1887
Volume 3, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2215-1931
  • E-ISSN: 2215-194X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The concept of functional load has been invoked for nearly a century in both research and pedagogy relating to pronunciation. However, it often suffers from a certain vagueness of definition. This article revisits the concept of functional load, outlining its origins and placing it within functionalist approaches to language and communication. The elaborated concept is then applied to the findings of lingua franca intelligibility studies, and it is argued that functional factors have explanatory potential. The application of functional load thus serves as a reinterpretation of the findings of lingua franca intelligibility studies by providing additional theoretical background. This reinterpretation suggests that although functional load is not a universal property of abstract language systems, certain features (such as consonants in general, and initial segments in particular) are widely relied upon in both lingua franca and non-lingua franca communication.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.3.1.03sew
2017-04-07
2019-10-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abercrombie, D
    (1949) Teaching pronunciation. English Language Teaching, 3, 113–122. doi: 10.1093/elt/III.5.113
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/III.5.113 [Google Scholar]
  2. Abbott, G
    (1991) A new look at phonological ‘redundancy’. In A. Brown (Ed.), Teaching English pronunciation: A book of readings (pp.225–234). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bailey, B
    (2004) Misunderstanding. In A. Duranti (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp.395–413). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bardovi-Harlig, K
    (2007) One functional approach to second language acquisition: the concept-oriented approach. In B. Van Patten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp.57–75). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Beckner, C. , Blythe, R. , Bybee, J. , Christiansen, M. H. , Croft, W. , Ellis, N.C. , Holland, J. , Ke, J. , Larsen-Freeman, D. , & Schoenemann, T
    (2009) Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning, 59(s1), 1–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00534.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00534.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Bent, T. , Bradlow, A. R. , & Smith, B. L
    (2007) Phonemic errors in different word positions and their effects on intelligiblity of non-native speech. In O.S. Bohn & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp.331–347). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lllt.17.28ben
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.28ben [Google Scholar]
  7. Bond, Z. S
    (1999) Slips of the ear: Errors in the perception of casual conversation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, A
    (1988) Functional load and the teaching of pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly, 22(4), 593–606. doi: 10.2307/3587258
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587258 [Google Scholar]
  9. (1991) Pronunciation models. Singapore: Singapore University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bybee, J
    (2001) Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511612886
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612886 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bybee, J. , & Hopper, P. J
    (2001) Introduction to frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. In J. Bybee & P.J. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp.1–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.45.01byb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45.01byb [Google Scholar]
  12. Catford, J. C
    (1987) Phonetics and the Teaching of Pronunciation. In J. Morley (Ed.), Current perspectives on pronunciation: Practices anchored in theory (pp.83–100). Washington, DC: TESOL.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (1988) Functional load and diachronic phonology. In Y. Tobin (Ed.), The Prague School and its legacy (pp.3–19). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/llsee.27.04cat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/llsee.27.04cat [Google Scholar]
  14. Croft, W
    (2000) Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Denes, P. B
    (1963) On the statistics of spoken English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 35, 892–904. doi: 10.1121/1.1918622
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1918622 [Google Scholar]
  16. Derwing, T. M. , & Munro, M. J
    (2009) Comprehensibility as a factor in listener interaction preferences: Implications for the workplace. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66(2), 181–202. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.66.2.181
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.66.2.181 [Google Scholar]
  17. Derwing, T. M. , Rossiter, M. J. , & Munro, M. J
    (2002) Teaching native speakers to listen to foreign-accented speech. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 23(4), 245–259. doi: 10.1080/01434630208666468
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434630208666468 [Google Scholar]
  18. Deterding, D
    (2013) Misunderstandings in English as a lingua franca: An analysis of ELF interactions in South-East Asia. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110288599
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110288599 [Google Scholar]
  19. Dziubalska-Kolaczyk, K. , & Przedlacka, J
    (Eds.) (2005) English pronunciation models: A changing scene. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Elder-Vass, D
    (2012) The reality of social construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139169202
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139169202 [Google Scholar]
  21. Field, J
    (2005) Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 399–423. doi: 10.2307/3588487
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588487 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gimson, A. C
    (1962) Introduction to the pronunciation of English. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gilner, L. , & Morales, F
    (2010) Functional load: Transcription and analysis of the 10,000 most frequent words in spoken English. The Buckingham Journal of Language and Linguistics, 3, 135–162.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Givón, T
    (1995) Functionalism and Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.74
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.74 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hahn, L
    (2004) Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 201–223. doi: 10.2307/3588378
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588378 [Google Scholar]
  26. Harris, R
    (1978) Communication and language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Reprinted in Love, N. (Ed.) (1990). The foundations of linguistic theory : Selected writings of Roy Harris (pp. 136-150). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hopper, P. J
    (1998) Emergent grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language (pp.155–175). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hung, T. N
    (2000) Towards a phonology of Hong Kong English. World Englishes, 19(3), 337–356. doi: 10.1111/1467‑971X.00183
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00183 [Google Scholar]
  29. Jakobson, R
    (1931) Prinzipien der historischen Phonologie. Travaux de Cercle Linguistique du Prague, 4, 247–267.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Jenkins, J
    (2000) The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (2002) A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an international language. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 83–103. doi: 10.1093/applin/23.1.83
