1887
Volume 4, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2542-3835
  • E-ISSN: 2542-3843
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The present study aims to investigate the relationship between perceived cross-linguistic similarity and second language (L2) production. To this purpose, Egyptian Arabic learners of Greek in Cyprus who took part in a previous cross-linguistic perceptual study, completed a production test with respect to the Cypriot Greek vowels. The findings showed that perceived cross-linguistic similarity was linked with L2 production since along with the consideration of first language (L1)-L2 acoustic differences, it predicted most of the L2 vowel productions. Also, many L2 vowels were considerably longer than the corresponding L1 vowels. This can be interpreted as an L1 transfer since Egyptian Arabic vowels are longer in duration than the Cypriot Greek vowels. An interesting finding was that the production of the L2 vowels had only partial overlap with the productions of the L1 vowels, a finding that provides support for the hypotheses of the Speech Learning Model.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.19031.geo
2021-04-16
2021-05-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Almbark, R.
    (2012) The perception and production of SSBE vowels by Syrian Arabic learners: The foreign language model (Doctoral dissertation, University of York, York, UK). Retrieved frometheses.whiterose.ac.uk/3736/
  2. Antoniou, M.
    (2010) One head, two languages: Speech production and perception in Greek–English bilinguals (Doctoral dissertation, University of Western Sydney) Retrieved fromresearchdirect.westernsydney.edu.au/islandora/object/uws:8854
  3. Best, C. T.
    (1995) A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception: New Directions in Research and Theory. InW. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp.171–204). Baltimore: York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Best, C.
    (1999) Development of Language-Specific Influences on Speech Perception and Production in Pre-verbal Infancy. InProceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp.1261–1263). Department of Linguistics, University of California at Berkeley.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Best, C. T. , & Strange, W.
    (1992) Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants. Journal of Phonetics, 20(3), 305–330. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)30637‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30637-0 [Google Scholar]
  6. Best, C. T. , & Tyler, M.
    (2007) Non-native and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In O-S. Bohn & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp.13–34). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.17.07bes
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.07bes [Google Scholar]
  7. Birdsong, D. , & Molis, M.
    (2001) On the Evidence for Maturational Constraints in Second-Language Acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(2), 235–249. 10.1006/jmla.2000.2750
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2750 [Google Scholar]
  8. Boersma, P. , & Weenink, D.
    (2009) Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer software]. Retrieved fromwww.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bongaerts, T.
    (1999) Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation: The case of very advanced late learners. InD. Birdsong (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp.133–160). Mawhaw: LEA.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bongaerts, T. , Van Summeren, C. , Planken, B. , & Schils, E.
    (1997) Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(4), 447–465. 10.1017/S0272263197004026
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197004026 [Google Scholar]
  11. Caramazza, A. , Yeni-Komshian, G. , Zurif, E. & Carbone, E.
    (1973) The acquisition of a new phonological contrast: the case of stop consonants in French-English bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 5, 421–428. 10.1121/1.1913594
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1913594 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cheng, B.
    (2009) The relationship between speech perception and production in second language learners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 2754. 10.1121/1.4784618
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4784618 [Google Scholar]
  13. Flege, J.
    (2003) Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception. In A. Meyer & N. Schiller (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities (pp.319–355). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110895094.319
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110895094.319 [Google Scholar]
  14. Flege, J. E. , & Eefting, W.
    (1987) Production and perception of English Stops by native Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 15(1), 67–83. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)30538‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30538-8 [Google Scholar]
  15. Flege, J. E.
    (1995) Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp.233–277). Baltimore: York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Flege, J. E. , Frieda, E. M. , & Nozawa, T.
