1887
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2542-3835
  • E-ISSN: 2542-3843
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

An important dimension that characterizes the contextual differences in second language acquisition (SLA) is the degree to which instruction is or . However, whether these differences in context play a role in determining the neural activity to process L2 grammar has not been well characterized. The present study investigated this issue by comparing the neural regions activated in response to novel L2 syntactic rules acquired under conditions of implicit and explicit instruction. In addition, participants’ declarative and procedural memories were measured to better understand the mediating effect of memory during learning under different conditions. Explicitly and implicitly instructed learners showed statistically indistinguishable behavioral performance. Region of interest (ROI) analysis also revealed that the task activated both declarative and procedural memory structures suggesting that instructional context did not affect the recruitment of memory systems when processing L2 syntax.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00019.vei
2023-03-07
2024-02-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abutalebi, J.
    (2008) Neural aspects of second language representation and language control. Acta Psychologica, 128(3), 466–478. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.03.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.03.014 [Google Scholar]
  2. Andringa, S., & Curcic, M.
    (2015) How explicit knowledge affects online L2 processing: Evidence from differential object marking acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(2), 237–268. 10.1017/S0272263115000017
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000017 [Google Scholar]
  3. Andringa, S., de Glopper, K., & Hacquebord, H.
    (2011) Effect of explicit and implicit instruction on free written response task performance. Language learning, 61(3), 868–903. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00623.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00623.x [Google Scholar]
  4. Ashby, F. G., Turner, B. O., & Horvitz, J. C.
    (2010) Cortical and basal ganglia contributions to habit learning and automaticity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(5), 208–215. 10.1016/j.tics.2010.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Batterink, L., & Neville, H.
    (2013) Implicit and explicit second language training recruit common neural mechanisms for syntactic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(6), 936–951. 10.1162/jocn_a_00354
    https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00354 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bowles, M. A.
    (2011) Measuring implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge: What can heritage language learners contribute?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(2), 247–271. 10.1017/S0272263110000756
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263110000756 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brill-Schuetz, K., & Morgan-Short, K.
    (2014) The role of procedural memory in adult second language acquisition. Paper presented at theProceedings of the Cognitive Science Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Clahsen, H., & Felser, C.
    (2006) Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(1), 3–42. 10.1017/S0142716406060024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716406060024 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dale, A. M.
    (1999) Optimal experimental design for event-related fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 8(2–3), 109–114. 10.1002/(SICI)1097‑0193(1999)8:2/3<109::AID‑HBM7>3.0.CO;2‑W
    https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)8:2/3<109::AID-HBM7>3.0.CO;2-W [Google Scholar]
  10. Destrebecqz, A., Peigneux, P., Laureys, S., Degueldre, C., Del Fiore, G., Aerts, J., ... & Maquet, P.
    (2005) The neural correlates of implicit and explicit sequence learning: Interacting networks revealed by the process dissociation procedure. Learning & Memory, 12(5), 480–490. 10.1101/lm.95605
    https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.95605 [Google Scholar]
  11. Doughty, C.
    (2004) Effects of instruction on learning a second language: A critique of instructed SLA research. InVanPatten, B., Williams, J., Rott, S., & M. Overstree (Eds.), Form–meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp.189–212). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Doyon, J., Bellec, P., Amsel, R., Penhune, V., Monchi, O., Carrier, J., ... & Benali, H.
    (2009) Contributions of the basal ganglia and functionally related brain structures to motor learning. Behavioural Brain Research, 199(1), 61–75. 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.11.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2008.11.012 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ellis, R.
    (2005) Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 141–172. 10.1017/S0272263105050096
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050096 [Google Scholar]
  14. (2009) Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge and instruction. InR. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp.3–25). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847691767‑003
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691767-003 [Google Scholar]
  15. Godfroid, A., Loewen, S., Jung, S., Park, J. H., Gass, S., & Ellis, R.
    (2015) Timed and untimed grammaticality judgments measure distinct types of knowledge: Evidence from eye-movement patterns. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(2), 269–297. 10.1017/S0272263114000850
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000850 [Google Scholar]
  16. Goo, J., Granena, G., Yilmaz, U. & Novella, M.
    (2015) Implicit and explicit instruction in L2 learning: Norris & Ortega (2000) revisited and updated. InP. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp.443–482). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.48.18goo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.48.18goo [Google Scholar]
  17. Granena, G.
    (2013) Cognitive aptitudes for second language learning and the LLAMA language aptitude test. What aptitude does the LLAMA measure?InG. Granena, & M. H. Long (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.35.04gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.35.04gra [Google Scholar]
  18. Grey, S., & Tagarelli, K. M.
    (2018) Psycholinguistic Methods. InA. Phakiti, P. De Costa, L. Plonsky, & S. Starfield (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology (pp.287–312). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑59900‑1_14
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59900-1_14 [Google Scholar]
  19. Grey, S., Tagarelli, K. M., Turkeltaub, P. E., & Ullman, M. T.
    (2013) The functional neuroanatomy of adult second language: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Poster presented at the20th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, San Francisco, CA. Retrieved fromwww.cogneurosociety.org/cns-2013-program
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hamrick, P.
