An exploratory systematic review of self-citations in the top-tier journals of applied linguistics

References

1. Al-Hoorie, A. H., Cinaglia, C., Hiver, P., Huensch, A., Isbell, D. R., Leung, C., & Sudina, E.
   (2024) Open science: Considerations and issues for TESOL research. TESOL Quarterly. Online first. 10.1002/tesq.3304
   https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3304 [Google Scholar]
2. Alferink, I.
   (2023) Using the OASIS research database for ELT professional development. TESOL Connections.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Albert, Á., & Csizér, K.
   (2022) Investigating individual differences with qualitative research methods: Results of a meta-analysis of leading applied linguistics journals. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(2), 303–335. 10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.2.6
   https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.2.6 [Google Scholar]
4. American Psychological Association
   American Psychological Association (2020) Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). 10.1037/0000165‑000
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000 [Google Scholar]
5. Baccini, A., De Nicolao, G., & Petrovich, E.
   (2019) Citation gaming induced by bibliometric evaluation: A country-level comparative analysis. PLOS One, 14(9), Article e0221212. 10.1371/journal.pone.0221212
   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221212 [Google Scholar]
6. Baccini, A., & Petrovich, E.
   (2023) A global exploratory comparison of country self-citations 1996–2019. PLOS One, 18(12), Article e0294669. 10.1371/journal.pone.0294669
   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294669 [Google Scholar]
7. COPE Council. COPE discussion document: Citation manipulation
   COPE Council. COPE discussion document: Citation manipulation. July 2019 10.24318/cope.2019.3.1
   https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.3.1
8. Costas, R., van Leeuwen, T. N., & Bordons, M.
   (2010) Self-citations at the meso and individual levels: Effects of different calculation methods. Scientometrics, 821, 517–537. 10.1007/s11192‑010‑0187‑7
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0187-7 [Google Scholar]
9. Csaba, L., Szentes, T., & Zalai, E.
   (2014) Tudományos-e a tudománymérés? Megjegyzések a tudománymetria, az impaktfaktor és az MTMT használatához [Is science measurement scientific? Notes on scientometrics, impact factor, and the use of MTMT]. Magyar Tudomány, 41, 442–466. www.matud.iif.hu/2014/04/12.htm
   [Google Scholar]
10. Fister Jr., I., Fister, I., & Perc, M.
    (2016) Toward the discovery of citation cartels in citation networks. Frontiers in Physics, 41, Article 49. 10.3389/fphy.2016.00049
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2016.00049 [Google Scholar]
11. Flatt, J. W., Blasimme, A., & Vayena, E.
    (2017) Improving the measurement of scientific success by reporting a self-citation index. Publications, 5(3), Article 20. 10.3390/publications5030020
    https://doi.org/10.3390/publications5030020 [Google Scholar]
12. Fowler, J. H., & Aksnes, D. W.
    (2007) Does self-citation pay?Scientometrics, 72(3), 427–437. 10.1007/s11192‑007‑1777‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1777-2 [Google Scholar]
13. Global scientometric ranking of researchers
    Global scientometric ranking of researchers. (n.d.). https://scientometrics.org/updates/information.html
14. Impact metrics: SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)
    Impact metrics: SCImago Journal Rank (SJR). (n.d.). University of Wisconsin–Madison Libraries. https://researchguides.library.wisc.edu/c.php?g=1226768&p=9004430
    [Google Scholar]
15. Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Maniadis, Z.
    (2023) In defense of quantitative metrics in researcher assessments. PLOS Biology, 21(12), Article e3002408. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002408
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002408 [Google Scholar]
16. Journal of Second Language Writing
    Journal of Second Language Writing (2024) https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/journal-of-second-language-writing/publish/guide-for-authors
17. Kaptay, Gy
    (2020) The k-index is introduced to replace the h-index to evaluate better the scientific excellence of individuals. Heliyon, 6(7), Article e04415. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04415
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04415 [Google Scholar]
18. Kaptay, Gy
    (2021) A hazai kutatók, tudományágak és kutatóhelyek nemzetközi láthatósága (2017–2019) [The international visibility of scientists, research fields and affiliations of Hungary (2017–2019)]. Anyagvizsgálók lapja1(2), 13–34. https://tab.mta.hu/files/7216/1035/5040/Hazai_kutatok_nemzetkozi_lathatosaga_2017-2019.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
19. King, M. M., Bergstrom, C. T., Correll, S. J., Jacquet, J., & West, J. D.
    (2017) Men set their own cites high: Gender and self-citation across fields and over time. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 31, 1–22. 10.1177/2378023117738903
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117738903 [Google Scholar]
