1887
image of Talking about oneself
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Second language instructors often have students talk about their own experiences rather than abstract impersonal topics. Intuitively, such topics seem more likely to encourage student engagement. Unfortunately, virtually no empirical research has examined the effects of personal prompts on spoken output. To address this gap in research, the current study ( = 117) compares the spoken output of Japanese university English students who responded to a personal prompt with students responding to an impersonal prompt. Output was recorded in transcripts and then analyzed using a battery of measures related to complexity, accuracy, and fluency. Findings showed that personalized prompts were associated with greater fluency. Moreover, there was some evidence that impersonal prompts led to output with greater lexical complexity. Rates of accuracy were similar in both groups. Correlational analysis suggested that lexical sophistication was associated with reduced fluency. The conclusion addresses practical implications and avenues for further research.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.21023.mue
2021-12-31
2022-01-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bellezza, F. S.
    (1984) The self as a mnemonic device: The role of internal cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(3), 506–516. doi:  10.1037/0022‑3514.47.3.506
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.3.506 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bialystok, E.
    (2001) Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511605963
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605963 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bui, G., & Skehan, P.
    (2018) Complexity, accuracy, and fluency. InJ. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp.1–7). John Wiley and Sons. 10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0046
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0046 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bygate, M.
    (2001) Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral interaction. InM. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogical tasks, second language learning, teaching and testing (pp.23–48). Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chang, M.-M., & Lehman, J. D.
    (2002) Learning foreign language through an interactive multimedia program: An experimental study on the effects of the relevance component of the ARCS model. CALICO Journal, 20(1), 81–98. doi:  10.1558/cj.v20i1.81‑98
    https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v20i1.81-98 [Google Scholar]
  6. Conway, M. A.
    (2005) Memory and the self. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(4), 594–628. doi:  10.1016/j.jml.2005.08.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.08.005 [Google Scholar]
  7. Conway, M. A., & Loveday, C.
    (2015) Remembering, imagining, false memories. Consciousness and Cognition, 33, 574–581. doi:  10.1016/j.concog.2014.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  8. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (2001) Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ferguson, T. J., Rule, B. G., & Carlson, D.
    (1983) Memory for personally relevant information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(2), 251–261. doi:  10.1037/0022‑3514.44.2.251
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.2.251 [Google Scholar]
  10. Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G.
    (2000) Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354–375. doi:  10.1093/applin/21.3.354
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.354 [Google Scholar]
  11. Foster, P., & Wigglesworth, G.
    (2016) Capturing accuracy in second language performance: The case for a weighted clause ratio. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 98–116. doi:  10.1017/S0267190515000082
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000082 [Google Scholar]
  12. Gaies, S. J.
    (1980) T-unit analysis in second language research: Applications, problems and limitations. TESOL Quarterly, 14(1), 53–60. doi:  10.2307/3586808
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3586808 [Google Scholar]
  13. Housen, A., & Kuiken, F.
    (2009) Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461–473. doi:  10.1093/applin/amp048
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp048 [Google Scholar]
  14. Housen, A., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.
    (2012) Complexity, accuracy and fluency: Definitions, measurement and research. InA. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp.1–20). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.32.01hou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32.01hou [Google Scholar]
  15. Hunt, K. W.
    (1970) Recent measures in syntactic development. InM. Lester (Ed.), Readings in applied transformational grammar. Holt, Rinehard and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jansari, A., & Parkin, A. J.
    (1996) Things that go bump in your life: Explaining the reminiscence bump in autobiographical memory. Psychology and Aging, 11(1), 85–91. doi:  10.1037/0882‑7974.11.1.85
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.11.1.85 [Google Scholar]
  17. Janssen, S. M. J., Chessa, A. G., & Murre, J. M. J.
    (2005) The reminiscence bump in autobiographical memory: Effects of age, gender, education, and culture. Memory, 13(6), 658–668. doi:  10.1080/09658210444000322
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210444000322 [Google Scholar]
  18. Keller, J. M.
    (1987) Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2–10. doi:  10.1007/BF02905780
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905780 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kerz, E., & Wiechmann, D.
    (2020) The role of verbal working memory in L2 sentence comprehension. Journal of Second Language Studies, 3(1): 1–30. doi:  10.1075/jsls.18022.ker
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.18022.ker [Google Scholar]
  20. Kihlstrom, J. F., Cantor, N., Albright, J. S., Chew, B. R., Klein, S. B., & Niedenthal, P. M.
    (1988) Information processing and the study of the self. InL. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 21 (pp.145–180). Academic Press. 10.1016/S0065‑2601(08)60226‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60226-9 [Google Scholar]
  21. Klein, S. B.
    (2012) The self and its brain. Social Cognition, 30(4) 474–518. doi:  10.1521/soco.2012.30.4.474
    https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2012.30.4.474 [Google Scholar]
  22. Klein, S. B., & Kihlstrom, J. F.
    (1986) Elaboration, organization, and the self-reference effect in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115(1), 26–38. doi:  10.1037/0096‑3445.115.1.26
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.26 [Google Scholar]
  23. Klein, S. B., & Loftus, J.
    (1988) The nature of self-referent encoding: The contributions of elaborative and organizational processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(1), 5–11. doi:  10.1037/0022‑3514.55.1.5
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.5 [Google Scholar]
  24. Levelt, W. J. M.
    (1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Malvern, D. D., & Richards, B. J.
