1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Second Language Studies
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Emerging engineering scholars’ stance in citations
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper presents a mixed-method study that integrates genre-based corpus analysis and discourse-based interviews to examine the form- and stance-related citation patterns in the research articles of ten first- and second-year engineering doctoral students. The corpus analysis reveals strong preferences for stance-marked citations and the and devices in particular, suggesting that writers use authorial stance to endorse cited propositions or provide likelihood- or evidence-based judgments in citations. Interview results indicate a discordance between writers’ intentions and their stance-related linguistic choices, as well as varied perceptions of authorial stance. Despite the frequent use of stance markers in citations, most writers claimed to be neutral reporters of knowledge. Only a few acknowledged their strategic stance choices and demonstrated a comprehensive understanding of the rhetorical roles citations play in their claim-making practices. The findings suggest that students with developing citation expertise lacked the academic and disciplinary expertise to understand the interplay among citations, authorial stance, and rhetorical move/step structures in their research writing. These writers could benefit from explicit feedback that raises their awareness of the strategic use of citations and stance, to facilitate the realization of rhetorical goals in research writing.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00033.zha
2024-09-24
2024-10-06

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00033.zha
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bazerman, C.
    (1994) Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. Genre and the new rhetoric, .
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernstein, B.
    (2000) Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique (Vol.). Rowman & Littlefield.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bhatia, V. K.
    (2004) Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. New York, NY: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bitchener, J., & Basturkmen, H.
    (2006) Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, (), –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2005.10.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  5. Brinkmann, S.
    (2014) Unstructured and semi-structured interviewing. The Oxford handbook of qualitative research, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Byun, J.
    (2015) A New Look to Research Article Abstracts (RAAs) of Novice Academic Writers: Their Communicative Strategic Use of Rhetorical Structure and Metadiscourse. English Studies, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Chang, P.
    (2012) Using a stance corpus to learn about effective authorial stance-taking: A textlinguistic approach. ReCALL, (), –. 10.1017/S0958344012000079
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000079 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chang, P., & Schleppegrell, M.
    (2011) Taking an effective authorial stance in academic writing: Making the linguistic resources explicit for L2 writers in the social sciences. Journal of English for academic purposes, (), –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.05.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.05.005 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2016) Explicit learning of authorial stance-taking by L2 doctoral students. Journal of Writing Research, (), –. 10.17239/jowr‑2016.08.01.02
     https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2016.08.01.02 [Google Scholar]
  10. Coffin, C. J.
    (2009) Incorporating and Evaluating Voices in a Film Studies Thesis. Writing & Pedagogy, (), –. 10.1558/wap.v1i2.163
     https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v1i2.163 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cotos, E., Huffman, S., & Link, S.
    (2017) A move/step model for methods sections: Demonstrating rigour and credibility. English for Specific Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.esp.2017.01.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fazel, I., & Shi, L.
    (2015) Citation behaviors of graduate students in grant proposal writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.10.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  13. Flowerdew, L.
    (2015) Using corpus-based research and online academic corpora to inform writing of the discussion section of a thesis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.06.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gries, S. T.
    (2018) On over — and underuse in learner corpus research and multifactoriality in corpus linguistics more generally. Journal of Second Language Studies, (), –. 10.1075/jsls.00005.gri
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00005.gri [Google Scholar]
  15. Harwood, N.
    (2009) An interview-based study of the functions of citations in academic writing across two disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  16. Harwood, N., & Petrić, B.
    (2012) Performance in the citing behavior of two student writers. Written Communication, (), –. 10.1177/0741088311424133
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088311424133 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hood, S.
    (2011) Writing discipline: Comparing inscriptions of knowledge and knowers in academic writing. Disciplinarity: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Hu, G., & Wang, G.
    (2014) Disciplinary and ethnolinguistic influences on citation in research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2013.11.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hyland, K.
    (2002) Activity and evaluation: Reporting practices in academic writing. Academic discourse, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. (2004) Disciplinary discourses, Michigan classics ed.: Social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.6719
     https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.6719 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kanoksilapatham, B.
    (2015) Distinguishing textual features characterizing structural variation in research articles across three engineering sub-discipline corpora. English for Specific Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.008 [Google Scholar]
  22. Koutsantoni, D.
    (2006) Rhetorical strategies in engineering research articles and research theses: Advanced academic literacy and relations of power. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, (), –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2005.11.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kuo, C. W., Cheng, S. W., & Kuo, C. H.
    (2011) Citations in Research Article Sections: Integrating Forms and Functions. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, Q., & Zhang, X.
