The effects of interleaving and blocking practice on L2 contextualized grammar learning

References

1. Bird, S.
   (2010) Effects of distributed practice on the acquisition of second language English syntax. Applied Psycholinguistics, , –. 10.1017/S0142716410000172
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716410000172 [Google Scholar]
2. Bjork, R. A.
   (1999) Assessing our own competence: Heuristics and illusions. InD. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp.–). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/1480.003.0023
   https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1480.003.0023 [Google Scholar]
3. Boers, F.
   (2014) A reappraisal of the 4/3/2 activity. RELC Journal, (), –. 10.1177/0033688214546964
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214546964 [Google Scholar]
4. Brunmair, M., & Richter, T.
   (2019) Similarity matters: A meta-analysis of interleaved learning and its moderators. Psychological Bulletin, , –. 10.1037/bul0000209
   https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000209 [Google Scholar]
5. Carpenter, S. K., & Mueller, F. E.
   (2013) The effects of interleaving versus blocking on foreign language pronunciation learning. Memory & Cognition, , –. 10.3758/s13421‑012‑0291‑4
   https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0291-4 [Google Scholar]
6. de Jong, N. H.
   (2016) Predicting pauses in L1 and L2 speech: The effects of utterance boundaries and word frequency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, , –. 10.1515/iral‑2016‑9993
   https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-9993 [Google Scholar]
7. DeKeyser, R. M.
   (2001) Automaticity and automatization. InP. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp.–). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524780.007
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.007 [Google Scholar]
8. DeKeyser, R. M.
   (2007) Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511667275
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667275 [Google Scholar]
9. DeKeyser, R.
   (2015) Skill acquisition theory. InB. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp.–). New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Ellis, R., & Shintani, N.
    (2014) Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Ferman, S., Olshtain, E., Schechtman, E., & Karni, A.
    (2009) The acquisition of a linguistic skill by adults: Procedural and declarative memory interact in the learning of an artificial morphological rule. Journal of Neurolinguistics, (), –. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.12.002 [Google Scholar]
12. Finkbeiner, M., & Nicol, J.
    (2003) Semantic category effects in second language word learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, , –. 10.1017/S0142716403000195
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716403000195 [Google Scholar]
13. Guadagnoli, M. A., Holcomb, W. R., & Weber, T. J.
    (1999) The relationship between contextual interference effects and performer expertise on the learning of a putting task. Journal of Human Movement Studies, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Jacobs, C. L., Cho, S.-J., & Watson, D. G.
    (2019) Self-priming in production: Evidence for a hybrid model of syntactic priming. Cognitive Science, , . 10.1111/cogs.12749
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12749 [Google Scholar]
15. Kang, S. H.
    (2016) The benefits of interleaved practice for learning. InJ. C. Horvath, J. M. Lodge, & J. Hattie (Eds.), From the laboratory to the classroom: Translating science of learning for teachers (pp.–). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kormos, J.
    (2006) Speech production and second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Langacker, R. W.
    (2008) Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
18. Lightbown, P.
    (2008) Transfer appropriate processing as a model for classroom second language acquisition. InZ. Han (Ed.), Understanding second language process (pp.–). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Nakata, T., & Suzuki, Y.
    (2019) Mixing grammar exercises facilitates long-term retention: Effects of blocking, interleaving, and increasing practice. The Modern Language Journal, , –. 10.1111/modl.12581
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12581 [Google Scholar]
20. Nikouee, M.
    (2021) Grammar practice and communicative language teaching: Groundwork for an investigation into the concept of transfer-appropriateness. (Doctoral Dissertation), University of Alberta.
21. Norris, J., & Ortega, L.
    (2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, , –. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00136
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136 [Google Scholar]
22. Pan, S. C., Tajrana, J., Loveletta, J., Osuna, J., & Rickard, T.
    (2018) Does interleaved practice enhance foreign language learning? The effects of training schedule on Spanish verb conjugation skills. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. 10.1037/edu000033
    https://doi.org/10.1037/edu000033 [Google Scholar]
23. Sato, M., & McDonough, K.
    (2019) Practice is important but how about its quality? Contextualized practice in the classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, , –. 10.1017/S0272263119000159
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000159 [Google Scholar]
24. Serrano, R., & Huang, H.-Y.
    (2018) Learning Vocabulary Through Assisted Repeated Reading: How Much Time Should There Be Between Repetitions of the Same Text?TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.1002/tesq.445
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.445 [Google Scholar]
25. Skehan, P.
    (ed.) (2014) Processing perspectives on task performance. London: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.5 [Google Scholar]
26. Suzuki, Y.
    (2017) The optimal distribution of practice for the acquisition of L2 morphology: A conceptual replication and extension. Language Learning, , –. 10.1111/lang.12236
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12236 [Google Scholar]
27. Suzuki, Y.
    (2021) Optimizing fluency training for speaking skills transfer: Comparing the effects of blocked and interleaved task repetition. Language Learning, , –. 10.1111/lang.12433
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12433 [Google Scholar]
28. Suzuki, Y.
    (2023) Introduction: Practice and automatization in a second language. InY. Suzuki (Ed.), Practice and automatization in second language research: Perspectives from skill acquisition theory and cognitive psychology (pp.–). New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003414643‑1
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003414643-1 [Google Scholar]
29. Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R.
    (2015) Effects of distributed practice on the proceduralization of morphology. Language Teaching Research, , –. 10.1177/1362168815617334
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815617334 [Google Scholar]
30. Suzuki, Y., Eguchi, M., & de Jong, N.
    (2022a) Does the reuse of constructions promote fluency development in task repetition? A usage-based perspective. TESOL Quarterly, , –. 10.1002/tesq.3103
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3103 [Google Scholar]
31. Suzuki, Y., Yokosawa, S., Aline, D.
    (2022b) The role of working memory in blocked and interleaved grammar practice: Proceduralization of L2 syntax. Language Teaching Research, (), –. 10.1177/1362168820913985
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820913985 [Google Scholar]
32. Suzuki, Y., Nakata, T., & DeKeyser, R. M.
    (2019) The desirable difficulty framework as a theoretical foundation for optimizing and researching second language practice. The Modern Language Journal, , –. 10.1111/modl.12585
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12585 [Google Scholar]