1887
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2542-3835
  • E-ISSN: 2542-3843
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study examined the relationships between individual differences in the executive component of working memory, and language analytical ability and the effectiveness of recasts, explicit correction and, metalinguistic prompts on the second-language (L2) development of the English past progressive. Participants were 155 Japanese learners of English, who were divided into recast, explicit correction, metalinguistic prompt, and task-only groups. The treatment groups completed tasks that required past progressive usage and received feedback. The executive component of working memory and language analytical ability were measured by the reading span test and LLAMA F. The outcome measures were an untimed grammaticality judgment test (UGJT) and elicited imitation test (EIT), which measured the participants’ declarative and procedural knowledge, respectively. The participants performed the pretest, immediate posttest, and delayed posttest. Multiple regression analyses showed that the executive component of working memory was significantly associated with the gain scores of the UGJT for the recast group and with the gain scores of the EIT for the metalinguistic prompt group. Language analytical ability was not associated with gain scores regardless of the test type for all groups.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.22012.sat
2023-03-07
2024-03-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahn, S.
    (2012) The relationships between grammatical sensitivity, noticing of recasts and learning of Korean object relative clauses through conversational interaction. Applied Language Learning, 221, 47–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baddeley, A.
    (2000) The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417–423. 10.1016/S1364‑6613(00)01538‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2 [Google Scholar]
  3. (2003) Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36(3), 189–208. 10.1016/S0021‑9924(03)00019‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00019-4 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bowles, M. A.
    (2011) Measuring implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(2), 247–271. 10.1017/S0272263110000756
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263110000756 [Google Scholar]
  5. Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S.
    (1959) Modern language aptitude test: Form A. Psychological Corporation.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cowan, N.
    (1999) An Embedded-Processes Model of working memory. InA. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp.62–101). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139174909.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174909.006 [Google Scholar]
  7. DeKeyser, R.
    (2012) Interactions between individual differences, treatments, and structures in SLA. Language Learning, 621, 189–200. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2012.00712.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00712.x [Google Scholar]
  8. (2015) Skill acquisition theory. InB. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (2019) The future of aptitude research. InZ. Wen, P. Skehan, A. Biedron, S. Li, & R. L. Sparks (Eds.), Language aptitude: Advancing theory, testing, research, and practice (pp.317–329). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315122021‑16
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315122021-16 [Google Scholar]
  10. Ellis, R.
    (2005) Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 271, 141–172. 10.1017/S0272263105050096
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050096 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2009) Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. InR. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp.31–64). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847691767‑004
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691767-004 [Google Scholar]
  12. Erlam, R.
    (2009) Elicited oral imitation as a measure of implicit knowledge. InR. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reiders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning and teaching (pp.65–93). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847691767‑005
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691767-005 [Google Scholar]
  13. Fu, M., & Li, S.
    (2021) The associations between implicit and explicit language aptitude and the effects of the timing of corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(3), 498–522. 10.1017/S0272263121000012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000012 [Google Scholar]
  14. Goo, J.
    (2012) Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 445–474. 10.1017/S0272263112000149
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000149 [Google Scholar]
  15. (2016) Corrective feedback and working memory capacity: A replication. InG. Granena, D. O. Jackson & Y. Yilmaz (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in second language processing and acquisition (pp.279–302). John Benjamins. 10.1075/bpa.3.13goo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.3.13goo [Google Scholar]
  16. Goo, J. & Mackey, A.
    (2013) The case against the case against recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition35(1), 1–39. 10.1017/S0272263113000028
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000028 [Google Scholar]
  17. Juffs, A., & Harrington, M.
    (2011) Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching, 44(2), 137–166. 10.1017/S0261444810000509
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000509 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kourtali, N. E., & Révész, A.
    (2020) The roles of recasts, task complexity, and aptitude in child second language development. Language Learning, 70(1), 179–218. 10.1111/lang.12374
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12374 [Google Scholar]
  19. Leow, R. P.
    (2015) Explicit learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centered approach. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315887074
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887074 [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, S.
    (2010) The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309–365. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00561.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x [Google Scholar]
  21. (2013) The interactions between the effects of implicit and explicit feedback and individual differences in language analytic ability and working memory. Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 634–654. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2013.12030.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12030.x [Google Scholar]
  22. (2017) The effects of cognitive aptitudes on the process and product of L2 interaction: A synthetic review. InL. Gurzynski (Ed.), Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach: Investigating learners, instructors and researchers (pp.41–70). Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/aals.16.03li
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.16.03li [Google Scholar]
  23. Li, S., Ellis, R., & Zhu, Y.
    (2019) The associations between cognitive ability and L2 development under five different instructional conditions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(3), 693–722. 10.1017/S0142716418000796
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716418000796 [Google Scholar]
  24. Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F.
    (2014) Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 21(4), 861–883. 10.3758/s13423‑013‑0565‑2
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0565-2 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L.
    (1997) Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66. 10.1017/S0272263197001034
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001034 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lyster, R. & Ranta, L.
