How can we communicate (visually) what we (usually) mean by collocation and keyness?

References

1. Anthony, L.
   (2022) AntConc (Version 4.0.1). Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Retrieved fromhttps://www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconc/
2. Bestgen, Yves & Sylviane Granger
   2014 Quantifying the development of phraseological competence in L2 English writing: An automated approach. Journal of Second Language Writing261. 28–41. 10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.004
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.004 [Google Scholar]
3. Brezina, V., McEnery, T., & Wattam, S.
   (2015) Collocations in context: A new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(2), 139–173. 10.1075/ijcl.20.2.01bre
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.2.01bre [Google Scholar]
4. BNC
   BNC (2007) The British National Corpus (Version 3 BNC XML ed.): Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. URL: www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/
5. Croft, W. B., Metzler, D., & Strohman, T.
   (2010) Search Engines: Information Retrieval in Practice. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Dunning, T.
   (1993) Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics, 19(1), 61–74.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Evert, Stefan & Brigitte Krenn
   (2001) Methods for the qualitative evaluation of lexical association measures. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, p, 188–195. 10.3115/1073012.1073037
   https://doi.org/10.3115/1073012.1073037 [Google Scholar]
8. Garside, R., & Smith, N.
   (1997) A hybrid grammatical tagger: CLAWS4. InR. Garside, G. Leech & A. McEnery (Eds.), Corpus Annotation: Linguistic Information from Computer Text Corpora (pp.102–121). London: Longman. 10.4324/9781315841366‑13
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315841366-13 [Google Scholar]
9. Gries, S. T.
   (2013) 50-something years of work on collocations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18(1), 137–165. 10.1075/ijcl.18.1.09gri
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.18.1.09gri [Google Scholar]
10. Gries
    Gries (2015) The most under-used statistical method in corpus linguistics: multi-level (and mixed-effects) models. Corpora, 10(1), 95–125. 10.3366/cor.2015.0068
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2015.0068 [Google Scholar]
11. Gries, S.
    (2022a) What do (some of) our association measures measure (most)? Association?Journal of Second Language Studies, 5(1). 10.1075/jsls.21028.gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.21028.gri [Google Scholar]
12. Gries, S.
    (2022b) What do (most of) our dispersion measures measure (most)? Dispersion?Journal of Second Language Studies. 10.1075/jsls.21029.gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.21029.gri [Google Scholar]
13. Hann, M. N.
    (1973) The Statistical Force of Random Distribution. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 201, 31–44. 10.1075/itl.20.04han
    https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.20.04han [Google Scholar]
14. Hardie, A.
    (2012) CQPweb: Combining Power, Flexibility and Usability in a Corpus Analysis Tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17(3), 380–409. 10.1075/ijcl.17.3.04har
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17.3.04har [Google Scholar]
15. Heaps, H.
    (1978) Information retrieval: Computational and theoretical aspects. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hoey, M.
    (2005) Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hoey, M.
    (2014) Words and their neighbours. InJ. R. Taylor (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of the Word. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hunston, S.
    (2002) Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524773
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524773 [Google Scholar]
19. Jeaco, S.
    (2017) Concordancing Lexical Primings: The rationale and design of a user-friendly corpus tool for English language teaching and self-tutoring based on the Lexical Priming theory of language. InM. Pace-Sigge & K. J. Patterson (Eds.), Lexical Priming: Applications and Advances (pp.273–296). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.79.11jea
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.79.11jea [Google Scholar]
20. Jeaco, S.
    (2020) Key words when text forms the unit of study: Sizing up the effects of different measures. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 25(2), 125–154. 10.1075/ijcl.18053.jea
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.18053.jea [Google Scholar]
21. Kilgarriff, A., Rychly, P., Smrz, P., & Tugwell, D.
    (2004) The Sketch Engine. Paper presented at the2003 International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Engineering, Beijing.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Mahlberg, M.
    (2013) Corpus stylistics and Dickens’s fiction: New York ; Routledge 2013 10.4324/9780203076088
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203076088 [Google Scholar]
23. Oakes, M. P.
    (1998) Statistics for Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. O’Keeffe, A., McCarthy, M., & Carter, R.
    (2007) From Corpus to Classroom: Language Use and Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511497650
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497650 [Google Scholar]
25. Rayson, P., & Garside, R.
    (2000) Comparing corpora using frequency profiling. Paper presented at theWorkshop on Comparing Corpora, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Read, T. R. C., & Cressie, N. A. C.
    (1988) Goodness-of-fit Statistics for Discrete Multivariate Data. New York: Springer-Verlag. 10.1007/978‑1‑4612‑4578‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4578-0 [Google Scholar]
27. RStudio Team
    RStudio Team (2022) RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. Boston, MA:PBC. Retrieved fromwww.rstudio.com/
    [Google Scholar]
28. Rychlý, P.
    (2008) A lexicographer-friendly association score. Paper presented at theRecent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing Conference, Masaryk University, Brno.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Scott, M.
    (1997) PC analysis of key words – and key key words. System, 25(2), 233–245. 10.1016/S0346‑251X(97)00011‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00011-0 [Google Scholar]
30. Scott, M., & Tribble, C.
    (2006) Textual Patterns: Key Words and Corpus Analysis in Language Education. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.22
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.22 [Google Scholar]
31. Scott, M.
    (2020) WordSmith Tools (Version 8). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Scott, M.
    (2022) WordSmith Tools online manual “KeyWords: calculation”. Retrieved31 October, 2022, fromwww.lexically.net/downloads/version7/HTML/keywords_calculate_info.htm
33. Sinclair, J. M.
    (1991) Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Sinclair, J. M.
    (2004) New evidence, new priorities, new attitudes. InJ. M. Sinclair (Ed.), How to Use Corpora in Language Teaching (pp.271–299). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.12.20sin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.12.20sin [Google Scholar]
35. Wermter, J., & Hahn, U.
    (2006) You can’t beat frequency (unless you use linguistic knowledge): A qualitative evaluation of association measures for collocation and term extraction. Paper presented at theAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Sydney. 10.3115/1220175.1220274
    https://doi.org/10.3115/1220175.1220274 [Google Scholar]
36. Wood, S. N.
    (2011) Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (B) 73(1):3–36. 10.1111/j.1467‑9868.2010.00749.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00749.x [Google Scholar]
37. Zipf, G. K.
    (1935) The Psycho-Biology of Language: An Introduction to Dynamic Philology. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
    [Google Scholar]