1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Second Language Studies
  4. Volume 8, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 8, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2542-3835
  • E-ISSN: 2542-3843
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Like other questionable research practices (QRPs) discussed in this issue, self-citation can range from fitting and appropriate to self-serving and unethical (Ioannidis, 2015). The present study sought to estimate self-citation patterns using a large, representative sample of applied linguistics research articles ( = 969). Our results indicate a median of 1 self-citation per paper (2% of all references) at the individual author level (median = 3 or 5% at the author-team or article level). However, much higher rates of self-citation were also observed among individual authors and author-teams (max = 23 and 31, respectively). We explore these and other results in the context of QRPs and in light of bibliometric research from other disciplines. We also consider our findings in relation to the incentive structures in academia. Recommendations for future research are provided along with suggestions for preventing and addressing excessive self-citation for different stakeholders (e.g., journals, institutions, learned societies).

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00052.plo
2025-09-23
2026-05-09

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00052.plo
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Grilli, L.
    (2021) The effects of citation-based research evaluation schemes on self-citation behavior. Journal of Informatics, 151, 101204. 10.1016/j.joi.2021.101204
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101204 [Google Scholar]
  2. Abritis, A., McCook, A., & Retraction Watch
    (2017) Cash incentives for papers go global. Science, 3571, 541. 10.1126/science.357.6351.541
     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.357.6351.541 [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Hoorie, A. H., & Hiver, P.
    (2024) Open science in applied linguistics: An introduction to metascience. InL. Plonsky (Ed.), Open science in applied linguistics (pp.17–43). Applied Linguistics Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Aksnes, D. W.
    (2003) A macro study of self-citation. Scientometrics, 561, 235–246. 10.1023/A:1021919228368
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021919228368 [Google Scholar]
  5. COPE Council
    COPE Council (2019) COPE discussion document: Citation manipulation. July 2019 10.24318/cope.2019.3.1
     https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.3.1 [Google Scholar]
  6. Falagas, M. E., & Kavvadia, P.
    (2006) “Eigenlob”: Self-citation in biomedical journals. FASEB journal: Official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 201, 1039–1042. 10.1096/fj.06‑0603ufm
     https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.06-0603ufm [Google Scholar]
  7. Fassoulaki, A., Paraskeva, A., Papilas, K., & Karabinis, G.
    (2000) Self-citations in six anaesthesia journals and their significance in determining the impact factor. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 841, 266–269. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013418
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013418 [Google Scholar]
  8. Gao, F., & Wright, W. E.
    (2020) A systematic analysis of five years of research articles published in the Journal of Language, Identity, and Education (2015–2019). Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 191, 3–8. 10.1080/15348458.2020.1715760
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2020.1715760 [Google Scholar]
  9. Hyland, K.
    (2003) Self-citation and self-reference: Credibility and promotion in academic publication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 541, 251–259. 10.1002/asi.10204
     https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10204 [Google Scholar]
  10. Ioannidis, J. P. A.
    (2015) A generalized view of self-citation: Direct, co-author, collaborative, and coercive induced self-citation. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 781, 7–11. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.11.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.11.008 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2024) August 2024data-update for “Updated science-wide author databases of standardized citation indicators”, Elsevier Data Repository, V71. 10.17632/btchxktzyw.7
     https://doi.org/10.17632/btchxktzyw.7 [Google Scholar]
  12. Ioannidis, J. P. A., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N.
    (2015) Meta-research: Evaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology, 131, e1002264. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ioannidis, J. P. A., Baas, J., Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W.
    (2019) A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field. PLoS Biology, 171, e3000384. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000384
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000384 [Google Scholar]
  14. Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Maniadis, Z.
    (2023) In defense of quantitative metrics in researcher assessments. PLoS Biology, 211, e3002408. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002408
