1887
image of Explicit versus non-explicit prosodic training in the learning of Spanish L2 stress contrasts by French listeners
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Different methods to acquire a language can contribute differently to learning success. In the present study we tested the success of L2 stress contrasts acquisition, when ab initio learners were taught or not about the theoretic nature of L2 stress contrasts. In two 4-hour perceptual training methods, French-speaking listeners received either (a) explicit instructions about Spanish stress patterns and perception activities commonly used in L2 pronunciation courses or (b) no explicit instructions and a unique perception activity, a shape/word matching task. Results showed that French-speaking listeners improved their ability to identify and discriminate stress contrasts in Spanish after training. However, there was no significant difference between explicit and non-explicit training nor was there an effect on stress processing under different phonetic variability conditions. This suggests that in L2 stress acquisition, non-explicit training may benefit ab initio learners as much as explicit instruction and activities used in L2 pronunciation courses.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.21017.sch
2021-10-12
2022-05-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Antoniou, M., Wong, P. C. M., & Wang, S.
    (2015) The effect of intensified language exposure on accommodating talker variability, J. Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(3), 722–727. 10.1044/2015_JSLHR‑S‑14‑0259
    https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-S-14-0259 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baars, B. J.
    (1988) A cognitive theory of consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M.
    (2008) Mixed effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items, J. Memory Lang, 59, 390–412. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. doi:  10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bemani Naeini, M., & Adni, Z.
    (2017) The impact of explicit vs. implicit instruction on pronunciation intelligibility among Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English, 6(2), 103–123.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
    (2011) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. [Computer Software]. www.praat.org
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bradlow, A., Akahane-Yamada, R., Pisoni, D. B., & Tohkura, Y.
    (1997) Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: Long-term retention of learning in perception and production. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 977–985. 10.3758/BF03206911
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206911 [Google Scholar]
  8. Carpenter, A.
    (2015) Phonetic training significantly mitigates the stress ‘deafness’ of French speakers. International Journal of Linguistics, 7. 10.5296/ijl.v7i3.7661
    https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v7i3.7661 [Google Scholar]
  9. Degrave, P.
    (2017) Can music help learners and teachers in word stress perception?Travaux du Cercle Belge de Linguistique, 11, 1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. DeKeyser, R. M.
    (1995) Learning second language grammar rules. An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 379–410. 10.1017/S027226310001425X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310001425X [Google Scholar]
  11. Dufour, S., Nguyen, N., & Frauenfelder, U.
    (2010) Does training on a phonemic contrast absent in the listener’s dialect influence word recognition?, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Express Letters, 128, EL43–EL48. 10.1121/1.3431102
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3431102 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dupoux, E., Pallier, C., Sebastián, N., & Mehler, J.
    (1997) A destressing ‘deafness’ in French?, J. Memory Lang, 36(3), 406–421. 10.1006/jmla.1996.2500
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.2500 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S., & Sebastián, N.
    (2001) A robust method to study stress ‘deafness’, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 110(3–1), 1606–1618. 10.1121/1.1380437
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1380437 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dupoux, E., Sebastián, N., Navarrete, E., & Peperkamp, S.
    (2008) Persistent stress ‘deafness’: The case of French learners of Spanish, Cognition, 106(2), 682–706. 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fujisaki, H., & Kawashima, T.
    (1970) Some experiments on speech perception and a model for the perceptual mechanism. Annual Report of the Engineering Research Institute, Vol. 29, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 1970, 207–214.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Garde, P.
    (1968) L’accent. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gordon, E.
    (1989) Advanced measures of music audition. Chicago: GIA Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gordon, J., & Darcy, I.
    (2016) The development of comprehensible speech in L2 learners. A classroom study on the effects of short-term pronunciation instruction. Journal of Second language Pronunciation, 2(1), 56–92. 10.1075/jslp.2.1.03gor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.2.1.03gor [Google Scholar]
  19. Honbolygó, F., Kóbor, A., & Csépe, V.
    (2017) Cognitive components of foreign word stress processing difficulty in speakers of a native language with non-contrastive stress. International Journal of Bilingualism, September4 2017 doi: 10.1177/1367006917728393#articleCitationDownloadContainer
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006917728393#articleCitationDownloadContainer [Google Scholar]
  20. Hualde, J. I.
    (2012) Stress and rhythm. InJ. I. Hualde, A. Olarrea & E. O’Rourke (Eds.). The handbook of Hispanic linguistics (pp.153–171). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.. 10.1002/9781118228098.ch8
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118228098.ch8 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kissling, E. M.
    (2013) Teaching pronunciation: Is explicit phonetics instruction beneficial for FL learners?The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 720–744. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2013.12029.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12029.x [Google Scholar]
  22. Kolinsky, R., Cuvelier, H., Goetry, V., Peretz, I. & Morais, J.
    (2009) Music training facilitates lexical stress processing. Music Perception, 26(3), 235–246. 10.1525/mp.2009.26.3.235
    https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2009.26.3.235 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lacheret-Dujour, A., & Beaugendre, F.
    (1999) La prosodie du français. Paris: CNRS éditions.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B.
