1887
Volume 2, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2772-3720
  • E-ISSN: 2772-3739
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper presents a descriptive account of reported speech, understood in terms of Spronck & Nikitina (2019), in Beserman (Uralic > Permic). Two phenomena are described in particular. First, it is demonstrated that, although Beserman generally prefers the direct speech strategy, the interpretation of indexicals in certain contexts may be affected by pragmatic factors. Second, Beserman allows for agreement mismatch between the subject and the predicate of the reported clause, known as “monstrous agreement”. This phenomenon has not been attested in Permic languages before. Apart from that, extended uses of two Beserman reported speech markers are described, whereby they convey pragmatic meanings that resemble English or . This semantic development reverses a well-known grammaticalization path that turns such pragmatic elements into reported speech markers. The study is based on both corpus and elicited data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jul.00019.ark
2023-11-16
2024-06-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agyagási, Klára
    2012 Language contact in the Volga-Kama area. Studia Uralo-altaica491. 21–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersen, Gisle
    1998 The pragmatic marker like from a Relevance-theoretic perspective. InAndreas H. Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds.), Pragmatics & beyond: New series, vol.571, 147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/pbns.57.09and
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.57.09and [Google Scholar]
  3. Buchstaller, Isabelle & Ingrid van Alphen
    2012 Preface: Introductory remarks on new and old quotatives. InIsabelle Buchstaller & Ingrid van Alphen (eds.), Quotatives: cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives (Converging evidence in language and communication research, vol. 15), xi–xxx. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.15.02pre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.15.02pre [Google Scholar]
  4. Claridge, Claudia
    2013 The evolution of three pragmatic markers: As it were, so to speak/say and if you like. Journal of Historical Pragmatics141. 161–184. 10.1075/jhp.14.2.01cla
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.14.2.01cla [Google Scholar]
  5. Cysouw, Michael & Jeff Good
    2013 Languoid, doculect and glossonym: Formalizing the notion ‘language.’ Language Documentation and Conservation71. 331–359.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Davidse, Kristin & Lieven Vandelanotte
    2011 Tense use in direct and indirect speech in English. Journal of Pragmatics431. 236–250. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.022
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.022 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dömötör, Adrienne
    2015 A mondván és az úgymond: diskurzusjelölő elemek keletkezése idéző szerkezetekből [Mondván and úgymond: The emergence of discourse markers from quoting constructions]. Magyar Nyelv1111. 21–37. 10.18349/MagyarNyelv.2015.1.21
    https://doi.org/10.18349/MagyarNyelv.2015.1.21 [Google Scholar]
  8. Evans, Nicholas
    2013 Some problems in the typology of quotation: a canonical approach. InDunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax, 66–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ganenkov, Dmitry
    2016 Eccentric agreement can be monstrous. Presented at the39th GLOW Conference, Göttingen, April 5–8, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Güldemann, Tom
    2008Quotative indexes in African languages: A synchronic and diachronic survey (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology [EALT]). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110211450
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211450 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2012 Thetic speaker-instantiating quotative indexes as a cross-linguistic type. InIsabelle Buchstaller & Ingrid van Alphen (eds.), Quotatives: cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives (Converging evidence in language and communication research, vol. 15), 117–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.15.08gul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.15.08gul [Google Scholar]
  12. Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
    2002World lexicon of grammaticalization. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613463
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613463 [Google Scholar]
  13. Kaplan, David
    1989 Demonstratives: An essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. InJoseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, 481–563. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Karpova, Lyudmila
