1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Second Language Studies
  4. Volume 7, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 7, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2542-3835
  • E-ISSN: 2542-3843
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Different models of L3 acquisition have different predictions about the cross-linguistic effects of previous learning. The ‘Cumulative Enhancement Model’ predicts that both L1 and L2 have cumulative facilitative effects on L3, but L2 the Status Factor (L2SF) claims that L2 has stronger effects on L3 acquisition. Similarly, while the Typological Primacy Model claims that among the already acquired languages, a typologically similar language transfers more properties to L3, the Linguistic Proximity Model predicts a transfer of structurally similar properties from the previously learnt languages. On the other hand, the Scalpel Model, besides considering linguistic similarity, gives importance to factors such as frequency of use and nature of the input, language dominance, and learning context. The current paper contributes to this debate by presenting data collected from two groups of Balochi learners of English in Balochistan (Pakistan) who were taught British English (BrE) aspiration contrast in plosives at the allophonic level after they had acquired Pakistani English (PakE) as adult L2 learners. Thus, Balochi was L1, PakE L2, and BrE L3 of the learners. After teaching for more than a year, the learners were tested for accuracy in VOTs for BrE plosives. The results support the L2SF and Scalpel Model.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.23002.sye
2024-01-18
2024-09-13

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jsls.23002.sye
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alonso, J. G., & Rothman, J.
    (2017) Coming of age in L3 initial stages transfer models: Deriving developmental predictions and looking towards the future. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 683–697. 10.1177/1367006916649265
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006916649265 [Google Scholar]
  2. Amaro, J. C.
    (2012) L3 Phonology: An understudied domain. InS. F. J. C. Amaro, & J. Rothman (Ed.), Third language acquisition in adulthood (pp. 33–60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.46.05ama
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.46.05ama [Google Scholar]
  3. Amaro, J. C., & Wrembel, M.
    (2016) Investigating the acquisition of phonology in a third language – a state of the science and an outlook for the future. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13(4), 395–409. 10.1080/14790718.2016.1217601
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2016.1217601 [Google Scholar]
  4. Angelovska, T., Roehm, D., & Weinmüller, S.
    (2023) Uncovering transfer effects of dominance and proficiency in L3 English acquisition using the visual moving window paradigm and grammaticality judgments. Applied Linguistics Review, 14(1), 115–143. 10.1515/applirev‑2019‑0075
     https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2019-0075 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bardel, C., & Falk, Y.
    (2007) The role of the second language in third language acquisition: The case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research, 231, 459–484. 10.1177/0267658307080557
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658307080557 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2021) L1, L2 and L3: Same or different?Second Language Research, 37(3), 459–464. 10.1177/0267658320941033
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658320941033 [Google Scholar]
  7. Benmamoun, E., & Albirini, A.
    (2018) Is Learning a Standard Variety Similar to Learning a New Language?: Evidence from Heritage Speakers of Arabic. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(1), 31–61. 10.1017/S0272263116000383
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000383 [Google Scholar]
  8. Berkes, E., & Flynn, S.
    (2012) Further evidence in support of the Cumulative-Enhancement Model: CP structure development. InS. F. J. Cabrelli Amaro, & Rothman, J. (Ed.), Third language acquisition in adulthood (pp. 143–164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.46.11ber
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.46.11ber [Google Scholar]
  9. Best, C. T.
    (1995) A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. InW. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–204). Timonium MD: York Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Birahimani, A. H.
    (2021) Reviewing the history and development of aspiration in Eastern Balochi, 11(3), 457–498. Journal of Historical Linguistics, 11(13), 457–498. 10.1075/jhl.19010.bir
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.19010.bir [Google Scholar]
  11. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
    (2012) Praat: doing phonetics by computer.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Brown, C. A.
    (1998) The role of the L1 grammar in the L2 acquisition of segmental structure. Second Language Research, 14(2), 136–193. 10.1191/026765898669508401
     https://doi.org/10.1191/026765898669508401 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cabrelli, J., & Pichan, C.
