1887
Volume 3, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2215-1931
  • E-ISSN: 2215-194X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between processing time and comprehensibility judgments in non-native listeners’ perception of L2 speech as a function of an L1- match between speaker and listener and non-native listeners’ proficiency. Instructed L2-English learners differing in L1 (Catalan, German) and L2-proficiency (Low, High), and native-English listeners performed speeded speech processing tasks with English word and sentence stimuli spoken by L1-Catalan, L1-German and native English speakers, and rated the sentence stimuli for comprehensibility. The results showed significant moderate correlations between processing times and comprehensibility judgments mediated by an interaction between listeners’ L1 and their L2 proficiency. Non-native English was processed faster and judged to be more comprehensible by non-native listeners if produced by L1-matched speakers. When non-native English was produced by L1-matched speakers, low-proficiency listeners found it easier to process and understand than native English, whereas high-proficiency listeners showed a processing advantage over native English listeners

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.3.2.01lud
2017-12-04
2019-11-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adank, P. , Evans, B. , Stuart-Smith, J. , & Scott, S.
    (2009) Comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar native accents under adverse listening conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35(2), 520–529.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bent, T. , & Bradlow, A. R.
    (2003) The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114(3), 1600–1610. doi: 10.1121/1.1603234
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1603234 [Google Scholar]
  3. Broersma, M. , & Scharenborg, O.
    (2010) Native and non-native listeners’ perception of English consonants in different types of noise. Speech Communication, 52(11), 980–995. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2010.08.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2010.08.010 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bundgaard-Nielsen, R. L. , Best, C. T. , & Tyler, M. D.
    (2011) Vocabulary size is associated with second-language vowel perception performance in adult learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(3), 433–461. doi: 10.1017/S0272263111000040
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263111000040 [Google Scholar]
  5. Clarke, C. M. , & Garrett, M. F.
    (2004) Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(6), 3647–3658. doi: 10.1121/1.1815131
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1815131 [Google Scholar]
  6. Connine, C. M. , Blasko, D. G. , & Titone, D.
    (1993) Do the beginnings of spoken words have a special status in auditory word recognition?Journal of Memory and Language, 32(2), 193–210. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1993.1011
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1011 [Google Scholar]
  7. Crowther, D. , Trofimovich, P. , Isaacs, T. , & Saito, K.
    (2015a) Does a speaking task affect second language comprehensibility?The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 80–95. doi: 10.1111/modl.12185
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12185 [Google Scholar]
  8. Crowther, D. , Trofimovich, P. , Saito, K. , & Isaacs, T.
    (2015b) Second language comprehensibility revisited: Investigating the effects of learner background. TESOL Quarterly, 49(4), 814–837. doi: 10.1002/tesq.203
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.203 [Google Scholar]
  9. Derwing, T. M. , & Munro, M. J.
    (1997) Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility. Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1017/S0272263197001010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001010 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2013) The development of L2 oral language skills in two L1 groups: A 7-year study. Language Learning, 63(2), 163–185. doi: 10.1111/lang.12000
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12000 [Google Scholar]
  11. Derwing, T. M. , Munro, M. J. , & Wiebe, G.
    (1998) Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 48, 393–410. doi: 10.1111/0023‑8333.00047
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00047 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dijkstra, T. , & Van Heuven, W. J.
    (2002) The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5(3), 175–197. doi: 10.1017/S1366728902003012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728902003012 [Google Scholar]
  13. Flege, J. E. , & Munro, M. J.
    (1994) The word unit in second language speech production and perception. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(4), 381–411. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100013437
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100013437 [Google Scholar]
  14. Floccia, C. , Butler, J. , Goslin, J. , & Ellis, L.
    (2009) Regional and foreign accent processing in English: Can listeners adapt?Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 38(4), 379–412. doi: 10.1007/s10936‑008‑9097‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-008-9097-8 [Google Scholar]
  15. Floccia, C. , Goslin, J. , Girard, F. , & Konopczynski, G.
    (2006) Does a regional accent perturb speech processing?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(5), 1276–1293. doi: 10.1037/0096‑1523.32.5.1276
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.5.1276 [Google Scholar]
  16. Goslin, J. , Duffy, H. , & Floccia, C.
    (2012) An ERP investigation of regional and foreign accent processing. Brain and language, 122(2), 92–102. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.04.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.04.017 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hayes-Harb, R. , Smith, B. , Bent, T. , & Bradlow, A.
    (2008) The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit for NSs of Mandarin: Production and perception of English word-final voicing contrasts. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 664–679. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2008.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2008.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  18. Isaacs, T. , & Trofimovich, P.
    (2012) Deconstructing comprehensibility. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 475–505. doi: 10.1017/S0272263112000150
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000150 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jenkins, J.
