fluent? The contributions of pauses, speed and repairs. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/0265532212455394
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532212455394 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chau, T., & Huensch, A.
    (2025) The relationships among L2 fluency, intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263125000014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263125000014 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chela-Flores, B.
    (1997) Rhythmic patterns as basic units in pronunciation teaching. Onomazein, , –. 10.7764/onomazein.2.05
    https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.2.05 [Google Scholar]
  8. Coulange, S., Kato, T., Rossato, S., & Masperi, M.
    (2024) Enhancing Language Learners’ Comprehensibility through Automated Analysis of Pause Positions and Syllable Prominence. Languages, , . 10.3390/languages9030078
    https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9030078 [Google Scholar]
  9. Crosswhite, K. & Antoniou, M.
    (2007) Duration-Logger [Praat Script]. Available at: https://www.ling.upenn.edu/courses/Fall_2013/ling520/DurationLogger.praat (accessedMay 2024).
  10. Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Saito, K., & Isaacs, T.
    (2018) Linguistic dimensions of L2 accentedness and comprehensibility vary across speaking tasks. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S027226311700016X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311700016X [Google Scholar]
  11. Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Boves, L.
    (2002) Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency: Comparisons between read and spontaneous speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, (), –. 10.1121/1.1471894
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1471894 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cummins, F.
    (2015) Rhythm and speech. InM. Redford (Ed.), The Handbook of Speech Production (pp.–). Wiley. 10.1002/9781118584156.ch8
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584156.ch8 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cutler, A.
    (1986) Forebear is a homophone: Lexical prosody does not constrain lexical access. Language and Speech, (), –. 10.1177/002383098602900302
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098602900302 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dauer, R. M.
    (1983) Stress timing and syllable timing reanalysed. Journal of Phonetics, , –. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)30776‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30776-4 [Google Scholar]
  15. de Jong, N. H.
    (2023) Fluency in speaking as a dynamic construct. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, , –. 10.32038/ltrq.2023.37.09
    https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2023.37.09 [Google Scholar]
  16. de Jong, N. H., Groenhout, R., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. H.
    (2015) Second language fluency: Speaking style or proficiency? Correcting measures of second language fluency for first language behavior. Applied Psycholinguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S0142716413000210
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716413000210 [Google Scholar]
  17. de Jong, N. H., Steinel, M. P., Florijn, A., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. H.
    (2013) Linguistic skills and speaking fluency in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S0142716412000069
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000069 [Google Scholar]
  18. Delattre, P.
    (1966) Les dix intonations de base du français. French Review, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Dellwo, V.
    (2006) Rhythm and Speech Rate: A Variation Coefficient for deltaC. InP. Karnowski & I. Szigeti (Eds.), Language and language-processing (pp.–). Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (2013) Duration Analyzer: Version 0.4 [Praat plug-in]. Switzerland: Universität Zürich. Available at: https://www.cl.uzh.ch/de/about-us/people/team/phonetics/vdellw/software.html (accessedMay 2024).
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Derwing, T., Munro, M., Thomson, R., & Rossiter, M.
    (2009) The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, , –. 10.1017/S0272263109990015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990015 [Google Scholar]
  22. Derwing, T., Munro, M., & Wiebe, G.
    (1998) Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, , –. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00047
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00047 [Google Scholar]
  23. Dickerson, W.
    (2019) The ripples of rhythm: Implications for ESL instruction. InJ. Levis, C. Nagle, & E. Todey (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (pp.–). Iowa State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G.
    (2000) Measuring Spoken Language: A Unit for All Reasons. Applied Linguistics, , –. 10.1093/applin/21.3.354
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.354 [Google Scholar]
  25. Fuchs, R.
    (2016) Speech rhythm in varieties of English: Evidence from educated Indian English and British English. Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑662‑47818‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47818-9 [Google Scholar]
  26. (Ed.) (2023) Speech Rhythm in Learner and Second Language Varieties of English. Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑19‑8940‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8940-7 [Google Scholar]
  27. Fullana, N., Mora-Plaza, I., Mora, J. C., Adrian, M., & Sosa-López, G.
    (2024) Task complexity effects on L2 speech rhythm in spontaneous speech production. Second Language Research, 02676583241281676.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Fraser, K., & Mora, J. C.