    (2021) Initial phonological transfer in L3 Brazilian Portuguese and Italian. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 111, 131–167. 10.1075/lab.18048.cab
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.18048.cab [Google Scholar]
  14. Cho, T., & Ladefoged, P.
    (1999) Variation and universals in VOT: evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics, 27(2), 207–229. 10.1006/jpho.1999.0094
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1999.0094 [Google Scholar]
  15. Colantoni, L., & Steele, J.
    (2018) The Mixed Effects of Phonetic Input Variability on Relative Ease of L2 Learning: Evidence from English Learners’ Production of French and Spanish Stop-Rhotic Clusters. Languages 2018, 3, 12; 10.3390/languages3020012
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages3020012 [Google Scholar]
  16. Davenport, M. and Hannahs, S. J.
    (2010) Introducing Phonetics and Phonology. London: Hodder Education
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Falk, Y., & Bardel, C.
    (2010) The study of the role of the background languages in third language acquisition: The state of the art. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 481, 185–220. 10.1515/iral.2010.009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2010.009 [Google Scholar]
  18. Falk, Y., Lindqvist, C., & Bardel, C.
    (2015) The role of L1 explicit metalinguistic knowledge in L3 oral production at the initial state. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 227–235. 10.1017/S1366728913000552
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000552 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fallah, N., & Jabbari, A. A.
    (2018) L3 acquisition of English attributive adjectives: Dominant language of communication matters for syntactic cross-linguistic influence. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(2), 193–216. 10.1075/lab.16003.fal
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.16003.fal [Google Scholar]
  20. Fallah, N., Jabbari, A. A., & Fazilatfar, A. M.
    (2016) Source(s) of syntactic cross-linguistic influence (CLI): The case of L3 acquisition of English possessives by Mazandarani-Persian bilinguals. Second Language Research, 32(2), 225–245. 10.1177/0267658315618009
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658315618009 [Google Scholar]
  21. Felge, J. E., & Wayland, R.
    (2019) The role of input in native Spanish Late learners’ production and perception of English phonetic segments. Journal of Second Language Studies, 2(1), 1–44. 10.1075/jsls.00004.fle
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00004.fle [Google Scholar]
  22. Flege, J. E.
    (1995) Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. InW. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). New York: Timonium, MD.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. (2009) Give input a chance. InT. Piske & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input matters in SLA (pp. 175–190). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Flege, J. E., Aoyama, K., & Bohn, O. S.
    (2021) The Revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r) Applied. InR. Wayland (Ed.), Second Language Speech Learning: Theoretical and Empirical Progress (pp. 3–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108886901.002
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108886901.002 [Google Scholar]
  25. Flynn, S., Foley, C., & Vinnitskaya, I.
    (2004) The cumulative-enhancement model for language acquisition: Comparing adults’ and children’s patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses. International Journal of Multilingualism, 11, 3–16. 10.1080/14790710408668175
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710408668175 [Google Scholar]
  26. Foulkes, P., Docherty, G., & Jones, M. J.
    (2010) Analyzing Stop. InP. Foulkes, G. Docherty & M. J. Jones (Eds.), Sociophonetics: a student’s guide (pp. 58–71). London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. German, J. G., Carlson, K., & Pierrehumbert, J. B.
    (2013) Reassignment of consonant allophones in rapid dialect acquisitionJournal of Phonetics, 41(3), 228–248. 10.1016/j.wocn.2013.03.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2013.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  28. Guo, Y., & Yuan, B.
    (2020) L3 acquisition of Mandarin sentence-final particle clusters by English-Cantonese bilinguals. 3 (2), 262–291. Journal of Second Language Studies, 3(2), 262–291. 10.1075/jsls.00013.guo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00013.guo [Google Scholar]
  29. Geiss, M., Gumbsheimer, S., Lloyd-Smith, A., Schmid, S., & Kupisch, T.
    (2022) Voice onset time in multilingual speakers: Italian heritage speakers in Germany with L3 English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(2), 435–459. 10.1017/S0272263121000280
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000280 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hammarberg, B.
    (2009) Processes in Third Language Acquisition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748635122
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748635122 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hanzawa, K.
    (2018) The development of voice onset time (VOT) in a content-based instruction university program by Japanese learners of English: A longitudinal study. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 74(501–522). 10.3138/cmlr.2018‑0196
     https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.2018-0196 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hermas, A.
