Assessing Chinese EFL learners’ speaking proficiency levels

References

1. Abdi Tabari, M., & Johnson, M. D.
   (2023) Exploring new insights into the role of cohesive devices in written academic genres. Assessing Writing, , . 10.1016/j.asw.2023.100749
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100749 [Google Scholar]
2. Abdi Tabari, M., & Wind, A. M.
   (2023) Dynamic development of cohesive devices in English as a second language writing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, (). 10.1515/iral‑2022‑0205
   https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2022-0205 [Google Scholar]
3. Chiang, S. Y.
   (1999) Assessing grammatical and textual features in L2 writing samples: The case of French as a foreign language. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/0026‑7902.00017
   https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00017 [Google Scholar]
4. Covington, M. A., & McFall, J. D.
   (2010) Cutting the gordian knot: The moving-average type–token ratio (MATTR). Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, (), –. 10.1080/09296171003643098
   https://doi.org/10.1080/09296171003643098 [Google Scholar]
5. Crossley, S. A., & Kim, Y.
   (2019) Text integration and speaking proficiency: Linguistic, individual differences, and strategy use considerations. Language Assessment Quarterly, (), –. 10.1080/15434303.2019.1628239
   https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2019.1628239 [Google Scholar]
6. Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S.
   (2010) Predicting second language writing proficiency: The roles of cohesion and linguistic sophistication. Journal of Research in Reading, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9817.2010.01449.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01449.x [Google Scholar]
7. Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K., & Dascalu, M.
   (2019) The tool for the automatic analysis of cohesion 2.0: Integrating semantic similarity and text overlap. Behavior Research Methods, (), –. 10.3758/s13428‑018‑1142‑4
   https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1142-4 [Google Scholar]
8. Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K., & McNamara, D. S.
   (2016a) The development and use of cohesive devices in L2 writing and their relations to judgments of essay quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, , –. 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.003
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.003 [Google Scholar]
9. Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K., & McNamara, D. S.
   (2016b) The tool for the automatic analysis of text cohesion (TAACO): Automatic assessment of local, global, and text cohesion. Behavior Research Methods, (), –. 10.3758/s13428‑015‑0651‑7
   https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0651-7 [Google Scholar]
10. Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S.
    (2013) Applications of text analysis tools for spoken response grading. Language Learning & Technology, (), –. 10125/44329
    https://doi.org/10125/44329 [Google Scholar]
11. Crossley, S. A., Clevinger, A., & Kim, Y.
    (2014) The role of lexical properties and cohesive devices in text integration and their effect on human ratings of speaking proficiency. Language Assessment Quarterly, (), –. 10.1080/15434303.2014.926905
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2014.926905 [Google Scholar]
12. Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G.
    (2000) Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, , –. 10.1093/applin/21.3.354
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.354 [Google Scholar]
13. Gao, M., & Liu, Y.
    (2023) An analysis of the distinguishing features of discourse performance in an online diagnostic speaking test. Journal of China Examinations, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Louwerse, M. M.
    (2003) What do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository text. InA. P. Sweet & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking Reading Comprehension (pp.–). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Gu, L., & Hsieh, C.-N.
    (2019) Distinguishing features of young english language learners’ oral performance. Language Assessment Quarterly, (), –. 10.1080/15434303.2019.1605518
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2019.1605518 [Google Scholar]
16. Guo, L., Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S.
    (2013) Predicting human judgments of essay quality in both integrated and independent second language writing samples: A comparison study. Assessing Writing, (), –. 10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.002 [Google Scholar]
17. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R.
    (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R.
    (1985) Language, context and text: Aspects of language in social-semiotic perspective. Deakin University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Iwashita, N., May, L., & Moore, P.
    (2017) Features of discourse and lexical richness at different performance levels in the Aptis speaking test. ARAGs Research Reports, AR-G/2017/002. British Council. https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/iwashita_et_al_layout_1_revised.pdf
20. Jin, Y., & Fan, J.
    (2011) Test for English majors (TEM) in China. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/0265532211414852
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532211414852 [Google Scholar]
21. Lee, C., Ge, H., & Chung, E.
    (2021) What linguistic features distinguish and predict L2 writing quality? A study of examination scripts written by adolescent Chinese learners of English in Hong Kong. System, , . 10.1016/j.system.2021.102461
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102461 [Google Scholar]
22. Lin, Y.-L., Tsai, Y.-S., & Hsieh, C.-Y.
    (2023) Discourse competence across band scores: An analysis of speaking performance in the general english proficiency test. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, (). 10.1515/iral‑2022‑0154
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2022-0154 [Google Scholar]
23. Liu, M., & Braine, G.
    (2005) Cohesive features in argumentative writing produced by Chinese undergraduates. System, (), –. 10.1016/j.system.2005.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.02.002 [Google Scholar]
24. Liu, Q., Zhou, S.
    (2024) Exploring Interaction Patterns in Web-Based Collaborative Writing Tasks Among Advanced L2 Learners: A Case Study Using Feishu Platform. In: Kubincová, Z., Emerging Technologies for Education. SETE 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14607. Springer, Singapore. 10.1007/978‑981‑97‑4246‑2_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4246-2_4 [Google Scholar]
25. Lu, X.
    (2012) The relationship of lexical richness to the quality of ESL learners’ oral narratives. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2011.01232_1.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01232_1.x [Google Scholar]
26. McCarthy, P. M., & Jarvis, S.
    (2010) MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods, (), –. 10.3758/BRM.42.2.381
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.2.381 [Google Scholar]
27. McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., McCarthy, P. M., & Graesser, A. C.
    (2010) Coh-Metrix: Capturing linguistic features of cohesion. Discourse Processes, (), –. 10.1080/01638530902959943
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902959943 [Google Scholar]
28. Tyler, A.
    (1992) Discourse structure and the perception of incoherence in international teaching assistants’ spoken discourse. TESOL Quarterly, (), . 10.2307/3586870
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3586870 [Google Scholar]
29. Tywoniw, R., & Crossley, S.
    (2019) The effect of cohesive features in integrated and independent L2 writing quality and text classification. Language Education and Assessment, (), –. 10.29140/lea.v2n3.151
    https://doi.org/10.29140/lea.v2n3.151 [Google Scholar]
30. Vögelin, C., Jansen, T., Keller, S. D., Machts, N., & Möller, J.
    (2019) The influence of lexical features on teacher judgements of ESL argumentative essays. Assessing Writing, , –. 10.1016/j.asw.2018.12.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.12.003 [Google Scholar]
31. Wang, T., & Zhou, D.
    (2023) Analyzing the distinguishing language features of Chinese EFL learners’ oral expression. Modern Foreign Languages, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Witte, S. P., & Faigley, L.
    (1981) Coherence, cohesion, and writing quality. College Composition and Communication, (), –. 10.58680/ccc198115912
    https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc198115912 [Google Scholar]
33. Witten, I. H., Frank, E., & Hall, M. A.
    (2011) Data mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Yang, W., & Sun, Y.
    (2012) The use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency levels. Linguistics and Education, (): –. 10.1016/j.linged.2011.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2011.09.004 [Google Scholar]
35. Yu, Hongliang
    (2005) An exploratory study of narrative structure in Chinese tertiary EFL learners’ monologic production. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
    [Google Scholar]