1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Uralic Linguistics
  4. Volume 3, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 3, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2772-3720
  • E-ISSN: 2772-3739
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The article analyzes the frequency of downtoners and intensifiers in seven Estonian registers based on data from the Estonian Pragmatics Corpus. These particles are most common in instant messaging, followed by institutional interaction, everyday conversation, online comments, printed fiction, media, and academic prose. The analysis revealed that previously offered situational features that increase frequencies (orality, spontaneity, dialogicity, everydayness and involved production) correlate only with frequencies of downtoners in comments, fiction and media. The frequency of downtoners in instant messaging is significantly higher than in spoken dialogues, and the use of all particles in academic prose is significantly lower than expected. We propose hypotheses to explain those anomalies. Ten especially frequent particles were identified: six downtoners and four intensifiers. Those particles account for 15% of all downtoners/intensifiers and account for 76% of particle use, with their proportion varying across registers from 87% in everyday conversation to 43% in academic prose.

© 2024 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jul.00029.hen
2024-11-08
2024-12-13

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jul.00029.hen
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aijmer, Karin
    2002 English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus (Studies in Corpus Linguistics 10). Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/scl.10
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.10 [Google Scholar]
  2. 2013 Understanding pragmatic markers: A variational pragmatic approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748635511
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748635511 [Google Scholar]
  3. Argus, Reili, Katrin Kern & Helika Mäekivi
    2022 Keeletoimetamine [Language editing]. Tallinn: Tallinna Ülikooli Kirjastus.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Baron, Naomi S.
    2013 Instant messaging. InSusan S. Herring, Dieter Stein & Tuija Virtanen (eds.), Pragmatics of computer-mediated communication (Handbooks of Pragmatics 9), 135–161. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110214468.135
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214468.135 [Google Scholar]
  5. Biber, Douglas
    1988 Variation across speech and writing. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2014 Using multidimensional analysis to explore cross-linguistic universals of register variation. Languages in Contrast14 (1). 7–34. 10.1075/lic.14.1.02bib
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.14.1.02bib [Google Scholar]
  7. Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad
    2019 Register, genre, and style. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108686136
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108686136 [Google Scholar]
  8. Biber, Douglas & Jesse Egbert
    2018 Register variation online. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316388228
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316388228 [Google Scholar]
  9. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
    1999 Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Chafe, Wallace L.
    1982 Integration and involvement in speaking, writing and oral literature. InDeborah Tannen (ed.), Spoken and written language. Exploring orality and literacy, 35–53. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Clarke, Isobelle
    2022 Register and social media. Register Studies4(2). 133–137. 10.1075/rs.00003.edi
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.00003.edi [Google Scholar]
  12. Clarke, Isobelle & Jack Grieve
    2019 Stylistic variation on the Donald Trump Twitter account: a linguistic analysis of tweets posted between 2009 and 2018. PLOS ONE14(9). 1–27. 10.1371/journal.pone.0222062
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222062 [Google Scholar]
  13. Conrad, Susan
    2023 Register in corpus linguistics: the role and legacy of Douglas Biber. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 19 (1). 7–21. 10.1515/cllt‑2022‑0032
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2022-0032 [Google Scholar]
  14. Conrad, Susan & Douglas Biber
    (eds.) 2001 Variation in English: Multidimensional studies. Harlow: Pearson Education
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Margret Selting
    2018 Interactional linguistics: Studying language in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781139507318
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139507318 [Google Scholar]
  16. Daems, Jocelyne, Dirk Speelman & Tom Ruette
    2013 Register analysis in blogs: Correlation between professional sector and functional dimensions. Leuven Working Papers in Linguistics2(1). 1–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Ehret, Katharina & Maite Taboada
    2019 Are online news comments like face-to-face conversation? A multidimensional analysis of an emerging register. MS (published in Register Studies 2020, 2:1. 1–36).
