1887
Volume 2, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2772-3720
  • E-ISSN: 2772-3739

Abstract

Abstract

This paper examines the morphosyntax of (dis)sociative ‘with(out)’, with particular reference to the facts of Hungarian but with an eye towards universality. The morphological analysis of / ‘with’ and / ‘without’ unpacks these complex forms, utilizing a variety of morphemes treated as heads of phrases in the syntax; the syntax, in turn, represents (dis)sociatives as depictive secondary predications, with a PRO-subject controlled by either the subject or the object of the containing clause. The morphophonology and semantics of sociative and dissociative unfold compositionally from the syntactic structure. The analysis of (dis)sociatives reveals the benefits of composing complex word-level formatives in syntax, shows that snowballing head movement and phrasal movement are two discrete strategies for syntactic word formation, and sheds new light on several grammatical formatives and their interactions.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jul.00015.dik
2023-06-19
2024-07-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jul.00015.dik.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/jul.00015.dik&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aasmäe, Niina
    2018 The morphosyntactic manifestations of the copula in Erzya. Linguistica Uralica541. 191–204. 10.3176/lu.2018.3.03
    https://doi.org/10.3176/lu.2018.3.03 [Google Scholar]
  2. Beke, Ödön
    1910 Megfejtetlen névragok [Unresolved noun suffixes]. Magyar Nyelvőr391. 194–200.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Budenz, József
    1884 A -stúl, -stűl comitativus rag [The comitative suffix -stúl, -stűl]. Nyelvtudományi Közlemények181. 158–160.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dékány, Éva
    2011 A profile of the Hungarian DP. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tromsø.
  5. Dékány, Éva & Veronika Hegedűs
    2021 Postpositions: Formal and semantic classification. InKatalin É. Kiss & Veronika Hegedűs (eds), The syntax of Hungarian: Postpositions and postpositional phrases, 11–191. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dikken, Marcel den
    2006Relators and linkers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5873.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5873.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2022 A phonosyntactic representation of Hungarian ‘lowering’. InJeroen van de Weijer (ed.), Segmental structure and representations, 307–326. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110730098‑016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110730098-016 [Google Scholar]
  8. (forthcoming). On the merger and antecedence of depictive secondary predicates. InMarcel den Dikken & Hideki Kishimoto eds Formal perspectives on secondary predication. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dikken, Marcel den & Éva Dékány
    2018 A restriction on recursion. Syntax211. 37–71. 10.1111/synt.12149
    https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12149 [Google Scholar]
  10. Fekete, István
    2013 Hungarian gyerekestül vs. gyerekkel (‘with [the] kid’). AHEA: E-Journal of the American Hungarian Educators Association61; ahea.net/e-journal/volume-6-2013/12
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Groot, Casper de
    2017 The essives in Hungarian. InCasper de Groot (ed.), Uralic essive and the expression of impermanent state, 325–352. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.119.14deg
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.119.14deg [Google Scholar]
  12. Hale, Kenneth
    1986 Notes on world view and semantic categories: Some Warlpiri examples. InPieter Muysken & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), Features and projections, 233–254. Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783110871661‑009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110871661-009 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hynönen, Emmi
    2017 The essive in Finnish. InCasper de Groot (ed.), Uralic essive and the expression of impermanent state, 29–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.119.02hyn
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.119.02hyn [Google Scholar]
  14. Jespersen, Otto
    1942A modern English grammar on historical principles, vol. VI: Morphology. London: George Allen & Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kayne, Richard
    1994The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kenesei, István, Robert Vago & Anna Fenyvesi
    1998Hungarian. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kiefer, Ferenc & Mária Ladányi
    2000 Morfoszintaktikailag semleges képzések [Morphosyntac-tically neutral derivations]. InFerenc Kiefer (ed.), Strukturális magyar nyelvtan [A structural grammar of Hungarian]. Vol.31, Morfológia [Morphology], 165–214. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kühner, Raphael
    1877–1879Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache [A detailed grammar of the Latin language]. Hannover: Hahnsche Buchhandlung.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Piñón, Christopher
    1991 Presupposition and the syntax of negation in Hungarian. InLise M. Dobrin, Lynn Nichols & Rosa M. Rodriguez (eds), CLS 27: Papers from the 27th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 1991. Part Two: The parasession on negation, 246–262. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou
    2003Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486326
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486326 [Google Scholar]
  21. Schirm, Anita
    2005 Az elidegeníthető és az elidegeníthetetlen birtoklás kifejezésmódjairól [On the expression of alienable and inalienable possession]. Acta Universitatis Szegediensis – Sectio Linguistica421. 155–69; accessed on-line at: publicatio.bibl.u-szeged.hu/7799/6/schirm_elidegenitheto_elidegenithetetlen.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Szabolcsi, Anna
    1983 A specifikus/nem specifikus megkülönböztetésről [On the specific/non-specific distinction]. Nyelvtudományi Közlemények851. 83–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ürögdi, Barbara
    2013 Adverbial clauses with -ig and the ‘until-puzzle’. Acta Linguistica Hungarica601. 303–363. 10.1556/ALing.60.2013.3.3
    https://doi.org/10.1556/ALing.60.2013.3.3 [Google Scholar]
  24. Zeijlstra, Hedde
    2010 Emphatic multiple negative expressions in Dutch: A by-product of loss of negative concord. The Linguistic Review271. 37–73. 10.1515/tlir.2010.003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2010.003 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jul.00015.dik
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): ablative; depictive; dissociative; essive; locative; negation; sociative
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error