1887
image of The acquisition of copular constructions in European Portuguese by
Chinese native speakers
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This research targets the acquisition of copular constructions by Chinese learners of European Portuguese (EP), evaluating the impact of the potential absence of the copular verb in Chinese in the acquisition of EP and determining whether L2 learners associate the copular verbs and in EP with their [+/−stage-level] semantic values. Moreover, it intends to assess whether non-native speakers acquire non-default features of when it combines with a PP predicate locating events. 102 participants completed an acceptability judgment task including APs and PPs. The results demonstrate that learners readily acquire the features that configure the presence of the verb in EP and associate and with the adequate semantic values, but show greater difficulty in acquiring non-default features of ([+−level, +dynamic]). We relate this progression in the acquisition path to the hierarchy of meso-, micro- and nanoparameters proposed by the updated Bottleneck Hypothesis (Slabakova, 2019).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00061.san
2026-01-20
2026-02-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adger, D. and Ramchand, G.
    (2003) Predication and equation. Linguistic Inquiry, ():–. 10.1162/002438903322247515
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438903322247515 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker, M.
    (2001) The atoms of language: The mind’s hidden rules of grammar. Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (2008) The macroparameter in a microparametric world. InBiberauer, T. (ed.), The limits of syntactic variation, pp.–. John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.132.16bak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.132.16bak [Google Scholar]
  4. Balazs, J.
    (2012) The syntax of small clauses. Master’s thesis, Cornell University.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Benmamoun, E.
    (2000) The feature structure of functional categories: a comparative study of Arabic dialects. Number 16 in Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195119947.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195119947.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  6. Biberauer, T.
    (2011) In defence of lexico-centric parametric variation: Two 3rd factor-constrained case studies. InWorkshop on formal grammar & syntactic variation: rethinking parameters, Madrid.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Biberauer, T. and Roberts, I.
    (2015a) Rethinking formal hierarchies: a proposed unification. InChancharu, J., Hu, X., and Mitrovic, M. (eds.), Cambridge occasional papers in linguistics, volume, pp.–. University of Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (2015b) The significance of what hasn’t happened. InInvited talk presented at the workshop on language variation and change and cultural evolution (Centre for Linguistics History and Diversity, York University), York, United Kingdom.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bowers, J.
    (1993) The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry, ():–.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (2001) Predication. InBaltin, M. R. and Collins, C., (eds.). The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, Blackwell handbooks in linguistics. Blackwell Publishers. 10.1002/9780470756416.ch10
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756416.ch10 [Google Scholar]
  11. Carlson, G. N.
    (1977) Reference to kinds in English. Outstanding dissertations in linguistics. Garland Pub.
  12. Cheng, H.
    (2021) All structures great and small: on copular sentences with shì in Mandarin. LOT. OCLC: 1267989124.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Chomsky, N.
    (1981) Lectures on government and binding. Number 9 in Studies in Generative Grammar. Foris Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Comrie, B.
    (1976) Aspect: an introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge textbooks in linguistics. Cambridge Univ. Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dikken, M. D.
    (2006) Relators and linkers: the syntax of predication, predicate inversion, and copulas. The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5873.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5873.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  16. Duarte, I.
    (2003) Frases copulativas. InMateus, M. H. M., Brito, A. M., Duarte, I., and Faria, I. H., (eds.). Gramática da Língua Portuguesa, pp.–. Caminho.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Dussias, P. E., Contemori, C., & Román, P.
    (2014) Processing ser and estar to locate objects and events: An ERP study with L2 speakers of Spanish. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/resla.27.1.03dus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.27.1.03dus [Google Scholar]
  18. Espírito Santo, A.
    (2022) The acquisition of prepositional relative clauses in European Portuguese by native Chinese speakers [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Lisbon.
  19. Hengeveld, K.
    (1990) A functional analysis of copula constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Studies in Language, ():–. 10.1075/sl.14.2.03hen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.14.2.03hen [Google Scholar]
  20. Heycock, C.
    (2013) The syntax of predication. InDikken, M. D., (ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax, pp.–. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511804571.014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804571.014 [Google Scholar]
  21. Higgins, F. R.
    (1979) The pseudo-cleft construction in English. Garland Pub. OCLC:958351623.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Huang, C.-T. J., Li, Y.-H. A., and Li, Y.
    (2009) The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166935
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166935 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lardiere, D.
