Exploring same- and different grade peer interactions among EFL young learners

References

1. Ahmadian, M., & Tajabadi, A.
   (2017) Patterns of interaction in young EFL learners’ pair work: the relationship between pair dynamics and vocabulary acquisition. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 22(3), 98–114. 10.17576/3L‑2017‑2301‑08
   https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2017-2301-08 [Google Scholar]
2. Azkarai, A., & Kopinska, M.
   (2020) Young EFL learners and collaborative writing: A study on patterns of interaction, engagement in LREs, and task motivation. System, 94, 10.1016/j.system.2020.102338
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102338 [Google Scholar]
3. Berman, M.
   (1998) A Multiple Intelligences Road to an ELT Classroom. Carmarthen: Crown House.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Berman, R. A.
   (2004) Language Development across Childhood and Adolescence. John Benjamins Publishing Company. Retrieved on21 July 2022, from www.myilibrary.com?ID=216013.> 10.1075/tilar.3
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.3 [Google Scholar]
5. Butler, Y. G., & Zeng, W.
   (2014) Young foreign language learners’ interactions during task-based paired assessments. Language Assessment Quarterly, 11(1), 45–75. 10.1080/15434303.2013.869814
   https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2013.869814 [Google Scholar]
6. Butler, Y. G., & Zeng, W.
   (2015) Young foreign language learners’ interactional development in task-based paired assessment in their first and foreign languages: a case of English learners in China. Education, 13(3), 292–321. 10.1080/03004279.2013.813955
   https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2013.813955 [Google Scholar]
7. Chen, W.
   (2017) The effect of conversation engagement on L2 learning opportunities. ELT Journal, 71, 329–340. 10.1093/elt/ccw075
   https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw075 [Google Scholar]
8. Chen, W.
   (2018) Patterns of pair interaction in communicative tasks: the transition process and effect on L2 teaching and learning. ELT Journal, 72(4), 425–434. 10.1093/elt/ccy015
   https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy015 [Google Scholar]
9. Damon, W. & Phelps, E.
   (1989) Strategic uses of peer learning in children’s education. InT. J. Berndt & G. W. Ladd (Eds.), Peer relationships in child development (pp.135–157). New York: Wiley.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dao, P., & McDonough, K.
    (2017) The effect of task role on Vietnamese EFL learners’ collaboration in mixed proficiency dyads. System, 65, 15–24. 10.1016/j.system.2016.12.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.12.012 [Google Scholar]
11. Davin, J. K., & Donato, R.
    (2013) Student collaboration and teacher-directed classroom dynamic assessment: A complementary pairing. Foreign Language Annals, 46(1), 5–22. 10.1111/flan.12012
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12012 [Google Scholar]
12. Doff, S. & Giesler, T.
    (2014) Jack in search of Jill. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der individuellen Förderung im Englischunterricht. InThorsten Bohl (Eds.), Friedrich Jahresheft “Fördern” pp. (79–56). Seelze: Friedrich.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Donato, R.
    (1994) Collective scaffolding in second language learning. InJ. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp.33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Ellis, R.
    (2003) Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford: University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Frank, S. S.
    (2014) Unterrichten in altersdurchmischten Klassen mit Young World 1–4. Baar: Klett und Balmer.
    [Google Scholar]
16. García Mayo, M. P.
    (ed.) (2017) Learning Foreign Languages in Primary School:Research Insights. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. ISBN-13: 978-1-78309-810-1.
    [Google Scholar]
17. García Mayo, M. P., & Agirre, A. I.
    (2016) Task repetition and its impact on EFL children’s negotiation of meaning strategies and pair dynamics: an exploratory study. The Language Learning Journal, 44(4), 451–466. 10.1080/09571736.2016.1185799
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1185799 [Google Scholar]
18. García Mayo, M. P., & Ibarrola, L.
    (2015) Do children negotiate for meaning in task-based interaction? Evidence from CLIL and EFL settings. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 54, 40–54. 10.1016/j.system.2014.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.12.001 [Google Scholar]
19. Heinzmann, S., Ries, S., & Wicki, W.
    (2015) Expertise „Altersdurchmischter Fremdsprachenunterricht im Fach Englisch. Forschungsbericht, 51. Luzern: Pädagogische Hochschule Luzern.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hoffman, J.
