Volume 1, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2542-3835
  • E-ISSN: 2542-3843
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


This study investigates the influence of L1 frequency on the acquisition of L2 idioms with an experiment employing structured input instruction based on the input processing model. Intermediate L2 Korean learners completed a pretest, computer-assisted instructional treatment session, and posttest. The tests included production, interpretation, and meaning tasks, which manipulated amount of context and idiom type (i.e., Shared L1-L2 idioms, which have linguistic representations in both languages and are subgrouped by high or low L1 frequency, and L2 Only idioms, which have no L1 equivalent). The results show that high L1 frequency had a consistently facilitatory effect on the learning of equivalent L2 idioms, but that context had the strongest effect on the learning of L2 idioms that have no counterpart in the L1.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Boers, F.
    (2000a) Metaphor awareness and vocabulary retention. Applied Linguistics, 21, 533–571.10.1093/applin/21.4.553
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.4.553 [Google Scholar]
  2. (2000b) Enhancing metaphoric awareness in specialised reading. English for Specific Purposes, 19(2), 137–147.10.1016/S0889‑4906(98)00017‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00017-9 [Google Scholar]
  3. (2009) Applied linguistics perspectives on cross-cultural variation in conceptual metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(4), 231–238.10.1207/S15327868MS1804_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1804_1 [Google Scholar]
  4. Boers, F. , & Demecheleer, M.
    (2001) Measuring the impact of cross-cultural differences on learners’ comprehension of imageable idioms. ELT Journal, 55(3), 255–262.10.1093/elt/55.3.255
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.3.255 [Google Scholar]
  5. Boers, F. , & Littlemore, J.
    (Eds.) (2003) Cross-cultural differences in conceptual metaphor: Applied linguistics perspectives [Special Issue]. Metaphor and Symbol. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Boers, F. , & Lindstromberg, S.
    (Eds.) (2008) Cognitive approaches to teaching vocabulary. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bortfeld, H.
    (2003) Comprehending idioms cross-linguistically. Experimental Psychology, 50, 217–230.10.1026//1617‑3169.50.3.217
    https://doi.org/10.1026//1617-3169.50.3.217 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, C.
    (1993) Factors affecting the acquisition of vocabulary: Frequency and saliency of words. In T. Huckin , M. Haynes , & J. Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp.263–286). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bybee, J.
    (2007) Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2008) Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp.216–236). New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Carrol, G. , Conklin, K. , & Gyllstad, H.
    (2016) Found in translation: The influence of the L1 on the reading of idioms in a L2. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(3), 403–443.10.1017/S0272263115000492
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000492 [Google Scholar]
  12. Charteris-Black, J.
    (2002) Second language figurative proficiency: A comparative study of Malay and English. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 104–133.10.1093/applin/23.1.104
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.1.104 [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen, Y. -C.
    (2016) Teaching figurative language to EFL learners: An evaluation of metaphoric instruction. The Language Learning Journal. doi: 10.1080/09571736.2016.1185798
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1185798 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cieślicka, A. B.
    (2011) Suppression of literal meanings in L2 idiom processing: Does context help?Studies in Second Language Acquisition and Teaching, 1(1), 13–36.10.14746/ssllt.2011.1.1.2
    https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2011.1.1.2 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cieślicka, A. B. , Heredia, R. R. , & Olivares, M.
    (2014) The eyes have it: How language dominance, salience, and context affect eye movements during idiomatic language processing. In L. Aronin & M. Pawlak (Eds.), Essential topics in applied linguistics and multilingualism: Studies in honor of David Singleton (pp.21–42). Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978‑3‑319‑01414‑2_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01414-2_2 [Google Scholar]
  16. Conklin, K. , & Schmitt, N.
    (2012) The processing of formulaic language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 45–61.10.1017/S0267190512000074
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000074 [Google Scholar]
  17. Davies, M.
    (2008) Corpus of contemporary American English. Available at corpus.byu.edu/coca
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Durrant, P. , & Schmitt, N.
    (2010) Adult learners’ retention of collocations from exposure. Second Language Research, 26(2), 163–188.10.1177/0267658309349431
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658309349431 [Google Scholar]
  19. Ellis, N. C.
    (2002) Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143–188.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (2008) Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learned attention, and the limited L2 endstate. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp.372–405). New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (2016) Frequency in language learning and language change. In H. Behrens & S. Pfänder (Eds.), Experience counts: Frequency effects in language (pp.239–254). Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ellis, N. C. , & Cadierno, T.
    (2009) Constructing a second language: Introduction to the special section. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 111–139.10.1075/arcl.7.05ell
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.7.05ell [Google Scholar]
  23. Ellis, R.
    (Ed.) (2005) Planning and task performance in a second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.11
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.11 [Google Scholar]
  24. File-Muriel, R. J.
    (2010) Lexical frequency as a scalar variable in explaining variation. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 55(1), 1–15.10.1353/cjl.0.0065
    https://doi.org/10.1353/cjl.0.0065 [Google Scholar]
  25. Gass, S. M.
    (1997) Input, interaction and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Goldberg, A.