    (2021) An Analysis of Citations in Chinese English-major Master’s Theses and Doctoral Dissertations. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, , 100982. 10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100982
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100982 [Google Scholar]
  25. Liardét, C. L., & Black, S.
    (2019) “So and so” says, states and argues: A corpus-assisted engagement analysis of reporting verbs. Journal of Second Language Writing, , –. 10.1016/j.jslw.2019.02.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  26. Mansourizadeh, K., & Ahmad, U. K.
    (2011) Citation practices among non-native expert and novice scientific writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, (), –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.03.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  27. Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R.
    (2005) The language of evaluation. NY: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  28. Maton, K.
    (2014) Knowledge and knowers: Towards a realist sociology of education. Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Morton, J., & Storch, N.
    (2019) Developing an authorial voice in PhD multilingual student writing: The reader’s perspective. Journal of Second Language Writing, , –. 10.1016/j.jslw.2018.02.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.02.004 [Google Scholar]
  30. Pecorari, D.
    (2003) Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second-language writing. Journal of second language writing, (), –. 10.1016/j.jslw.2003.08.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2003.08.004 [Google Scholar]
  31. Peng, J. E.
    (2019) Authorial voice constructed in citation in literature reviews of doctoral theses: Variations across training contexts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2018.11.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Petrić, B.
    (2007) Rhetorical functions of citations in high — and low-rated master’s theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, (), –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2007.09.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.09.002 [Google Scholar]
  33. Ren, H., & Li, Y.
    (2011) A Comparison Study on the Rhetorical Moves of Abstracts in Published Research Articles and Master’s Foreign-Language Theses. English Language Teaching, (), –. 10.5539/elt.v4n1p162
     https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n1p162 [Google Scholar]
  34. Samraj, B.
    (2005) An exploration of a genre set: Research article introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, (), –. 10.1016/j.esp.2002.10.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2002.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  35. (2013) Form and function of citations in discussion sections of master’s theses and research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, (), –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2013.09.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  36. San, L. Y., & Tan, H.
    (2012) A comparative study of the rhetorical moves in abstracts of published research articles and students’ term papers in the field of computer and communication systems engineering. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, (), –. 10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.7p.40
     https://doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.7p.40 [Google Scholar]
  37. Shaw, J.
    (1995) A schema approach to the formal literature review in engineering theses. System, (), –. 10.1016/0346‑251X(95)00020‑K
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(95)00020-K [Google Scholar]
  38. Shi, L., & Dong, Y.
    (2018) Chinese graduate students paraphrasing in English and Chinese contexts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2018.03.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  39. Silver, M.
    (2012) Voice and stance across disciplines in academic discourse. Stance and voice in written academic genres, –. 10.1057/9781137030825_13
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137030825_13 [Google Scholar]
  40. Swales, J. M.
    (1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. (2014) Variation in Citational Practice in a Corpus of Student Biology Papers: From Parenthetical Plonking to Intertextual Storytelling. Written Communication, (), –. 10.1177/0741088313515166
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313515166 [Google Scholar]
  42. Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B.
    (2012) Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (Vol. 3). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.2173936
     https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.2173936 [Google Scholar]
  43. Thompson, P., & Tribble, C.
    (2001) Looking at citations: Using corpora in English for academic purposes. Language Learning & Technology, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Thornton, L.
    (2019) “That’s the way I did it”: A mixed methods study of the intertextual practices of first-year undergraduate health sciences students (Doctoral dissertation, University of Sydney). Retrieved fromhttps://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/handle/2123/21684
  45. White, P.
    (2001) Engagement and Dialogistic Positioning. RetrievedSeptember 2021fromhttps://www.grammatics.com/appraisal/appraisalguide/appraisalguidewpfiles.html
  46. Xie, J.
    (2016) Direct or indirect? Critical or uncritical? Evaluation in Chinese English-major MA thesis literature reviews. Journal of English for academic purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2016.05.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  47. Yang, R., & Allison, D.
    (2003) Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for specific purposes, (), –. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(02)00026‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00026-1 [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhang, G.
    (2022) The citational practice of social science research articles: An analysis by part-genres. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, , 101076. 10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101076
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101076 [Google Scholar]
  49. (2023) Authorial stance in citations: Variation by writer expertise and research article part-genres. English for Specific Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.esp.2022.12.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhang, L., & Zhang, L. J.
    (2021) Fostering stance-taking as a sustainable goal in developing EFL students’ academic writing skills: Exploring the effects of explicit instruction on academic writing skills and stance deployment. Sustainability, (), . 10.3390/su13084270
     https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084270 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00033.zha
Loading
Emerging engineering scholars’ stance in citations
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00033.zha
/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00033.zha
/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00033.zha
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: research articles ; citations ; stance ; doctoral writing ; engineering writing

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error