1887
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2542-3835
  • E-ISSN: 2542-3843
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

An auditory lexical decision task tests morphological decomposition and sensitivity to violations in inflection in late second language learners, early learners (heritage speakers), and native speakers of Russian. Two datasets compared reaction times and error rates to real Russian inflected nouns and nonce nouns. Two parameters of real nouns were manipulated: case (the nominative, or the oblique case), and inflection (overt or zero). Nonce nouns had (a) real stems and inflections combined in an illegal way (), and (b) inflected nonce stems (. Results suggest that heritage and late learners process inflectional morphology; however, their processing of inflected words is unreliable: they are willing to accept words with incongruent inflections. While no major differences were found in the processing patterns of early and late learners, a developmental trajectory was observed in both groups of learners: their sensitivity to violations in inflection improved with proficiency.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.17021.gor
2018-05-07
2019-11-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Akaike, H.
    (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723. doi: 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baayen, H. , Dijkstra, T. , & Schreuder, R.
    (1997) Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a dual parallel route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 94–119. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2509
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2509 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baayen, R. H. , Milin, P. , Filipović Đurđević, D. , Hendrix, P. , & Marelli, M.
    (2011) An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review, 118, 438–481. doi: 10.1037/a0023851
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023851 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bates, D. , Maechler, M. , Bolker, B. , & Walker, S.
    (2014) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-7. CRAN.Rproject.org/package=lme4
  5. Butterworth, B.
    (1983) Lexical representation. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production: Development, writing and other language processes (pp.257–294). London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Caramazza, A. , Laudanna, A. , & Romani, C.
    (1988) Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 297–332. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0277(88)90017‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90017-0 [Google Scholar]
  7. Clahsen, H. , Balkhair, L. , Schutter, J-S. , & Cunnings, I.
    (2013) The time course of morphological processing in a second language. Second Language Research, 29, 7–31. doi: 10.1177/0267658312464970
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312464970 [Google Scholar]
  8. Clahsen, H. , Felser, C. , Neubauer, K. , Sato, M. , & Silva, R.
    (2010) Morphological structure in native and nonnative language processing. Language Learning, 60, 21–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00550.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00550.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Coltheart, M. , Besner, D. , Jonasson, J. T. , & Davelaar, E.
    (1979) Phonological encoding in the lexical decision task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 489–507. doi: 10.1080/14640747908400741
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14640747908400741 [Google Scholar]
  10. Coughlin, C. E. , & Tremblay, A.
    (2013) Proficiency and working memory based explanations for nonnative speakers’ sensitivity to agreement in sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 647–647. doi: 10.1017/S0142716411000890
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000890 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2015) Morphological decomposition in native and non-native French speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 524–542. doi: 10.1017/S1366728914000200
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000200 [Google Scholar]
  12. Diependaele, K. , Lemhöfer, K. , & Brysbaert, M.
    (2013) The word frequency effect in first- and second-language word recognition: A lexical entrenchment account. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 843–863. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.720994
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.720994 [Google Scholar]
  13. Estivalet, G. L. , & Meunier, F. E.
    (2015) Decomposability and mental representation of French verbs. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, Article 4. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00004
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00004 [Google Scholar]
  14. Fang, Y.
    (2011) Asymptotic equivalence between cross-validations and Akaike information criteria in mixed-effects models. Journal of Data Science, 9, 15–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Feldman, L. B. , Kostić, A. , Basnight-Brown, D. M. , Filipović Đurđević, D. , & Pastizzo, M. J.
    (2010) Morphological facilitation for regular and irregular verb formations in native and non-native speakers: Little evidence for two distinct mechanisms. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 119–135. doi: 10.1017/S1366728909990459
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990459 [Google Scholar]
  16. Foote, R.
    (2015) The storage and processing of morphologically complex words in L2 Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. FirstView Article. doi: 10.1017/S0272263115000376
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000376 [Google Scholar]
  17. Forster, K. I. , & Forster, J. C.
    (2003) DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods Instruments and Computers, 35(1), 116–124. doi: 10.3758/BF03195503
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195503 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gor, K.
    (2015) Phonology and morphology in lexical processing. In J. W. Schwieter (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of bilingual processing (pp.173–199). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107447257.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107447257.007 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gor, K. , Chrabaszcz, A. , & Cook, S.
    (2017a) Processing of nonnative inflected words: Beyond affix stripping. Journal of Memory and Language, 93, 315–332. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.06.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.06.014 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2017b) A case for agreement: Processing of case inflection by early and late learners. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. doi: 10.1075/lab.16017.gor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.16017.gor [Google Scholar]
  21. Gor, K. , & Cook, S.
    (2010) Non-native processing of verbal morphology: In search of regularity. Language Learning, 60, 88–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00552.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00552.x [Google Scholar]
  22. Gor, K. , & Jackson, S.
    (2013) Morphological decomposition and lexical access in a native and second language: A nesting doll effect. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 1065–1091. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2013.776696
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.776696 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gor, K. , Kireev, M. , Chrabaszcz, A. , & Medvedev, S.
    (2017c) An fMRI study of morphological decomposition in the recognition of case-inflected nouns: Dissociation of inflection and case. Paper presented at the10th International Morphological Processing Conference, SISSA, Trieste, Italy, June 22-24, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hopp, H.
