Of revistas and magacínes

References

1. Adler, R. M., Valdés Kroff, J. R., & Novick, J. M.
   (2020) Does integrating a code-switch during comprehension engage cognitive control?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(4), 741.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Alnæs, D., Sneve, M. H., Espeseth, T., Endestad, T., van de Pavert, S. H. P., & Laeng, B.
   (2014) Pupil size signals mental effort deployed during multiple object tracking and predicts brain activity in the dorsal attention network and the locus coeruleus. Journal of Vision, 14(1), 1–20. 10.1167/14.4.1
   https://doi.org/10.1167/14.4.1 [Google Scholar]
3. Andrews, S.
   (1992) Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(2), 234–254.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D.
   (2005) An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. The Annual Review of Neuroscience, 28, 403–450. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709
   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709 [Google Scholar]
5. Attar, N., Schneps, M., & Pomplun, M.
   (2013) Pupil size as a measure of working memory load during a complex visual search task. Journal of Vision, 13, 160. 10.1167/13.9.160
   https://doi.org/10.1167/13.9.160 [Google Scholar]
6. Backus, A.
   (2012) A usage-based approach to borrowability. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies, 27.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Beatty, J., & Kahneman, D.
   (1996) Pupillary changes in two memory tasks. Psychonomic Science, 5, 371–372. 10.3758/BF03328444
   https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03328444 [Google Scholar]
8. Beatty-Martínez, A. L., & Dussias, P. E.
   (2017) Bilingual experience shapes language processing: Evidence from codeswitching. Journal of Memory and Language, 95, 173–189. 10.1016/j.jml.2017.04.002
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.04.002 [Google Scholar]
9. Blanco-Elorrieta, E., & Pylkkänen, L.
   (2017) Bilingual language switching in the lab vs. in the wild: The spatio-temporal dynamics of adaptive language control. Journal of Neuroscience, 37, 9022–9036. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0553‑17.2017
   https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0553-17.2017 [Google Scholar]
10. Blanco-Elorrieta, E., & Pylkkänen, L.
    (2018) Ecological Validity in Bilingualism Research and the Bilingual Advantage. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(12), 1117–1126. 10.1016/j.tics.2018.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.10.001 [Google Scholar]
11. Boada, R., Sánchez-Casas, R., Gavilán, J. M., Garcia-Albea, J. E., & Tokowicz, N.
    (2013) Effect of multiple translations and cognate status on translation recognition performance of balanced bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(1), 183–197. 10.1017/S1366728912000223
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000223 [Google Scholar]
12. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
    (2020) Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.1.09, retrieved fromwww.praat.org/
13. Bosma, E., Blom, E., Hoekstra, E., & Versloot, A.
    (2019) A longitudinal study on the gradual cognate facilitation effect in bilingual children’s Frisian receptive vocabulary. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(4), 371–385. 10.1080/13670050.2016.1254152
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2016.1254152 [Google Scholar]
14. Bradshaw, J. L.
    (1967) Pupil size as a measure of arousal during information processing. Nature, 216, 515–516. 10.1038/216515a0
    https://doi.org/10.1038/216515a0 [Google Scholar]
15. Byers-Heinlein, K., Morin-Lessard, E., & Lew-Williams, C.
    (2017) Bilingual infants control their languages as they listen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(34), 9032–9037. 10.1073/pnas.1703220114
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1703220114 [Google Scholar]
16. Carrol, S. E.
    (1992) On cognates. Second Language Research, 8(2), 93–119.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Costa, A., Caramazza, A., & Sebastian-Gallés, N.
    (2000) The cognate facilitation effect: implications for models of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(5), 1283.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Davies, M.
    (2016–) Corpus del Español: Two billion words, 21 countries. Available online atwww.corpusdelespanol.org/web-dial/. (Web / Dialects)
19. Delong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., Groppe, D. M., & Kutas, M.
    (2011) Overlapping dual ERP responses to low cloze probability sentence continuations. Psychophysiology, 48(9), 1203–1207. 10.1111/j.1469‑8986.2011.01199.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01199.x [Google Scholar]
20. Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & Van Heuven, W. J.