    (2002) Flexible grouping strategies in the multiage classroom. Theory into Practice, 41(1), 47–52. Retrieved on21 July 2022, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/1477537?seq=1.>
    [Google Scholar]
21. Huf, C., & Raggl, A.
    (2015) Social orders and interactions among children in age mixed classes in primary schools – new perspectives from a synthesis of ethnographic data. Ethnography and Education, 10(2), 230–241. 10.1080/17457823.2015.1017514
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2015.1017514 [Google Scholar]
22. Hyry-Beihammer, E. K. & Hascher, T.
    (2015) Multi-grade teaching practices in Austrian and Finnish primary schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 74(1), 104–113. Elsevier Ltd.RetrievedAugust 19, 2022fromhttps://www.learntechlib.org/p/203436/. 10.1016/j.ijer.2015.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.07.002 [Google Scholar]
23. Kalaoja, E., & Pietarinen, J.
    (2009) Small rural primary schools in Finland:A pedagogically valuable part of the school network. International Journal of Educational Research, 48(2), 109–116. 10.1016/j.ijer.2009.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2009.02.003 [Google Scholar]
24. Kopinska, M. & Azkarai, A.
    (2020) Exploring young EFL learners’ motivation: Individual versus pair work on dictogloss tasks. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(3), 607–630. 10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.3.10
    https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.3.10 [Google Scholar]
25. Kos, T.
    (2017) Peer assistance among mixed-age pairs in mixed-age EFL secondary school classrooms in Germany. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 61–112. 10.1515/eujal‑2017‑0013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2017-0013 [Google Scholar]
26. Kos, T.
    (2019) Patterns of Interaction: Analysis of Mixed-Age Peer Interactions in Secondary School Classrooms In Germany. Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 1–29. https://www.jltl.com.tr/index.php/jltl/article/view/72
    [Google Scholar]
27. Kos, T.
    (2021a) Exploring young learners’ L2 development and perceptions of mixed-age and same-age peer interactions in EFL mixed-age classrooms. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 331–364. 10.1515/eujal‑2020‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2020-0001 [Google Scholar]
28. Kos, T.
    (2021b) What exactly is mutuality? An analysis of mixed-age peer interactions on classroom tasks in German secondary school classrooms. InM. García Mayo (Eds.), Working Collaboratively in Second/Foreign Language Learning (pp.59–88). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501511318‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501511318-004 [Google Scholar]
29. Kowal, M., & Swain, M.
    (1994) Using collaborative language production tasks to promote learners’ language awareness. Language Awareness, 3(2), 73–93. 10.1080/09658416.1994.9959845
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.1994.9959845 [Google Scholar]
30. Kutnick, P., & Kington, A.
    (2005) Children’s friendships and learning in school: Cognitive enhancement through social interaction?British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(4), 1–19. 10.1348/000709904X24591
    https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904X24591 [Google Scholar]
31. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E.
    (2008) Sociocultural Theory and the Teaching of Second Languages. London: Equinox Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L.
    (2006) Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Leeser, M.
    (2004) Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 55–81. 10.1191/1362168804lr134oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168804lr134oa [Google Scholar]
34. Li, M., & Zhu, W.
    (2013) Patterns of Computer-mediated Interaction in Small Writing Groups using Wikis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(1), 61–82. 10.1080/09588221.2011.631142
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.631142 [Google Scholar]
35. Li, M., & Zhu, W.
    (2017) Explaining Dynamic Interactions in Wiki-based Collaborative Writing. Language Learning & Technology, 21(1), 96–120.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Little, A. W.