    (2023) L2 speech rhythm in spontaneous and controlled speaking modes: exploring differences and distance measures. Research in Language, (), –. 10.18778/1731‑7533.21.4.04
    https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.21.4.04 [Google Scholar]
  29. Frost, D.
    (2011) Stress and cues to relative prominence in English and French: A perceptual study. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, (), — . 10.1017/S0025100310000253
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100310000253 [Google Scholar]
  30. Gagné, N., French, L. M., & Hummel, K. M.
    (2025) Investigating the contribution of L1 fluency, L2 initial fluency, working memory and phonological memory to L2 fluency development. Language Teaching Research, (), –. 10.1177/13621688221076418
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221076418 [Google Scholar]
  31. Gavaldà-Ferré, N.
    (2007) Vowel reduction and Catalan speech rhythm [Master’s thesis, University College London].
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Garcia-Amaya, L.
    (2024) Investigating the relation between L2 pauses, syntactic complexity, and pause location: Longitudinal data from L2-Spanish study-abroad learners. Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1177/02676583231152652
    https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583231152652 [Google Scholar]
  33. Gordon, J., & Darcy, I.
    (2022) Teaching segmentals and suprasegmentals: Effects of explicit pronunciation instruction on comprehensibility, fluency, and accentedness. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, (), –. 10.1075/jslp.21042.gor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.21042.gor [Google Scholar]
  34. Goswami, U.
    (2019) Speech rhythm and language acquisition: an amplitude modulation phase hierarchy perspective. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, (), –. 10.1111/nyas.14137
    https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14137 [Google Scholar]
  35. Grabe, E., & Low, E. L.
    (2002) Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. Laboratory Phonology, , –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Halliday, M. A. K.
    (1989) Spoken and written language (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Huensch, A., & Tracy-Ventura, N.
    (2017) Understanding second language fluency behavior: The effects of individual differences in first language fluency, cross-linguistic differences, and proficiency over time. Applied Psycholinguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S0142716416000424
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716416000424 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kahng, J.
    (2014) Exploring utterance and cognitive fluency of L1 and L2 English speakers: temporal measures and stimulated recall. Language Learning, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. (2020) Explaining second language utterance fluency: Contribution of cognitive fluency and first language utterance fluency. Applied Psycholinguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S0142716420000065
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716420000065 [Google Scholar]
  40. Kallio, H., Kautonen, M., & Kuronen, M.
    (2023) Prosody and fluency of Finland Swedish as a second language: Investigating global parameters for automated speaking assessment, Speech Communication, , –. 10.1016/j.specom.2023.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2023.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kormos, J. K. J.
    (2006) Speech production and second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Kormos, J., & Sáfár, A.
    (2008) Phonological short-term memory, working memory and foreign language performance in intensive language learning. Bilingualism: Language and cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728908003416
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003416 [Google Scholar]
  43. Ladefoged, P., & Johnson, K.
    (2011) A course in phonetics (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Lee, H. Y., & Song, J.
    (2019) Evaluating Korean learners’ English rhythm proficiency with measures of sentence stress. Applied Psycholinguistics, , –. 10.1017/S0142716419000298
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716419000298 [Google Scholar]
  45. Lehiste, I.
    (1977) Isochrony reconsidered. Journal of Phonetics, , –. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)31139‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31139-8 [Google Scholar]
  46. Lennon, P.
    (1990) Investigating fluency in EFL: a quantitative approach. Language Learning, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Meara, P., & Miralpeix, I.
    (2015) V_YesNo Lognostics Vocabulary Test. www.lognostics.co.uk/tools/V_YesNo/V_YesNo.htm
  48. Mora-Plaza, I., Saito, K., Suzukida, Y., Dewaele, J.-M., & Tierney, A.
    (2022) Tools for second language speech research and teaching. sla-speech-tools.com. 10.17616/R31NJNAX
    https://doi.org/10.17616/R31NJNAX
  49. Mousikou, P., Strycharczuk, P., & Rastle, K.
    (2024) Acoustic correlates of stress in speech perception. Journal of Memory and Language, , Article 104509. 10.1016/j.jml.2024.104509
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2024.104509 [Google Scholar]
