1887
Volume 2, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2542-3835
  • E-ISSN: 2542-3843
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study investigated the topic-prominent characteristics of the interlanguage development of native speakers of Chinese learning English as a foreign language (EFL). Two groups of Chinese EFL learners – an intermediate group and an advanced group – were recruited to complete two production tasks: a written Chinese-to-English translation task and an oral story-retelling task. The findings showed that Chinese EFL learners at each proficiency level transferred Chinese topic-prominent structures to their target language production at a varying degree. The topic-prominent constructions in the learners’ production, based on a hierarchy of difficulty, were placed on two slightly different Gradation Zones, one for written production and the other for oral production. Gradation Zones were a generalized reflection of how discourse and pragmatic relations in topic-prominent Chinese were gradually reanalyzed as syntactic relations with the development of learners’ English proficiency level. There was a tendency for topic-prominent features to decrease and subject-prominent features to increase as EFL learners’ proficiency level progressed. It was also argued that sources of these topic-prominent properties in interlanguage were an interaction of factors, including degree of markedness, perceptual saliency, second language (L2) input, and language production task type.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.17016.gon
2019-04-18
2019-09-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bland, S.
    (1981) Topic/comment sentences in English. Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics, 2, 32–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cai, J. T.
    (1998) The influence of Chinese topic-prominent features on Chinese EFL learners’ compositions. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 30(4), 17–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (2002) Topic structure transfer: An analysis of subjects loss in English output. Foreign Language Education, 23(4), 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chafe, W.
    (1976) Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. InW. Chafe (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp.25–55). New York, NY: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chao, Y. R.
    (1968) A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chaudron, C., & Parker, K.
    (1990) Discourse markedness and structural markedness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 43–64. 10.1017/S0272263100008731
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100008731 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, P.
    (1987) Discourse and analysis of Chinese zero anaphor. Chinese, 5, 16–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, P. T.
    (2009) Topic and topic-comment structures in first language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese. InY. Xiao (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st North American Conference on Chinese linguistics (NACCL-21) (pp.165–177). Smithfield, RD: Bryant University.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. den Dikken, M.
    (2005) A comment on the topic of topic-comment. Lingua, 115(5), 691–710. 10.1016/j.lingua.2003.11.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2003.11.005 [Google Scholar]
  10. Ding, S.
    (1961) Xiandai hanyu yufa jianghua [Talks on modern Chinese grammar]. Shanghai: Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Eckman, F. R.
    (1977) Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning, 27, 315–330. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1977.tb00124.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00124.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Fuller, J. W., & Gundel, J. K.
    (1987) Topic-prominence in interlanguage. Language Learning, 27(1), 1–18. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1968.tb01310.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1968.tb01310.x [Google Scholar]
  13. Gasde, H.-D., & Paul, W.
    (1996) Functional categories, topic prominences, and complex sentences in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics, 34, 263–294. 10.1515/ling.1996.34.2.263
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1996.34.2.263 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L.
    (Eds.) (1992) Language transfer in language learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.5 [Google Scholar]
  15. Givon, T.
    (1983) Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. InT. Givon (Ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study (pp.1–41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.3.01giv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.3.01giv [Google Scholar]
  16. Green, C. F.
    (1996) The origins and effects of topic-prominence in Chinese-English interlanguage. IRAL, 2, 119–134.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Green, C. F., Christopher, E. R., & Mei, J.
    (2000) The incidence and effects on coherence of marked themes in interlanguage texts: A corpus-based enquiry. English for Specific Purposes, 19, 99–113. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(98)00014‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00014-3 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gundel, J. K.
    (1988) Universals of topic-comment structure. InM. Hammond, E. A. Moravcsik & J. Wirth (Eds.), Studies in syntactic typology (pp.209–239). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.17.16gun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.17.16gun [Google Scholar]
  19. Han, Z.
    (2000) Persistence of the implicit influence of NL: The case of the pseudo-passive. Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 78–105. 10.1093/applin/21.1.78
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.1.78 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hong, X. H.
    (1956) Studies of the problems of Chinese syntax. Shanghai, China: Xin Zhishi Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Householder, F. W., & Cheng, R. L.
    (1967) Universe-scope relations in Chinese and Japanese. New York, NY: University of York.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Huang, S. F.
    (1973) Movement in Mandarin syntax. Bulletin of the College of Liberal Arts. National Taiwan University, No.22.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hwang, M. O.
    (1983) Topic continuity and discontinuity in Korean narrative. Korean Linguistics, 3, 47–75. 10.1075/kl.3.05moh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/kl.3.05moh [Google Scholar]
  24. Hyltenstam, K.
    (1984) The use of typological markedness conditions as predictors in second language acquisition: The case of pronominal copies in relative clauses. InR. Andersen (Ed.), Second language: A crosslinguistic perspective. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Jiang, Z.
    (1991) Some aspects of the syntax of topic and subject in Chinese. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.
  26. Jin, H. G.
    (1994) Topic-prominence and subject-prominence in L2 acquisition: Evidence of English-to-Chinese typological transfer. Language Learning, 44(1), 101–122.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Jung, E. H.
