Response particles and verbal identity

References

1. Aelbrecht, Lobke
   2010 The syntactic licensing of ellipsis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.149
   https://doi.org/10.1075/la.149 [Google Scholar]
2. Bánréti, Zoltán
   2007 A mellérendelés és az ellipszis nyelvtana a magyarban [The grammar of coordination and ellipsis in Hungarian]. Budapest: Tinta Könyvkiadó.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Barros, Matthew
   2014 Sluicing and identity in ellipsis. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.
4. Chomsky, Noam
   1965 Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chung, Sandra
   2006 Sluicing and the lexicon: The point of no return. InRebecca T. Cover & Yuni Kim (eds.), Proceedings of BLS, 73–91. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Dikken, Marcel den
   2020 Unmatched and unparalleled. Voice and argument structure mismatches in ellipsis – Analysis and implications. Manuscript, Budapest: ELTE SEAS / Hungarian Research Center for Linguistics.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cyrino, Sonia M. L. & Gabriela Matos
   2002 VP ellipsis in European and Brazilian Portuguese – a comparative analysis. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics11, 177–195. 10.5334/jpl.41
   https://doi.org/10.5334/jpl.41 [Google Scholar]
8. É. Kiss, Katalin
   2002 The syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511755088
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755088 [Google Scholar]
9. Esipova, Maria
   2021 Polar responses in Russian across modalities and across interfaces. Journal of Slavic Linguistics291. ojs.ung.si/index.php/JSL/article/view/151
   [Google Scholar]
10. Farkas, Donka
    2009 Polarity particles in Hungarian. InMarcel den Dikken & Robert M. Vago (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian111. 95–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/atoh.11.05far
    https://doi.org/10.1075/atoh.11.05far [Google Scholar]
11. Farkas, Donka & Kim Bruce
    2010 On reacting to assertions and polar questions. Journal of semantics271. 81–118. 10.1093/jos/ffp010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffp010 [Google Scholar]
12. Freywald, Ulrike & Rita Finkbeiner
    (eds) 2018 Exact repetition in grammar and discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Goldberg, Lotus
    2005 Verb-stranding VP-ellipsis: A cross-linguistic study. PhD dissertation, McGill University.
14. Gribanova, Vera
    2013 Verb-stranding verb phrase ellipsis and the structure of the Russian verbal complex. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory311. 91–136. 10.1007/s11049‑012‑9183‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-012-9183-3 [Google Scholar]
15. Gribanova, Vera
    2017 Head movement and ellipsis in the expression of Russian polarity focus. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory351. 1079–1121. 10.1007/s11049‑017‑9361‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-017-9361-4 [Google Scholar]
16. Gribanova, Vera
    2018 Head movement, ellipsis and identity. Manuscript, Stanford University.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gribanova, Vera
    2020 Predicate formation and verb-stranding ellipsis in Uzbek. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics51. 1241. 1–40. 10.5334/gjgl.1042
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1042 [Google Scholar]
18. Gribanova, Vera & Boris Harizanov
    2019 Whither head movement?Natural Language and Linguistic Theory371. 461–522. 10.1007/s11049‑018‑9420‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-018-9420-5 [Google Scholar]
19. Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
    1976 Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hoji, Hajime
    1998 Null object and sloppy identity in Japanese. Linguistic Inquiry291. 127–125. 10.1162/002438998553680
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438998553680 [Google Scholar]
21. Holmberg, Anders
    2001 The syntax of yes and no in Finnish. Studia Linguistica551. 141–174. 10.1111/1467‑9582.00077
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9582.00077 [Google Scholar]
22. Holmberg, Anders
    2016 The syntax of yes and no. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Holmberg, Anders & Ian Roberts
    2014 Parameters and the three factors of language design. InCarme Picallo (ed.), Linguistic variation in the minimalist framework, 61–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702894.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702894.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
24. Johnson, Kyle
    2001 What VP-ellipsis can do, and what it can’t, but not why. InMark Baltin & Chris Collins (eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, 439–479. Malden: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756416.ch14
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756416.ch14 [Google Scholar]
25. Kenesei, István
    2001 Criteria for auxiliaries in Hungarian. InIstván Kenesei (ed.), Argument structure in Hungarian, 83–106. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Kenesei, István, Robert M. Vago & Anna Fenyvesi
    1998 Hungarian. Routledge Descriptive Grammars. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Kramer, Ruth & Kyle Rawlins
    2009 Polarity particles: An ellipsis account. InSuzi Lima, Kevin Mullin & Brian Smith (eds.), Proceedings of NELS391, 479–492. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Krifka, Manfred
    2013 Response particles as propositional anaphors. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT)231, 1–18. 10.3765/salt.v23i0.2676
    https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v23i0.2676 [Google Scholar]
29. Landau, Idan
    2018 Missing objects in Hebrew: Argument ellipsis, not VP ellipsis. Glossa31, 761. 1–37. 10.5334/gjgl.560
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.560 [Google Scholar]
30. Landau, Idan
    2020 Constraining head-stranding ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry511. 281–318. 10.1162/ling_a_00347
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00347 [Google Scholar]
31. Levin, Lori
    1982 Sluicing: A lexical interpretation procedure. InJoan Bresnan (ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations, 590–654. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Lipták, Anikó
    2012 V-stranding ellipsis and verbal identity: the role of polarity focus. InMarion Elenbaas & Suzanne Aalberse (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2012, 82–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/avt.29.07lip
    https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.29.07lip [Google Scholar]
33. Lipták, Anikó
    2013 The syntax of positive polarity in Hungarian: evidence from ellipsis. InAnne Breitbarth, Karen De Clercq & Liliane Haegeman (eds.), Emphatic polarity. Special issue ofLingua1281. 72–94. 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.11.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.11.013 [Google Scholar]
34. Lipták, Anikó
    2015 Identity in ellipsis: an introduction. Lingua166B1. 155–171. 10.1016/j.lingua.2015.08.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.08.003 [Google Scholar]
35. Lipták, Anikó
    2018 Dissecting adpositional particle constructions: remarks from ellipsis. InHuba Bartos, Marcel den Dikken, Zoltán Bánréti & Tamás Váradi (eds.), Boundaries crossed: Studies at the crossroads of morphosyntax, phonology, pragmatics, and semantics, 327–348. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑90710‑9_21
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90710-9_21 [Google Scholar]
36. Lipták, Anikó
    2020 Fragments with correction. Linguistic Inquiry511. 154–167. 10.1162/ling_a_00333
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00333 [Google Scholar]
37. Lipták, Anikó & Andrés Saab
    2019 Hungarian particle reduplication as local doubling. Acta Linguistica Academica661. 527–574. 10.1556/2062.2019.66.4.3
    https://doi.org/10.1556/2062.2019.66.4.3 [Google Scholar]