    (2010) Ultimate attainment in L2 inflection: Performance similarities between nonnative and native speakers. Lingua, 120, 901–931. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2009.06.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.06.004 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2013) Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability. Second Language Research, 29, 33–56. doi: 10.1177/0267658312461803
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312461803 [Google Scholar]
  26. Jacob, G. , & Kırkıcı, B.
    (2016) The processing of morphologically complex words in a specific speaker group. The Mental Lexicon, 11, 308–328. doi: 10.1075/ml.11.2.06jac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.11.2.06jac [Google Scholar]
  27. Jiang, N. , Hu, G. , Chrabaszcz, A. , & Ye, L.
    (2015) The activation of grammaticalized meaning in L2 processing: Toward an explanation of the morphological congruency effect. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(1), 81–98. doi: 1367006915603823
    https://doi.org/1367006915603823 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kirkici, B. , & Clahsen, H.
    (2013) Inflection and derivation in native and non-native language processing: Masked priming experiments on Turkish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 776–791. doi: 10.1017/S1366728912000648
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000648 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kuznetsova, A. , Brockhoff, P. , & Christensen, R.
    (2015) lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models. R package version 2.0-25. CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest
  30. Lehtonen, M. , & Laine, M.
    (2003) How word frequency affects morphological processing in monolinguals and bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 213–225. doi: 10.1017/S1366728903001147
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728903001147 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lehtonen, M. , Vorobyev, V. , Hugdahl, K. , Tuokkola, T. , & Laine, M.
    (2006) Neural correlates of morphological decomposition in a morphologically rich language: An fMRI study. Brain and Language, 98, 182–193. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.04.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2006.04.011 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lehtonen, M. , Vorobyev, V. , Soveri, A. , Hugdahl, K. , Tuokkola, T. , & Laine, M.
    (2009) Language-specific activations in the brain: Evidence from inflectional processing in bilinguals. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, 495–513. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2009.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2009.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  33. Lukatela, G. , Gligorijevic, B. , Kostić, A. , & Turvey, M. T.
    (1980) Representation of inflected nouns in the internal lexicon. Memory and Cognition, 8, 415–423. doi: 10.3758/BF03211138
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211138 [Google Scholar]
  34. Marantz, A.
    (2013) No escape from morphemes in morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(7), 905–916. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2013.779385
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.779385 [Google Scholar]
  35. Montrul, S. , & Foote, R.
    (2014) Age of acquisition interactions in bilingual lexical access: A study of the weaker language of L2 learners and heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18, 274–303. doi: 10.1177/1367006912443431
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006912443431 [Google Scholar]
  36. Montrul, S. , Foote, R. , & Perpiñán, S.
    (2008) Gender agreement in adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers: The effects of age and context of acquisition. Language Learning, 58, 503–553. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2008.00449.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00449.x [Google Scholar]
  37. Neubauer, K. , & Clahsen, H.
    (2009) Decomposition of inflected words in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 403–435. doi: 10.1017/S1366728912000648
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000648 [Google Scholar]
  38. Portin, M. , Lehtonen, M. , Harrer, G. , Wande, E. , Niemi, J. , & Laine, M.
    (2008) L1 effects on the processing of inflected nouns in L2. Acta Psychologica, 128, 452–465. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  39. Portin, M. , Lehtonen, M. , & Laine, M.
    (2007) Processing of inflected nouns in late bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 135–56. doi: 10.1017/S014271640607007X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271640607007X [Google Scholar]
  40. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Scontras, G. , Fuchs, Z. , & Polinsky, M.
    (2015) Heritage language and linguistic theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 6.1545. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01545
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01545 [Google Scholar]
  42. Sharoff, S.
    (2001) The frequency dictionary for Russian. Available at bokrcorpora.narod.ru/frqlist/frqlist-en.html (4December 2007).
    [Google Scholar]
  43. (2006) Methods and tools for development of the Russian Reference Corpus. Language and Computers, 56, 167–180.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Slioussar, N. , & Cherepovskaia, N.
    (2014) Case errors in processing: Evidence from Russian. InFormal approaches to Slavic linguistics: The First Hamilton Meeting 2013 (pp.319–338). Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Slioussar, N. , Stetsenko, A. , & Matyushkina, T.
    (2015) Producing case errors in Russian. In Y. Oseki , M. Esipova , & S. Harves (Eds.), Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics: The First New York Meeting 2015. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Stanners, R. F. , Neiser, J. J. , Hernon, W. P. , & Hall, R.
    (1979) Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 399–412. doi: 10.1016/S0022‑5371(79)90219‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90219-6 [Google Scholar]
  47. Taft, M.
    (1979) Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory and Cognition, 7, 263–272. doi: 10.3758/bf03197599
    https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03197599 [Google Scholar]
  48. (2004) Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 745–765. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000477
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980343000477 [Google Scholar]
  49. (2017) Cross-morphemic transposed letter effects argue against a single decompositional pathway. Paper presented at the10th International Morphological Processing Conference, SISSA, Trieste, Italy, June 22–24, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Tockowitz, N. , & MacWhinney, B.
    (2005) Implicit and explicit measures of sensitivity to viola-tions in second language grammar: An event related potential investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2, 173–204.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Vaida, F. , & Blanchard, S.
    (2005) Conditional Akaike information for mixed-effects models. Biometrika, 92, 351–370. doi: 10.1093/biomet/92.2.351
    https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/92.2.351 [Google Scholar]
  52. Voga, М. , Anastassiadis-Symeonidis, А. , & Giraudo, H.
    (2014) Does morphology play a role in L2 processing? Two masked priming experiments with Greek speakers of ESL. Lingvisticae Investigationes, 37, 338–352. doi: 10.1075/li.37.2.10vog
    https://doi.org/10.1075/li.37.2.10vog [Google Scholar]
  53. Yap, M. J. , Sibley, D. E. , Balota, D. A. , Ratcliff, R. , & Rueckl, J.
    (2015) Responding to nonwords in the lexical decision task: Insights from the English Lexicon Project. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 597–613. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000064
    https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000064 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.17021.gor
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.17021.gor
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error