Research ethics awareness among practitioner-researchers of an intensive English as a foreign language program

References

1. AAAL Ethics Guidelines Task Force
   AAAL Ethics Guidelines Task Force (2017) AAAL ethics guidelines. Retrieved fromc.ymcdn.com/sites/www.aaal.org/resource/resmgr/AAAL_Ethics_Guidelines_-_App.pdf
2. American Psychological Association
   American Psychological Association (2017) Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, amended effectiveJune 1, 2010, and January 1, 2017). www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.html
3. Atai, M. R., Karimi, M. N., & Asadnia, F.
   (2018) Conceptions of research publication among Iranian doctoral students of applied linguistics: Cherish the wish to publish or rush to perish. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL), (), –.
   [Google Scholar]
4. British Association for Applied Linguistics
   British Association for Applied Linguistics (2016) Recommendations on good practice in applied linguistics (report). www.baal.org.uk/goodpractice_full_2016.pdf
5. Banasick, S.
   (2023) Ken-Q Analysis (Version 2.0.1) [Computer software]. 10.5281/zenodo.8310377
   https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8310377 [Google Scholar]
6. Bardi, M.
   (2015) Learning the practice of scholarly publication in English: A Romanian perspective. English for Specific Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.esp.2014.08.002
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.08.002 [Google Scholar]
7. Boyd, K., & Davies, A.
   (2002) Doctors’ orders for language testers: The origin and purpose of ethical codes. Language Testing, –. 10.1191/0265532202lt231oa
   https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532202lt231oa [Google Scholar]
8. De Costa, P. I.
   (Ed.) (2015) Ethics in applied linguistics research: Language researcher narratives. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315816937
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315816937 [Google Scholar]
9. Dikilitaş, K., & Bostancıoğlu, A.
   (2019) Inquiry and research skills for language teachers. Springer Nature. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑21137‑0
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21137-0 [Google Scholar]
10. Gass, S., Loewen, S., & Plonsky, L.
    (2021) Coming of age: The past, present, and future of quantitative SLA research. Language Teaching, , –. 10.1017/S0261444819000430
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000430 [Google Scholar]
11. Gilliland, B., Kunkel, M., Nguyen, T. H., Urada, K., & Christenson, C.
    (2023) Ethical dilemmas of teacher research in applied linguistics. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, (), . 10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100072
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100072 [Google Scholar]
12. Government of Saudi Arabia
    Government of Saudi Arabia (2016) Vision 2030. Saudi Government. https://www.vision2030.gov.sa/
    [Google Scholar]
13. Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L.
    (2004) Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, (), –. 10.1177/1077800403262360
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360 [Google Scholar]
14. Ioannidis, J. P. A.
    (2005) Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, , e124. 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 [Google Scholar]
15. Isbell, D. R., Brown, D., Chen, M., Derrick, D. J., Ghanem, R., Arvizu, M. N. G., Schnur, E., Zhang, M., & Plonsky, L.
    (2022) Misconduct and questionable research practices: The ethics of quantitative data handling and reporting in applied linguistics. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/modl.12760
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12760 [Google Scholar]
16. John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D.
    (2012) Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, , –. 10.1177/0956797611430953
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953 [Google Scholar]
17. King Saud University
    King Saud University (2015) Rules governing the ethics of scientific research (policy). https://dsrs.ksu.edu.sa/sites/dsrs.ksu.edu.sa/files/imce_images/aklqyat-new.pdf
18. Kubanyiova, M.
    (2008) Rethinking research ethics in contemporary applied linguistics: The tension between macroethical and microethical perspectives in situated research. Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2008.00784.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00784.x [Google Scholar]
19. Kwan, B. S. C.
    (2010) An investigation of instruction in research publishing offered in doctoral programs: The Hong Kong case. Higher Education, , –. 10.1007/s10734‑009‑9233‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9233-x [Google Scholar]
20. Larsson, T., Plonsky, L., Sterling, S., Kytö, M., Yaw, K., & Wood, M.
    (2023) On the frequency, prevalence, and perceived severity of questionable research practices. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, (), . 10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100064
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100064 [Google Scholar]
21. McKeown, B., & Thomas, D. B.
    (2013) Q methodology. Sage publications. 10.4135/9781483384412
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384412 [Google Scholar]
22. National Council on Bio Ethics
    National Council on Bio Ethics (2011) The law of ethics of research on living creatures. https://ncbe.kacst.edu.sa/media/v21nnihb/نظام-أخلاقيات-البحث-على-المخلوقات-الحية-النسخة-الإلكترونية.pdf
23. Pirotto, C., & Dykes, R.
    (2019) Quantitative methods: Mistakes to avoid. JALT CUE.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Plonsky, L.
    (2013) Study quality in SLA: An assessment of designs, analyses, and reporting practices in quantitative L2 research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263113000399
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000399 [Google Scholar]
25. Plonsky, L.
    (2014) Study quality in quantitative L2 research (1990–2010): A methodological synthesis and call for reform. Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2014.12058.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12058.x [Google Scholar]
26. Plonsky, L., Brown, D., Chen, M., Ghanem, R., Arvizu, M. N. G., Isbell, D. R., & Zhang, M.
    (2024) “Significance sells”: Applied linguists’ views on questionable research practices. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, (), 100099.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Sijtsma, K.
    (2016) Playing with data — Or how to discourage questionable research practices and stimulate researchers to do things right. Psychometrika, , –. 10.1007/s11336‑015‑9446‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0 [Google Scholar]
28. Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U.
    (2011) False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, , –. 10.1177/0956797611417632
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632 [Google Scholar]
29. Shagoury, R., & Power, B. M.
    (2023) Living the questions: A guide for teacher-researchers. Routledge. 10.4324/9781032681528
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032681528 [Google Scholar]
30. TESOL Research Professional Council
    TESOL Research Professional Council (2023) TESOL RPC Research Priorities Survey 2022: Report on Findings (Technical Report). TESOL International.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Thomas, M.
    (2009) Ethical issues in the study of second language acquisition: Resources for researchers, Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1177/0267658309349676
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658309349676 [Google Scholar]
32. Wood, M., Sterling, S., Larsson, T., Plonsky, L., Kytö, M., & Yaw, K.
    (2024) Researchers training researchers: Ethics training in quantitative applied linguistics. TESOL Quarterly. 10.1002/tesq.3323
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3323 [Google Scholar]
33. Wu, S., & Li, Z.
    (2024) How semantic prosody is acquired in novel word learning: Evidence from the “Double-Date Tree” effect. Acta Psychologica Sinica, (), –. 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2024.00531
    https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2024.00531 [Google Scholar]
34. Yaw, K., Plonsky, L., Larsson, T., Sterling, S., & Kytö, M.
    (2023) Research ethics in applied linguistics. Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1017/S0261444823000010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444823000010 [Google Scholar]