    (2004) Topic and subject prominence in interlanguage development. Language Learning, 54(4), 713–738. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2004.00284.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00284.x [Google Scholar]
  28. Kim, H. Y.
    (1989) Nominal reference in discourse: Introduction and tracking referents in Korean spoken narratives. InS. Juno (Ed.), Proceedings of Harward Workshop on Korean linguistics. Seoul, Korea: Hanshin.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lado, R.
    (1957) Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. LaPolla, R. J.
    (1990) Grammatical relations in Chinese: Synchronic and diachronic considerations. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
  31. (1993) Arguments against ‘subject’ and ‘direct object’ as viable concepts in Chinese. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, 63(4), 759–813.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. LaPolla, R. J., & Poa, D.
    (2006) Describing word order. InF. Ameka, A. Dench & N. Evans (Eds.), Catching language: The standing challenge of grammar writing (pp.269–295). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A.
    (1976) Subject and topic: A new typology. InC. Li & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Subject and topic (pp.457–489). New York, NY: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (1981) Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Li, S., & Yang, L.
    (2014) Topic prominence in Chinese EFL learners’ inerlanguage. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(1), 109–125. 10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.1.6
    https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.1.6 [Google Scholar]
  36. (2014) A discourse perspective of topic-prominence in Chinese EFL learners’ interlanguage. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 3(4), 190–197. 10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.4p.190
    https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.4p.190 [Google Scholar]
  37. Li, X.
    (2010) The influence of Chinese topic-prominent features on the acquisition of four types of English subjects. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(5), 80–94.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Lv, S. X.
    (1984) Hanyu Yufa Luwenji [A collection of essays on Chinese grammar]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshu Guan.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Ma, J.
    (1983/1898) Mashi Wentong [Ma’s Grammar]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Meng, W. Z.
    (1984) Zhuwei Weiyu Ju de Fanwei [On the subject-predicate predicate structure]. Beijing: Beijing University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Odlin, T.
    (1989) Language transfer: Cross-Linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524537
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524537 [Google Scholar]
  42. Qu, Y.
    (1994) Object noun phrase dislocation in Mandarin Chinese. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia.
  43. Register, N.
    (1990) Influences of typological parameters on L2 learners’ judgment of null pronouns in English. Language Learning, 40(3), 369–385. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1990.tb00668.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00668.x [Google Scholar]
  44. Rutherford, W. E.
    (1983) Language typology and language transfer. InS. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (pp.358–370). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Schachter, J., & Rutherford, W.
    (1979) Discourse function and language transfer. Working Paper on Bilingualism, 19, 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Selinker, L.
    (1966) A psycholinguistic study of language transfer. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Georgetown University.
  47. Shi, D.
    (2000) Topic and topic-comment constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Language, 76(2), 383–408. 10.1353/lan.2000.0070
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2000.0070 [Google Scholar]
  48. Simargool, N.
    (2008) Interlanguage passive construction. Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 97–103.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Tai, J. H-Y.
    (1973) A note on the ba-construction. Paper presented at the6th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Language and Linguistics. San Diego, California.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Teng, S.-H.
    (1974) Double nominatives in Chinese. Language, 50, 455–473. 10.2307/412218
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412218 [Google Scholar]
  51. Tsao, F.-F.
    (1979) A functional study of topic in Chinese: The first step towards discourse analysis. Taipei: Student Book C.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. (1990) Sentence and clause structure in Chinese: A functional perspective. Taipai: Student Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Wen, X.
    (1994) Topic prominence in the acquisition of Chinese existential sentences by English speakers. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 10(2), 127–145.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. White, L.
    (1987) Markedness and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 261–280. 10.1017/S0272263100006689
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100006689 [Google Scholar]
  55. Xiao, Y.
    (2002) The syntactic development of school-age Chinese-speaking children learning English. IRAL, 40, 235–271. 10.1515/iral.2002.012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2002.012 [Google Scholar]
  56. Xu, L.
    (2014) Topic prominence. InS.-Y. Wang & C. Sun (Eds.), Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics (pp.393–403). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Xu, L., & Langendoen, T.
    (1985) Topic structures in Chinese. Language, 61, 1–27. 10.2307/413419
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413419 [Google Scholar]
  58. Yang, L.
    (2008) Topic prominence in typological interlanguage development of Chinese students’ English. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Shanghai Foreign Studies University.
  59. Yang, L., & Li, S.
    (2012) Topic prominence in typological interlanguage development of Chinese students’ English. Journal of Cambridge Studies, 7(4), 126–141.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Yang, L., Yu, S., & Wang, J.
    (2003) Typological error analysis on interlanguage data. Teaching English in China, 9(3), 48–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Yip, V.
    (1995a) Interlanguage and learnability from Chinese to English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.11
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.11 [Google Scholar]
  62. (1995b) Interlanguage and typology: The case of topic-prominence. InL. Eubank, L. Selinker & M. S. Smith (Eds.), The current state of interlanguage (pp.17–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.73.03yip
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.73.03yip [Google Scholar]
  63. Yuan, B.
    (1997) Asymmetry of null subjects and null objects in Chinese speakers’ L2 English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 467–497. 10.1017/S0272263197004038
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197004038 [Google Scholar]
  64. Zhang, A. L., & Su, X. J.
    (2002) Topic-prominence structures and interlanguage. Journal of Foreign Languages, 4, 30–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Zhu, D. X.
    (1985) Yufu Dawen [Grammar: questions and answers]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshu Guan.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.17016.gon
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.17016.gon
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error