    (1991) Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a first report. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 874–886. 10.1121/1.1894649
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1894649 [Google Scholar]
  25. Michas, I. C., & Berry, D. C.
    (1994) Implicit and explicit processes in a second-language learning task. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6, 357–81. 10.1080/09541449408406520
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09541449408406520 [Google Scholar]
  26. Norris, J., & Ortega, L.
    (2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00136
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136 [Google Scholar]
  27. Nieuwenhuis, R., Pelzer, B., & te Grotenhuis, M.
    (2012) Tools for detecting influential data in mixed effects models. The R Journal, 4(2). URLhttps://journal.r-project.org/archive/2012-2/RJournal_2012-2_Nieuwenhuis~et~al.pdf (Last viewedApril 18, 2020).
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ortega-Llebaria, M., Gu, H., & Fan, J.
    (2013) English Speakers’ Perception of Spanish Lexical Stress: Context-Driven L2 Stress Perception, J. Phon., 41, 186–97. 10.1016/j.wocn.2013.01.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2013.01.006 [Google Scholar]
  29. Pakjamsai, J., & Pongpairoj, N.
    (2018) The effectiveness of explicit and implicit instruction of L2 English word stress among L1 Thai learners. Thoughts, 1, 1–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Peperkamp, S., Vendelin, I., & Dupoux, E.
    (2010) Perception of predictable stress: A cross-linguistic investigation, Journal of Phonetics, 38(3), 422–430. 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  31. Pisoni, D. B.
    (1973) Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels. Perception & Psychophysics, 13, 253–260. 10.3758/BF03214136
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214136 [Google Scholar]
  32. Quilis, A.
    (1999) Tratado de fonética y fonología españolas (2nd ed.). Madrid: Gredos.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2019) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [computer software]. www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Rahmani, H., Rietveld, T., & Gussenhoven, C.
    (2015) Stress ‘deafness’ reveals absence of lexical marking of stress or tone in the adult grammar. PLoS ONE, 10(12): e0143968. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0143968
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143968 [Google Scholar]
  35. Saito, Y., & Saito, K.
    (2016) Differential effects of instruction on the development of second language comprehensibility, word stress, rhythm, and intonation: The case of inexperienced Japanese EFL learners. Language Teaching Research, 21(5), 589–608. 10.1177/1362168816643111
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816643111 [Google Scholar]
  36. Schmidt, R.
    (2001) Attention. InP. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp.3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524780.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.003 [Google Scholar]
  37. Schwab, S. & Dellwo, V.
    (2017) Intonation and talker variability in the discrimination of Spanish lexical stress contrasts by Spanish, German and French listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 142 (4), 2419–2429. doi:  10.1121/1.5008849
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5008849 [Google Scholar]
  38. (2019) Explicit and implicit training methods for the learning of stress contrasts in Spanish. InLahoz-Bengoechea, J. M., Pérez Ramón, R., & Villa Villa, J. (Eds.), Subsidia. Tools and resources for speech sciences. Malaga: Universidad de Malaga.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. S. Schwab, N. Giroud, M. Meyer, & Dellwo, V.
    (2020) Working memory and not acoustic sensitivity is related to stress processing ability in a foreign language: An ERP study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 55, 1–15. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100897
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100897 [Google Scholar]
  40. Schwab, S., & Llisterri, J.
    (2013) Does training make French speakers more able to identify lexical stress?Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech, Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 5.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Segal, O., & Kishon-Rabin, L.
    (2018) Influence of the native language in sensitivity to lexical stress: evidence from native Arabic and Hebrew speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(1), 151–178. doi:  10.1017/S0272263117000390
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000390 [Google Scholar]
  42. Thomson, R. I., & Derwing, T. M.
    (2015) The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics, 36, 326–344. 10.1093/applin/amu076
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu076 [Google Scholar]
  43. Thomson, R. I.
    (2018) High Variability [Pronunciation] Training (HVPT). A proven technique about which every language teacher and learner ought to know. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 4, 208–231. 10.1075/jslp.17038.tho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.17038.tho [Google Scholar]
  44. Tremblay, A.
    (2009) Phonetic variability and the variable perception of L2 word stress by French Canadian listeners. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13, 35–62. 10.1177/1367006909103528
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006909103528 [Google Scholar]
  45. van Dommelen, W. A., & Hazan, V.
    (2012) Impact of talker variability on word recognition in non-native listeners, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 132, 1690–1699. 10.1121/1.4739447
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4739447 [Google Scholar]
  46. Werker, J. F., & Logan, J. S.
    (1985) Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 35–44. 10.3758/BF03207136
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207136 [Google Scholar]
  47. Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C.
    (1984) Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75, 1866–1878. 10.1121/1.390988
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.390988 [Google Scholar]
  48. Wong, P. C. M., Perrachione, T. K., & Parrish, T. B.
    (2007) Neural characteristics of successful and less successful speech and word learning in adults. Human Brain Mapping, 28(10), 995–1006. 10.1002/hbm.20330
    https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20330 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.21017.sch
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.21017.sch
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error