  50. Nolan, F., & Asu, E. L.
    (2009) The Pairwise Variability Index and coexisting rhythms in language. Phonetica, (), –. 10.1159/000208931
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000208931 [Google Scholar]
  51. Olsen, C. L.
    (1972) Rhythmical patterns and syllabic features of the Spanish sense-group. InProceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp.–). Mouton. 10.1515/9783110814750‑135
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110814750-135 [Google Scholar]
  52. Ordin, M., & Polyanskaya, L.
    (2015) Acquisition of speech rhythm in a second language by learners with rhythmically different native languages. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, (), –. 10.1121/1.4923359
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4923359 [Google Scholar]
  53. Ortega-Llebaria, M., & Prieto, P.
    (2011) Acoustic correlates of stress in Central Catalan and Castilian Spanish. Language and Speech, (), –. 10.1177/0023830910388014
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830910388014 [Google Scholar]
  54. Pallotti, G.
    (2020) Measuring complexity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF). InThe Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and language testing (pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9781351034784‑23
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351034784-23 [Google Scholar]
  55. Peltonen, P.
    (2022) Connections between measured and assessed fluency in L2 peer interaction: a problem-solving perspective. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1515/iral‑2020‑0030
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2020-0030 [Google Scholar]
  56. Peterson, R. A., and Cavanough, J. E.
    (2020) Ordered quantile normalization: a semiparametric transformation built for the cross-validation era. Journal of Applied Statistics, : –: –. 10.1080/02664763.2019.1630372
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2019.1630372 [Google Scholar]
  57. Peterson, R. A.
    (2021) Finding optimal normalizing transformations via bestNormalize. The R Journal, (): –. 10.32614/RJ‑2021‑041
    https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2021-041 [Google Scholar]
  58. Pike, K.
    (1945) The intonation of American English. University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Polyanskaya, L., Ordin, M., & Busa, M. G.
    (2017) Relative salience of speech rhythm and speech rate on perceived foreign accent in a second language. Language and Speech, (), –. 10.1177/0023830916648720
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830916648720 [Google Scholar]
  60. Préfontaine, Y., & Kormos, J.
    (2015) The relationship between task difficulty and second language fluency in French: A mixed methods approach. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/modl.12186
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12186 [Google Scholar]
  61. (2016) A qualitative analysis of perceptions of fluency in second language French. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1515/iral‑2016‑9995
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-9995 [Google Scholar]
  62. Prieto, P., Vanrell, M. D. M., Astruc, L., Payne, E., & Post, B.
    (2012) Phonotactic and phrasal properties of speech rhythm. Evidence from Catalan, English, and Spanish. Speech Communication, (), –. 10.1016/j.specom.2011.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2011.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  63. Quené, H., & van Delft, L. E.
    (2010) Non-native durational patterns decrease speech intelligibility. Speech Communication, (), –. 10.1016/j.specom.2010.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2010.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  64. Quesada Vásquez, L.
    (2019) The introduction of rhythm instruction in the English as a foreign language classroom to improve the comprehensibility and fluency of English for specific purposes students. [doctoral dissertation, Universitat Rovira i Virgili]
  65. Ramus, F., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J.
    (1999) Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition, , –. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(99)00058‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00058-X [Google Scholar]
  66. Roach, P.
    (1982) On the distinction between ‘stress-timed’ and ‘syllable-timed’ languages. InD. Crystal (Ed.), Linguistic controversies: Essays in linguistic theory and practice in honour of F. R. Palmer (pp.–). Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Saito, K., & Plonsky, L.
    (2019) Effects of second language pronunciation teaching revisited: A proposed measurement framework and meta-analysis. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12345
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12345 [Google Scholar]
  68. Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T.
    (2017) Using listener judgments to investigate linguistic influences on L2 comprehensibility and accentedness: A validation and generalization study. Applied Linguistics, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Schiel, F.
    (2015) WebMAUS: The Munich Automatic Segmentation System (MAUS) [web interface]. Available at: https://clarin.phonetik.uni-muenchen.de/BASWebServices/interface (accessedMay 2024).
