1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Second Language Studies
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Adult second language acquisition under negligible exposure and no instruction
EPUB
PDF

Abstract

Abstract

This study investigates whether adult learners of Italian as a second language (L2) acquire Obligatory Control (OC) in non-finite gerundive adjuncts, which is the local relationship between the empty subject PRO in the adjunct and the subject of the main clause. Adjunct OC in Italian is neither frequent in input nor explicitly taught. In a self-paced reading experiment with a sentence similarity-judgment task, 34 participants with various L1s and proficiency levels were tested seven months apart. By the second session, participants were more accurate and faster at identifying the main clause subject as the PRO controller and showed faster reading times at the non-finite form in the target-probe matching condition. We explore whether proficiency, exposure, L1, input distribution, or a combination of factors may explain our results.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00053.ras
2025-10-03
2025-11-14

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00053.ras
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/jsls.00053.ras/jsls.00053.ras.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00053.ras&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ambridge, B.
    (2020) Against stored abstractions: A radical exemplar model of language acquisition. First Language, (), –. 10.1177/0142723719869731
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723719869731 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baayen, H.
    (2010) Demythologizing the word frequency effect: A discriminative learning perspective. The Mental Lexicon, (), –. 10.1075/ml.5.3.10baa
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.5.3.10baa [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, C. L.
    (1979) Syntactic theory and the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry(): –.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, (), –. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  5. Berwick, R. C., Pietroski, P., Yankama, B. and Chomsky, N.
    (2011) Poverty of the Stimulus Revisited. Cognitive Science, : –. 10.1111/j.1551‑6709.2011.01189.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01189.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Bley-Vroman, R.
    (1983) The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: The case of systematicity. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1983.tb00983.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1983.tb00983.x [Google Scholar]
  7. (1989) What is the logical problem of foreign language learning?InS. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. –). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524544.005
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524544.005 [Google Scholar]
  8. Boeckx, C., Hornstein, N. & Nunes, J.
    (2010) Control as movement. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511761997
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761997 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brezina, V. & Pallotti, G.
    (2019) Morphological complexity in written L2 texts. Second Language Research, , –. 10.1177/0267658316643125
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658316643125 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cook, V.
    (1999) Going beyond the Native Speaker in Language Teaching. TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.2307/3587717
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3587717 [Google Scholar]
  11. Corcoran, K., Epstude, K., Damisch, L. & Mussweiler, T.
    (2011) Fast similarities: efficiency advantages of similarity-focused comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, (), . 10.1037/a0023922. PMID: 21707213.
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023922 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cornips, L., Swanenberg, J., Heeringa, W. & de Vriend, F.
    (2016) The relationship between first language acquisition and dialect variation: Linking resources from distinct disciplines in a CLARIN-NL project, Lingua, , –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2015.11.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dabrowska, E., Becker, L. & Miorelli, L.
    (2020) Is Adult Second Language Acquisition Defective?Frontiers in Psychology, 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01839
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01839 [Google Scholar]
  14. De Mauro, T.
    (2016) Il Nuovo Vocabolario di Base della Lingua Italiana. Internazionale. https://www.internazionale.it/opinione/tullio-de-mauro/2016/12/23/il-nuovo-vocabolario-di-base-della-lingua-italiana
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Diessel, H.
    (2017) Usage-Based Linguistics. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. https://oxfordre.com/linguistics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-363
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Ellis, N. C.
    (1998) Emergentism, connectionism and language learning. Language Learning: –. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00063
     https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00063 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2002) Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition: –. 10.1017/S0272263102002024
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024 [Google Scholar]
  18. Flynn, S.
    (1987) A parameter-setting model of L2 acquisition. Dordrecht: Reidel. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑3747‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3747-5 [Google Scholar]
  19. Frank, S. L., Fernandez Monsalve, I., Thompson, R. L., and Vigliocco, G.
    (2013) Reading time data for evaluating broad-coverage models of English sentence processing. Behav. Res. Methods, –. 10.3758/s13428‑012‑0313‑y
