1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Second Language Studies
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of How do constructions with modal verbs develop in second language learners of English?
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The study reported on in this paper uses data from a large, pseudolongitudinal corpus of second language (L2) learner writing to investigate how L2 knowledge of verb-argument constructions (VACs) develops from low-beginner to upper-intermediate proficiency levels. The focus is on learners from two L1 backgrounds (L1 German and L1 Spanish) and on a subset of VACs that contain modal auxiliaries in combination with lexical verbs (e.g., subject-modal-verb, as in ). For each VAC, L1, and proficiency level, frequency lists of verbs were created and compared across datasets. Reference data on the same constructions was extracted from a corpus of L1 writing. Results suggest that modal VACs become more frequent, less predictable, more productive, and more aligned with L1 production as learner proficiency increases. The findings of this study help to expand our understanding of the processes that underlie L2 construction acquisition.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00029.rom
2024-08-12
2024-09-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00029.rom
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alexopoulou, T., Geertzen, J., Korhonen, A., & Meurers, D.
    (2015) Exploring big educational learner corpora for SLA research: Perspectives on relative clauses. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, (), –. 10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.04ale
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.04ale [Google Scholar]
  2. Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E.
    (2015) A constructivist account of child language acquisition. InB. MacWhinney & W. O’Grady (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Emergence (pp.–). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118346136.ch22
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118346136.ch22 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bardovi-Harlig, K.
    (2002) A new starting point? Investigating formulaic use and input in future expressions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, , –. 10.1017/S0272263102002036
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002036 [Google Scholar]
  4. Behrens, H.
    (2009) Usage-based and emergentist approaches to language acquisition. Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/LING.2009.014
     https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2009.014 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bergs, A.
    (2010) Expression of futurity in contemporary English: A construction grammar perspective. English Language and Linguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S1360674310000067
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674310000067 [Google Scholar]
  6. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
    (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Boogaart, R.
    (2009) Semantics and pragmatics in construction grammar: The case of modal verbs. InA. Bergs & G. Diewald (Eds.), Contexts and constructions (pp.–). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.9.09boo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.9.09boo [Google Scholar]
  8. Bybee, J.
    (2010) Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cappelle, B., & Depraetere, I.
    (2016) Short-circuited interpretations of modal verb constructions. Some evidence fromThe Simpsons. Constructions and Frames, (), –. 10.1075/cf.8.1.02cap
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.8.1.02cap [Google Scholar]
  10. Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D.
    (1999) The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen, H.
    (2010) Contrastive learner corpus analysis of epistemic modality and interlanguage pragmatic competence in L2 writing. Arizona Working Papers in SLA & Teaching, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen, D., & Manning, C. D.
    (2014) A fast and accurate dependency parser using neural networks. InProceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (pp.–). Retrieved fromhttps://cs.stanford.edu/~danqi/papers/emnlp2014.pdf. 10.3115/v1/D14‑1082
     https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/D14-1082 [Google Scholar]
  13. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (2001) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Davies, M.
    (2008–) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 560 million words, 1990-present. Available online athttps://corpus.byu.edu/coca/
     [Google Scholar]
  15. de Marneffe, M.-C., & Manning, C. D.
    (2008) Stanford typed dependencies manual (revised for the Stanford Parser v. 3.5.2 in April 2015). Retrieved fromhttps://nlp.stanford.edu/software/dependencies_manual.pdf
  16. Deshors, S.
    (2014) Constructing meaning in L2 discourse: The case of modal verbs and sequential dependencies. InD. Glynn & M. Sjölin (Eds.), Subjectivity and Epistemicity. Corpus, discourse and literary approaches to stance (pp.–). MediaTryck Lund, Sweden.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Díez-Bedmar, M. B.
    (2012) The use of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages to evaluate compositions in the English exam section of the university admissions examination. Revista de Educación, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Diessel, H.
    (2004) The development of complex sentence constructions in English: A usage-based approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Ellis, N. C.