    (2010) Language acquisition as computational resetting: Verb movement in L3 initial state. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(4), 343–362. 10.1080/14790718.2010.487941
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2010.487941 [Google Scholar]
  33. (2014) Multilingual transfer: L1 morphosyntax in L3 English. International Journal of Language Studies, 8(2), 1–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Honeybone, P.
    (2005) Diachronic evidence in segmental phonology: The case of laryngeal specifications. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Hsu, Y. Y., & Lee, K. K.
    (2020) Similarities and Differences of Dou in Mandarin and Cantonese. InQ. Su & W. Zhan (Eds.), From Minimal Contrast to Meaning Construct. Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑32‑9240‑6_6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9240-6_6 [Google Scholar]
  36. Iverson, P., Ekanayake, D., Hamann, S., Sennema, A., & Evans, B. G.
    (2008) Category and perceptual interference in second-language phoneme learning: An examination of English /w/-/v/ learning by Sinhala, German, and Dutch speakers. Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance, 34(5), 1305–1316.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Jahani, C.
    (2019) A Grammar of Modern Standard Balochi. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Jin, F.
    (2009) Third language acquisition of Norwegian objects: Interlanguage transfer or l1 influence?InY-k. I. Leung (Ed.), Third language acquisition and Universal Grammar (pp. 144–161). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/15999/1/38.pdf.pdf#page=163. 10.21832/9781847691323‑010
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691323-010 [Google Scholar]
  39. Johnson, K., & Babel, M.
    (2010) On the perceptual basis of distinctive features: Evidence from the perception of fricatives by Dutch and English speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 38(1), 127–136. 10.1016/j.wocn.2009.11.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2009.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  40. Khan, S., Ali, S., Mustafa, S., Habib Ali, N., Sher, Z., & Azeem, Z.
    (2014) VOT for English Plosives by speakers of Balochi. Unpublished thesis. Department of English Language and Literature. LUAWMS. Uthal.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Khezri, F., Razmi, M. H., Jabbari, A. A., & Ghadaki, H.
    (2020) Acquisition of French (L3) Prepositions by Iranian Learners of English. Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 4(4), 41–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Kokaislova, P.
    (2012) Ethnic Identity of the Baloch People. Central Asian and the Caucasus Journal of Social and Political Studies, (3), 45–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Kopečková, R., & Wrembel, M.
    (2022) Phonological cross-linguistic influence at the initial stages of L3 acquisition. Second Language Research, 1–25. 10.1177/026765832211239941
     https://doi.org/10.1177/026765832211239941 [Google Scholar]
  44. Leung, Y.-k. I.
    (2005) L2 vs. L3 initial state: A comparative study of the acquisition of French DPs by Vietnamese monolinguals and Cantonese–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 8(1), 39–61. 10.1017/S1366728904002044
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728904002044 [Google Scholar]
  45. Lisker, L., & Abramson, A.
    (1964) A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: acoustical measurements. Word, 20(3), 384–422. 10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830 [Google Scholar]
  46. Llama, R., & Cardoso, W.
    (2018) Revisiting (Non-)Native Influence in VOT Production: Insights from Advanced L3 Spanish. Languages, 3(3), 1–18. 10.3390/languages3030030
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages3030030 [Google Scholar]
  47. Llama, R., Cardoso, W., & Collins, L.
    (2010) The influence of language distance and language status on the acquisition of L3 phonology. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(1), 39–57. 10.1080/14790710902972255
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710902972255 [Google Scholar]
  48. Llama, R., & López-Morelos, L. P.
    (2016) VOT production by Spanish heritage speakers in a trilingual context. International Journal of Multilingualism, 131, 444–458. 10.1080/14790718.2016.1217602
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2016.1217602 [Google Scholar]
  49. Lombardi, L.
    (2003) Second language data and constraints on Manner: explaining substitutions for the English interdentals. Second Language Research, 19(3), 225–250. 10.1177/026765830301900304
     https://doi.org/10.1177/026765830301900304 [Google Scholar]
  50. Mahboob, A., & Ahmar, N. H.
    (2004) Pakistani English: Phonology. InE. W. Schneider (Ed.), A Handbook of Varieties of English: A Multimedia Reference Tool (pp. 1003–1015). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Mayans, D.