    (2005) Learning and teaching in multigrade settings. Paper prepared forUNESCO 2005 EFA Monitoring Report.
37. Mercer, N.
    (2005) Sociocultural Discourse Analysis: Analysing Classroom Talk as a Social Mode of Thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 137–168. 10.1558/japl.v1i2.137
    https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v1i2.137 [Google Scholar]
38. Mercer, N.
    (2010) The analysis of classroom talk: Strengths and weaknesses. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), 1–14. 10.1348/000709909X479853
    https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X479853 [Google Scholar]
39. Ohta, A. S.
    (2000) Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. InJ. P. Lantolf (Eds.), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning (pp.51–78). Oxford: Oxford University.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Oliver, R., & Azkarai, A.
    (2019) Patterns of interaction and young ESL learners: What is the impact of proficiency and task type?: What is the impact of proficiency and task type?Language Teaching for Young Learners, 1(1), 82–102. 10.1075/ltyl.00006.oli
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.00006.oli [Google Scholar]
41. Oliver, R., Philp, J. & Duchesne, S.
    (2017) Children working it out together: A comparison of younger and older learners collaborating in task based interaction. System, 69, 1–14. 10.1016/j.system.2017.08.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.08.001 [Google Scholar]
42. Panagiotopoulou, A. J., & Carle, U.
    (2004) Sprachentwicklung und Schriftspracher- werb. Beobachtungs- und Fördermöglichkeiten in Familie, Kindergarten und Grundschule. Hohengehren.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Pape, M.
    (2016) Didaktische Handeln in jahrgangsheterogenen Grundschulklassen. Eine qualitative Studie zur Inneren Differenzierung und zur Anleitung des Lernens [Didactic action in heterogeneous primary school classes. A qualitative study of inner differentiation and guidance in learning]. Bad Heilbrunn: Verlag Julius.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Philp, J., Adams, R., & Iwashita, N.
    (2014) Peer interaction and second language learning. New York: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Philp, J., & Duchesne, S.
    (2016) Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 50–72. 10.1017/S0267190515000094
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000094 [Google Scholar]
46. Pinter, A.
    (2007) Some benefits of peer-peer interaction: 10-year-old children practising with a communication task. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), (pp.189–207). 10.1177/1362168807074604
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807074604 [Google Scholar]
47. Qiu, X., & Lee, M.-K.
    (2020) Regulated learning and self-efficacy beliefs in peer collaborative writing: An exploratory study of L2 learners’ written products, task discussions, and self-reports. System (Linköping), 93, 102312-. 10.1016/j.system.2020.102312
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102312 [Google Scholar]
48. Saeedakhtar, A., Haqju, R., & Rouhi, A.
    (2021) The impact of collaborative listening to podcasts on high school learners’ listening comprehension and vocabulary learning. System (Linköping), 101, 102588-. 10.1016/j.system.2021.102588
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102588 [Google Scholar]
49. Saqlain, N.
    (2015) A Comprehensive Look at Multi-Age Education. Journal Of Educational And Social Research, 5(2), 285. Retrieved fromhttps://www.mcser.org/journal/index.php/jesr/article/view/6588. 10.5901/jesr.2015.v5n2p285
    https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2015.v5n2p285 [Google Scholar]
50. Shahid, K. A., Moghal, S., & Aziz, F.
    (2018) Mixed-Age Group Teaching in Second Language Learning: An Observational Study of a Montessori Classroom in Pakistan. Journal of Early Childhood Care and Education, 2, 87–100.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Smit, R., & Engeli, E.
    (2015) An Empirical Model of Mixed-Age Teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 74, 136–145. 10.1016/j.ijer.2015.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.05.004 [Google Scholar]
52. Storch, N.
    (2002) Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52, 119–158. 10.1111/1467‑9922.00179
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00179 [Google Scholar]
53. Storch, N.
    (2021) Collaborative writing: Promoting languaging among language learners. InMaría del Pilar García Mayo and Ainara Imaz Agirre (Eds.) Working collaboratively in second/foreign language learning (pp.13–33). De Gruyter – Trends in Applied Linguistics series. 10.1515/9781501511318‑002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501511318-002 [Google Scholar]
54. Storch, N., & Aldosari, A.
    (2012) Pairing students in pair work activity. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 31–48. 10.1177/1362168812457530
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168812457530 [Google Scholar]
55. Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G.