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0313-y [Google Scholar]
  20. Geeraerts, D.
    (1994) Varieties of lexical variation. InEuralex 1994 Proceedings (Vol.).
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Gerard, J. & McDaniel, D.
    (2023) The Acquisition of Adjunct Control and Working Memory. Proceedings of the 47th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, ed.Paris Gappmayr and Jackson Kellogg, –. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Green, J.
    (2019) A movement theory of adjunct control, Glossa: a journal of general linguistics(): . 10.5334/gjgl.724
     https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.724 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gries, S. T.
    (2015) Statistics for learner corpus research. InG. Gilquin, S. Granger, & F. Meunier (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research (pp. –). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139649414.008
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139649414.008 [Google Scholar]
  24. Gries, S. Th.
    (2021) (Generalized linear) mixed-effects modeling: A learner corpus example. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12448
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12448 [Google Scholar]
  25. Gries, S. T., & Ellis, N. C.
    (2015) Statistical measures for usage-based linguistics. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12119
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12119 [Google Scholar]
  26. Heil, J., & López, L.
    (2020) Acquisition without evidence: English infinitives and poverty of stimulus in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1177/0267658319850611
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658319850611 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hornstein, Norbert
    (1999) “Movement and Control.” Linguistic Inquiry, (), –. 10.1162/002438999553968
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999553968 [Google Scholar]
  28. Jespersen, Otto
    (1954) A modern English grammar on historical principles. Part V, Syntax: Vol. 4. London: Allen and Unwin.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Jegerski, J. & Keating, G. D.
    (2023) Using self-paced reading in research with heritage speakers: a role for reading skill in the online processing of Spanish verb argument specifications. Frontiers in Psychology, , 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1056561
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1056561 [Google Scholar]
  30. Keating, G., & Jegerski, J.
    (2015) Experimental designs in sentence processing research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, , –. 10.1017/S0272263114000187
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000187 [Google Scholar]
  31. Landau, I.
    (2013) Control in Generative Grammar. A Research Companion. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139061858
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061858 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2014) A Two-Tiered Theory of Control. LingBuzz, https://lingbuzz.net/lingbuzz/001937/current.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  33. (2019) Control in Generative Grammar: A Research Companion (1st ed. 2013). Cambridge University Press
     [Google Scholar]
  34. (2021) A Selectional Theory of Adjuncts Control. The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/13925.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13925.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  35. (2024) Noncanonical Obligatory Control. Language and Linguistics Compass, . 10.1111/lnc3.12515
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12515 [Google Scholar]
  36. (2024c) Control. Cambridge Elements in Generative Syntax. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009243124
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009243124 [Google Scholar]
  37. Lee, H. & Berger, M.
    (2021) On the obligatory versus no control split in Korean. InA. Mucha, J. M. Hartmann and B. Trawinski (Eds). Non-canonical Control in a Cross-linguistic Perspective, Amsterdam-Philadelphia, John Benjamins, pp. –. 10.1075/la.270.04lee
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.270.04lee [Google Scholar]
  38. Lonzi, L.
    (1998) Avverbi e altre costruzioni a controllo. Bologna, il Mulino.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Lyngfelt, B.
    (2009) Control phenomena. InF. Brisard, J.-O. Östman, & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Grammar, Meaning and Pragmatics (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/hoph.5.02lyn
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.5.02lyn [Google Scholar]
  40. MacWhynney, B. & Bates, E.
    (1984) Cue Validity and Sentence Interpretation in English, German, and Italian. Journal Of Verbal Learning And Verbal Behavior, –. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(84)90093‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90093-8 [Google Scholar]
  41. Manzini, R.
    (1983) On Control and Control Theory. Linguistic Inquiry, , pp. –
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Manzini, M. R., & Roussou, A.
    (2000) A minimalist theory of A-movement and control. Lingua, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Marsden, E., Thompson, S. & Plonsky, L.
    (2018) A methodological synthesis of self-paced reading in second language research. Applied Psycholinguistics, –. 10.1017/S0142716418000036
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716418000036 [Google Scholar]
  44. Myles, Florence, Hooper, Janet, & Mitchell, Rosamund
    (1998) Rote or rule? Exploring the role of formulaic language in classroom second language learning. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00045
     https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00045 [Google Scholar]
  45. O’Grady, W.
