1887
image of Orthographic friends and lexical strangers in the L2 lexicon
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Some recent studies demonstrated a lexical processing difference between L1 and L2. In a lexical decision task, masked word primes had an inhibitory or no effect on the identification of their neighbor targets (e.g., ) in L1, but they produced a faciliatory priming effect in L2. The present study attempted to replicate this finding with materials that were developed with familiarity, length, and frequency considerations. Native and nonnative speakers of English were tested on 40 English targets that were preceded by prime words that were their neighbors or orthographically unrelated. The results replicated previous findings. Nonnative speakers showed a significant priming effect of 63 ms but native speakers produced a nonsignificant effect of 11 ms. This finding suggested that words in the L2 lexicon seemed to recognize and interact with each other only on the basis of orthographic overlap (thus orthographic friends). They did not seem to do so on the basis of lexical status (thus lexical strangers), i.e., showing little lexical interaction or competition. Current explanations of this intriguing L1-L2 difference are discussed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.21012.jia
2021-05-06
2021-08-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andrews, S.
    (1992) Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(2), 234–254.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews, S., & Hersch, J.
    (2010) Lexical precision in skilled readers: Individual differences in masked neighbor priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 299–318. 10.1037/a0018366
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018366 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bijeljac-Babic, R., Biardeau, A., & Grainger, J.
    (1997) Masked orthographic priming in bilingual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 25(4), 447–457. 10.3758/BF03201121
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201121 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bodner, G. E., & Masson, M. E.
    (1997) Masked repetition priming of words and nonwords: Evidence for a nonlexical basis for priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(2), 268–293. 10.1006/jmla.1996.2507
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.2507 [Google Scholar]
  6. Broersma, M.
    (2012) Increased lexical activation and reduced competition in second-language listening. Language and cognitive processes, 27(7–8), 1205–1224. 10.1080/01690965.2012.660170
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.660170 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brysbaert, M., Lagrou, E., & Stevens, M.
    (2017) Visual word recognition in a second language: A test of the lexical entrenchment hypothesis with lexical decision times. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(3), 530–548. 10.1017/S1366728916000353
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916000353 [Google Scholar]
  8. Castles, A., Davis, C., Cavalot, P., & Forster, K.
    (2007) Tracking the acquisition of orthographic skills in developing readers: Masked priming effects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97, 165–182. 10.1016/j.jecp.2007.01.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2007.01.006 [Google Scholar]
  9. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D.
    (1977) Access to the internal lexicon. InS. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performanceVI, (pp.535–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Davis, C. J., & Lupker, S. J.
    (2006) Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(3), 668–687.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. De Groot, A. M., Borgwaldt, S., Bos, M., & Van den Eijnden, E.
    (2002) Lexical decision and word naming in bilinguals: Language effects and task effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 91–124. 10.1006/jmla.2001.2840
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2840 [Google Scholar]
  12. De Groot, A. M., & Nas, G. L.
    (1991) Lexical representation of cognates and noncognates in compound bilinguals. Journal of memory and language, 30(1), 90–123. 10.1016/0749‑596X(91)90012‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(91)90012-9 [Google Scholar]
  13. Diependaele, K., Duñabeitia, J. A., Morris, J., & Keuleers, E.
    (2011) Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 344–358. 10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  14. Elgort, I.
    (2011) Deliberate learning and vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Language Learning, 61, 367–413. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00613.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00613.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Forster, K. I.
    (1987) Form-priming with masked primes: The best match hypothesis. InM. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII (pp.127–146). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (1999) The microgenesis of priming effects in lexical access. Brain and Language, 68, 5–15. 10.1006/brln.1999.2078
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2078 [Google Scholar]
  17. Forster, K. I., & Davis, C.
    (1984) Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(4), 680–698.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J.
    (2003) DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 35, 116–124. 10.3758/BF03195503
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195503 [Google Scholar]
  19. Forster, K. I., & Veres, C.
    (1998) The prime lexicality effect: Form-priming as a function of prime awareness, lexical status, and discrimination difficulty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(2), 498–514.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gaskell, M., & Dumay, N.
    (2003) Lexical competition and the acquisition of novel words. Cognition, 89, 105–132. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(03)00070‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00070-2 [Google Scholar]
  21. Gollan, T. H., Forster, K. I., & Frost, R.
    (1997) Translation priming with different scripts: Masked priming with cognates and noncognates in Hebrew-English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(5), 1122–1139.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M.
    (1996) Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518–565. 10.1037/0033‑295X.103.3.518
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.518 [Google Scholar]
  23. Heyer, V., & Clahsen, H.
    (2015) Late bilinguals see a scan in scanner AND in scandal: dissecting formal overlap from morphological priming in the processing of derived words. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 543–550. 10.1017/S1366728914000662
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000662 [Google Scholar]
  24. Jiang, N.
    (1999) Testing processing explanations for the asymmetry in masked crosslanguage priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2(1), 59–75. 10.1017/S1366728999000152
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728999000152 [Google Scholar]
  25. Jiang, N., Li, M., & Guo, T.
    (2020) A tale of two frequency effects: Toward a verification model of L2 word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 41(1), 215–236. 10.1017/S0142716419000481
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716419000481 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B.