    (1998) Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar. Second Language Research, ():–. 10.1191/026765898672500216
    https://doi.org/10.1191/026765898672500216 [Google Scholar]
  24. (2009) Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, ():–. 10.1177/0267658308100283
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658308100283 [Google Scholar]
  25. Larson, R.
    (1991) Some issues in verb serialization. InLefebvre, C., (ed.), Serial verbs: grammatical, comparative and cognitive approaches, pp.–. John Benjamins. 10.1075/ssls.8.07lar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssls.8.07lar [Google Scholar]
  26. Leborans, M. J. F.
    (1999) La predicación: las oraciones copulativas. InI. Bosque & V. Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española 2 (pp.–). Espasa Calpe.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Li, C. N. and Thompson, S. A.
    (1974) Co-verbs in Mandarin Chinese: verbs or prepositions?Journal of Chinese Linguistics, :–.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (1977) A mechanism for the development of copula morphemes. InLi, C. N., (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change, pp. –. University of Texas Press. 10.7560/750357‑012
    https://doi.org/10.7560/750357-012 [Google Scholar]
  29. (1981) Mandarin Chinese: a functional reference grammar. University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520352858
    https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520352858 [Google Scholar]
  30. Milsark, G.
    (1974) Existential sentences in English. Garland.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Paul, W.
    (2015) New perspectives on Chinese syntax: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110338775
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110338775 [Google Scholar]
  32. Pérez-Leroux, A. T., Álvarez, Y., & Battersby, T.
    (2010) Cuando era feliz, e indocumentado: An Aspectual Approach to Copula Choice in L2 Spanish. InC. Borgonovo, M. Español-Echevarría, & P. Prévost (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 12th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Perpiñán, S. and Marín, R.
    (2021) Aspect in the acquisition of the Spanish locative paradigm by Italian L2 learners. InBaauw, S., Drijkoningen, F., and Meroni, L. (eds.), Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, pp. –. John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Perpiñán, S., Marín, R., and Moreno Villamar, I.
    (2020) The role of aspect in the acquisition of ser and estar in locative contexts by English-speaking learners of Spanish. Language Acquisition, ():–. 10.1080/10489223.2019.1610408
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2019.1610408 [Google Scholar]
  35. Pustet, R.
    (2003) Copulas: universals in the categorization of the lexicon. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199258505.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199258505.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  36. Raposo, E. B. P., Nascimento, M. F. B., Mota, M. A. C. D., Segura, L., and Mendes, A.
    (2013) Gramática do Português. Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Ribeiro, R.
    (2020) Sobre a semântica dos verbos ser e estar em português. Master’s thesis, Universidade do Porto.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Roberts, I. G.
    (2012) Macroparameters & minimalism: a programme for comparative research. InGalves, C., Cyrino, S. M. L., and Lopes, R. E. V. (eds.), Parameter theory and linguistic change, number 2 in Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics, pp. –. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659203.003.0017
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659203.003.0017 [Google Scholar]
  39. Slabakova, R.
    (2006) Is there a critical period for semantics?Second Language Research, ():–. 10.1191/0267658306sr270oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658306sr270oa [Google Scholar]
  40. (2008) Meaning in the second language. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110211511
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211511 [Google Scholar]
  41. (2009) What is easy and what is hard to acquire in a second language?InBowles, M., Ionin, T., Montrul, S. A., and Tremblay, A. (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th generative approaches to second language acquisition conference, pp.–, Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. (2019) The bottleneck hypothesis updated. InIonin, T. and Rispoli, M. (eds.), Three streams of generative language acquisition research: selected papers from the 7th meeting of generative approaches to language acquisition — North America, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, volume 63 of Language Acquisition Disorders, pp. –. John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.63.16sla
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.63.16sla [Google Scholar]
  43. Stowell, T.
    (1981) Origins of phrase structure. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.
  44. (1983) Subjects across categories. The linguistic review, ():–. 10.1515/tlir‑1983‑020305
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir-1983-020305 [Google Scholar]
  45. Sun, C.
    (2006) Chinese: a linguistic introduction. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511755019
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755019 [Google Scholar]
  46. Svenonius, P.
    (1994) Dependent nexus: subordinate predication structures in English and the Scandinavian languages. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California.
  47. Tsimpli, I. M.
    (2014) Early, late or very late?: Timing acquisition and bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1075/lab.4.3.01tsi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.4.3.01tsi [Google Scholar]
  48. Williams, E.
    (1980) Predication. Linguistic Inquiry, ():–.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00061.san
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.00061.san
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: copular constructions ; Bottleneck Hypothesis ; event location ; L2 acquisition
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error