    (2003) Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. InC. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp.–). Malden, MA: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756492.ch4
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch4 [Google Scholar]
  20. Ellis, N. C., & Cadierno, T.
    (2009) Constructing a second language. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, (Special section), –. 10.1075/arcl.7.05ell
     https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.7.05ell [Google Scholar]
  21. Ellis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F.
    (2009) Constructions and their acquisition: Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, , –. 10.1075/arcl.7.08ell
     https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.7.08ell [Google Scholar]
  22. Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D.
    (2009) Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics – Introduction to the special issue. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/aml028
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml028 [Google Scholar]
  23. Ellis, N. C., & O’Donnell, M. B.
    (2014) Construction learning as category learning: A cognitive analysis. InT. Herbst, H. J. Schmid, & S. Faulhaber (Eds.), Constructions Collocations Patterns. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, –. 10.1515/9783110356854.71
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110356854.71 [Google Scholar]
  24. Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., & O’Donnell, M. B.
    (2016) Usage-based Approaches to Language Acquisition and Processing: Cognitive and Corpus Investigations of Construction Grammar (Language Learning Monograph Series). Malden, MA: Wiley.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Elturki, E. and Salsbury, T.
    (2016) A cross-sectional investigation of the development of modality in English language learners’ writing: A corpus-driven study. Issues in Applied Linguistics 20. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/19z4h5h0. 10.5070/L4200016202
     https://doi.org/10.5070/L4200016202 [Google Scholar]
  26. Eskildsen, S. W.
    (2009) Constructing another language: Usage-based linguistics in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amn037
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn037 [Google Scholar]
  27. (2012) L2 negation constructions at work. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2012.00698.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00698.x [Google Scholar]
  28. (2014) What’s new? A usage-based classroom study of linguistic routines and creativity in L2 learning. International Review of Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/iral‑2014‑0001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2014-0001 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2017) The emergence of creativity in L2 English: A usage-based case study. InN. Bell (Ed.). Multiple Perspectives on Language Play (pp.–). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Eskildsen, S. W., & Cadierno, T.
    (2007) Are recurring multi-word expressions really syntactic freezes? Second language acquisition from the perspective of usage-based linguistics. InM. Nenonen & Niemi, S. (Eds.). Collocations and Idioms 1. Papers from the First Nordic Conference on Syntactic Freezes (Vol.). Joensuu, Finland: Joensuu University Press, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Eskildsen, S. W., Cadierno, T., & Li, P.
    (2015) On the development of motion constructions in four learners of L2 English. InT. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-Based Perspectives on Second Language Learning (pp.–). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110378528‑011
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110378528-011 [Google Scholar]
  32. Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T.
    (2019) The Trinity Lancaster Corpus: Development, description and application. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Geertzen, J., Alexopoulou, T., & Korhonen, A.
    (2013) Automatic linguistic annotation of large scale L2 databases: The EF-Cambridge Open Language Database (EFCAMDAT). Proceedings of the 31st Second Language Research Forum (SLRF). Carnegie Mellon University: Cascadilla Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Goldberg, A. E.
    (1995) Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. (2003) Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Science, , –. 10.1016/S1364‑6613(03)00080‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00080-9 [Google Scholar]
  36. (2006) Constructions at Work. The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. (2019) Explain Me This. Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., & Sethuraman, N.