    (2017) lmerTest Package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82. doi:  10.18637/jss.v082.i13
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13 [Google Scholar]
  27. Li, J., & Taft, M.
    (2020) The processing of English prefixed words by Chinese-English bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42, 239–249. 10.1017/S0272263119000172
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000172 [Google Scholar]
  28. Li, J., Taft, M., & Xu, J.
    (2017) The processing of English derived words by Chinese-English bilinguals. Language Learning, 67(4), 858–884. 10.1111/lang.12247
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12247 [Google Scholar]
  29. Li, M., Jiang, N., & Gor, K.
    (2017) L1 and L2 processing of compound words: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20, 384–402. 10.1017/S1366728915000681
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000681 [Google Scholar]
  30. Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B.
    (1998) Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19, 1–36. 10.1097/00003446‑199802000‑00001
    https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199802000-00001 [Google Scholar]
  31. Luke, S. G.
    (2017) Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 1494–1502. 10.3758/s13428‑016‑0809‑y
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0809-y [Google Scholar]
  32. Marian, V., Bartolotti, J., Chabal, S., Shook, A.
    (2012) CLEARPOND: Cross-Linguistic Easy-Access Resource for Phonological and Orthographic Neighborhood Densities. PLoS ONE7(8): e43230. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0043230
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043230 [Google Scholar]
  33. Marian, V., & Blumenfeld, H.
    (2006) Phonological neighborhood density guides lexical access in native and non-native language production. Journal of Social and Ecological Boundaries, 2(1), 3–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Mulder, K., van Heuven, W. J., & Dijkstra, T.
    (2018) Revisiting the neighborhood: How L2 proficiency and neighborhood manipulation affect bilingual processing. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 1860. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01860
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01860 [Google Scholar]
  35. Nakayama, M., & Lupker, S. J.
    (2018) Is there lexical competition in the recognition of L2 words for different-script bilinguals? An examination using masked priming with Japanese-English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(8), 1168–1185.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Nakayama, M., Sears, C. R., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J.
    (2013) Masked translation priming with Japanese-English bilinguals: Interactions between cognate status, target frequency, and L2 proficiency. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 949–981. 10.1080/20445911.2013.839560
    https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.839560 [Google Scholar]
  37. Nakayama, M., Ida, K., & Lupker, S. J.
    (2016) Cross-script L2-L1 noncognate translation priming in lexical decision depends on L2 proficiency: Evidence from Japanese-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(5), 1001–1022. 10.1017/S1366728915000462
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000462 [Google Scholar]
  38. Nakayama, M., Sears, C. R., & Lupker, S. J.
    (2008) Masked priming with orthographic neighbors: A test of the lexical competition assumption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1236–1260.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Perea, M., Dunabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M.
    (2008) Masked associative/semantic priming effects across languages with highly proficient bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(4), 916–930. 10.1016/j.jml.2008.01.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  40. Pérez, M. A.
    (2007) Age of acquisition persists as the main factor in picture naming when cumulative word frequency and frequency trajectory are controlled. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(1), 32–42. 10.1080/17470210600577423
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210600577423 [Google Scholar]
  41. Qiao, X., & Forster, K. I.
    (2013) Novel word lexicalization and the prime lexicality effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(4), 1064–1074.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. (2017) Is the L2 lexicon different from the L1 lexicon? Evidence from novel word lexicalization. Cognition, 158, 147–152. 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.026
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.026 [Google Scholar]
  43. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URLhttps://www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K.
    (2000) Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and cognitive processes, 15(4–5), 507–537. 10.1080/01690960050119689
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119689 [Google Scholar]
  45. Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B.
    (2004) The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 11(6), 1090–1098. 10.3758/BF03196742
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196742 [Google Scholar]
  46. RStudio Team
    RStudio Team (2020) RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA URLwww.rstudio.com/
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Sabourin, L., Brien, C., & Burkholder, M.
    (2014) The effect of age of L2 acquisition on the organization of the bilingual lexicon: Evidence from masked priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(3), 542–555. 10.1017/S1366728913000643
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000643 [Google Scholar]
  48. Segui, J., & Grainger, J.
    (1990) Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 65–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Tamminen, J., & Gaskell, M. G.
    (2013) Novel word integration in the mental lexicon: Evidence from unmasked and masked semantic priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 1001–1025. 10.1080/17470218.2012.724694
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.724694 [Google Scholar]
  50. Williams, J. N.
    (1994) The relationship between word meanings in the first and second language: Evidence for a common, but restricted, semantic code. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 195–220. 10.1080/09541449408520143
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09541449408520143 [Google Scholar]
  51. Witzel, N. O., & Forster, K. I.
    (2012) How L2 words are stored: The episodic L2 hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(6), 1608–1621.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Xia, V., & Andrews, S.
    (2015) Masked translation priming asymmetry in Chinese-English bilinguals: Making sense of the Sense Model. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(2), 294–325. 10.1080/17470218.2014.944195
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.944195 [Google Scholar]
  53. Van Heuven, W. J. B., Dijkstra, T., & Grainger, J.
    (1998) Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 458–483. 10.1006/jmla.1998.2584
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2584 [Google Scholar]
  54. Vitevitch, M. S.
    (2002) The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28(4), 735–747.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Ziegler, J. C., Muneaux, M., & Grainger, J.
    (2003) Neighborhood effects in auditory word recognition: Phonological competition and orthographic facilitation. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(4), 779–793. 10.1016/S0749‑596X(03)00006‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00006-8 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.21012.jia
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.21012.jia
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error