oa Minimal effects of L2 phonetic training on non‑naïve learners’ perception of cross‑linguistic similarity

References

1. Baigorri, M., Campanelli, L., & Levy, E. S.
   (2019) Perception of American English vowels by early and late Spanish–English bilinguals. Language and speech, (), –. 10.1177/0023830918806933
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830918806933 [Google Scholar]
2. Best, C., & Tyler, M.
   (2007) Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. InO.-S. Bohn, & M. Munro (Eds.), Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning — In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. –). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/lllt.17.07bes
   https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.07bes [Google Scholar]
3. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
   (2018) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.0.43) [Computer program]. www.praat.org/
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bradlow, A. R.
   (2008) Training non-native language sound patterns: Lessons from training Japanese adults on the English /r/-/l/ contrast. InJ. G. Hansen Edwards, & M. L. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and Second Language Acquisition (pp. –). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/sibil.36.14bra
   https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.36.14bra [Google Scholar]
5. Carlet, A., & Cebrian, J.
   (2022) The roles of task, segment type, and attention in L2 perceptual training. Applied Psycholinguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S0142716421000515
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716421000515 [Google Scholar]
6. Cebrian, J.
   (2006) Experience and the use of non-native duration in L2 vowel categorization. Journal of Phonetics, (), –. 10.1016/j.wocn.2005.08.003
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.08.003 [Google Scholar]
7. Cebrian, J.
   (2019) Perceptual assimilation of British English vowels to Spanish monophthongs and diphthongs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, (), –. 10.1121/1.5087645
   https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5087645 [Google Scholar]
8. Cebrian, J., Gorba, C., Gavaldà, N.
   (2021) When the easy becomes difficult: Factors affecting the acquisition of the English /iː/-/ɪ/ contrast. Frontiers in Communication, , –. 10.3389/fcomm.2021.660917
   https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.660917 [Google Scholar]
9. Cebrian, J., Gavaldà, N., Gorba, C. & Carlet, A.
   (2024) Differential effects of identification and discrimination training tasks on L2 vowel identification and discrimination. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, , –. 10.1017/S0272263124000408
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263124000408 [Google Scholar]
10. Chang, C.
    (2019) The phonetics of second language learning and bilingualism. The Routledge Handbook of Phonetics (pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9780429056253‑16
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056253-16 [Google Scholar]
11. Elvin, J., & Escudero, P.
    (2019) Cross-linguistic influence in second language speech: implications for learning and teaching. InM. J. Gutierrez-Mangado, M. Martinez-Adrian, & F. Gallardo-del-Puerto (Eds.), Cross-Linguistic Influence: From Empirical Evidence to Classroom Practice (pp. –). 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑22066‑2_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22066-2_1 [Google Scholar]
12. Flege, J. E.
    (1991) The Interlingual Identification of Spanish and English Vowels: Orthographic Evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, (), –. 10.1080/14640749108400993
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749108400993 [Google Scholar]
13. Flege, J. E., & Bohn, O.-S.
    (2021) The Revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-R). InR. Wayland (Ed.), Second Language Speech Learning: Theoretical and Empirical Progress (pp–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108886901.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108886901.002 [Google Scholar]
14. Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & Fox, R. A.
    (1994) Auditory and categorical effects on cross-language vowel perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, (), –. 10.1121/1.409931
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.409931 [Google Scholar]
15. Gong, J., Garcia-Lecumberri, M. L., & Cooke, M.
    (2017) Ab initio perceptual learning of foreign language sounds: Spanish consonant acquisition by Chinese learners. System, , –. 10.1016/j.system.2017.03.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.03.018 [Google Scholar]
16. IBM Corp
    IBM Corp (2017) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Imai, S., Flege, J. E., Wayland, R.
    (2004, June24–26). Perception of cross-language vowel differences: A longitudinal study of native Spanish adults learning English [conference poster]. 9th Conference on Laboratory Phonology, University of Illinois.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Ingram, J. C., & Park, S.
    (1997) Cross-language vowel perception and production by Japanese and Korean learners of English. Journal of Phonetics, (), –. 10.1006/jpho.1997.0048
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0048 [Google Scholar]
19. Iverson, P., & Evans, B. G.
    (2009) Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems II: Auditory training for native Spanish and German speakers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, (), –. 10.1121/1.3148196
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3148196 [Google Scholar]
20. Levy, E. S.
    (2009) On the assimilation-discrimination relationship in American English adults’ French vowel learning. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, (), –. 10.1121/1.3224715
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3224715 [Google Scholar]
21. Mayr, R., & Escudero, P.
    (2010) Explaining individual variation in L2 perception: Rounded vowels in English learners of German. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, , –. 10.1017/S1366728909990022
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990022 [Google Scholar]
22. Polka, L.
    (1992) Characterizing the influence of native language experience on adult speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, (), –. 10.3758/BF03206758
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206758 [Google Scholar]
23. Rallo Fabra, L.
    (2005) Predicting ease of acquisition of L2 speech sounds. A perceived dissimilarity test. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Rauber, A. S., Rato, A., Kluge, D., & Santos, G. R.
    (2011) TP software.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Shinohara, Y. & Iverson, P.
    (2018) High variability identification and discrimination training for Japanese speakers learning English /r/–/l/. Journal of Phonetics, , –. 10.1016/j.wocn.2017.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2017.11.002 [Google Scholar]
26. Thomson, R. I.
    (2018) High variability [pronunciation] training (HVPT): A proven technique about which every language teacher and learner ought to know. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, (), –. 10.1075/jslp.17038.tho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.17038.tho [Google Scholar]
27. Tyler, M. D., Best, C. T., Faber, A., & Levitt, A. G.
    (2014) Perceptual Assimilation and Discrimination of Non-Native Vowel Contrasts. Phonetica, , –. 10.1159/000356237
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000356237 [Google Scholar]
28. Uchihara, T., Karas, M., & Thomson, R.
    (2025) High variability phonetic training (HVPT): A meta-analysis of L2 perceptual training studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, –. 10.1017/S0272263125100879
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263125100879 [Google Scholar]
29. Wagner, K. O. C., & Baker-Smemoe, W.
    (2013) An investigation of the production of ejectives by native (L1) and second (L2) language speakers of Q’eqchi’ Mayan. Journal of Phonetics, (), –. 10.1016/j.wocn.2013.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2013.08.002 [Google Scholar]