Case and agreement puzzle in the Moksha debitive

References

1. Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Christina Sevdali
   2020 Two modes of dative and genitive case assignment: Evidence from two stages of Greek. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory381. 987–1051. 10.1007/s11049‑020‑09465‑z
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-020-09465-z [Google Scholar]
2. Bailyn, John Frederick
   2004 The case of Q. InProceedings of FASL, vol.121, 1–35.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baker, Mark
   1985 The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry161.373–415.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Baker, Mark
   2015 Case. Its principles and its parameters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107295186
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107295186 [Google Scholar]
5. Barrie, Michael & Christine Pittman
   2010 Mandatives: Lessons on raising/control diagnostics. Canadian Journal of Linguistics551. 131–138. 10.1017/S0008413100001407
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008413100001407 [Google Scholar]
6. Bikina, Daria
   2021 Moksha “definite” declension, D-linking, and global choice functions. Talk given atSouthern New England Workshop in Semantics, UConn (virtually). https://snewsling.files.wordpress.com/2021/05/moksha_definite_declension-4.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bobaljik, Jonathan David
   2008 Where’s phi? Agreement as a post-syntactic operation. InDaniel Harbour, David Adger & Susana Béjar (eds.), Phi-theory: Phi features across interfaces and modules, 295–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199213764.003.0010
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199213764.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
8. Burukina, Irina
   2020 Mandative verbs and deontic modals in Russian: Between obligatory control and overt embedded subjects. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics51. 54. 10.5334/gjgl.905
   https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.905 [Google Scholar]
9. Cable, Seth
   2004 Restructuring in English. Unpublished manuscript. MIT, Cambridge, MA.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Chomsky, Noam
    1981 Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Chomsky, Noam
    1995 The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Efremov, Evgenii
    2020 Dative case with infinitives in Russian. InProceedings of the 2020 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association. https://cla-acl.ca/pdfs/actes-2020/efremov_claacl2020.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
13. Egorova, Anastasia
    2018 Sentencial’nye aktanty [Sentential arguments]. InSvetlana Toldova & Maria Kholodilova (eds.), Èlementy mokšanskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii [Elements of the Moksha language in a typological perspective], 666–706. Moscow: Buki Vedi.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Holvoet, Axel & Marta Grzybowska
    2014 Non-canonical grammatical relations in a modal construction: The Latvian debitive. InAxel Holvoet & Nicole Nau (eds.), Grammatical relations and their non-canonical encoding in Baltic, 97–135. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/vargreb.1.03hol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/vargreb.1.03hol [Google Scholar]
15. Kashkin, Egor
    2018 Opredelënnost’ [Definiteness]. InSvetlana Toldova & Maria Kholodilova (eds.), Èlementy mokšanskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii [Elements of the Moksha language in a typological perspective], 122–152. Moscow: Buki Vedi.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kholodilova, Maria
    2018a Imennaja predikacija [Nominal predication]. InSvetlana Toldova & Maria Kholodilova (eds.), Èlementy mokšanskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii [Elements of the Moksha language in a typological perspective], 616–632. Moscow: Buki Vedi.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kholodilova, Maria
    2018b Morfologija imeni [Nominal morphology]. InSvetlana Toldova & Maria Kholodilova (eds.), Èlementy mokšanskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii [Elements of the Moksha language in a typological perspective], 63–121. Moscow: Buki Vedi.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kozlov, Alexey
    2018 Glagol [Verb]. InSvetlana Toldova & Maria Kholodilova (eds.), Èlementy mokšanskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii [Elements of the Moksha language in a typological perspective], 341–395. Moscow: Buki Vedi.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Marantz, Alec
    2000 Case and licensing. InEric J. Reuland (ed.), Arguments and case: Explaining Burzio’s generalization, 11–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.34.04mar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.34.04mar [Google Scholar]