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.1.83 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2005) Teaching pronunciation for English as a lingua franca: A sociopolitical perspective. In C. Gnutzmann & F. Intemann (Eds.), The globalisation of English and the English language classroom (pp.145–158). Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Jenkins, J. , Cogo, A. , & Dewey, M
    (2011) Review of developments in research into English as a lingua franca. Language Teaching, 44(3), 281–315. doi: 10.1017/S0261444811000115
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000115 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kennedy, S
    (2012) When nonnative speakers misunderstand each other: Identifying important aspects of pronunciation. Contact Magazine, 38(2), 49–62. Retrieved from www.teslontario.net/uploads/publications/researchsymposium/ResearchSymposium2012.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kirkpatrick, A
    (2007) World Englishes: Implications for international communication and English language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lawson, T
    (1997) Economics and reality. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203195390
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203195390 [Google Scholar]
  37. Levis, J. M
    (2005) Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 369–377. doi: 10.2307/3588485
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588485 [Google Scholar]
  38. (2016) The interaction of research and pedagogy. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 2(1), 1–7. doi: 10.1075/jslp.2.1.001lev
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.2.1.001lev [Google Scholar]
  39. Lindemann, S. , Campbell, M. A. , Litzenberg, J. , & Close Subtirelu, N
    (2016) Explicit and implicit training methods for improving native English speakers’ comprehension of nonnative speech. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 2(1), 93–108. doi: 10.1075/jslp.2.1.04lin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.2.1.04lin [Google Scholar]
  40. MacKenzie, I
    (2014) English as a lingua franca; Theorizing and teaching English. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Marslen-Wilson, W. , & Zwitserlood, P
    (1989) Accessing spoken words: The importance of word onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(3), 576–585. doi: 10.1037/0096‑1523.15.3.576
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.15.3.576 [Google Scholar]
  42. Mesthrie, R
    (2010) Contact and African Englishes. In R. Hickey (Ed.), The handbook of language contact (pp.518–537). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781444318159.ch25
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318159.ch25 [Google Scholar]
  43. Meyerstein, R. S
    (1970) Functional load: Descriptive limitations, alternatives of assessment and extensions of application (Janua Linguarum, Series Minor 99). The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Mines, M. A. , Hanson, B. F. , & Shoup, J. E
    (1978) Frequency of occurrence of phonemes in conversational English. Language and Speech, 21(3), 221–241.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Munro, M. J. , & Derwing, T. M
    (2006) The functional load principle in ESL pronunciation instruction: An exploratory study. System, 34(4), 520–531. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2006.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  46. Munro, M. J. , Derwing, T. M. & Morton ,S
    (2006) The mutual intelligibility of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(01), 111–131. doi: 10.1017/S0272263106060049
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060049 [Google Scholar]
  47. Munro, M. J. , & Derwing, T. M
    (2015) A prospectus for pronunciation research in the 21st century: A point of view. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 1(1), 11–42. doi: 10.1075/jslp.1.1.01mun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.1.1.01mun [Google Scholar]
  48. Nelson, C. L
    (2008) Intelligibility since 1969. World Englishes, 27(3–4), 297–308. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.2008.00568.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2008.00568.x [Google Scholar]
  49. (2011) Intelligibility in World Englishes: Theory and application. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Norris, D. , McQueen, J. , & Cutler, A
    (1995) Competition and segmentation in spoken-word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(5), 1209–1228. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.21.5.1209
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.5.1209 [Google Scholar]
  51. Pickering, L
    (2006) Current research on intelligibility in English as a Lingua Franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 26, 219–233. doi: 10.1017/S0267190506000110
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190506000110 [Google Scholar]
  52. Reddy, M. J
    (1993) The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp.164–201). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.012 [Google Scholar]
  53. Rischel, J
    (2007) Sound structure in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Rogerson-Revell, P
    (2011) English phonology and pronunciation teaching. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Schachter, J
    (1974) An error in error analysis. Language Learning, 24(2), 205–214. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1974.tb00502.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1974.tb00502.x [Google Scholar]
  56. Schreier, D
    (2005) Consonant change in English worldwide. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230513327
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230513327 [Google Scholar]
  57. Shannon, C
    (1951) Prediction and entropy of printed English. Bell System Technical Journal, 30(1), 50–64. doi: 10.1002/j.1538‑7305.1951.tb01366.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1951.tb01366.x [Google Scholar]
  58. Smith, L. E. , & Nelson, C. L
    (1985) International intelligibility of English: Directions and resources. World Englishes, 4(3), 333–342. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.1985.tb00423.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1985.tb00423.x [Google Scholar]
  59. Surendran, D. , & Niyogi, P
    (2003) Measuring the usefulness (functional load) of phonological contrasts. Technical Report TR-2003–12, Department of Computer Science, University of Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. (2006) Quantifying the functional load of phonemic oppositions, distinctive features, and suprasegmentals. In O. Nedergaard Thomsen (Ed.), Competing models of linguistic change (pp.43–58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.279.05sur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.279.05sur [Google Scholar]
  61. Sweet, H
    1964 [1899]The practical study of languages. London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Walker, R
    (2010) Teaching the pronunciation of English as a lingua franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Weber, A. , & Cutler, A
    (2004) Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1016/S0749‑596X(03)00105‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00105-0 [Google Scholar]
  64. Yazan, B
    (2015) Intelligibility. ELT Journal, 69(2), 202–204. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccu073
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccu073 [Google Scholar]
  65. Zielinski, B. W
    (2008) The listener: No longer the silent partner in reduced intelligibility. System, 36(1), 69–84. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2007.11.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.11.004 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.3.1.03sew
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.3.1.03sew
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): [to be provided]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error