    (1999) Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and language, 41(4), 496–518. 10.1006/jmla.1999.2654
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2654 [Google Scholar]
21. Dijkstra, T., Miwa, K., Brummelhuis, B., Sappelli, M., & Baayen, H.
    (2010) How cross-language similarity and task demands affect cognate recognition. Journal of Memory and language, 62(3), 284–301. 10.1016/j.jml.2009.12.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.12.003 [Google Scholar]
22. Elston-Güttler, K. E., Gunter, T. C., & Kotz, S. A.
    (2005) Zooming into L2: Global language context and adjustment affect processing of interlingual homographs in sentences. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 57–70. 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.04.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.04.007 [Google Scholar]
23. Fasiolo, M., Nedellec, R., Goude, Y., & Wood, S. N.
    (2018) Scalable visualisation methods for modern Generalized Additive Models. Arxiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.03307
    [Google Scholar]
24. Foote, S. L., & Morrison, J. H.
    (1987) Extrathalamic modulation of cortical function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 10, 67–95. 10.1146/annurev.ne.10.030187.000435
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.10.030187.000435 [Google Scholar]
25. Fricke, M., Kroll, J. F., & Dussias, P. E.
    (2016) Phonetic variation in bilingual speech: A lens for studying the production-comprehension link. Journal of Memory and Language, 89, 110–137. 10.1016/j.jml.2015.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.10.001 [Google Scholar]
26. Gabay, S., Pertzov, Y., & Henik, A.
    (2011) Orienting of attention, pupil size, and the norepinephrine system. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 123–129. 10.3758/s13414‑010‑0015‑4
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-010-0015-4 [Google Scholar]
27. Gagl, B., Hawelka, S., & Hutzler, F.
    (2011) Systematic influence of gaze position on pupil size measurement: analysis and correction. Behavior Research Methods, 43(4), 1171–1181. 10.3758/s13428‑011‑0109‑5
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0109-5 [Google Scholar]
28. Goldrick, M., Putnam, M., & Schwartz, L.
    (2016) Coactivation in bilingual grammars: A computational account of code mixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(5), 857–876. 10.1017/S1366728915000802
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000802 [Google Scholar]
29. Goldwater, B. C.
    (1972) Psychological significance of pupillary movements. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 340–355. 10.1037/h0032456
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032456 [Google Scholar]
30. Gollan, T. H., Slattery, T. J., Goldenberg, D., Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Rayner, K.
    (2011) Frequency drives lexical access in reading but not in speaking: The frequency-lag hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(2), 186. 10.1037/a0022256
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022256 [Google Scholar]
31. Grosjean, F.
    (1995) A psycholinguistic approach to code-switching: The recognition of guest words by bilinguals. One speaker, two languages: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on code-switching, 259–275. 10.1017/CBO9780511620867.012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620867.012 [Google Scholar]
32. Guasch, M., Ferré, P., & Haro, J.
    (2017) Pupil dilation is sensitive to the cognate status of words: further evidence for non-selectivity in bilingual lexical access. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(1), 49–54. 10.1017/S1366728916000651
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916000651 [Google Scholar]
33. Gunter, T. C., Friederici, A. D., & Schriefers, H.
    (2006) Syntactic Gender and Semantic Expectancy: ERPs Reveal Early Autonomy and Late Interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(4), 556–568. 10.1162/089892900562336
    https://doi.org/10.1162/089892900562336 [Google Scholar]
34. Hartsuiker, R. J., Pickering, M. J., & Veltkamp, E.
    (2004) Is Syntax Separate or Shared between Languages? Cross-Linguistic Syntactic Priming in Spanish-English Bilinguals. Psychological Science, 15(6), 409–414. 10.1111/j.0956‑7976.2004.00693.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00693.x [Google Scholar]
35. Haspelmath, M.
    (2009) Lexical borrowing: Concepts and issues. InM. Haspelmath and U. Tadmor (Eds.), Loanwords in the World’s Languages (pp.35–54). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110218442.35
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110218442.35 [Google Scholar]
36. Hoshino, N., & Kroll, J. F.
    (2008) Cognate effects in picture naming: Does cross-language activation survive a change of script?Cognition, 106(1), 501–511. 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.001 [Google Scholar]
37. Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H.