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002408 [Google Scholar]
  15. Krumrei-Mancuso, E. J., & Rouse, S. V.
    (2016) The development and validation of the comprehensive intellectual humility scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(2), 209–221. 10.1080/00223891.2015.1068174
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1068174 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kulkarni, A. V., Aziz, B., Shams, I., & Busse, J. W.
    (2011) Author self-citation in the general medicine literature. PLoS ONE61, e20885. 10.1371/journal.pone.0020885
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020885 [Google Scholar]
  17. Larsson, T., Plonsky, L., Sterling, S., Kytö, M., Yaw, K., Wood, M.
    (2023) On the frequency, prevalence, and perceived severity of Questionable Research Practices. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 21, 100064. 10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100064
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100064 [Google Scholar]
  18. Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Sugimoto, C. R., & Tsou, A.
    (2015) Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 661, 1323–1332. 10.1002/asi.23266
     https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23266 [Google Scholar]
  19. Manuscript Submission Guidelines: Language Testing
    Manuscript Submission Guidelines: Language Testing. (n.d.). Submission Guidelines. RetrievedMarch 4, 2025, fromhttps://journals.sagepub.com/author-instructions/LTJ
  20. Mishra, S., Fegley, B. D., Diesner, J., & Torvik, V. I.
    (2018) Self-citation is the hallmark of productive authors, of any gender. PloS One, 131, e0195773. 10.1371/journal.pone.0195773
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195773 [Google Scholar]
  21. Plonsky, L., Larsson, T., Sterling, S., Kytö, M., Yaw, K., & Wood, M.
    (2024) A taxonomy of questionable research practices in quantitative humanities. InP. I. De Costa, A. Rabie-Ahmed, & C. Cinaglia (Eds.), Ethical issues in applied linguistics scholarship (pp.10–27). John Benjamins. 10.1075/rmal.7.01plo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.7.01plo [Google Scholar]
  22. Poku, M.
    (2016) Campbell’s Law: Implications for health care. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 211, 137–139. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26731318. 10.1177/1355819615593772
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1355819615593772 [Google Scholar]
  23. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L.
    (1979) Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428. 10.1037/0033‑2909.86.2.420
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 [Google Scholar]
  24. Sudina, E., Bikmohammadi, M., & Plonsky, L.
    (in preparation). Self-citation attitudes and practices in applied linguistics: A mixed-methods study. Manuscript under review.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Szomszor, M., Pendlebury, D. A., & Adams, J.
    (2020) How much is too much? The difference between research influence and self-citation excess. Scientometrics, 1231, 1119–1147. 10.1007/s11192‑020‑03417‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03417-5 [Google Scholar]
  26. Taşkın, Z., Doğan, G., Kulczycki, E., & Zuccala, A. A.
    (2021) Self-citation patterns of journals indexed in the journal citation reports. Journal of Informetrics, 151, 101221. 10.1016/j.joi.2021.101221
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101221 [Google Scholar]
  27. TESOL Quarterly Submission Guidelines, General Submission Guidelines
    TESOL Quarterly Submission Guidelines, General Submission Guidelines. (n.d.). TESOL Quarterly — Wiley Online Library. RetrievedMarch 4, 2025, fromhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/page/journal/15457249/homepage/forauthors.html
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Van Noorden, R., & Chawla, D. S.
    (2019) Hundreds of extreme self-citing scientists revealed in new database. Nature, 5721, 578–580. 10.1038/d41586‑019‑02479‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02479-7 [Google Scholar]
  29. Xu, Y., Zhuang, J., Blair, B., Kim, A., Li, F., Thorson Hernández, R., & Plonsky, L.
    (2023) Modeling quality and prestige in applied linguistics journals: A bibliometric and synthetic analysis. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 131, 755–779. 10.14746/ssllt.40215
     https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.40215 [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhang, S., & Aryadoust, V.
    (2025) Why are some articles highly cited in applied linguistics? A bibliometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 47(1), 3–25. 10.1017/S0272263124000743
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263124000743 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00052.plo
Loading
Self-citation practices in applied linguistics
Journal of Second Language Studies 8, 264 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00052.plo
/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00052.plo
/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00052.plo
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): bibliometrics; questionable research practices; research ethics; self-citation

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error