    (2010) Learners’ processing, uptake and retention of corrective feedback on writing: Case studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 303–334. 10.1017/S0272263109990532
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990532 [Google Scholar]
56. Swain, M.
    (2006) Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced language proficiency. InH. Byrnes (Eds.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Haliday and Vygotsky (pp.95–108). London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Swain, M.
    (2010) Talking it through: Languaging as a source of learning. InR. Batstone (Eds.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use/learning (pp.112–130). Oxford: Oxford Univesrity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S.
    (1998) Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 320–337. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1998.tb01209.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.x [Google Scholar]
59. Tan, L., Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N.
    (2010) Pair Interaction and Mode of Communication:Comparing Face-to-Face and Computer Mediated Communication. Australian Review Of Applied Linguistics, 33, 1–27. 10.2104/aral1027
    https://doi.org/10.2104/aral1027 [Google Scholar]
60. Tellier, A., & Roehr-Brackin, K.
    (2017) Raising children’s metalinguistic awareness to enhance classroom second language learning. InM. P. Garcia Mayo (Eds.), Learning foreign languages in primary school: Research insights (pp.22–48). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783098118‑004
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783098118-004 [Google Scholar]
61. Thoren, K., & Brunner, M.
    (2019) State-wide implementation of mixed-age learning; which types can be identified, and do they differ in their school and teaching quality?Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft22, 279–300. 10.1007/s11618‑018‑0841‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-018-0841-z [Google Scholar]
62. Thurn, S.
    (2011) Individualisierung ernst genommen. Englisch lernen in jahrgangsübergreifenden Gruppen (3/4/5). Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Van de Pol, J., Volman, M. & Beishuizen, J.
    (2010) Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research, Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–297. 10.1007/s10648‑010‑9127‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6 [Google Scholar]
64. Vygotsky, L. S.
    (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Vygotsky, L. S.
    (1986) Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Wagener, M.
    (2014) Gegenseitiges Helfen. Soziales Lernen im jahrgangsgemischten Unterricht [Helping Each Other. Social Learning in Age-mixed Lessons]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. 10.1007/978‑3‑658‑03402‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-03402-3 [Google Scholar]
67. Waschk, K.
    (2008) Öffnung des Englischunterrichts in der Grundschule: Studien zur Wahlfreiheit und Lernerautonomie. Duisburg: Univ.-Verl. Rhein-Ruhr.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Watanabe, Y.
    (2008) Peer-Peer Interaction between L2 Learners of Different Proficiency Levels: Their Interactions and Reflections. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(2), 605–635. 10.3138/cmlr.64.4.605
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.64.4.605 [Google Scholar]
69. Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M.
    (2007) Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: collaborative dialogue between adult ESL students. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 121–142. 10.1177/136216880607074599
    https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880607074599 [Google Scholar]
70. Webb, N. M., & Mastergeorge, A.
    (2003) Promoting Effective Helping Behavior in Peer-Directed Groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1), 73–97. 10.1016/S0883‑0355(03)00074‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00074-0 [Google Scholar]
71. Wertsch, J.
    (1991) Voices of the mind: a sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Wu, S., Liu, D. & Li, Z.
    (2022) Consolidating EFL content and vocabulary learning via interactive reading. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. Advance online publication. 10.1515/iral‑2021‑0228
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2021-0228 [Google Scholar]
73. Young, A. & Tedick, D.
    (2016) Collaborative dialogue in a two-way Spanish/English immersion classroom: Does heterogeneous grouping promote peer linguistic scaffolding?InM. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp.135–160). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/lllt.45.06you
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45.06you [Google Scholar]