20. Martin, Roger
    2001 Null case and the distribution of PRO. Linguistic Inquiry321. 141–166. 10.1162/002438901554612
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438901554612 [Google Scholar]
21. Marušič, Franc & Rok Žaucer
    2006 On the intensional FEEL-LIKE construction in Slovenian: A case of a phonologically null verb. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory241. 1093–1159. 10.1007/s11049‑005‑4996‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-005-4996-y [Google Scholar]
22. Murav’ëva, Aleksandra & Maria Kholodilova
    2018 Poslelogi i reljacionnye imena [Postpositions and relational nouns]. InSvetlana Toldova & Maria Kholodilova (eds.), Èlementy mokšanskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii [Elements of the Moksha language in a typological perspective], 212–248. Moscow: Buki Vedi.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Pleshak, Polina
    2015 Semantics and morphosyntax of Moksha possessive constructions. Nyelvtudományi Közlemények1111. 379–393.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Pleshak, Polina
    2021 The exponence of caseless NPs in Moksha. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America61. 628–640. 10.3765/plsa.v6i1.4999
    https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v6i1.4999 [Google Scholar]
25. Pleshak, Polina
    2022 The status of Dative case in the Moksha case paradigm. Voprosy Jazykoznanija51. 108–130. 10.31857/0373‑658X.2022.5.108‑130
    https://doi.org/10.31857/0373-658X.2022.5.108-130 [Google Scholar]
26. Preminger, Omer
    2014 Agreement and its failures. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262027403.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262027403.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
27. Preminger, Omer
    . to appear. Taxonomies of case and ontologies of case. InElena Anagnostopoulou, Christina Sevdali & Dionysios Mertyris eds. On the place of case in grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Rivero, María Luisa
    2003 Reflexive clitic constructions with datives: syntax and semantics. InFormal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, vol.111, 469–494.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Schütze, Carson
    2001 On the nature of default case. Syntax41. 205–238. 10.1111/1467‑9612.00044
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9612.00044 [Google Scholar]
30. Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann
    1989 Verbal syntax and case in Icelandic. University of Lund dissertation.
31. Stenin, Ivan
    2018 Passiv [Passive voice]. InSvetlana Toldova & Maria Kholodilova (eds.), Èlementy mokšanskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii [Elements of the Moksha language in a typological perspective], 491–545. Moscow: Buki Vedi.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Toldova, Svetlana
    2017 Kodirovanie prjamogo dopolnenija v mokšanskom jazyke [Encoding direct objects in Moksha]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies131. 123–157.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Toldova, Svetlana
    2018 Predikacii s glagolʹnym skazuemym [Clauses with verbal predicates]. InSvetlana Toldova & Maria Kholodilova (eds.), Èlementy mokšanskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii [Elements of the Moksha language in a typological perspective], 546–615. Moscow: Buki Vedi.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Toldova, Svetlana & Maria Kholodilova
    (eds.) 2018 Èlementy mokšanskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii [Elements of the Moksha language in a typological perspective]. Moscow: Buki Vedi.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Tsedryk, Egor
    2017 Dative-infinitive constructions in Russian: Are they really biclausal. InWayles Browne, Miloje Despic, Naomi Enzinna, Simone Harmath-de Lemos, Robin Karlin & Draga Zec (eds.), Proceedings of Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, vol.251, 298–317. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Woolford, Ellen
    2006 Lexical case, inherent case, and argument structure. Linguistic Inquiry371. 111–130. 10.1162/002438906775321175
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438906775321175 [Google Scholar]
37. Wurmbrand, Susanne
    2003 Infinitives: Restructuring and clause structure. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110908329
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110908329 [Google Scholar]
38. Zakirova, Aigul
    2018 Nominalizacii [Nominalisations]. InSvetlana Toldova & Maria Kholodilova (eds.), Èlementy mokšanskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii [Elements of the Moksha language in a typological perspective], 753–778. Moscow: Buki Vedi.
    [Google Scholar]