    (1997) A new measure of lexical diversity. InA. Ryan & A. Wray (Eds.), Evolving models of language: papers from the annual meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics held at the University of Wales, Swansea, September 1996 (pp.58–71). Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Mayer, R. E., Fennell, S., Farmer, L., & Campbell, J.
    (2004) A personalization effect in multimedia learning: Students learn better when words are in conversational style rather than formal style. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 389–395. doi:  10.1037/0022‑0663.96.2.389
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.389 [Google Scholar]
  27. McLaughlin, B.
    (1990) Restructuring. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 113–128. doi:  10.1093/applin/11.2.113
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.113 [Google Scholar]
  28. Michel, M. C.
    (2017) Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in L2 production. InS. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp.50–68). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315676968‑4
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676968-4 [Google Scholar]
  29. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E.
    (2000) Engaging students in active learning: The case for personalized multimedia messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 724–733. doi:  10.1037/0022‑0663.92.4.724
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.724 [Google Scholar]
  30. Mueller, C. M.
    (2010) Effects of explicit instruction on incidental noticing of metaphorical word sequences during a subsequent reading task. International Journal of English Studies, 10(1), 81–101. doi:  10.6018/ijes/2010/1/113991
    https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2010/1/113991 [Google Scholar]
  31. Mueller, C. M., & Kraus, W. A.
    (2018) The effects of personalized prompts on Japanese EFL students’ written essays. OnCUE Journal, 11(1), 25–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Munawar, K., Kuhn, S. K., & Haque, S.
    (2018) Understanding the reminiscence bump: A systematic review. PLoS ONE, 13(12), e0208595. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0208595
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208595 [Google Scholar]
  33. Robinson, P.
    (2005) Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43(1), 1–32. doi:  10.1515/iral.2005.43.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2005.43.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  34. (2015) The Cognition Hypothesis, second language task demands, and the SSARC model of pedagogical task sequencing. InM. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT. A decade of plenaries from the international conference (pp.87–121). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.8.04rob
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.8.04rob [Google Scholar]
  35. Robinson, P., & Gilabert, R.
    (2007) Task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis and second language learning and performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45(3), 161–176. doi:  10.1515/iral.2007.007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2007.007 [Google Scholar]
  36. Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A., & Kirker, W. S.
    (1977) Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(9), 677–688. doi:  10.1037/0022‑3514.35.9.677
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.9.677 [Google Scholar]
  37. Skehan, P.
    (1998) A cognitive approach to second language learning. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. (2009) Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532. doi:  10.1093/applin/amp047
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047 [Google Scholar]
  39. Skehan, P., & Foster, P.
    (1997) Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 185–211. doi:  10.1177/136216889700100302
    https://doi.org/10.1177/136216889700100302 [Google Scholar]
  40. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S.
    (1995) Problems in output and the cognitive process they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371–391. doi:  10.1093/applin/16.3.371
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.371 [Google Scholar]
  41. Symons, C. S., & Johnson, B. T.
    (1997) The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 121(3), 371–394. doi:  10.1037/0033‑2909.121.3.371
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.371 [Google Scholar]
  42. Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P.
    (2005) Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. InR. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp.239–273). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.11.15tav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.11.15tav [Google Scholar]
  43. Text Inspector
    Text Inspector (2018) Online lexis analysis tool attextinspector.com
  44. Thomsen, D. K.
    (2015) Autobiographical periods: A review and central components of a theory. Review of General Psychology, 19(3), 294–310. doi:  10.1037/gpr0000043
    https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000043 [Google Scholar]
  45. Wright, C.
    (2020) Effects of task type on L2 Mandarin fluency development. Journal of Second Language Studies, 3(2): 157–179. 10.1075/jsls.00010.wri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00010.wri [Google Scholar]
  46. Wu, S., & Ma, Z.
    (2016) Suppression and working memory in auditory comprehension of L2 narratives: Evidence from cross-modal priming. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 45 (5):1115–1135. 10.1007/s10936‑015‑9390‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9390-2 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.21023.mue
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.21023.mue
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: accuracy ; complexity ; self-reference ; fluency ; speaking ; prompts
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error