    (2004) Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, , –. 10.1515/cogl.2004.011
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2004.011 [Google Scholar]
  39. Goldberg, A. E. & van der Auwera, J.
    (2012) This is to count as a construction. Folia Linguistica, (), –. 10.1515/flin.2012.4
     https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2012.4 [Google Scholar]
  40. Hall, C. J., Joyce, J., & Robson, C.
    (2017) Investigating the lexico-grammatical resources of a non-native user of English: The case of can and could in email requests. Applied Linguistics Review, (), –. 10.1515/applirev‑2016‑1001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2016-1001 [Google Scholar]
  41. Hawkins, J. A., & Buttery, P.
    (2010) Criterial features in learner corpora: Theory and illustrations. English Profile Journal, (), –. 10.1017/S2041536210000036
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S2041536210000036 [Google Scholar]
  42. Hilpert, M.
    (2016) Change in modal meanings: Another look at the shifting collocates of may. Constructions and Frames, (), –. 10.1075/cf.8.1.05hil
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.8.1.05hil [Google Scholar]
  43. Hinkel, E.
    (1995) The Use of Modal Verbs as a Reflection of Cultural Values. TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.2307/3587627
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3587627 [Google Scholar]
  44. Khushik, G. A., & Huhta, A.
    (2019) Investigating syntactic complexity in EFL learners’ writing across Common European Framework of Reference levels A1, A2, and B1. Applied Linguistics, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Kumar, U., Kumar, V., & Kapur, J. N.
    (1986) Normalized measures of entropy. International Journal of General Systems, (), –. 10.1080/03081078608934927
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03081078608934927 [Google Scholar]
  46. Kyle, K.
    (2016) Measuring Syntactic Development in L2 Writing: Fine Grained Indices of Syntactic Complexity and Usage-Based Indices of Syntactic Sophistication. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University, USA.
  47. Kyle, K., & Crossley, S.
    (2017) Assessing syntactic sophistication in L2 writing: A usage-based approach. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/0265532217712554
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532217712554 [Google Scholar]
  48. Lahuerta Martínez, A. C.
    (2018) Analysis of syntactic complexity in secondary education EFL writers at different proficiency levels. Assessing Writing, , –. 10.1016/j.asw.2017.11.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2017.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  49. Leclercq, B.
    (2022) From modals to modal constructions: An n-gram analysis of can, could and be able to. Constructions and Frames, (), –. 10.1075/cf.21001.lec
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.21001.lec [Google Scholar]
  50. Li, P., Eskildsen, S. W., & Cadierno, T.
    (2014) Tracing an L2 learner’s motion constructions over time: A usage-based classroom investigation. The Modern Language Journal, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Lieven, E., Pine, J. M., & Baldwin, G.
    (1997) Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development. Journal of Child Language, (), –. 10.1017/S0305000996002930
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000996002930 [Google Scholar]
  52. Lu, X.
    (2011) A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers’ language development. TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.5054/tq.2011.240859
     https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.240859 [Google Scholar]
  53. Lyngfelt, B.
    (2018) Introduction: Constructions and Constructicography. InB. Lyngfelt, L. Borin, K. Ohara, & T. Timponi Torren (Eds.), Constructicography: Constructicon Development across Languages (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.22.01lyn
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.22.01lyn [Google Scholar]
  54. Murakami, A.
    (2013) L1 Influence and Individual Variation in the L2 Accuracy Development of Grammatical Morphemes: Insights from Learner Corpora. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge, UK.
  55. Ninio, A.
    (1999) Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity. Journal of Child Language, , –. 10.1017/S0305000999003931
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000999003931 [Google Scholar]
  56. (2006) Language and the Learning Curve. A New Theory of Syntactic Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199299829.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199299829.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  57. Nisioi, S.
    (2015) Feature analysis for native language identification. InA. Gelbukh (Ed.), Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2015. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑18111‑0_49
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18111-0_49 [Google Scholar]
  58. R Development Core Team
    R Development Core Team (2021) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Roehr-Brackin, K.