     [Google Scholar]
  18. 2021 Characterising online news comments: A multidimensional cruise through online registers. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence41. 10.3389/frai.2021.643770
     https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.643770 [Google Scholar]
  19. EKG II = Mati Erelt, Reet Kasik, Helle Metslang, Henno Rajandi, Kristiina Ross, Henn Saari, Kaja Tael & Silvi Vare
    1993 Eesti keele grammatika. II. Süntaks. lisa: kiri. [Grammar of Estonian II]. Tallinn: Eesti Teaduste Akadeemia Keele ja Kirjanduse Instituut.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Erelt, Mati, Tiiu Erelt & Kristiina Ross
    2020 Eesti keele käsiraamat [Handbook of Estonian]. Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Foolen, Ad
    1996 Pragmatic particles. InFrank Brisard, Pedro Gras, Sigurd D’hondt & Mieke Vandenbrouck (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics online, 10.1075/hop.2.pra3
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.2.pra3 [Google Scholar]
  22. Fraser, Bruce
    2010 Pragmatic competence: The case of hedging. InGunther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch & Stefan Schneider (eds.), New approaches to hedging, 15–34. Bingley, UK: Emerald. 10.1163/9789004253247_003
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004253247_003 [Google Scholar]
  23. Goulart, Larissa, Bethany Gray, Shelley Staples, Amanda Black, Aisha Shelton, Douglas Biber, Jesse Egbert & Stacey Wizner
    2020 Linguistic perspectives on register. Annual Review of Linguistics61. 435–55. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑011718‑012644
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-012644 [Google Scholar]
  24. Grieve, Jack, Douglas Biber, Eric Friginal & Tatiana Nekrasova
    2010 Variation among blogs: A multidimensional analysis. InAlexander Mehler, Serge Sharoff & Marina Santini (eds.), Genres on the web: Computational models and empirical studies, 303–322. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer-Verlag. 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑9178‑9_14
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9178-9_14 [Google Scholar]
  25. Haselow, Alexander
    2012 Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the negotiation of common ground in spoken discourse: Final particles in English. Language & Communication32 (3). 182–204. 10.1016/j.langcom.2012.04.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2012.04.008 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hennoste, Tiit
    2012 Enda algatatud eneseparandus eestikeelsetes MSN-i dialoogides [Self-initiated self-repair in Estonian instant messaging interaction]. Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu aastaraamat 8 = Estonian Papers in Applied Linguistics81. 37–54. 10.5128/ERYa8.03
     https://doi.org/10.5128/ERYa8.03 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2023 Suuline keel [Spoken language]. InHelle Metslang (ed.), Eesti grammatika [Estonian grammar], 997–1181. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Hennoste, Tiit & Karl Pajusalu
    2013 Eesti keele allkeeled [Varietes of Estonian]. Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Hennoste, Tiit, Gerson Klumpp & Helle Metslang
    2022 Diskursusemarkerid ja pragmaatika. Sissejuhatuseks [Discourse markers and pragmatics: Introduction]. Keel ja Kirjandus65 (1–2), 3–18. 10.54013/kk770a1
     https://doi.org/10.54013/kk770a1 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hennoste, Tiit, Helle Metslang, Külli Habicht & Külli Prillop
    2021 Kuue (inter)subjektiivsuspartikli kasutus eesti keele registrites [The use of six (inter)subjectivity particles in Estonian registers]. Emakeele Seltsi aastaraamat661. 91–123. 10.3176/esa66.04
     https://doi.org/10.3176/esa66.04 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hennoste, Tiit, Olga Gerassimenko, Riina Kasterpalu, Mare Koit, Kirsi Laanesoo, Anni Oja, Andriela Rääbis & Krista Strandson
    2010 The structure of a discontinuous dialogue formed by internet comments. InPetr Sojka, Aleš Horák, Ivan Kopeček & Karel Pala (eds.), Text, Speech and Dialogue, 515–522. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑15760‑8_65
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15760-8_65 [Google Scholar]
  32. Holmes, Janet
    1990 Hedges and boosters in women’s and men’s speech. Language & Communication101. 185–205. 10.1016/0271‑5309(90)90002‑S
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(90)90002-S [Google Scholar]
  33. Hyland, Ken
    1998 Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text181. 349–382.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. 2005 Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Jonsson, Ewa
    2015 Conversational writing: A multidimensional study of synchronous and supersynchronous computer-mediated communication. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Edition. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑06512‑1
     https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-06512-1 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kehayov, Petar
    2009 Interaction between grammatical evidentials and lexical markers of epistemicity and evidentiality: A case study of Bulgarian and Estonian. Wiener Slawistischer Almanach721. 165–201.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Kilgarriff, Adam, Vít Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubíček, Vojtěch Kovář, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý & Vít Suchomel
    2014 The Sketch Engine: ten years on. Lexicography11. 7–36. 10.1007/s40607‑014‑0009‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9 [Google Scholar]
  38. Laanesoo-Kalk, Kirsi
    2024 Functions of the particles tõesti ‘really’ and tõepoolest ‘indeed’ in spoken, online and printed registers. Journal of Uralic Linguistics31. 186–208. 10.1075/jul.00030.laa
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jul.00030.laa [Google Scholar]