    2013Leksika severnogo narechija udmurtskogo jazyka [Vocabulary of the Northern dialect of the Udmurt language]. Izhevsk: Izdatel’stvo Udmurtskogo Universiteta.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kasenov, Daniar
    2021 Indexical shift and monstrous agreement in Balkar. Presented at the18th Conference on Typology and Grammar for Young Scholars, St. Petersburg, Russia.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kelmakov, Valentin
    1998Kratkij kurs udmurtskoj dialektologii [A brief course on Udmurt dialectology]. Izhevsk: Izdatel’stvo Udmurtskogo Universiteta.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Khachaturyan, Elizaveta
    2020 Marqueurs discursifs du dire (français, russe, norvégien): Des sémantiques lexicales différentes pour des stratégies énonciatives similaires? [Discursive markers of “say” (French, Russian, Norwegian): Different lexical semantics for similar speech strategies?]. Corela (HS-31). 10.4000/corela.11158
    https://doi.org/10.4000/corela.11158 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kibardina, Tatyana
    2012Sredstva vyrazhenija modal’nosti v udmurtskom jazyke [Means of expression of modality in Udmurt]. Mozhga: Udmurtskij universitet.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kirillova, Lyudmila
    (ed.) 2008Udmurtsko-russkij slovar’: Ok. 50000 slov [Udmurt–Russian dictionary: ca. 50,000 headwords]. Izhevsk: Izdatel’stvo Udmurtskogo Universiteta.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Klumpp, Gerson
    2016 Semantic functions of complementizers in Permic languages. InKasper Boye & Petar Kehayov (eds.), Complementizer semantics in European languages (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 57), 529–586. De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110416619‑016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110416619-016 [Google Scholar]
  21. Knyazev, Mikhail
    2022 SAY-complementizers and indexical shift in Poshkart Chuvash: With emphasis on communicative reception reports. Studies in Language461. 402–452. 10.1075/sl.19078.kny
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.19078.kny [Google Scholar]
  22. Kolyaseva, Alena
    2021 The divergent paths of pragmaticalization: The case of the Russian particles tipa and vrode. Journal of Pragmatics2011. 181–196. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.08.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.08.003 [Google Scholar]
  23. König, Ekkehard
    2002The meaning of focus particles: A comparative perspective. London / New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203212288
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203212288 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lytkin, Vasiliy
    1962Komi-Jaz’vinskij dialekt [Yazva Komi dialect]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 1964Istoricheskij vokalizm permskix jazykov [Historical vocalism of the Permic languages]. Moscow: Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Matić, Dejan & Brigitte Pakendorf
    2013 Non-canonical SAY in Siberia: Areal and genealogical patterns. Studies in Language371. 356–412. 10.1075/sl.37.2.04mat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.37.2.04mat [Google Scholar]
  27. Messick, Troy
    2017 The morphosyntax of self-ascription: A cross-linguistic study. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
  28. Nikitina, Tatiana
    2012 Personal deixis and reported discourse: Towards a typology of person alignment. Linguistic Typology161. 233–263. 10.1515/lity‑2012‑0008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0008 [Google Scholar]
  29. Podobryaev, Alexander
    2014 Persons, imposters, and monsters. PhD dissertation, MIT. hdl.handle.net/1721.1/87498
  30. Schlenker, Philippe
    2003 A plea for monsters. Linguistics and Philosophy261. 29–120. 10.1023/A:1022225203544
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022225203544 [Google Scholar]
  31. Serdobolskaya, Natalia & Svetlana Toldova
    2010 Grammaticalization of the verb of speech in Finno-Ugric languages. InCongressus XI Internationalis Finno-Ugristarum. Pars VI: Dissertationes symposiorum ad linguisticam. Piliscsaba: Reguly Társaság.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 2014 Glagol rechi manaš v marijskom jazyke: osobennosti grammatikalizacii [The verb of speaking manaš in the Mari language: Peculiarities of grammaticalization]. Voprosy jazykoznanija61. 66–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Skribnik, Elena
    2022 Clause combining. InMarianne Bakró-Nagy, Johanna Laakso, and Elena Skribnik (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Uralic languages, 996–1017. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198767664.003.0053
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198767664.003.0053 [Google Scholar]