    (2015) Declarative and procedural memory abilities as individual differences in incidental language learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 441, 9–15. 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.10.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.10.003 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hernandez, A., Li, P., & MacWhinney, B.
    (2005) The emergence of competing modules in bilingualism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(5), 220–225. 10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.003 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hickok, G., & Small, S. L.
    (2016) Neurobiology of language: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hsieh, H.-C., Moreno, N., & Leow, R. P.
    (2015) Awareness, type of medium, and L2 development: Revisiting Hsieh (2008). InR. P. Leow, L. Cerezo, & M. Baralt (Eds.), A psycholinguistic approach to technology and language learning (pp.131–150). Berlin: DeGruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781614513674‑010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614513674-010 [Google Scholar]
  24. Jenkinson, M., Bannister, P., Brady, M., & Smith, S.
    (2002) Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage, 17(2), 825–841. 10.1006/nimg.2002.1132
    https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1132 [Google Scholar]
  25. Jenkinson, M., & Smith, S.
    (2001) A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Medical Image Analysis, 5(2), 143–156. 10.1016/S1361‑8415(01)00036‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-8415(01)00036-6 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee, J., & VanPatten, B.
    (2003) Making communicative language teaching happen. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Leow, R. P.
    (2015) Explicit learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centered approach: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315887074
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887074 [Google Scholar]
  28. Loewen, S.
    (2009) Grammaticality judgment tests and the measurement of implicit and explicit L2 knowledge. InR. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning testing and teaching (pp.94–112). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847691767‑006
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691767-006 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lum, J. A., & Kidd, E.
    (2012) An examination of the associations among multiple memory systems, past tense, and vocabulary in typically developing 5-year-old children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(4), 989–1006. 10.1044/1092‑4388(2011/10‑0137)
    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0137) [Google Scholar]
  30. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D.
    (2005) Detection theory: A user’s guide. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Maie, R., & Godfroid, A.
    (2022) Controlled and automatic processing in the acceptability judgment task: An eye-tracking study. Language Learning, 72(1), 158–197. 10.1111/lang.12474
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12474 [Google Scholar]
  32. Meara, P.
    (2005) LLAMA language aptitude tests: The manual. Swansea: Lognostics.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Morgan-Short, K.
    (2020) Insights into the neural mechanisms of becoming bilingual: A brief synthesis of second language research with artificial linguistic systems. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(1), 87–91. 10.1017/S1366728919000701
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728919000701 [Google Scholar]
  34. Morgan-Short, K., Deng, Z., Brill-Schuetz, K. A., Faretta-Stutenberg, M., Wong, P. C., & Wong, F. C.
    (2015) A view of the neural representation of second language syntax through artificial language learning under implicit contexts of exposure. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(2), 383–419. 10.1017/S0272263115000030
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000030 [Google Scholar]
  35. Morgan-Short, K., Hamrick, P., & Ullman, M. T.
    (2022) Declarative and procedural memory as predictors of second language development. InS. Li, P. Hiver, & M. Papi (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and individual differences (pp.67–81). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003270546‑6
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003270546-6 [Google Scholar]
  36. Morgan-Short, K., Sanz, C., Steinhauer, K., & Ullman, M. T.
    (2010) Second language acquisition of gender agreement in explicit and implicit training conditions: An event-related potential study. Language Learning, 60(1), 154–193. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00554.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00554.x [Google Scholar]
  37. Morgan-Short, K., Steinhauer, K., Sanz, C., & Ullman, M. T.
    (2012) Explicit and implicit second language training differentially affect the achievement of native-like brain activation patterns. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(4), 933–947. 10.1162/jocn_a_00119
    https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00119 [Google Scholar]
  38. Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P.
    (1987) Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 1–32. 10.1016/0010‑0285(87)90002‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(87)90002-8 [Google Scholar]
  39. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L.
    (2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00136
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136 [Google Scholar]
  40. Paradis, M.
    (1994) Neurolinguistic aspects of implicit and explicit memory: implications for bilingualism. InN. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of second languages (pp.393–419). London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Perani, D., & Abutalebi, J.
    (2005) The neural basis of first and second language processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15(2), 202–206. 10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.007 [Google Scholar]
  42. Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L.
    (2014) How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 641, 878–912. 10.1111/lang.12079
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079 [Google Scholar]
  43. Presson, N., Davy, C., & MacWhinney, B.
    (2013) Experimentalized CALL for adult second language learners. Innovative research and practices in second language acquisition and bilingualism, 381, 139–164.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Roberts, L., González Alonso, J., Pliatsikas, C., & Rothman, J.
