1887
image of Acquiring the core-peripheral distinction in split intransitivity
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study presents the results of an experimental investigation into the L2 acquisition of the core-peripheral distinction in the syntax of split intransitivity by L1 Mandarin EFL learners to verify whether or not their L2 acquisition is lexically constrained by the Split Intransitivity Hierarchy, which predicts that core verbs have primacy in both L1 and L2 acquisition over peripheral ones ( ). Two diagnostics of English split intransitivity, the prenominal past participles (PPPs) and the constructions, were used to test native English speakers and Mandarin EFL learners’ gradient acceptability with respect to core-peripheral verb classes. The results of an acceptability judgment test show that both native speakers and nonnative speakers are sensitive to the core-peripheral distinction in the two diagnostics, and EFL learners exhibit a native-like sensitivity to core unaccusatives in PPPs but not in the constructions. The results confirm that the core-peripheral distinction can be accounted for neither by L1 transfer nor L2 input, which suggests for the behavior is due to direct access to semantic universals in the L2 acquisition of split intransitivity syntax.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.19043.wu
2021-04-06
2021-04-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E., & Everaert, M.
    (Eds.) (2004) The unaccusativity puzzle: Explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bard, E. G., Frenck-Mestre, C., & Sorace, A.
    (2010) Processing auxiliary selection with Italian intransitive verbs. Linguistics, 48(2), 325–362. 10.1515/ling.2010.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2010.011 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, J.
    (2018) Split intransitivity in English. English Language & Linguistics, 23 (3), 557–589. 10.1017/S1360674317000533
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674317000533 [Google Scholar]
  4. Balcom, P.
    (1997) Why is this happened? Passive morphology and unaccusativity. Second Language Research, 13 (1), 1–9. 10.1191/026765897670080531
    https://doi.org/10.1191/026765897670080531 [Google Scholar]
  5. Borer, H.
    (2005) The normal course of events (Vol.2). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Burzio, L.
    (1986) Italian syntax: A Government-Binding approach. Dordrecht: Reidel. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑4522‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4522-7 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chung, T.
    (2014) Multiple factors in the L2 acquisition of English unaccusative verbs. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 52 (1), 59–87. 10.1515/iral‑2014‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2014-0003 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dowty, D.
    (1991) Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67, 547–619. 10.1353/lan.1991.0021
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1991.0021 [Google Scholar]
  9. Feng, S.
    (2019) The acquisition of English definite noun phrases by Mandarin Chinese speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41 (4), 881–896. 10.1017/S0272263118000323
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263118000323 [Google Scholar]
  10. Hoekstra, T.
    (1984) Transitivity. Grammatical Relations in Government-Binding Theory. Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783112327241
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112327241 [Google Scholar]
  11. Ionin, T., & Montrul, S.
    (2010) The role of L1 transfer in the interpretation of articles with definite plurals in L2 English. Language learning, 60(4), 877–925. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00577.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00577.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Ju, M. K.
    2000 Overpassivization errors by second language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 85–111. 10.1017/S0272263100001042
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100001042 [Google Scholar]
  13. Keller, F., & Sorace, A.
    (2003) Gradient auxiliary selection and impersonal passivization in German: an experimental investigation. Journal of Linguistics, 39, 57–108. 10.1017/S0022226702001676
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226702001676 [Google Scholar]
  14. Laws, J., & Yuan, B.
    (2010) Is the core-peripheral distinction for unaccusative verbs cross-linguistically consistent?: Empirical evidence from Mandarin. Mandarin Language and Discourse, 1 (2), 220–263.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Levin, B. & M. Rappaport
    (1986) The formation of adjectival passives. Linguistic Inquiry, 17 (4), 623–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M.
    (1995) Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Montrul, S.
    (2001) Agentive verbs of manner of motion in Spanish and English as second languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23 (2), 171–206. 10.1017/S0272263101002030
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101002030 [Google Scholar]
  18. (2004) Psycholinguistic evidence for split intransitivity in Spanish second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 239–267. 10.1017/S0142716404001122
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716404001122 [Google Scholar]
  19. Oshita, H.
    (1997) The unaccusative trap: L2 acquisition of English intransitive verbs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Perlmutter, D.
    (1978) Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Berkeley Linguistic Society, 4, 157–189. 10.3765/bls.v4i0.2198
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v4i0.2198 [Google Scholar]
  21. Rothstein, S.
    (2008) Structuring events: A study in the semantics of lexical aspect. John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Schwartz, B., & Sprouse, R.
    (1996) L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40–72. 10.1177/026765839601200103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839601200103 [Google Scholar]
  23. Schoorlemmer, M.
    (2004) Syntactic unaccusativity in Russian. InAlexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E., & Everaert, M. (Eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle: Explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface (pp.207–42). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
  24. Slabakova, R.
    (2000) L1 transfer revisited: the L2 acquisition of telicity marking in English by Spanish and Bulgarian native speakers. Linguistics, 38(4), 739–770. 10.1515/ling.2000.004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2000.004 [Google Scholar]
  25. Smith, C. S.
    (1997) The parameter of aspect (2nd Ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5606‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5606-6 [Google Scholar]
  26. Sorace, A.
    (1993) Incomplete vs. divergent representations of unaccusativity in non-native grammars of Italian. Second Language Research, 9, 22–47. 10.1177/026765839300900102
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839300900102 [Google Scholar]
  27. (1995) Acquiring linking rules and argument structures in a second language: The unaccusative/unergative distinction. InL. Eubank, L. Selinker, & M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), The current state of interlanguage (pp.153–175). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/z.73.13sor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.73.13sor [Google Scholar]
  28. (2000) Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs. Language, 76, 859–890. 10.2307/417202
    https://doi.org/10.2307/417202 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2004) Gradience at the lexicon-syntax interface: evidence from auxiliary selection. InA. Alexiadou, M. Everaert, & E. Anagnostopoulou (Eds.), The Unaccusativity Puzzle (pp.243–268). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2011) Gradience in split intransitivity: the end of the unaccusative hyposthesis. Archivio Glottologico Italiano, 96, 67–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sorace, A., & Shomura, Y.
    (2001) Lexical constraints on the acquisition of split intransitivity: Evidence from L2 Japanese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23 (2), 247–278. 10.1017/S0272263101002066
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101002066 [Google Scholar]
  32. Tenny, C. L.
    (1987) Grammaticalizing aspect and affectedness. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Van Hout, A.
    (2004) Telicity Checking. InAlexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E., & Everaert, M. (Eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle: Explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface (pp.60–83). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  34. Van Valin, R. D.
    (1990) Semantic parameters of split intransitivity. Language, 66, 221–260. 10.2307/414886
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414886 [Google Scholar]
  35. White, L.
    (2003) Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511815065
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815065 [Google Scholar]
  36. Yip, V.
    (1995) Interlanguage and learnability: From Mandarin to English. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.11
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.11 [Google Scholar]
  37. Yuan, B.
    (1999) Acquiring the unaccusative/unergative distinction in a second language: evidence from English-speaking learners of L2 Mandarin. Linguistics, 37, 275–296. 10.1515/ling.37.2.275
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.37.2.275 [Google Scholar]
  38. Zaenen, A.
    (1993) Unaccusativity in Dutch: Integrating syntax and lexical semantics. InSemantics and the Lexicon (pp.129–161). Springer, Dordrecht. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑1972‑6_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1972-6_9 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.19043.wu
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.19043.wu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error