38. Lukács, Imre Sz.
    1997 Magyar gulág [Hungarian Gulag]. Szeged: Bába. mek.niif.hu/02900/02915/html/01.htm
    [Google Scholar]
39. Martins, Ana Maria
    1994 Enclisis, VP-deletion and the nature of Sigma. Probus61. 173–205. 10.1515/prbs.1994.6.2‑3.173
    https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.1994.6.2-3.173 [Google Scholar]
40. McCloskey, James
    1991 Clause structure, ellipsis and proper government in Irish. Lingua851. 259–302. 10.1016/0024‑3841(91)90023‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(91)90023-X [Google Scholar]
41. McCloskey, James
    2011 The shape of Irish clauses. InAndrew Carnie (ed.), Formal approaches to Celtic linguistics, 143–178. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
42. McCloskey, James
    2017 Ellipsis, polarity and the cartography of verb-initial orders in Irish. Ms, UCSC. 10.1515/9781501504037‑005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501504037-005 [Google Scholar]
43. Merchant, Jason
    2001 The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Merchant, Jason
    2013 Polarity items under ellipsis. InLisa L.-S. Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds.), Diagnosing syntax, 441–462. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602490.003.0022
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602490.003.0022 [Google Scholar]
45. Merchant, Jason
    2018 Verb-stranding predicate ellipsis in Greek, implicit arguments and ellipsis-internal focus. InJason Merchant, Line Mikkelsen, Deniz Rudin & Kelsey Sasaki (eds.), A reasonable way to proceed: Essays in honor of Jim McCloskey, 229–269. University of California eScholarship.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Ngonyani, Deo
    1996 VP ellipsis in Ndendeule and Swahili applicatives. InEdward Garrett & Felicia Lee (eds.), Syntax at Sunset: UCLA Working Papers in Syntax and Semantics11, 109–128. Los Angeles: UCLA.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Otani, Kazuyo & John Whitman
    1991 V-raising and VP ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry221. 345–358.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Peruch Mezari, Meiry
    2016 Lexical identity in VP ellipsis in Brazilian Portuguese: An experimental approach. Paper presented atEllipsis across borders, Sarajevo, 20–21 June.
49. Piñón, Christopher
    1992 Heads in the focus field. In: István Kenesei & Csaba Pléh (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian41, 99–121. Szeged: JATE.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Portelance, Eva
    2020 Genuine verb stranding VP-ellipsis in Lithuanian. InMariam Asatryan, Yixiao Song & Ayana Whitmal (eds.), Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society31, 59–72. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Roelofsen, Floris & Donka Farkas
    2015 Polarity particle responses as a window onto the interpretation of questions and assertions. Language911. 359–414. 10.1353/lan.2015.0017
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2015.0017 [Google Scholar]
52. Rooth, Mats
    1992 Ellipsis redundancy and reduction redundancy. InSteve Berman & Arild Hestvik (eds.), Proceedings from the Stuttgart Ellipsis Workshop. Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereich 340, No. 29.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Santos, Ana Lúcia
    2009 Minimal answers: Ellipsis, syntax and discourse in the acquisition of European Portuguese. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.48
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.48 [Google Scholar]
54. Sato, Yosuke
    2020 Idioms, argument ellipsis and LF copy. Journal of East Asian Linguistics291. 259–278. 10.1007/s10831‑020‑09211‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-020-09211-x [Google Scholar]
55. Schoorlemmer, Erik & Tanja Temmerman
    2012 Head movement as a PF-phenomenon. Evidence from identity under ellipsis. InJaehoon Choi (eds.), Proceedings of the 29th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 232–240. Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Surányi, Balázs
    2009a Verbal particles inside and outside vP. Acta Linguistics Hungarica561. 201–249. 10.1556/ALing.56.2009.2‑3.3
    https://doi.org/10.1556/ALing.56.2009.2-3.3 [Google Scholar]
57. Surányi, Balázs
    2009b Locative particle and adverbial incorporation at the interfaces. InKatalin É. Kiss (ed.), Adverbs and adverbial adjuncts at the interfaces, 39–74. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214802.1.39
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214802.1.39 [Google Scholar]
58. Svennevig, Jan
    2003 Echo answers in native/non-native interaction. Pragmatics131. 285–309.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Thoms, Gary
    2018 On the verbal identity requirement. Ms, New York: NYU.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Wiltschko, Martina
    2017 Response particles beyond answering. InLaura R. Bailey & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Order and structure in syntax I: Word order and syntactic structure, 241–279. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]