    (2015) Transfer in third language phonology: Does l3 typological proximity play a role?61, 273–288. Revista de Filologia, 61, 273–288. 10.14198/ITACA2015.6.16
     https://doi.org/10.14198/ITACA2015.6.16 [Google Scholar]
  52. Moyer, A.
    (2009) Input as a critical means to an end: Quantity and quality in L2 phonological attainment. InT. Piske & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input matters in SLA (pp. 159–174). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Na Ranong, S., & Leung, Y-k. I.
    (2009) Null objects in L1 Thai-L2 English-L3 Chinese: An empiricist take on a theoretical problem. InY-k. I. Leung (Ed.), Third language acquisition and Universal Grammar (pp. 162–191). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/15999/1/38.pdf.pdf#page=181. 10.21832/9781847691323‑011
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691323-011 [Google Scholar]
  54. Paradis, M.
    (2009) Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.40
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.40 [Google Scholar]
  55. Puig-Mayenco, E., Alonso, J. G., & Rothman, J.
    (2020) A systematic review of transfer studies in third language acquisition. Second Language Research, 36(1), 31–64. 10.1177/0267658318809147
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658318809147 [Google Scholar]
  56. Pyun, K.-S.
    (2005) A model of interlanguage analysis – the case of Swedish by Korean speakers. InB. H. R. Fouser (Ed.), Introductory Readings in L3 (pp. 55–70). Tübingen: Stauffenberg Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Rahman, T.
    (2020) Pakistani English. InW. B. K. Bolton & A. Kirkpatrick (Eds.), The Handbook of Asian Englishes (pp. 279–296). New York: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118791882.ch11
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118791882.ch11 [Google Scholar]
  58. Regan, B.
    (2023) Individual differences in the acquisition of language-specific and dialect-specific allophones of intervocalic/d/by L2 and heritage Spanish speakers studying abroad in Sevilla. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45(1), 65–92. 10.1017/S027226312200002X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226312200002X [Google Scholar]
  59. Rothman, J.
    (2011) L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: The typological primacy model. Second Language Research, 27(1), 107–127. 10.1177/0267658310386439
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658310386439 [Google Scholar]
  60. (2013) Cognitive economy, non-redundancy and typological primacy in L3 acquisition: Evidence from initial stages of L3 Romance. InS. Baauw, F. Dirjkoningen & M. Pinto (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2011 (pp. 217–247). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/rllt.5.11rot
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.5.11rot [Google Scholar]
  61. (2015) Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the Typological Primacy Model (TPM) of third language (L3) transfer: Timing of acquisition and proficiency considered. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 179–190. 10.1017/S136672891300059X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672891300059X [Google Scholar]
  62. Rothman, J., González, A. J., & Puig-Mayenco, E.
    (2019) Third language acquisition and linguistic transfer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316014660
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316014660 [Google Scholar]
  63. Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A.
    (2021) The Full Transfer/Full Access model and L3 cognitive states. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(1), 1–29. 10.1075/lab.20055.sch
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.20055.sch [Google Scholar]
  64. Slabakova, R.
    (2017) The scalpel model of third language acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 651–665. 10.1177/1367006916655413
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006916655413 [Google Scholar]
  65. Slabakova, R., & Mayo, M. P. G.
    (2015) The L3 syntax–discourse interface. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 208–226. 10.1017/S1366728913000369
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000369 [Google Scholar]
  66. Shea, C. E., & Curtin, S.
    (2010) Discovering the relationship between context and allophones in a second language: Evidence for distribution-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(4), 581–606. 10.1017/S0272263110000276
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263110000276 [Google Scholar]
  67. Stevens, K. N., Keyser, S. J., & Kawasaki, H.
    (1986) Toward a Phonetic and Phonological Theory of Redundant Features. InJ. S. Perkell & D. H. Klatt (Eds.), Invariance and variability in speech processes (pp. 426–463). New York: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Syed, N. A.
    (2013) The acquisition of English consonants by Pakistani learners. (Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation), University of Essex, Colchester.
  69. (2015) The Role of Teacher in Second Language Learning. The NUML Journal of Linguistic Inquiry, 13(1), 71–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Syed, N. A., & Bibi, S.
