Enacting voices

References

1. Bakhtin, M.
   (1981) The dialogic imagination. Four essays, M. Holquist (Ed.). (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. (Original work published in 1934)
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bayley, R., & Tarone, E.
   (2011) Variationist perspectives. InS. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp.41–56). New York, NY: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Beebe, L.
   (1980) Sociolinguistic variation and style-shifting in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 30, 433–47. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1980.tb00327.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1980.tb00327.x [Google Scholar]
4. Bell, A.
   (1984) Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13, 145–204. 10.1017/S004740450001037X
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001037X [Google Scholar]
5. Broner, M.
   (2001) Impact of interlocutor and task on first and second language use in a Spanish immersion program. CARLA Working Paper, 18. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Corder, S.
   (1967) The significance of learners’ errors. IRAL, 5(4), 161–70.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G.
   (2005) Analysing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Foster, P., & Skehan, P.
   (1996) The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299–323. 10.1017/S0272263100015047
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100015047 [Google Scholar]
9. Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G.
   (2000) Measuring spoken language. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354–75. 10.1093/applin/21.3.354
   https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.354 [Google Scholar]
10. Foster, P., & Wigglesworth, G.
    (2016) Capturing accuracy in second language performance: The case for a weighted clause ratio. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 98–116. 10.1017/S0267190515000082
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000082 [Google Scholar]
11. Geeslin, K., & Long, A.
    (2014) Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition: Learning to use language in context. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gorsuch, G., Meyers, C., Pickering, L., & Griffee, D.
    (2013) For ITAs: Techniques for improving discourse intonation. InEnglish communication for international teaching assistants (2nd ed., pp.167–74). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Kvernbekk, T.
    (2003) On identifying narratives. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 22, 267–79. 10.1023/A:1022869204722
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022869204722 [Google Scholar]
14. Labov, W., & Waletzky, J.
    (1967) Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 3–38. 10.1075/jnlh.7.02nar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.02nar [Google Scholar]
15. Lantolf, J.
    (2000) Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Lantolf, J.
    (2006) Sociocultural theory and L2: State of the art. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 67–109. 10.1017/S0272263106060037
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060037 [Google Scholar]
17. Lantolf, J., & Beckett, T.
    (2009) Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 42(4), 459–75. 10.1017/S0261444809990048
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444809990048 [Google Scholar]
18. Lantolf, J., Thorne, S., & Poehner, M.
    (2015) Sociocultural theory and second language development. InB. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed., pp.207–26). New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. LaScotte, D.
    (2016) ‘So please be nice in class!’: An analysis of the complexity, accuracy and fluency of two English learners’ language through a heteroglossic lens (Unpublished M.A. qualifying paper). University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. hdl.handle.net/11299/179951 (10September 2018).
20. LaScotte, D., & Tarone, E.
    (2019) Heteroglossia and constructed dialogue in SLA. Modern Language Journal, 103(Supplement 2019), 95–112. doi:  10.1111/modl.12533
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12533 [Google Scholar]
21. Laver, J.
    (1980) The phonetic description of voice quality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Lennon, P.
    (1990) Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning, 40, 387–417. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1990.tb00669.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00669.x [Google Scholar]
23. Long, M.
    (1998) SLA: Breaking the siege. University of Hawai’i Working Papers in ESL, 17, 79–129.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Mathis, T., & Yule, G.
    (1994) Zero quotatives. Discourse Processes, 18, 63–76. 10.1080/01638539409544884
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539409544884 [Google Scholar]
25. Meyers, C.
    (2013) Mirroring project update: Intelligible accented speakers as pronunciation models. TESOL Video News: The Newsletter of the Video and Digital Media Interest Sections. newsmanager.commpartners.com/tesolvdmis/issues/2013-07-27/6.html
    [Google Scholar]
26. Moreno, L.
    (2016) Channeling Charlie: Suprasegmental pronunciation in a second language learner’s performance of others’ voices (Unpublished M.A. qualifying paper). University of Minnesota. hdl.handle.net/11299/183052 (10 September 2018).
27. Selinker, L.
    (1972) Interlanguage. IRAL, 10, 209–41. 10.1515/iral.1972.10.1‑4.209
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209 [Google Scholar]
28. Selinker, L., & Douglas, D.
    (1985) Wrestling with ‘context’ in interlanguage theory. Applied Linguistics, 6, 190–204. 10.1093/applin/6.2.190
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/6.2.190 [Google Scholar]
29. Skehan, P., & Foster, P.
    (1999) The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49, 93–120. 10.1111/1467‑9922.00071
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00071 [Google Scholar]
30. Tannen, D.
    (1989) Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Tarone, E.
    (1979) Interlanguage as chameleon. Language Learning, 29, 181–91. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1979.tb01058.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1979.tb01058.x [Google Scholar]
32. Tarone, E.
    (1983) On the variability of interlanguage systems. Applied Linguistics, 4, 142–63. 10.1093/applin/4.2.142
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.142 [Google Scholar]
33. Tarone, E.
    (2000a) Still wrestling with ‘context’ in interlanguage theory. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 182–98. 10.1017/S0267190500200111
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500200111 [Google Scholar]
34. Tarone, E.
    (2000b) Getting serious about language play: Language play, interlanguage variation and second language acquisition. InB. Swierzbin, F. Morris, M. Anderson, C. Klee & E. Tarone (Eds.), Social and cognitive factors in SLA: Proceedings of the 1999 second language research forum (pp.31–54). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Tarone, E., & Liu, G.
    (1995) Situational context, variation and SLA theory. InG. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp.107–24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Vygotsky, L.
    (1981) The genesis of higher mental functions. InJ. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp.144–88). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Wiese, R.
    (1984) Language production in foreign and native languages: Same or different?InH. Dechert, D. Möhle, & M. Raupach (Eds.) Second language productions (pp.11–25). Tubingen: Gunter Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Yule, G.
    (1993) Reported discourse in contemporary English. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 26–27, 17–26.
    [Google Scholar]