The effects of transliterations, thematic organization, and working memory on adult L2 vocabulary learning

References

1. Aiken, L. S. , & West, S. G.
   (1991) Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bassetti, B.
   (2008) Orthographic input and second language phonology. In T. Piske & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input matters in SLA (pp.191–206). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847691118‑013
   https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691118-013 [Google Scholar]
3. Brewer, W. F. , & Nakamura, G. V.
   (1984) The nature and functions of schemas. Center for the Study of Reading Technical Report, no.325.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Brysbaert, M. , & New, B.
   (2009) Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–990. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
   https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.977 [Google Scholar]
5. Choi, T. H.
   (2003, July). The effects of semantic and thematic grouping on learning efficiency and retention of the L2 vocabulary. Tokyo, Japan: Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Clauson, G.
   (2002) Studies in Turkic and Mongolic linguistics. New York, NY: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center
   Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center (2005) Iraqi basic language survival guide. Presidio of Monterey, CA.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Degani, T. , & Tokowicz, N.
   (2010) Ambiguous words are harder to learn. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 299–314. doi: 10.1017/S1366728909990411
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990411 [Google Scholar]
9. Degani, T. , Tseng, A. M. , & Tokowicz, N.
   (2014) Together or apart? Learning of ambiguous words. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 749–765. doi: 10.1017/S1366728913000837
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000837 [Google Scholar]
10. Elgort, I.
    (2011) Deliberate learning and vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Language Learning, 61, 367–413. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00613.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00613.x [Google Scholar]
11. Eriksen, B. A. , & Eriksen, C. W.
    (1974) Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143–149. doi: 10.3758/BF03203267
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203267 [Google Scholar]
12. Finkbeiner, M. , & Nicol, J.
    (2003) Semantic category effects in second language word learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 369–383. doi: 10.1017/S0142716403000195
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716403000195 [Google Scholar]
13. Folse, K. S.
    (2004) Vocabulary myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. doi: 10.3998/mpub.23925
    https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.23925 [Google Scholar]
14. Hayes-Harb, R. , & Cheng, H. -W.
    (2016) The influence of the Pinyin and Zhuyin writing systems on the acquisition of Mandarin word forms by native English speakers. Frontiers in Psychology, 7 (785). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00785
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00785 [Google Scholar]
15. Hu, C.
    (2008) Use orthography in L2 auditory word learning: Who benefits?Reading and Writing, 21, 823–841. doi: 10.1007/s11145‑007‑9094‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9094-6 [Google Scholar]
16. Kaushanskaya, M.
    (2012) Cognitive mechanisms of word learning in bilingual and monolingual adults: The role of phonological memory. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(3), 470–489. doi: 10.1017/S1366728911000472
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000472 [Google Scholar]
17. Kroll, J. F. , & Stewart, E.
    (1994) Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149–174. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1994.1008
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1008 [Google Scholar]
18. Kuznetsova, A. , Brockhoff, P. B. , & Christensen, R. H. B.
    (2013) lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package). R package version 2.0–3. 2013. Available from: CRAN.R–project.org/package=lmerTest
19. Linck, J. A. , Osthus, P. , Koeth, J. T. , & Bunting, M. F.
    (2014) Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. doi: 10.3758/s13423‑013‑0565‑2
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0565-2 [Google Scholar]
20. Morris, C. D. , Bransford, J. D. , & Franks, J. J.
    (1977) Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533. doi: 10.1016/S0022‑5371(77)80016‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80016-9 [Google Scholar]
21. Nelson, J. R. , Balass, M. , & Perfetti, C. A.
    (2005) Differences between written and spoken input in learning new words. Written Language & Literacy, 8, 25–44. doi: 10.1075/wll.8.2.04nel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.8.2.04nel [Google Scholar]
22. Park, M. S.
    (2015) Orthographic input and the acquisition of second language phonology: A review. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 40(3), 389–401.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Perfetti, C. A. & Hart, L.
    (2002) The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Verhoeven , C. Elbro , & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp.67–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/swll.11.14per
    https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.11.14per [Google Scholar]
24. Powell, M. J. D.
    (June 2009) The BOBYQA algorithm for bound constrained optimization without derivatives Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Cambridge University. DAMTP 2009/NA06. Retrieved2014-02-14.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Psychological Software Tools, Inc.
    Psychological Software Tools, Inc. (2000) E-Prime [Computer software]. Pittsburgh, PA.
26. Roediger, III, H. L. , & Karpicke, J. D.
    (2006) The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 181–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1745‑6916.2006.00012.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x [Google Scholar]
27. RStudio Team
    RStudio Team (2016) RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA. www.rstudio.com/.
28. Stroop, J. R.
    (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. doi: 10.1037/h0054651
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054651 [Google Scholar]
29. Tinkham, T.
    (1997) The effects of semantic and thematic clustering on the learning of second language vocabulary. Second Language Research, 13, 138–163. doi: 10.1191/026765897672376469
    https://doi.org/10.1191/026765897672376469 [Google Scholar]
30. Tokowicz, N. , Michael, E. B. , & Kroll, J. F.
    (2004) The roles of study-abroad experience and working-memory capacity in the types of errors made during translation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 255–272. doi: 10.1017/S1366728904001634
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728904001634 [Google Scholar]
31. Turner, M. L. , & Engle, R. W.
    (1989) Is working memory capacity task dependent?Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154 doi: 10.1016/0749‑596X(89)90040‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90040-5 [Google Scholar]
32. Waters, G. S. , & Caplan, D.
    (1996) The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Experimental Psychology, 49A, 51–79. doi: 10.1080/713755607
    https://doi.org/10.1080/713755607 [Google Scholar]