1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Second Language Studies
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of ‘These results are inconsistent’
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Shell nouns (SNs; e.g., and ) are an open group of abstract nouns defined functionally through use as emergent ‘shells’ referencing and labeling ideas in surrounding discourse. This paper analyzes the ‘ + [SN]’ pattern in second language (L2) English Master’s theses and published English research articles (RAs) across three Engineering disciplines (Electrical, Mechanical, Chemical), with a secondary focus on unattended ‘’ use and disciplinary variation. The corpus includes 60 RAs per discipline (840,683 words) and 25 Master’s theses per discipline (899,182 words). Corpus methods were used to support manual identification of ‘ + [SN]’. Results show that L2 English Master’s thesis writers used this pattern significantly less than writers of RAs. Normalized frequencies, frequent SNs, and functional patterns are also presented across genres and disciplines. L2 writers and experts use a similar range of SN types, and expert writers adopt a more rhetorically sophisticated means of organizing information.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00031.cas
2024-09-24
2024-10-13

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00031.cas
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aktas, R. N., & Cortes, V.
    (2008) Shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and ESL student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  2. Anthony, L.
    (2023) AntConc (Version 4.2.4) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available fromhttps://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Benitez-Castro, M.-A.
    (2021) Shell-noun use in disciplinary student writing: A multifaceted analysis of problem and way in third-year undergraduate writing across three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.esp.2020.10.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.10.004 [Google Scholar]
  4. Benitez-Castro, M.-A., & Thompson, P.
    (2015) Shell-nounhood in academic discourse: A critical state-of-the-art review. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, , –. 10.1075/ijcl.20.3.05ben
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.3.05ben [Google Scholar]
  5. Bray, J. H., & Maxwell, S. E.
    (1985) Multivariate analysis of variance. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781412985222
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985222 [Google Scholar]
  6. Caldwell, C.
    (2009) Lexical vagueness in student writing: Are shell nouns the problem?Saarbrücken: Verlag Dr. Müller.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Casal, J. E.
    (2020) An integrated corpus and genre analysis approach to writing research and pedagogy: Development of graduate student genre knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Charles, M.
    (2003) ‘This mystery.’: A corpus-based study of the use of nouns to construct stance in theses from two contrasting disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, , –. 10.1016/S1475‑1585(03)00048‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00048-1 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2007) Argument or evidence? Disciplinary variation in the use of the Noun that pattern in stance construction. English for Specific Purposes, (), –. 10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.004 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2011) Using hands-on concordancing to teach rhetorical functions: Evaluation and implications for EAP writing classes. InA. Frankenberg-Garcia, L. Flowerdew, & G. Aston (Eds.), New trends in corpora and language learning (pp.–). London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Díez Prados, M.
    (2018) Abstract nouns as metadiscursive shells in academic discourse. Caplletra, , –. 10.7203/caplletra.64.11372
     https://doi.org/10.7203/caplletra.64.11372 [Google Scholar]
  12. Ellis, N. C.
    (2008) The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Flowerdew, J.
    (2006) Use of signaling nouns in a learner corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/ijcl.11.3.07flo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.11.3.07flo [Google Scholar]
  14. Flowerdew, J., & Forest, R. W.
    (2015) Signaling nouns in English: A corpus-based discourse approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139135405
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139135405 [Google Scholar]
  15. Francis, G.
    (1986) Anaphoric nouns (Discourse analysis monograph). Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Garner, J. R.
    (2016) A phrase-frame approach to investigating phraseology in learner writing across proficiency levels. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, (), –. 10.1075/ijlcr.2.1.02gar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.2.1.02gar [Google Scholar]
  17. Gilmore, A., & Millar, N.
    (2018) The language of civil engineering research articles: A corpus-based approach. English for Specific Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.esp.2018.02.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gray, B.
    (2010) On the use of demonstrative pronouns and determiners as cohesive devices: A focus on sentence-initial this/these in academic prose. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, (), –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2009.11.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2009.11.003 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gray, B., & Cortes, V.
    (2011) Perception vs. evidence: An analysis of this and these in academic prose. English for Specific Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.esp.2010.06.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2010.06.004 [Google Scholar]
  20. Gries, S. T.
    (2018) On over — and underuse in learner corpus research and multifactoriality in corpus linguistics more generally. Journal of Second Language Studies, (), –. 10.1075/jsls.00005.gri
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00005.gri [Google Scholar]
  21. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R.
    (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Hasselgård, H.
    (2012) Facts, ideas, questions, problems, and issues in advanced learners’ English. Nordic Journal of English Studies, (), –. 10.35360/njes.254
     https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.254 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hinkel, E.