  70. Segalowitz, N.
    (2010) Cognitive bases of second language fluency. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203851357
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203851357 [Google Scholar]
  71. (2016) Second language fluency and its underlying cognitive and social determinants. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1515/iral‑2016‑9991
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-9991 [Google Scholar]
  72. Segalowitz, N., & Freed, B. F.
    (2004) Context, contact, and cognition in oral fluency acquisition: Learning Spanish in at home and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263104262027
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104262027 [Google Scholar]
  73. Setter, J., & Sebina, B.
    (2017) English lexical stress, prominence and rhythm. InO. Kang, R. I. Thomson, & J. M. Murphy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of contemporary English pronunciation (pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315145006‑9
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315145006-9 [Google Scholar]
  74. Skehan, P.
    (2009) Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amp047
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047 [Google Scholar]
  75. Stockmal, V., Markus, D., & Bond, D.
    (2005) Measures of native and non-native rhythm in a quantity language. Language and Speech, (), –. 10.1177/00238309050480010301
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309050480010301 [Google Scholar]
  76. Suzuki, S., & Kormos, J.
    (2020) Linguistic dimensions of comprehensibility and perceived fluency: An investigation of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language argumentative speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263119000421
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000421 [Google Scholar]
  77. (2023) The multidimensionality of second language oral fluency: Interfacing cognitive fluency and utterance fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263121000899
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000899 [Google Scholar]
  78. (2025) The moderating role of L2 proficiency in the predictive power of L1 fluency on L2 utterance fluency. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/02655322241241851
    https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322241241851 [Google Scholar]
  79. Suzuki, S., Kormos, J., & Uchihara, T.
    (2021) The relationship between utterance and perceived fluency: A meta-analysis of correlational studies. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/modl.12706
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12706 [Google Scholar]
  80. Tavakoli, P.
    (2016) Fluency in monologic and dialogic task performance: Challenges in defining and measuring L2 fluency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1515/iral‑2016‑9994
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-9994 [Google Scholar]
  81. Tavakoli, P., & Wright, C.
    (2020) Second language speech fluency: From research to practice. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108589109
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108589109 [Google Scholar]
  82. Tavakoli, P., Nakatsuhara, F., & Hunter, A. M.
    (2020) Aspects of fluency across assessed levels of speaking proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/modl.12620
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12620 [Google Scholar]
  83. Tilsen, S., & Arvaniti, A.
    (2013) Speech rhythm analysis with decomposition of the amplitude envelope: characterizing rhythmic patterns within and across languages. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, (), –. 10.1121/1.4807565
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4807565 [Google Scholar]
  84. Trofimovich, P., & Baker, W.
    (2006) Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263106060013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060013 [Google Scholar]
  85. Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T.
    (2012) Disentangling accent from comprehensibility. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728912000168
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000168 [Google Scholar]
  86. Uchihara, T.
    (2022) Vowel reduction as a measure of speech rhythm: Validity, reliability, and pedagogical implications. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, (), –. 10.1075/jslp.21003.uch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.21003.uch [Google Scholar]
  87. Valls Ferrer, M.
    (2011) The development of oral fluency and rhythm during a stay abroad period [Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Pompeu Fabra].
  88. van Maastricht, L., Zee, T., Krahmer, E., & Swerts, M.
    (2021) The interplay of prosodic cues in the L2: How intonation, rhythm, and speech rate in speech by Spanish learners of Dutch contribute to L1 Dutch perceptions of accentedness and comprehensibility. Speech Communication, , –. 10.1016/j.specom.2020.04.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2020.04.003 [Google Scholar]
  89. Van Os, M., de Jong, N. H., & Bosker, H. R.
    (2020) Fluency in dialogue: Turn-taking behavior shapes perceived fluency in native and nonnative speech. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12416
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12416 [Google Scholar]
  90. White, L., & Mattys, S. L.
    (2007) Calibrating rhythm: First language and second language studies. Journal of Phonetics, (), –. 10.1016/j.wocn.2007.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2007.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  91. Wu, S. L., Tio, W. P., & Ortega, L.
    (2021) Elicited imitation as a measure of L2 proficiency: New insights from a comparison of two L2 English parallel forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263121000103
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000103 [Google Scholar]
  92. Yoo, H.
    (2023) Relationship between fluency and rhythm measures and proficiency level in spontaneous English speech of Korean EFL learners. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.25052.fra
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.25052.fra
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: pronunciation proficiency ; L2 prosody ; comprehensibility ; L2 fluency ; speech rhythm
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error