  39. Lakoff, Robin
    1975 Language and women’s place. New York: Harper & Row.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Leech, Geoffrey
    2000 Grammars of spoken English: New outcomes of corpus-oriented research. Language Learning50:4, 675–724. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00143
     https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00143 [Google Scholar]
  41. Leech, Geoffrey & Mick Short
    2007 Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. 2nd ed.London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Metslang, Helle
    2023 Kolme (inter)subjektiivsusmarkeri lugu: ehk, äkki, järsku [The story of three (inter)subjectivity markers: ehk, äkki, järsku]. Eesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse ajakiri = Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics14(2). 271–296. 10.12697/jeful.2023.14.2.11
     https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2023.14.2.11 [Google Scholar]
  43. Metslang, Helle, Külli Habicht, Tiit Hennoste, Kirsi Laanesoo-Kalk, Külli Prillop, Andriela Rääbis & Carl Eric Simmul
    2024 (Inter)subjectivity in Estonian registers: Introduction. Journal of Uralic Linguistics31. 119–157. 10.1075/jul.00028.met
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jul.00028.met [Google Scholar]
  44. Miller, Jim & Regina Weinert
    1998/2009 Spontaneous spoken language: Syntax and discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Newman, Matthew L., Carla J. Groom, Lori D. Handelman & James W. Pennebaker
    2008 Gender differences in language use: An analysis of 14,000 text samples. Discourse Processes, 451. 211–236. 10.1080/01638530802073712
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530802073712 [Google Scholar]
  46. Paumäe, Pamela & Reili Argus
    2023 Modaalpartiklid jutusaates „Keskpäevatund“. [Modal particles in “Midday news”]. InKirsi Laanesoo-Kalk, Mart Velsker & Roosmarii Kurvits (eds.), Kahtlus ja mõttemäss: Pühendusteos Tiit Hennoste 70. sünnipäevaks, 109–122. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli kirjastus.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Pic, Elsa & Grégory Furmaniak
    2012 A study of epistemic modality in academic and popularised discourse: The case of possibility adverbs perhaps, maybe and possibly. Revista de Lenguas para Fines Especificos181. 13–44. https://ojsspdc.ulpgc.es/ojs/index.php/LFE/article/view/35 (8 July, 2024)
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Prillop, Külli & Külli Habicht
    2022 Vist või kindlasti? Tõenäosuspartikli vist pikk teekond eesti kirjakeeles [The long journey of the probability particle vist in literary Estonian]. Keel ja Kirjandus65 (1–2). 35–53. 10.54013/kk770a3
     https://doi.org/10.54013/kk770a3 [Google Scholar]
  49. Prillop, Külli, Tiit Hennoste, Külli Habicht & Helle Metslang
    2021 Ei saa me läbi “Pragmaatika” korpuseta. Korpuspragmaatika ja pragmaatikakorpus [We can’t get by without the pragmatics corpus. Corpus pragmatics and the pragmatics corpus]. Mäetagused811. 161–176. 10.7592/MT2021.81.pragmaatika
     https://doi.org/10.7592/MT2021.81.pragmaatika [Google Scholar]
  50. Prillop, Külli, Tiit Hennoste & Helle Metslang
    2024 Pragmatic particles as distinguishing features of registers. Journal of Uralic Linguistics31. 266–298. 10.1075/jul.00033.pri
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jul.00033.pri [Google Scholar]
  51. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
    1989 A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Rääbis, Andriela & Andra Rumm
    2022 Tahan lihtsalt koju saada. Vähendav ja tugevdav partikkel lihtsalt hädaabikõnedes [Downgrading and upgrading with the particle lihtsalt in Estonian emergency calls]. Keel ja Kirjandus65 (1–2). 54–73. 10.54013/kk770a4
     https://doi.org/10.54013/kk770a4 [Google Scholar]
  53. Rühlemann, Christoph
    2007 Conversation in context: A corpus-driven approach. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2007 Sequence organization in interaction. Volume 1: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  55. Stivers, Tanya, Nick J. Enfield, Penelope Brown, Christina Englert, Makoto Hayashi, Trine Heinemann, Gertie Hoymann, Federico Rossano, Jan P. De Ruiter, Kyung-Eun Yoon & Stephen C. Levinson
    2009 Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS)1061. 10587–10592. 10.1073/pnas.0903616106
     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903616106 [Google Scholar]
  56. Valdmets, Annika
    2011 Kahe eesti kirjakeele modaalpartikli arengust viimase sadakonna aasta jooksul [On the development of two modal particles in written Estonian over the last century]. Keel ja Kirjandus54(10). 764–776. https://keeljakirjandus.ee/archive/764-776.pdf (11 July, 2024)
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Zimmermann, Malte
    2011 Discourse particles. InClaudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, vol.21, 2012–2038. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. CombiDic = EKI ühendsõnastik [The EKI Combined Dictionary]
    CombiDic = EKI ühendsõnastik [The EKI Combined Dictionary] Compilers and editors Indrek Hein, Jelena Kallas, Olga Kiisla, Kristina Koppel, Margit Langemets, Tiina Leemets, Maia Melts, Sirje Mäearu, Tiina Paet, Peeter Päll, Maire Raadik, Mai Tiits, Katrin Tsepelina, Maria Tuulik, Udo Uibo, Tiia Valdre & Ülle Viks. https://sonaveeb.ee (11 July, 2024)
/content/journals/10.1075/jul.00029.hen
Loading
Downtoners and intensifiers in different registers
Journal of Uralic Linguistics 3, 158 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1075/jul.00029.hen
/content/journals/10.1075/jul.00029.hen
/content/journals/10.1075/jul.00029.hen
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): downtoners; Estonian; intensifiers; internet language; pragmatic particles; printed texts; registers; situational features; spoken interaction

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error