    (1998) Discrete serial versus cascaded processing in lexical access in speech production: Further evidence from the coactivation of near-synonyms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(5), 1256–1274.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Johns, M. A., Valdés Kroff, J. R., & Dussias, P. E.
    (2019) Mixing things up: How blocking and mixing affect the processing of codemixed sentences. International Journal of Bilingualism, 23(2), 584–611. 10.1177/1367006917752570
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006917752570 [Google Scholar]
39. Kay, G.
    (1995) English loanwords in Japanese. World Englishes, 14(1), 67–76. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.1995.tb00340.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1995.tb00340.x [Google Scholar]
40. Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M.
    (2010) Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator. Behavior Research Methods42(3), 627–633. 10.3758/BRM.42.3.627
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.3.627 [Google Scholar]
41. Kuchinsky, S. E., Ahlstrom, J. B., Vaden Jr., K. I., Cute, S. L., Humes, L. E., Dubno, J. R., & Eckert, M. A.
    (2013) Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss. Psychophysiology, 50, 23–34. 10.1111/j.1469‑8986.2012.01477.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01477.x [Google Scholar]
42. Kuitert, S. R.
    (2013) English Loanwords in Norwegian: A Loanword Processing Study in Young Speakers of Norwegian (Master’s thesis, Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet, Trondheim, Norway). Retrieved from: https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/handle/11250/243497
    [Google Scholar]
43. Kutas, M. & Hillyard, S. A.
    (1980a) Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203–205. 10.1126/science.7350657
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7350657 [Google Scholar]
44. Kutas, M. & Hillyard, S. A.
    (1980b) Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words. Biological Psychology, 11(2), 99–116. 10.1016/0301‑0511(80)90046‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(80)90046-0 [Google Scholar]
45. Kutas, M. & Hillyard, S. A.
    (1984) Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 161–163. 10.1038/307161a0
    https://doi.org/10.1038/307161a0 [Google Scholar]
46. Lagrou, E., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Duyck, W.
    (2011) Knowledge of a second language influences auditory word recognition in the native language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(4), 952–965.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Libben, M. R., & Titone, D. A.
    (2009) Bilingual lexical access in context: evidence from eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(2), 381.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Linck, J. A., Kroll, J. F., & Sunderman, G.
    (2009) Losing access to the native language while immersed in a second language: Evidence for the role of inhibition in second-language learning. Psychological Science, 20(12), 1507–1515. 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2009.02480.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02480.x [Google Scholar]
49. Litcofsky, K. A., & Van Hell, J. G.
    (2017) Switching direction affects switching costs: Behavioral, ERP, and time-frequency analyses of intra-sentential codeswitching. Neuropsychologia, 97, 112–139. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.02.002 [Google Scholar]
50. Makowski, D.
    (2018) The Psycho Package: An Efficient and Publishing-Oriented Workflow for Psychological Science. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(22), 470. Available fromhttps://github.com/neuropsychology/psycho.R. 10.21105/joss.00470
    https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00470 [Google Scholar]
51. Morales, A.
    (2009) Diccionario de anglicismos actuales: fotografía desde la Internet. Academia Puertorriqueña de la Lengua Española.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Moreno, E. M., Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M.