    (2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Goldschneider, J. M. , & DeKeyser, R. M.
    (2001) Explaining the ‘natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition’ in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51(2), 1–50.10.1111/1467‑9922.00147
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00147 [Google Scholar]
  28. Granger, S. , Dagneaux, E. , Meunier, F. , & Paquot, M.
    (2009) International corpus of learner English (version 2). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Gyllstad, H. , & Wolter, B.
    (2016) Collocational processing in light of the phraseological continuum model: Does semantic transparency matter?Language Learning, 66(2), 296–323.10.1111/lang.12143
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12143 [Google Scholar]
  30. Jiang, N.
    (2000) Lexical representation and development in a second language. Applied Linguistics, 21, 47–77.10.1093/applin/21.1.47
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.1.47 [Google Scholar]
  31. Jiang, N. , & Nekrasova, T.
    (2007) The processing of formulaic sequences by second language speakers. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 433–445.10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2007.00589.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00589.x [Google Scholar]
  32. Laufer, B. , & Goldstein, Z.
    (2004) Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54, 399–436.10.1111/j.0023‑8333.2004.00260.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2004.00260.x [Google Scholar]
  33. Levelt, W. J. M.
    (1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Lowie, W. , & Verspoor, M.
    (2004) Input versus transfer? The role of frequency and similarity in the acquisition of L2 prepositions. In M. Achard & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp.77–93). Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199857.77
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199857.77 [Google Scholar]
  35. Madlener, K.
    (2016) Effects of type and token frequency manipulations in instructed second language learning. In H. Behrens & S. Pfänder (Eds.), Experience counts: Frequency effects in language (pp.133–173). Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110346916‑007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346916-007 [Google Scholar]
  36. Paquot, M.
    (2015) L1 frequency in foreign language acquisition: Recurrent word combinations in French and Spanish EFL learner writing. Second Language Research [Epub ahead of print March 5, 2016]. doi: 10.1177/0267658315620265
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658315620265 [Google Scholar]
  37. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Robinson, P.
    (2001) Task complexity, task difficulty and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27–57.10.1093/applin/22.1.27
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.27 [Google Scholar]
  39. Sanz, C. , & Morgan-Short, K.
    (2004) Positive evidence versus explicit rule presentation and explicit negative feedback: A computer-assisted study. Language Learning, 54(1), 35–78.10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2004.00248.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00248.x [Google Scholar]
  40. Siyanova-Chanturia, A. , Conklin, K. , & van Heuven, W. J. B.
    (2011) Seeing a phrase ‘time and again’ matters: The role of phrasal frequency in the processing of multi-word sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Language, Memory, and Cognition, 37(3), 776–784.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Sonbul, S.
    (2015) Fatal mistake, awful mistake or extreme mistake? Frequency effects on off-line/on-line collocation processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(3), 419–437.10.1017/S1366728914000674
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000674 [Google Scholar]
  42. Tomasello, M.
    (2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Türker, E.
    (2016a) The role of L1 conceptual knowledge and frequency in the acquisition of L2 metaphorical expressions. Second Language Research, 32(1), 25–48.10.1177/0267658315593336
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658315593336 [Google Scholar]
  44. (2016b) Idiom acquisition by second language learners: The influence of cross-linguistic similarity and context. The Language Learning Journal. doi: 10.1080/09571736.2016.1221441
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1221441 [Google Scholar]
  45. VanPatten, B.
    (1996) Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. (2003) Processing instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. (2004) Input processing in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp.5–31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. (2007) Input processing in adult SLA. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp.115–135). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Webb, S.
    (2007) The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 28, 46–65.10.1093/applin/aml048
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml048 [Google Scholar]
  50. Wolter, B. , & Gyllstad, H.
    (2011) Collocational links in the L2 mental lexicon and the influence of L1 intralexical knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 32(4), 430–449.10.1093/applin/amr011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr011 [Google Scholar]
  51. (2013) Frequency of input and L2 collocational processing: A comparison of congruent and incongruent collocations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(3), 451–482.10.1017/S0272263113000107
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000107 [Google Scholar]
  52. Wolter, B. , & Yamashita, J.
    (2014) Processing collocations in a second language: A case of first language activation. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(5), 1193–1221.10.1017/S0142716414000113
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716414000113 [Google Scholar]
  53. Yamashita, J. , & Jiang, N.
    (2010) L1 influence on the acquisition of L2 collocations: Japanese ESL users and EFL learners acquiring English collocations. TESOL Quarterly, 44(4), 647–668.10.5054/tq.2010.235998
    https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.235998 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): acquisition; context; frequency; idiom; Korean
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error