Volume 1, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2772-3720
  • E-ISSN: 2772-3739



This paper presents a unified outlook on the syntax of constructions featuring the reflexive clitic , with particular emphasis on the uniform morphosyntax of the Hungarian element , treated as an exponent of both in the verbal domain and in the nominal domain (in ordinal numeral constructions). The analysis is couched in the syntax of predication proposed in Den Dikken (2006), with represented as the subject of a reverse predication.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.

Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Abaffy, Erzsébet
    1991 Az ikes ragozás kialakulása. A határozott és az általános ragozás elkülönülése [The emergence of the ik-conjugation: The separation of the definite and the general conjugations]. InLoránd Benkő, Erzsébet E. Abaffy & Endre Rácz (eds.), A magyar nyelv történeti nyelvtana. A korai ómagyar kor és előzményei [A historical grammar of Hungarian: Early Old Hungarian and its antecedents], 125–139. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 1992 Az igei személyragozás [Verbal conjugation]. InLoránd Benkő (ed.), A magyar nyelv történeti nyelvtana. A kései ómagyar kor: Morfematika [A historical grammar of Hungarian: The morphology of Late Old Hungarian], 184–238. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Florian Schäfer
    2015External arguments in transitivity alternations: A layering approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, Mark
    1988Incorporation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Balázs, Géza
    2001Magyar nyelvhelyességi lexikon [A lexicon of correct Hungarian]. Budapest: Corvina.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bouchard, Denis
    1984On the content of empty categories. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. De la Mora, Juliana
    2011 A quantitative approach to variable se-marking in Spanish ingestive verbs. PhD dissertation, The Ohio State University.
  8. Dikken, Marcel den
    2006Relators and linkers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5873.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5873.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2015 Raising the subject of the ‘object-of’ relation. InÁngel J. Gallego & Dennis Ott (eds.), 50 years later: Reflections on Chomsky’s Aspects. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics771. 85–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2018 An integrated perspective on Hungarian nominal and verbal inflection. InHuba Bartos, Marcel den Dikken, Zoltán Bánréti & Tamás Váradi (eds.), Boundaries crossed, at the crossroads of morphosyntax, phonology, pragmatics and semantics, 147–162. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑90710‑9_10
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90710-9_10 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2020 Canonical and reverse predication in the syntax of the active/passive diathesis alternation. InAdriana Belletti & Christopher Collins (eds.), Smuggling in syntax, 147–187. Oxford/ New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dikken, Marcel den & Éva Dékány
    2019 Passives that look like causatives – Causatives that read like passives: caus+se=pass. Paper presented at the12th SinFonIJA conference, Masaryk University, Brno, 14 September 2019. Ms., RIL.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Doron, Edit & Malka Rappaport Hovav
    2007 Towards a uniform theory of valence-changing operations. Proceedings of IATL231. 2–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. É. Kiss, Katalin
    1998The syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2018 Possessive agreement turned into a derivational suffix. InHuba Bartos, Marcel den Dikken, Zoltán Bánréti & Tamás Váradi (eds.), Boundaries crossed, at the interfaces of morphosyntax, phonology, pragmatics and semantics, 87–105. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑90710‑9_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90710-9_6 [Google Scholar]
  16. Fodor, Janet Dean
    2017 Ambiguity, parsing, and the evaluation measure. Language Acquisition241. 85–99. 10.1080/10489223.2016.1270948
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2016.1270948 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hale, Kenneth & S. Jay Keyser
    1993 Argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. InKenneth Hale & S. Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from Building201, 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Halm, Tamás
    2020 Grammaticalization without feature economy: Evidence from the voice cycle in Hungarian. Diachronica371. 1–42. 10.1075/dia.19008.hal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.19008.hal [Google Scholar]
  19. Havas, Ferenc
    2004 Objective conjugation and medialisation. Acta Linguistica Hungarica511. 95–141. 10.1556/ALing.51.2004.1‑2.5
    https://doi.org/10.1556/ALing.51.2004.1-2.5 [Google Scholar]
  20. Horn, Laurence
    2008 ‘I love me some him’: The landscape of non-argument datives. InOlivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.), Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics71. 169–192. www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss7/horn-eiss7.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum
    2002The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316423530
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kayne, Richard
    1975French syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 1994The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Krejci, Bonnie
    2012 Causativization as antireflexivization: A study of middle and ingestive verbs. MA thesis, University of Texas at Austin.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Márkus, Andrea
    2015 Taming the Hungarian (in)transitivity zoo. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.
  26. Mészöly, Gedeon
    1941 Az ikes ragozás -ik ragjának eredete [The origin of the -ik suffix in the ik-conjugation]. Nyelvtudományi Közlemények511. 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Nedjalkov, Vladimir
    2007 Polysemy of reciprocal markers. InVladimir Nedjalkov (ed.), Reciprocal constructions, 231–334. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.71.10ned
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.71.10ned [Google Scholar]
  28. Newman, John
    (ed.) 2009The linguistics of eating and drinking. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.84
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.84 [Google Scholar]
  29. Rappaport Hovav, Malka
    2014 Lexical content and context: The causative alternation in English revisited. Lingua1411. 8–29. 10.1016/j.lingua.2013.09.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.09.006 [Google Scholar]
  30. Reinhart, Tanya & Eric Reuland
    1993 Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry241. 657–720.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Reinhart, Tanya & Tal Siloni
    2005 The lexicon–syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations. Linguistic Inquiry361. 389–436. 10.1162/0024389054396881
    https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389054396881 [Google Scholar]
  32. Resenes, Mariana & Marcel den Dikken
    2012 Semi-clefts as a window on the syntax of predication and the ‘object of’ relation. InProceedings of CLS481. 519–33. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sárosi, Zsófia
    2003 Morfématörténet [Historical morphology]. InJenő Kiss & Ferenc Pusztai (eds.), Magyar nyelvtörténet [The history of Hungarian], 129–172. Budapest: Osiris.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Schäfer, Florian
    2017 Romance and Greek medio-passives and the typology of Voice. InRoberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco & Ángel Gallego (eds.), The verbal domain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Sleeman, Ruby
    2017 Ordinal numerals in dialects of Dutch. MA thesis, University of Leiden.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Sportiche, Dominique
    2014 Assessing unaccusativity and reflexivity: Using focus alternatives to decide what gets which θ-role. Linguistic Inquiry451. 305–21. 10.1162/LING_a_00156
    https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00156 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): -ik; ordinals; predication; reflexive clitic se; reflexives; unaccusatives
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error