    (2002) Switching Languages, Switching Palabras (Words): An Electrophysiological Study of Code Switching. Brain and Language, 80, 188–207. 10.1006/brln.2001.2588
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2588 [Google Scholar]
53. Muysken, P.
    (2013) Language contact outcomes as the result of bilingual optimization strategies. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(4), 709–730. 10.1017/S1366728912000727
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000727 [Google Scholar]
54. Myers-Scotton, C.
    (1993) Duelling Languages. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Myers-Scotton, C.
    (2002) Contact linguistics: Bilingual encounters and grammatical outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299530.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299530.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
56. Myers-Scotton, C.
    (2006) Multiple voices: An introduction to bilingualism. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Peeters, D., Dijkstra, T., & Grainger, J.
    (2013) The representation and processing of identical cognates by late bilinguals: RT and ERP effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(4), 315–332. 10.1016/j.jml.2012.12.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.12.003 [Google Scholar]
58. Poplack, S.
    (1980) Sometimes I’ll start a sentence in Spanish y termino en español. Linguistics, 18(7/8), 581–618. 10.1515/ling.1980.18.7‑8.581
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1980.18.7-8.581 [Google Scholar]
59. Poplack, S.
    (2012) What does the Nonce Borrowing Hypothesis hypothesize?Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(3), 644–648. 10.1017/S1366728911000496
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000496 [Google Scholar]
60. Poplack, S.
    (2018) Borrowing: Loanwords in the Speech Community and in the Grammar. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Poplack, S., Sankoff, M., & Miller, C.
    (1988) The social correlates and linguistic processes of lexical borrowing and assimilation. Linguistics, 26, 47–104. 10.1515/ling.1988.26.1.47
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1988.26.1.47 [Google Scholar]
62. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: https://www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
63. Samuels, E. R., & Szabadi, E.
    (2008) Functional neuroanatomy of the noradrenergic locus coeruleus: its role in the regulation of arousal and autonomic function part I: principles of functional organisation. Current Neuropharmacology, 6, 235–253. 10.2174/157015908785777229
    https://doi.org/10.2174/157015908785777229 [Google Scholar]
64. Sankoff, D., Poplack, S., & Vanniarajan, S.
    (1990) The case of the nonce loan in Tamil. Language Variation and Change, 2, 71–101. 10.1017/S0954394500000272
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500000272 [Google Scholar]
65. Schmid, H. J.
    (2007) Entrenchment, salience, and basic levels. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 117, 138.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Schmidtke, J.
    (2014) Second language experience modulates word retrieval effort in bilinguals: evidence from pupillometry. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00137
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00137 [Google Scholar]
67. Schmidtke, J.
    (2018) Pupillometry in Linguistic Research: An introduction and review for second language researchers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 529–549. 10.1017/S0272263117000195
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000195 [Google Scholar]
68. Schoonbaert, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J.
    (2007) The representation of lexical and syntactic information in bilinguals: Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(2), 153–171. 10.1016/j.jml.2006.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.10.002 [Google Scholar]
69. Schuster, S., Himmelstoss, N. A., Hutzler, F., Richlan, F., Kronbichler, M., & Hawelka, S.
    (2021) Cloze enough? Hemodynamic effects of predictive processing during natural reading. NeuroImage, 228, 117–687. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117687
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117687 [Google Scholar]
70. Segui, J., Mehler, J., Frauenfelder, U., & Morton, J.
    (1982) The word frequency effect and lexical access. Neuropsychologia, 20(6), 615–627. 10.1016/0028‑3932(82)90061‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(82)90061-6 [Google Scholar]
71. Sirois, S., & Brisson, J.
    (2014) Pupillometry. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 5(6), 679–692. 10.1002/wcs.1323
    https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1323 [Google Scholar]
72. Stammers, J. R., & Deuchar, M.
    (2012) Testing the nonce borrowing hypothesis: Counter-evidence from English-origin verbs in Welsh. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(3), 630–643. 10.1017/S1366728911000381
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000381 [Google Scholar]