  34. Sorvacheva, V.
    (ed.) 1961Sravnitel’nyj slovar’ komi-zyrjanskix dialektov [Comparative dictionary of Komi-Zyrian dialects]. Syktyvkar: Komi knizhnoe izdatel’stvo.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Spronck, Stef & Daniela Casartelli
    2021 In a manner of speaking: How reported speech may have shaped grammar. Frontiers in Communication61. 624486. 10.3389/fcomm.2021.624486
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.624486 [Google Scholar]
  36. Spronck, Stef & Tatiana Nikitina
    2019 Reported speech forms a dedicated syntactic domain. Linguistic Typology231. 119–159. 10.1515/lingty‑2019‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2019-0005 [Google Scholar]
  37. Sundaresan, Sandhya
    2011 A plea for syntax and a return to first principles: monstrous agreement in Tamil. InProceedings of SALT211, 674–693. 10.3765/salt.v21i0.2626
    https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v21i0.2626 [Google Scholar]
  38. Tánczos, Orsolya
    2013Hogy ... hogy? Kettős kötőszók az udmurt mondatban [That... that? Double conjunctions in the Udmurt sentence]. InKlára Agyagási, Attila Hegedűs & Katalin É. Kiss (eds.), Nyelvelmélet és kontaktológia21., 95–112. Piliscsaba: PPKE BTK Magyar Nyelvészeti Tanszék.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Teptiuk, Denys
    2019Quotative indexes in Finno-Ugric (Komi, Udmurt, Hungarian, Finnish and Estonian). Tartu University. hdl.handle.net/10062/66597
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 2021 Self-quotative markers in Permic and Hungarian. Linguistica Uralica571. 213. 10.3176/lu.2021.3.04
    https://doi.org/10.3176/lu.2021.3.04 [Google Scholar]
  41. Teptiuk, Denys & Johannes Hirvonen
    2021 Perspective shift in reported discourse of Finno-Ugric languages. Presented at54th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, Athens, August 31 – September 3, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Tyshkevich, Natalia
    2014Kosvennaja rech’ v besermjanskom dialekte udmurtskogo jazyka [Indirect speech in the Beserman dialect of Udmurt]. Presented at the2nd Workshop on Beserman and Mari studies, Moscow, February 28, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Usacheva, Maria, Timofey Arkhangelskiy, Olga Biryuk, Vladimir Ivanov & Ruslan Idrisov
    2017Tezaurus besermjanskogo narechija: Imena i sluzhebnye chasti rechi (govor derevni Shamardan) [Thesaurus of the Beserman supradialect: Nominals and functional parts of speech (Shamardan village variety)]. Moscow: Izdatel’skie reshenija.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Usacheva, Maria N.
    2021 Dialogue-focused experiments in the field: Advantages and disadvantages (a Permic experience). InTatiana B. Agranat & Leyli R. Dodykhudoeva (eds.), Strategies for knowledge elicitation, 27–62. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑79341‑8_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79341-8_3 [Google Scholar]
  45. Vakhrushev, Vasiliy, V. Zakharov & L. Kalinina
    1974Grammatika sovremennogo udmurtskogo jazyka. Sintaksis slozhnogo predlozhenija [Grammar of contemporary Udmurt. Syntax of the complex sentence]. Izhevsk: Udmurtskij NII istorii, ekonomiki, literatury i jazyka.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Van der Houwen, Fleur
    2012 The effect of genre on reporting speech: conversations and newspaper articles. Borealis – An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics11. 101. 10.7557/1.1.1.2294
    https://doi.org/10.7557/1.1.1.2294 [Google Scholar]
  47. Winkler, Eberhard
    2011Udmurtische Grammatik [Udmurt grammar] (Veröffentlichungen der Societas Uralo-Altaica 81). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Zakirova, Aygul & Alexey Kozlov
    2022 The emphatic identity particle =OK in the Volga-Kama Sprachbund. Presented atCongressus XIII Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum, Vienna, August 21–26, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Zubova, Iuliia
    2019 Variatsii v ispol’zovanii modal’nyx chastits v literaturnom udmurtskom jazyke i v besermjanskom dialekte [Variation in the use of modal particles in literary Udmurt and in the Beserman dialect]. Uralo-Altajskie issledovanija41. 71–90.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jul.00019.ark
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Beserman; indexicals; monstrous agreement; pragmatics; reported speech; Udmurt
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error