    (2008) Language without grammar. InP. Robinson and N. Ellis (eds) Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. New York and London: Routledge, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. (2012) Three factors in the design and acquisition of language. WIREs Cognitive Science, (), –. 10.1002/wcs.1188
     https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1188 [Google Scholar]
  47. Parodi, T.
    (2000) Finiteness and verb placement in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1177/026765830001600403
     https://doi.org/10.1177/026765830001600403 [Google Scholar]
  48. Pérez-Tattam, R.
    (2007) Infinitival subordination in Spanish: A study of control, raising and ECM constructions in bilingual and non-native acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Ottawa, Ottawa. ON, Canada.
  49. (2011) Second language competence: The acquisition of complex syntax in Spanish. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Pienemann, M.
    (2015) An outline of processability theory and its relationship to other approaches to SLA. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12095
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12095 [Google Scholar]
  51. Polinsky, M.
    (2013) Raising and Control. Inden Dikken, M., ed.The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax. Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics. Cambridge University Press; :–pp–. 10.1017/CBO9780511804571.021
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804571.021 [Google Scholar]
  52. Rastelli, S.
    (2019) The Discontinuity Model: Statistical and Grammatical learning in adult Second Language Acquisition. Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1080/10489223.2019.1571594
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2019.1571594 [Google Scholar]
  53. (2024) The Frequency-Grammar Interface. Rules and Regularities in First and Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam-Philadelphia. John Benjamins Pulishing Company10.1075/bpa.20
     https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.20 [Google Scholar]
  54. Rizzi, L.
    (1997) The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In: Haegeman, L. (eds) Elements of Grammar. Kluwer International Handbooks of Linguistics. Springer, Dordrecht. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  55. (1986) Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Sheehan, M.
    (2018) Control of inflected infinitives in European Portuguese. InA. Gonçalves & A.-L. Santos (Eds.), Complement Clauses in Portuguese: Syntax and Acquisition (pp. –). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ihll.17.02she
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.17.02she [Google Scholar]
  57. (2020) “The Development of Exceptional Case Marking in Romance with a Particular Focus on French” Probus, vol., no. 2020, pp. –. 10.1515/probus‑2020‑0002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2020-0002 [Google Scholar]
  58. Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Spina, S.
    (2020) Development of formulaic knowledge in learner writing: A longitudinal perspective. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12378
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12378 [Google Scholar]
  59. Skytte, G. & Salvi, G.
    (1991) Frasi subordinate all’infinito, inRenzi, Lorenzo, Salvi, Giampaolo & Cardinaletti, Anna (eds.), Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, Bologna, il Mulino, vol., pp. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Sudina, E., & Plonsky, L.
    (2024) The effects of frequency, duration, and intensity on L2 learning through Duolingo: A natural experiment. Journal of Second Language Studies, (), –. 10.1075/jsls.00021.plo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00021.plo [Google Scholar]
  61. Szecsenyi, K.
    (2021) Control and covert modality in Hungarian: MECs and postverbal-only focus constructions. InA. Mucha, J. M. Hartmann and B. Trawinski (Eds). Non-canonical Control in a Cross-linguistic Perspective, Amsterdam-Philadelphia, John Benjamins, pp. –. 10.1075/la.270.06sze
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.270.06sze [Google Scholar]
  62. Tomasello, M.
    (2000) Do young children have adult syntactic competence?Cognition, , –. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(99)00069‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00069-4 [Google Scholar]
  63. Xanthos, A. & Gillis, S.
    (2010) Quantifying the Development of Inflectional Diversity, First Language, () –. 10.1177/0142723709359236
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723709359236 [Google Scholar]
  64. Wexler, K.
    (2020) “Arbitrary control instead of obligatory control in temporal adjuncts in Child Grammar: An ATTRACT analysis”. Linguistic Variation: Structure and Interpretation, edited byLudovico Franco and Paolo Lorusso, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, , pp. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Whelan, R.
    Effective Analysis of Reaction Time Data. The Psychological Record, – (2008) 10.1007/BF03395630
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395630 [Google Scholar]
  66. Williams, E.
    (1980) Predication. Linguistic Inquiry (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. 1992 Adjunct control. InRichard K. Larson, Sabine Iatridou, Utpal Lahiri & James Higginbotham (eds.), Control and grammar (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol.), –. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑7959‑9_9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7959-9_9 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00053.ras
Loading
Adult second language acquisition under negligible exposure and no instruction
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00053.ras
/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00053.ras
/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00053.ras
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: target-probe matching ; gerund ; obligatory control ; non-finite adjunct ; self-paced reading ; L2 Italian

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error