73. Strijkers, K., Costa, A., & Thierry, G.
    (2010) Tracking lexical access in speech production: electrophysiological correlates of word frequency and cognate effects. Cerebral Cortex, 20(4), 912–928. 10.1093/cercor/bhp153
    https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp153 [Google Scholar]
74. Tamaoka, K. & Miyaoka, Y.
    (2003) The cognitive processing of Japanese loanwords in katakana. Japanese Psychological Research, 45(2), 69–79. 10.1111/1468‑5884.t01‑1‑00035
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5884.t01-1-00035 [Google Scholar]
75. Thierry, G., & Wu, Y. J.
    (2007) Brain potentials reveal unconscious translation during foreign-language comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(30), 12530–12535. 10.1073/pnas.0609927104
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609927104 [Google Scholar]
76. Thomason, S. G. & Kaufman, T.
    (1988) Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkley, CA: University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520912793
    https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520912793 [Google Scholar]
77. Titone, D., Libben, M., Mercier, J., Whitford, V., & Pivneva, I.
    (2011) Bilingual lexical access during L1 sentence reading: The effects of L2 knowledge, semantic constraint, and L1–L2 intermixing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1412–1431.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Torres Cacoullos, R., & Travis, C. E.
    (2015) Gauging convergence on the ground: Code-switching in the community. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(4), 365–386. 10.1177/1367006913516046
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913516046 [Google Scholar]
79. Torres Cacoullos, R., & Travis, C. E.
    (2018) Bilingualism in the Community: Codeswitching and grammars in contact. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108235259
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108235259 [Google Scholar]
80. Travis, C. E., Torres Cacoullos, R., & Kidd, E.
    (2017) Cross-language priming: A view from bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(2), 283–298. 10.1017/S1366728915000127
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000127 [Google Scholar]
81. Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Diependaele, K.
    (2009) Does bilingualism change native-language reading? Cognate effects in a sentence context. Psychological science, 20(8), 923–927. 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2009.02389.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02389.x [Google Scholar]
82. van Hout, R. & Muysken, P.
    (1994) Modeling lexical borrowability. Language Variation and Change, 6, 39–62. 10.1017/S0954394500001575
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500001575 [Google Scholar]
83. van Rij, J., Hendriks, P., Van Rijn, H., Harald Baayen, R., & Wood, S. N.
    (2019) Analyzing the Time Course of Pupillometric Data. Trends in Hearing, 23, 1–22. 10.1177/2331216519832483
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216519832483 [Google Scholar]
84. van Rij, J., Wieling, M., Baayen, R. H., & Van Rijn, H.
    (2017) itsadug: Interpreting time series and autocorrelated data using GAMMs. R package version 2.3
    [Google Scholar]
85. Wetzel, N., Buttelmann, D., Schieler, A., & Widmann, A.
    (2016) Infant and adult pupil dilation in response to unexpected sounds. Developmental Psychobiology, 58(3), 382–392. 10.1002/dev.21377
    https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.21377 [Google Scholar]
86. Wieling, M.
    (2018) Analyzing dynamic phonetic data using generalized additive mixed modeling: A tutorial focusing on articulatory differences between L1 and L2 speakers of English. Journal of Phonetics, 70, 86–116. 10.1016/j.wocn.2018.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.03.002 [Google Scholar]
87. Wood, S. N.
    (2011) Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 73(1), 3–36. 10.1111/j.1467‑9868.2010.00749.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00749.x [Google Scholar]
88. Wood, S. N.
    (2017) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Chapman and Hall/CRC. 10.1201/9781315370279
    https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315370279 [Google Scholar]
89. Wood, S. N., Pya, N., & Saefken, B.
    (2016) Smoothing parameter and model selection for general smooth models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 111, 1548–1575. 10.1080/01621459.2016.1180986
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2016.1180986 [Google Scholar]
90. Wood, S. N.
    (2003) Thin-plate regression splines. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (B), 65(1), 95–114. 10.1111/1467‑9868.00374
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00374 [Google Scholar]