    (2002) A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an international language. Applied Linguistics, 23, 83–103. doi: 10.1093/applin/23.1.83
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.1.83 [Google Scholar]
  20. Ju, M. , & Luce, P. A.
    (2004) Falling on sensitive ears: Constraints on bilingual lexical activation. Psychological Science, 15(5), 314–318. doi: 10.1111/j.0956‑7976.2004.00675.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00675.x [Google Scholar]
  21. Kennedy, S. , & Trofimovich, P.
    (2008) Intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness of L2 speech: The role of listener experience and semantic context. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(3), 459–489. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.64.3.459
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.64.3.459 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lagrou, E. , Hartsuiker, R. J. , & Duyck, W.
    (2012) The influence of sentence context and accented speech on lexical access in second-language auditory word recognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(3), 508–517. doi: 10.1017/S1366728912000508
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000508 [Google Scholar]
  23. Levis, J. M.
    (2005) Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 369–377. doi: 10.2307/3588485
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588485 [Google Scholar]
  24. (2006) Pronunciation and the assessment of spoken language. In R. Hughes (Ed.), Spoken English, TESOL and applied linguistics: Challenges for theory and practice (pp.245–270). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230584587_11
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584587_11 [Google Scholar]
  25. Meara, P. , & Miralpeix, I.
    (2016) Tools for researching vocabulary. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Munro, M. J. , & Derwing, T. M.
    (1995a) Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45, 285–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1995.tb00963.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x [Google Scholar]
  27. (1995b) Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech. Language and Speech, 38, 289–306. doi: 10.1177/002383099503800305
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099503800305 [Google Scholar]
  28. (1998) The effects of speaking rate on listener evaluations of native and foreign-accented speech. Language Learning, 48(2), 159–182. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9922.00038
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00038 [Google Scholar]
  29. Munro, M. , Derwing, T. , & Morton, S.
    (2006) The mutual intelligibility of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 111–131. doi: 10.1017/S0272263106060049
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060049 [Google Scholar]
  30. Nation, I. S. P.
    (2006) How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening?Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 59–82. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59 [Google Scholar]
  31. Ortmeyer, C. , & Boyle, J.
    (1985) The effect of accent differences on comprehension. RELC Journal, 16(2), 48–53. doi: 10.1177/003368828501600208
    https://doi.org/10.1177/003368828501600208 [Google Scholar]
  32. Pinet, M. , Iverson, P. , & Huckvale, M
    (2011) Second-language experience and speech-in-noise recognition: The role of L2 experience and acoustic similarity in the talker-listener accent interaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(3), 1653–1662. doi: 10.1121/1.3613698
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3613698 [Google Scholar]
  33. Saito, K. , Trofimovich, P. , & Isaacs, T.
    (2015a) Using listener judgments to investigate linguistic influences on L2 comprehensibility and accentedness: A validation and generalization study. Applied Linguistics. doi: 10.1093/applin/amv047
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv047 [Google Scholar]
  34. (2015b) Second language speech production: Investigating linguistic correlates of comprehensibility and accentedness for learners at different ability levels. Applied Psycholinguistics. doi: 10.1017/S0142716414000502
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716414000502 [Google Scholar]
  35. Saito, K. , Webb, S. , Trofimovich, P. , & Isaacs, T.
    (2016) Lexical correlates of comprehensibility versus accentedness in second language speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 597–609. doi: 10.1017/S1366728915000255
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000255 [Google Scholar]
  36. Segalowitz, N. , & Frenkiel-Fishman, S.
    (2005) Attention control and ability level in a complex cognitive skill: Attention shifting and second-language proficiency. Memory and Cognition, 33(4), 644–653. doi: 10.3758/BF03195331
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195331 [Google Scholar]
  37. Segalowitz, N. , & Hulstijn, J.
    (2005) Automaticity in bilingualism and second language learning. In J. Kroll & A. De Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp.371–388). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Stibbard, R. , & Lee, J.
    (2006) Evidence against the mismatched interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit hypothesis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 433–442. doi: 10.1121/1.2203595
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2203595 [Google Scholar]
  39. van Wijngaarden, S. J. , Steeneken, H. J. M. , & Houtgast, T.
    (2002) Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for NNLs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111(4), 1906–1916. doi: 10.1121/1.1456928
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1456928 [Google Scholar]
  40. Weber, A. , Broersma, M. , & Aoyagi, M.
    (2011) Spoken-word recognition in foreign-accented speech by L2 listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 479–491. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.12.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.12.004 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.3.2.01lud
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.3.2.01lud
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): accent , comprehensibility , L2 proficiency , L2 speech , non-native listeners and processing time
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error