    (2018) Evidence from neurolinguistic methodologies: Can it actually inform linguistic/language acquisition theories and translate to evidence-based applications?Second Language Research, 34(1), 125–143. 10.1177/0267658316644010
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658316644010 [Google Scholar]
  45. Sanz, C. & Morgan-Short, K.
    (2004) Positive evidence vs. explicit rule presentation and explicit negative feedback: A computer-assisted study. Language Learning, 54(1), 35–78. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2004.00248.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00248.x [Google Scholar]
  46. Schmidt, R.
    (1995) Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. InR. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp.1–63). Honolulu, Hawai’i: University of Hawai’i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. (2001) Attention. InP. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524780.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.003 [Google Scholar]
  48. Sebastian, R., Laird, A. R., & Kiran, S.
    (2011) Meta-analysis of the neural representation of first language and second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(4), 799–819. 10.1017/S0142716411000075
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000075 [Google Scholar]
  49. Smith, S. M.
    (2002) Fast robust automated brain extraction. Human Brain Mapping, 17(3), 143–155. 10.1002/hbm.10062
    https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.10062 [Google Scholar]
  50. Sok, S., Kang, E. Y., & Han, Z.
    (2019) Thirty-five years of ISLA on form-focused instruction: A methodological synthesis. Language Teaching Research, 23(4), 403–427. 10.1177/1362168818776673
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818776673 [Google Scholar]
  51. Spada, N., & Tomita, Y.
    (2010) Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language learning, 60(2), 263–308. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00562.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x [Google Scholar]
  52. Tagarelli, K. M.
    (2014) The neurocognition of adult second language learning: An fMRI study. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Georgetown University.
  53. Tagarelli, K. M., Grey, S., Ullman, M. T., & Turkeltaub, P. E.
    (2012) A comprehensive neuroanatomical meta-analysis of second language functional imaging studies. Poster presented at the4th Annual Meeting of the Society for the Neurobiology of Language, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Tagarelli, K. M., Shattuck, K. F., Turkeltaub, P. E., & Ullman, M. T.
    (2019) Language learning in the adult brain: A neuroanatomical meta-analysis of lexical and grammatical learning. NeuroImage, 1931, 178–200. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.061
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.061 [Google Scholar]
  55. Ullman, M. T.
    (2001a) A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(10), 717–726. 10.1038/35094573
    https://doi.org/10.1038/35094573 [Google Scholar]
  56. (2001b) The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(2), 105–122. 10.1017/S1366728901000220
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728901000220 [Google Scholar]
  57. (2004) Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/ procedural model. Cognition, 92(1), 231–270. 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008 [Google Scholar]
  58. (2005) A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. InC. Sanz (Ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory and practice (pp.141–178). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. (2015) The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiologically motivated theory of first and second language. InB. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp.135–158). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. (2016) The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiological model of language learning, knowledge and use. InG. Hickok & S. A. Small (Eds.), The neurobiology of language (pp.953–968). Elsevier. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑407794‑2.00076‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407794-2.00076-6 [Google Scholar]
  61. (2020) The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiologically motivated theory of first and second language. InB. VanPatten, G. D. Keating, & S. Wulff (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp.128–161). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 10.4324/9780429503986‑7
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429503986-7 [Google Scholar]
  62. Ullman, M. T., & Lovelett, J. T.
    (2016) Implications of the declarative/procedural model for improving second language learning: The role of memory enhancement techniques. Second Language Research, 0267658316675195.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Ullman, M. T., Earle, F. S., Walenski, M., & Janacsek, K.
    (2020) The neurocognition of developmental disorders of language. Annual Review of Psychology, 711, 389–417. 10.1146/annurev‑psych‑122216‑011555
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011555 [Google Scholar]
  64. VanPatten, B., & Rothman, J.
    (2014) Against ‘rules’. InA. Benati, C. Laval & M. J. Arche (Eds.), The grammar dimension in instructed second language acquisition: Theory, research, and practice (pp.15–35). London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Wickens, T. D.
    (2002) Elementary signal detection theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Woolrich, M. W., Ripley, B. D., Brady, M., & Smith, S. M.
    (2001) Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modeling of FMRI data. Neuroimage, 14(6), 1370–1386. 10.1006/nimg.2001.0931
    https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0931 [Google Scholar]
  67. Worsley, K. J.
    (2001) Statistical analysis of activation images. Functional MRI: An Introduction to Methods, 14(1), 251–270. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780192630711.003.0014
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780192630711.003.0014 [Google Scholar]
  68. Wu, S., Liu, D., & Li, Z.
    (2022) Testing the Bottleneck Hypothesis: Chinese EFL learners’ knowledge of morphology and syntax across proficiency levels. Second Language Research, Advance online publication. 10.1177/02676583221128520
    https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583221128520 [Google Scholar]
  69. Yang, J., & Li, P.
    (2012) Brain networks of explicit and implicit learning. PloS one, 7(8), e42993. 10.1371/journal.pone.0042993
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042993 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00019.vei
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00019.vei
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error