oa Ordinals, reflexives and unaccusatives

References

1. Abaffy, Erzsébet
   1991 Az ikes ragozás kialakulása. A határozott és az általános ragozás elkülönülése [The emergence of the ik-conjugation: The separation of the definite and the general conjugations]. InLoránd Benkő, Erzsébet E. Abaffy & Endre Rácz (eds.), A magyar nyelv történeti nyelvtana. A korai ómagyar kor és előzményei [A historical grammar of Hungarian: Early Old Hungarian and its antecedents], 125–139. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Abaffy, Erzsébet
   1992 Az igei személyragozás [Verbal conjugation]. InLoránd Benkő (ed.), A magyar nyelv történeti nyelvtana. A kései ómagyar kor: Morfematika [A historical grammar of Hungarian: The morphology of Late Old Hungarian], 184–238. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Florian Schäfer
   2015 External arguments in transitivity alternations: A layering approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
4. Baker, Mark
   1988 Incorporation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Balázs, Géza
   2001 Magyar nyelvhelyességi lexikon [A lexicon of correct Hungarian]. Budapest: Corvina.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bouchard, Denis
   1984 On the content of empty categories. Dordrecht: Foris.
   [Google Scholar]
7. De la Mora, Juliana
   2011 A quantitative approach to variable se-marking in Spanish ingestive verbs. PhD dissertation, The Ohio State University.
8. Dikken, Marcel den
   2006 Relators and linkers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5873.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5873.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
9. Dikken, Marcel den
   2015 Raising the subject of the ‘object-of’ relation. InÁngel J. Gallego & Dennis Ott (eds.), 50 years later: Reflections on Chomsky’s Aspects. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics771. 85–98.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dikken, Marcel den
    2018 An integrated perspective on Hungarian nominal and verbal inflection. InHuba Bartos, Marcel den Dikken, Zoltán Bánréti & Tamás Váradi (eds.), Boundaries crossed, at the crossroads of morphosyntax, phonology, pragmatics and semantics, 147–162. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑90710‑9_10
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90710-9_10 [Google Scholar]
11. Dikken, Marcel den
    2020 Canonical and reverse predication in the syntax of the active/passive diathesis alternation. InAdriana Belletti & Christopher Collins (eds.), Smuggling in syntax, 147–187. Oxford/ New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dikken, Marcel den & Éva Dékány
    2019 Passives that look like causatives – Causatives that read like passives: caus+se=pass. Paper presented at the12th SinFonIJA conference, Masaryk University, Brno, 14 September 2019. Ms., RIL.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Doron, Edit & Malka Rappaport Hovav
    2007 Towards a uniform theory of valence-changing operations. Proceedings of IATL231. 2–20.
    [Google Scholar]
14. É. Kiss, Katalin
    1998 The syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. É. Kiss, Katalin
    2018 Possessive agreement turned into a derivational suffix. InHuba Bartos, Marcel den Dikken, Zoltán Bánréti & Tamás Váradi (eds.), Boundaries crossed, at the interfaces of morphosyntax, phonology, pragmatics and semantics, 87–105. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑90710‑9_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90710-9_6 [Google Scholar]
16. Fodor, Janet Dean
    2017 Ambiguity, parsing, and the evaluation measure. Language Acquisition241. 85–99. 10.1080/10489223.2016.1270948
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2016.1270948 [Google Scholar]
17. Hale, Kenneth & S. Jay Keyser
    1993 Argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. InKenneth Hale & S. Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from Building201, 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Halm, Tamás
    2020 Grammaticalization without feature economy: Evidence from the voice cycle in Hungarian. Diachronica371. 1–42. 10.1075/dia.19008.hal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.19008.hal [Google Scholar]
19. Havas, Ferenc
    2004 Objective conjugation and medialisation. Acta Linguistica Hungarica511. 95–141. 10.1556/ALing.51.2004.1‑2.5
    https://doi.org/10.1556/ALing.51.2004.1-2.5 [Google Scholar]
20. Horn, Laurence
    2008 ‘I love me some him’: The landscape of non-argument datives. InOlivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.), Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics71. 169–192. www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss7/horn-eiss7.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
21. Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum
    2002 The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316423530
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530 [Google Scholar]
22. Kayne, Richard
    1975 French syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kayne, Richard
    1994 The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Krejci, Bonnie
    2012 Causativization as antireflexivization: A study of middle and ingestive verbs. MA thesis, University of Texas at Austin.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Márkus, Andrea
    2015 Taming the Hungarian (in)transitivity zoo. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.
26. Mészöly, Gedeon
    1941 Az ikes ragozás -ik ragjának eredete [The origin of the -ik suffix in the ik-conjugation]. Nyelvtudományi Közlemények511. 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Nedjalkov, Vladimir
    2007 Polysemy of reciprocal markers. InVladimir Nedjalkov (ed.), Reciprocal constructions, 231–334. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.71.10ned
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.71.10ned [Google Scholar]
28. Newman, John
    (ed.) 2009 The linguistics of eating and drinking. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.84
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.84 [Google Scholar]
29. Rappaport Hovav, Malka
    2014 Lexical content and context: The causative alternation in English revisited. Lingua1411. 8–29. 10.1016/j.lingua.2013.09.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.09.006 [Google Scholar]
30. Reinhart, Tanya & Eric Reuland
    1993 Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry241. 657–720.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Reinhart, Tanya & Tal Siloni
    2005 The lexicon–syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations. Linguistic Inquiry361. 389–436. 10.1162/0024389054396881
    https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389054396881 [Google Scholar]
32. Resenes, Mariana & Marcel den Dikken
    2012 Semi-clefts as a window on the syntax of predication and the ‘object of’ relation. InProceedings of CLS481. 519–33. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Sárosi, Zsófia
    2003 Morfématörténet [Historical morphology]. InJenő Kiss & Ferenc Pusztai (eds.), Magyar nyelvtörténet [The history of Hungarian], 129–172. Budapest: Osiris.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Schäfer, Florian
    2017 Romance and Greek medio-passives and the typology of Voice. InRoberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco & Ángel Gallego (eds.), The verbal domain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Sleeman, Ruby
    2017 Ordinal numerals in dialects of Dutch. MA thesis, University of Leiden.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Sportiche, Dominique
    2014 Assessing unaccusativity and reflexivity: Using focus alternatives to decide what gets which θ-role. Linguistic Inquiry451. 305–21. 10.1162/LING_a_00156
    https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00156 [Google Scholar]