    (2022) The emergence of a new phonological feature in Pakistan English: Focusing on the allophonic split in VOT of coronal stops in PakE. English Today, 38(4), 278–283. 10.1017/S0266078421000316
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078421000316 [Google Scholar]
  71. Syed, N. A., & Hasan, G.
    (2014) An acoustic analysis of speech of London-based Baloch learners of English. Balochistan Review, 31(2), 91–104.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Tremblay, M. C.
    (2007) L2 influence on L3 pronunciation: Native-like VOT in the L3 Japanese of English-French bilinguals. Paper presented at theL3 Phonology Satellite Workshop of ICPhS XVI, Freiburg, Germany.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Westergaard, M.
    (2021a) L3 acquisition and cross-linguistic influence as co-activation: Response to commentaries on the keynote ‘Microvariation in multilingual situations: The importance of property-byproperty acquisition’. Second Language Research, 37(3), 501–518. 10.1177/02676583211007897
     https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583211007897 [Google Scholar]
  74. (2021b) Microvariation in multilingual situations: The importance of property-by-property acquisition. Second Language Research, 37(3), 379–407. 10.1177/0267658319884116
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658319884116 [Google Scholar]
  75. Westergaard, M., Mitrofanova, N., Mykhaylyk, R., & Rodina, Y.
    (2017) Cross-linguistic influence in the acquisition of a third language: The Linguistic Proximity Model. International Journal of Bilingualism, 211, 666–682. 10.1177/1367006916648859
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006916648859 [Google Scholar]
  76. Westergaard, M., Mitrofanova, N., Rodina, Y., & Slabakova, R.
    (2023) Full Transfer Potential in L3/Ln acquisition: Cross-linguistic influence as a property-by-property process. InC.-O. A. Cabrelli J, González, Alonso J., (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of third language acquisition and processing (pp. 219–242). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108957823.010
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108957823.010 [Google Scholar]
  77. Wrembel, M.
    (2009) The impact of voice quality resetting on the perception of a foreign accent in third language acquisition. InM. A. W. A. S. Rauber, & B. O. Baptista (Ed.), Recent Research in Second Language Phonetics and Phonology: Perception and Production (pp. 291–307). New Castle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. (2010) L2-accented speech in L3 production. International Journal of Multilingualism, 71, 75–90. 10.1080/14790710902972263
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710902972263 [Google Scholar]
  79. (2014) VOT Patterns in the Acquisition of Third Language Phonology. Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 751–771.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. (2015) In Search of a New Perspective: Cross-Linguistic Influence in the Acquisition of Third Language Phonology. Poznan: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Wrembel, M., Marecka, M., & Kopeckova, R.
    (2019) Extending perceptual assimilation model to L3 phonological acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(4), 513–533. 10.1080/14790718.2019.1583233
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2019.1583233 [Google Scholar]
  82. Williams, S., & Hammarberg, B.
    (1998) Language switches in L3 production: Implications for a polyglot speaking model. Applied Linguistics, 191, 259–333. 10.1093/applin/19.3.295
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.3.295 [Google Scholar]
  83. Wunder, E.-M.
    (2011) Cross-linguistic Influence in Multilingual Language Acquisition: Phonology in Third or Additional Language Acquisition. InG. d. A. a. J.-M. Dewaele (Ed.), In New Trends in Cross-linguistic Influence and Multilingualism Research (pp. 105–128). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847694430‑008
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847694430-008 [Google Scholar]
  84. Xiang, J., & Yuan, B.
    (2020) Definiteness constraint on subjects in L2 and L3 Mandarin grammars: Empirical evidence concerning the source of transfer in L3 acquisition. Journal of Second Language Studies, 3(2), 234–261. 10.1075/jsls.00012.xia
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00012.xia [Google Scholar]
  85. Xu, Y.
    (2013) ProsodyPro – A Tool for Large-scale Systematic Prosody Analysis. TRASP.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Zhang, X.
    (1998) Dialect MT: a case study between Cantonese and Mandarin. Paper presented atThe 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.23002.sye
Loading
VOT for plosives in the indigenous languages of Balochistan
Journal of Second Language Studies 7, 157 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.23002.sye
/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.23002.sye
/content/journals/10.1075/jsls.23002.sye
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): allophones; aspiration; Balochi; L3; PakE; VOT

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error