    (1997) Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics, 25(2), 169–186. 10.1006/jpho.1996.0040
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1996.0040 [Google Scholar]
  17. Fowler, C.
    (1980) Coarticulation and theories of extrinsic timing. Journal of Phonetics, 8, 113–33. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)31446‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31446-9 [Google Scholar]
  18. (1986) An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct realist perspective. Journal of Phonetics, 14, 3–28. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)30607‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30607-2 [Google Scholar]
  19. Georgiou, G. P.
    (2019a) ‘Bit’ and ‘beat’ are heard as the same: Mapping the vowel perceptual patterns of Greek-English bilingual children. Language Sciences, 72, 1–12. 10.1016/j.langsci.2018.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2018.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2019b) EFL teachers’ cognitions about pronunciation in Cyprus. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40(6), 538–550. 10.1080/01434632.2018.1539090
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2018.1539090 [Google Scholar]
  21. (2019c) Cue-reliance and vowel perceptual patterns of Cypriot Greek children who learn English. Journal of Experimental Phonetics, 28, 229–253.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (2018) Discrimination of L2 Greek vowel contrasts: Evidence from learners with Arabic L1 background. Speech Communication, 102, 68–77. 10.1016/j.specom.2018.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2018.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  23. Grasseger, H.
    (1991) Perception and production of Italian plosives by Italian learners. Actes du XIIème Congrès international des sciences phonétiques (pp.290–293). Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence, Service des Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Guillelmon, D. , & Grosjean, F.
    (2001) The gender marking effect in spoken word recognition: The case of bilinguals. Memory and Cognition, 29(3), 503–511. 10.3758/BF03196401
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196401 [Google Scholar]
  25. Ingram, J. C. L. , & Park, S.-G.
    (1997) Cross-language vowel perception and production by Japanese and Korean learners of English. Journal of Phonetics, 25(3), 1–28. 10.1006/jpho.1997.0048
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0048 [Google Scholar]
  26. Jilka, M.
    (2009) Talent and proficiency in language. In G. Dogil , S. Reiterer (Eds.), Language Talent and Brain Activity (pp.1–16). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Johnson, J. S. , & Newport, E. L.
    (1989) Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21(1), 60–99. 10.1016/0010‑0285(89)90003‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(89)90003-0 [Google Scholar]
  28. Ladefoged, P.
    (2003) Phonetic data analysis: an introduction to field work and instrumental techniques. USA: Blackwell Pub.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Leppik, K. , & Lippus, P.
    (2014) A comparative study of Estonian and Spanish vowels in L1 and L2 production. In K. Jähi & L. Taimi (Eds), XXVIII Fonetiikan päivät, Turku25–26, lokakuuta 2013. Konferenssijulkaisu. Turku, Finland: Turun Yliopisto.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Levy, E. S. & Law II, F. F.
    (2010) Production of French vowels by American-English learners of French: Language experience, consonantal context, and the perception-production relationship. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128, 1290–1305. 10.1121/1.3466879
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3466879 [Google Scholar]
  31. Liberman, A. & Mattingly, I.
    (1985) The Motor Theory of Speech Perception Revised. Cognition, 21, 1–36. 10.1016/0010‑0277(85)90021‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90021-6 [Google Scholar]
  32. Liberman, A. , K. Harris , H. Hoffman , & Griffith, B.
    (1957) The Discrimination of Speech Sounds Within and Across Phoneme Boundaries. J. Exp Psych, 54, 358–368. 10.1037/h0044417
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044417 [Google Scholar]
  33. Mack, M.
    (1990) Phonetic transfer in a French-English bilingual child. In P. H. Nelde (Ed.), Language Attitudes and Language Conflict (pp.107–124). Bonn: Duemmler.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Papachristou, V.
    (2011) Explicit vs. implicit pronunciation teaching to Greek children: The case of the acquisition of English vowels. Selected papers from the 19th International Symposium on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics (pp.371–381). Thessaloniki, Greece.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Sheldon, A. & Strange, W.
    (1982) The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English: evidence that speech production can precede speech perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3, 243–261. 10.1017/S0142716400001417
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400001417 [Google Scholar]
  36. Themistocleous, C.
    (2017) Modern Greek vowels and the nature of acoustic gradience. Phonetica, 74(3), 157–172. 10.1159/000450554
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000450554 [Google Scholar]
  37. Yeni-Komshian, G. H. , Flege, J. E. , & Liu, S.
    (2000) Pronunciation proficiency in the first and second languages of Korean–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Lang. Cognition, 3(2), 131–149.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.19031.geo
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.19031.geo
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Cypriot Greek , Egyptian Arabic , speech perception and speech production
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error