    (2013) Counterpoint piece: The case for variety in corrective feedback research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition35(1), 1–18. 10.1017/S027226311200071X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311200071X [Google Scholar]
  27. Lyster, R., & Saito, K.
    (2010) Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265–302. 10.1017/S0272263109990520
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990520 [Google Scholar]
  28. Mackey, A., & Goo, J.
    (2007) Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. InA. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp.407–452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Meara, P.
    (2005) LLAMA language aptitude tests: The manual. Swansea: Lognostics.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Révész, A.
    (2012) Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures. Language Learning, 62(1), 93–132. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2011.00690.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00690.x [Google Scholar]
  31. Sato, Y.
    (2021) Effects of recasts, explicit correction and metalinguistic prompts on L2 knowledge of the English past tense. Journal of Asia TEFL, 18(2), 390–405. 10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.2.1.390
    https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.2.1.390 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2022) Associations between L2 proficiency and efficacy of corrective feedback types. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 19(2), 563–576. 10.18823/asiatefl.2022.19.2.10.563
    https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2022.19.2.10.563 [Google Scholar]
  33. Schmidt, R. W.
    (1995) Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. InAttention and awareness in foreign language learning. HonoluluR. W. Schmidt (Ed.). HI: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center, (1–63).
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (2001) Attention. InP. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp.3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524780.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.003 [Google Scholar]
  35. Serafini, E. J., & Sanz, C.
    (2016) Evidence for the decreasing impact of cognitive ability on second language development as proficiency increases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(4), 607–646. 10.1017/S0272263115000327
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000327 [Google Scholar]
  36. Sheen, Y.
    (2007) The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. InA. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp.301–322). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Sheen, Y., & Ellis, R.
    (2011) Corrective feedback in language teaching. InE. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, 21 (pp.593–610). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Shibasaki, H., Tokimoto, S., Ono, Y., & Inoue, T.
    (2015) Developing Group-type reading span tests in English and Japanese for high school students and the examination on the relationship between working memory and English proficiency. Study of cognition psychology, 121, 101–120.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Shirahata, T.
    (2015) Eigoshidoo ni okeru koukatekina ayamari teisei: Daini gengo syuutoku kenkyuu no chiken kara. [Effective grammatical corrections in English teaching: From the viewpoint of second language acquisition research]. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Skehan, P.
    (1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. (2016) Foreign language aptitude, acquisitional sequences, and psycholinguistic processes. InG. Granena, D. O. Jackson & Y. Yilmaz (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in second language processing and acquisition (pp.17–40). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bpa.3.02ske
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.3.02ske [Google Scholar]
  42. Trofimovich, P., Ammar, A., & Gatbonton, E.
    (2007) How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. InA. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp.171–195). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Wen, Z.
    (2016) Working memory and second language learning: Towards an integrated approach. Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783095735
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783095735 [Google Scholar]
  44. (2019) Working memory as language aptitude: The Phonological/Executive Model. InZ. Wen, P. Skehan, A. Biedroń, S. Li, & R. Sparks (Eds.), Language aptitude: Advancing theory, testing, research and practice (pp.187–214). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315122021‑10
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315122021-10 [Google Scholar]
  45. Wen, Z., & Skehan, P.
    (2021) Stages of Acquisition and the P/E Model of Working Memory: Complementary or contrasting approaches to foreign language aptitude?Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 411, 6–24. 10.1017/S0267190521000015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190521000015 [Google Scholar]
  46. Wu, S., & Ma, Z.
    (2016) Suppression and Working Memory in Auditory Comprehension of L2 Narratives: Evidence from Cross-Modal Priming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45(5), 1115–1135. 10.1007/s10936‑015‑9390‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9390-2 [Google Scholar]
  47. Yalçın, Ş., & Spada, N.
    (2016) Language aptitude and grammatical difficulty: An EFL classroom-based study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(2), 239–263. 10.1017/S0272263115000509
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000509 [Google Scholar]
  48. Yang, Y., & Lyster, R.
    (2010) Effects of form-focused practice and feedback on Chinese EFL learners– acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(02), 235–263. 10.1017/S0272263109990519
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990519 [Google Scholar]
  49. Yilmaz, Y.
    (2013) Relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback: The role of working memory capacity and language analytic ability. Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 344–368. 10.1093/applin/ams044
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams044 [Google Scholar]
  50. (2016) The role of exposure condition in the effectiveness of explicit correction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition38(1), 65–96. 10.1017/S0272263115000212
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000212 [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhang, R.
    (2014) Measuring university-level L2 learners’ implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Advance online publication. 10.1017/S0272263114000370
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000370 [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhao, Y., & Ellis, R.
    (2020) The relative effects of implicit and explicit corrective feedback on the acquisition of 3rd person -s by Chinese university students: A classroom-based study. Language Teaching Research. 10.1177/1362168820903343
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820903343 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.22012.sat
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.22012.sat
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error