    (2014) Explicit knowledge and processes from a usage-based perspective: The developmental trajectory of an instructed L2 learner. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12081
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12081 [Google Scholar]
  60. Römer, U.
    (2019) A corpus perspective on the development of verb constructions in second language learners. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/ijcl.00013.roe
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.00013.roe [Google Scholar]
  61. Römer, U. & Garner, J. R.
    (2019) The development of verb constructions in spoken learner English: Tracing effects of usage and proficiency. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research(), –. 10.1075/ijlcr.17015.rom
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.17015.rom [Google Scholar]
  62. (2022) What can corpus linguistics tell us about second language acquisition?InA. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics (2nd edition). London: Routledge. –. 10.4324/9780367076399‑23
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367076399-23 [Google Scholar]
  63. Römer, U., O’Donnell, M. B., & Ellis, N. C.
    (2014) Second language learner knowledge of verb-argument constructions: Effects of language transfer and typology. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/modl.12149
     https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12149 [Google Scholar]
  64. Römer, U., Roberson, A., O’Donnell, M. B., & Ellis, N. C.
    (2014) Linking learner corpus and experimental data in studying second language learners’ knowledge of verb-argument constructions. ICAME Journal, , –. 10.2478/icame‑2014‑0006
     https://doi.org/10.2478/icame-2014-0006 [Google Scholar]
  65. Römer, U., Skalicky, S., & Ellis, N. C.
    (2020) Verb-argument constructions in advanced L2 English learner production: Insights from corpora and verbal fluency tasks. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Römer, U. & Yilmaz, S.
    (2019) Effects of L2 usage and L1 transfer on Turkish learners’ production of English verb-argument constructions. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, –. 10.35869/vial.v0i16.95
     https://doi.org/10.35869/vial.v0i16.95 [Google Scholar]
  67. Savage, C., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M.
    (2003) Testing the abstractness of children’s linguistic representations: Lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions in young children. Developmental Science, (), –. 10.1111/1467‑7687.00312
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00312 [Google Scholar]
  68. Shatz, I.
    (2020) Refining and modifying the EFCAMDAT: Lessons from creating a new corpus from an existing large-scale English learner language database. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, (), –. 10.1075/ijlcr.20009.sha
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.20009.sha [Google Scholar]
  69. Tan, Y. & Römer, U.
    (2022) Using phrase-frames to trace the language development of L1 Chinese learners of English. System, , 10.1016/j.system.2022.102844
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102844 [Google Scholar]
  70. Tomasello, M.
    (1992) First Verbs. A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development of Cognition and Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511527678
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527678 [Google Scholar]
  71. (2003) Constructing a Language. A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Tono, Y., & Díez-Bedmar, M. B.
    (2014) Focus on learner writing at the beginning and intermediate stages: The ICCI corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/ijcl.19.2.01ton
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.19.2.01ton [Google Scholar]
  73. Torres-Martínez, S.
    (2019) Taming English modals: How a construction grammar approach helps to understand modal verbs. English Today, (), –. 10.1017/S0266078418000081
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078418000081 [Google Scholar]
  74. Trousdale, G., & Hoffmann, T.
    (Eds.) (2013) Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Tyler, A. E., Mueller, C. M., & Ho, V.
    (2010) Applying cognitive linguistics to instructed L2 learning. AILA Review, , –. 10.1075/aila.23.03tyl
     https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.23.03tyl [Google Scholar]
  76. Tyler, A. E., & Ortega, L.
    (2018) Usage-inspired L2 instruction: An emergent, researched pedagogy. InTyler, A. E., L. Ortega, M. Uno, & H. I. Park (Eds.), Usage-Inspired L2 Instruction: Researched Pedagogy (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.49.01tyl
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.49.01tyl [Google Scholar]
  77. Yang, X.
    (2018) A corpus-based study of modal verbs in Chinese learners’ academic writing. English Language Teaching, (), –. 10.5539/elt.v11n2p122
     https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n2p122 [Google Scholar]
  78. Zipf, G. K.
    (1935) The Psycho-biology of Language. An introduction to dynamic philology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00029.rom
Loading
How do constructions with modal verbs develop in second language learners of English?
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00029.rom
/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00029.rom
/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00029.rom
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: second language development ; learner corpus ; usage-based SLA ; German learners ; verb-argument constructions ; modals ; Spanish learners

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error