    (2004) Teaching academic ESL writing: Practical techniques in vocabulary and grammar. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Ivanič, R.
    (1991) Nouns in search of a context: A study of nouns with both open — and closed-system characteristics. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, , –. 10.1515/iral.1991.29.2.93
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1991.29.2.93 [Google Scholar]
  25. Jiang, K. F., & Hyland, K.
    (2015) ’The fact that’: Stance nouns in disciplinary writing. Discourse Studies, , –. 10.1177/1461445615590719
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445615590719 [Google Scholar]
  26. (2018) Nouns and academic interactions: A neglected feature of metadiscourse. Applied Linguistics, () –. 10.1093/applin/amw023
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw023 [Google Scholar]
  27. Jiang, F., & Hyland, K.
    (2021) ‘The goal of this analysis.’: Changing patterns of metadiscursive nouns in disciplinary writing. Lingua, . 10.1016/j.lingua.2020.103017
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.103017 [Google Scholar]
  28. Jin, H.
    (2019) On the anaphoric use of demonstratives this/these in L2 academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2019.01.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  29. Johns, T.
    (1991) Should you be persuaded: Two examples of data-driven learning. InT. Johns & P. King (Eds.), Classroom concordancing. English Language Research Journal, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Laso, N. J., & John, S.
    (2013) A corpus-based analysis of the collocational patterning of adjectives with abstract nouns in medical English. InI. Verdaguer, N. J. Laso, & D. Salazar (Eds.), Biomedical English: A corpus-based approach (–). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/scl.56.04las
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.56.04las [Google Scholar]
  31. Lee, J. J., & Casal, J. E.
    (2014) Metadiscourse in RAD chapters: A cross-linguistic analysis of English and Spanish thesis writers in engineering. System, , –. 10.1016/j.system.2014.07.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.07.009 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lee, J. J., Tyko, T., & Larkin, R.
    (2021) (Un)attended this/these in undergraduate student writing: A corpus analysis of high — and low-rated L2 writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, , 100967. 10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100967
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100967 [Google Scholar]
  33. Liu, Q., & Deng, L.
    (2017) A genre-based study of shell-noun use in the N-be-that construction in popular and professional science articles. English for Specific Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.esp.2016.11.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  34. Manning, C., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J., Bethard, S., & McClosky, D.
    (2014) The Stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. InProceedings of the 52nd annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics: System demonstrations (vols. ). 10.3115/v1/P14‑5010
     https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/P14-5010 [Google Scholar]
  35. Nesi, H., & Moreton, E.
    (2012) EFL/ESL writers and the use of shell nouns. InR. Tang (Ed.), Academic Writing in a Second or Foreign Language: Issues and Challenges Facing ESL/EFL Academic Writers in Higher Education Contexts (pp.–). London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L.
    (2014) How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, , –. 10.1111/lang.12079
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079 [Google Scholar]
  37. Schanding, B., & Pae, H. K.
    (2018) Shell noun use in English argumentative essays by native speakers of Japanese, Turkish, and English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, (). –. 10.1075/ijlcr.16014.sch
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.16014.sch [Google Scholar]
  38. Schmid, H-J.
    (2000) English abstract nouns as conceptual shells: From corpus to cognition. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110808704
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110808704 [Google Scholar]
  39. Sinclair, J.
    (1993) Written discourse structure. InJ. M. Sinclair, M. Hoey, & G. Fox (Eds.), Techniques of Description: Spoken and written discourse, a festschrift for Malcolm Coulthard London (pp.–). London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Sing, C. S.
    (2013) Shell noun patterns in student writing in English for specific academic purposes. InS. Granger, G. Gilquin & F. Meunier (Eds.), Twenty Years of Learner Corpus Research: Looking Back, Moving Ahead (pp.–). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Swales, J., & Feak, C.
    (2012) Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (3rd Edition). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.2173936
     https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.2173936 [Google Scholar]
  42. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S.
    (2001) Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang, Y., & Hu, G.
    (2023) Shell noun phrases in scientific writing: A diachronic corpus-based study on research articles in chemical engineering. English for Specific Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.esp.2023.05.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2023.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  44. Wulff, S., Römer, U., & Swales, J.
    (2012) Attended/unattended this in academic student writing: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, (), –. 10.1515/cllt‑2012‑0006
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2012-0006 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00031.cas
Loading
‘These results are inconsistent’
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00031.cas
/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00031.cas
/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00031.cas
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: Corpus Linguistics ; Genre Analysis ; English for Academic Purposes ; Academic Writing ; Shell Nouns

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error