20. Kolstoe, S.
    (2023) Defining the spectrum of questionable research practices (QRPs). UK Research Integrity Office. https://ukrio.org/ukrio-resources/questionable-research-practices/. 10.37672/UKRIO.2023.02.QRPs
    https://doi.org/10.37672/UKRIO.2023.02.QRPs [Google Scholar]
21. Language Learning Author Guidelines
    Language Learning Author Guidelines (2024) https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/page/journal/14679922/homepage/forauthors.html
22. Larsson, T., Plonsky, L., Sterling, S., Kytö, M., Yaw, K., & Wood, M.
    (2023) On the frequency, prevalence, and perceived severity of questionable research practices. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(3), Article 100064. 10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100064
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100064 [Google Scholar]
23. Ménes, A.
    (2019) A tudományos tevékenységek teljesítményértékelése [Assessing performance based on scientific activities]. Marketing & Menedzsment: The Hungarian Journal of Marketing and Management, 41(1), 63–67. https://journals.lib.pte.hu/index.php/mm/article/view/1257
    [Google Scholar]
24. Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., … McKenzie, J. E.
    (2021) PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 3721, Article 160. 10.1136/bmj.n160
    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160 [Google Scholar]
25. Papp, Z.
    (2006) Mire és hogyan nem lenne szabad használni az impakt faktort? [To what and how should the impact factor not be used?]. Magyar Tudomány, 11, 99–103.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Plonsky, L.
    (2024) Study quality as an intellectual and ethical imperative: A proposed framework. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. Online first. 10.1017/S0267190524000059
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190524000059 [Google Scholar]
27. Plonsky, L., & Sudina, E.
    (2025) Self-citation practices in applied linguistics: A bibliometric review. Journal of Second Language Studies. 10.1075/jsls.00052.plo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00052.plo [Google Scholar]
28. Plonsky, L., & Sudina, E.
    (2023, December15). Self-citation practices in applied linguistics [Conference session]. Research ethics Symposium, Uppsala University, Sweden. https://drive.google.com/file/d/15YohrwXfc9MBQTB5g4XIW9I8KHaht7w8/view
    [Google Scholar]
29. Seeber, M., Cattaneo, M., Meoli, M., & Malighetti, P.
    (2019) Self-citations as strategic response to the use of metrics for career decisions. Research Policy, 48(2), 478–491. 10.1016/j.respol.2017.12.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.12.004 [Google Scholar]
30. Sterling, S., Plonsky, L., Larsson, T., Kytö, M., & Yaw, K.
    (2023) Introducing and illustrating the Delphi method for applied linguistics research. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(1), Article 100040. 10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100040
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100040 [Google Scholar]
31. Studies in Second Language Acquisition Author Guidelines
    Studies in Second Language Acquisition Author Guidelines (2024) https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/studies-in-second-language-acquisition/information/author-instructions
32. System Author Guidelines
    System Author Guidelines (2024) https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/system/publish/guide-for-authors
33. Szomszor, M., Pendlebury, D. A., & Adams, J.
    (2020) How much is too much? The difference between research influence and self-citation excess. Scientometrics, 1231, 1119–1147. 10.1007/s11192‑020‑03417‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03417-5 [Google Scholar]
34. Taşkin, Z., Doğan, G., Kulczycki, E., & Zuccala, A. A.
    (2021) Self-citation patterns of journals indexed in the journal citation reports. Journal of Informetrics, 15(4), Article 101221. 10.1016/j.joi.2021.101221
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101221 [Google Scholar]
35. TESOL Quarterly Author Guidelines
    TESOL Quarterly Author Guidelines (2024, July07). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/page/journal/15457249/homepage/forauthors.html
36. The Modern Language Journal Author Guidelines
    The Modern Language Journal Author Guidelines (2024, July05). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/page/journal/15404781/homepage/forauthors.html
37. Van Noorden, R., Chawla, D. S.
    (2019) Policing self-citations. Nature, 572(7771), 578–579. 10.1038/d41586‑019‑02479‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02479-7 [Google Scholar]
38. Vitta, J. P., Hahn, A., Canning, D., Isbell, D. R., Al-Hoorie, A. H., & Nicklin, C.
    (2025) Conceptualization and frequency of sampling (mal)practices in L2 inferential quantitative research: Towards a potential QRP?Journal of Second Language Studies. Online first. 10.1075/jsls.00049.vit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00049.vit [Google Scholar]
39. Wood, M., Sterling, S., Larsson, T., Plonsky, L., Kytö, M., & Yaw, K.
    (2024) Researchers training researchers: Ethics training in quantitative applied linguistics. TESOL Quarterly. Online first. 10.1002/tesq.3323
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3323 [Google Scholar]
40. Xu, Y., Zhuang, J., Blair, R., Kim, A. I., Li, F., Hernández, R. T., & Plonsky, L.
    (2023) Modeling quality and prestige in applied linguistics journals: A bibliometric and synthetic analysis. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 13(4), 755–779. 10.14746/ssllt.40215
    https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.40215 [Google Scholar]