1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Uralic Linguistics
  4. Volume 4, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 4, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2772-3720
  • E-ISSN: 2772-3739
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Hungarian reflexives and 1 and 2 object pronouns have a possessive origin, and, together with 1 and 2 possessive noun phrases, they exhibit accusative case drop to varying degrees in object positions in a language that is otherwise consistently accusative marking. This paper argues that there is a systematic correlation between the frequency of accusative drop and the degree of grammaticalization in the : the more grammaticalized possessive structure a reflexive or an object pronoun has, the less likely accusative case is to be spelled out. Following É. Kiss & Mus (2022), accusative drop is analysed as an instance of exaptation, that is, a case of repurposing possessive morphology as accusative marking. The paper presents evidence from diachronic and synchronic corpora to argue that this analysis makes the right predictions both for the historical changes that have taken place in this domain, and for the fine-grained variation in accusative use on reflexives in the synchronic system.

© 2025 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jul.00036.rak
2025-07-10
2026-03-09

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jul.00036.rak
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Martin Everaert
    1999 Toward a more complete typology of anaphoric expressions. Linguistic Inquiry30 (1). 97–119. 10.1162/002438999553977
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999553977 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bárány, András
    2015 Differential object marking in Hungarian and the morphosyntax of case and agreement. Cambridge: University of Cambridge PhD dissertation.
  3. Bárczi, Géza & László Országh
    (eds.) 1959–1962 A magyar nyelv értelmező szótára [An explanatory dictionary of Hungarian]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bartos, Huba
    1999 Morfoszintaxis és interpretáció: A magyar inflexiós jelenségek szintaktikai háttere [Morphosyntax and interpretation: the syntactic background of Hungarian inflection]. Budapest: ELTE PhD dissertation.
  5. Bassel, Noa
    2024 Complex anaphors. PhD dissertation. Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
  6. . Forthcoming. Evidence for cyclicity in complex reflexive anaphors. InElitzur Bar-Asher Siegal, Nora Boneh, Eitan Grossman & Aynat Rubinstein eds. Historical linguistics and formal semantics. Dordrecht: Springer. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/006538 (1 December, 2023.)
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bresnan, Joan
    2016 Linguistics: The garden and the bush. Computational Linguistics42 (4). 599–617. 10.1162/COLI_a_00260
     https://doi.org/10.1162/COLI_a_00260 [Google Scholar]
  8. Déchaine, Rose-Marie & Martina Wiltschko
    2017 A formal typology of reflexives. Studia Linguistica71 (1–2). 60–106. 10.1111/stul.12072
     https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12072 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dékány, Éva
    2018 The position of case markers relative to possessive agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory361. 365–400. 10.1007/s11049‑017‑9379‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-017-9379-7 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2021 The Hungarian Nominal Functional Sequence (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 100). Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑63441‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63441-4 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dikken, Marcel den
    2004 Agreement and ‘clause union’. InKatalin É. Kiss & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), Verb clusters: A study of Hungarian, German and Dutch, 445–498. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.69.24dik
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.69.24dik [Google Scholar]
  12. 2006 Where Hungarians agree (to disagree): The fine structure of ‘phi’ and ‘art’. Ms. CUNY Graduate Center.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Mátai, Mária
    1999 A névmások története a középmagyar kor végéig [The history of pronominals until the end of Middle Hungarian period]. Magyar Nyelvőr123 (4). 438–478.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. É. Kiss, Katalin
    2002 The syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511755088
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755088 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2013 The Inverse Agreement Constraint in Uralic languages. Finno-Ugric Languages and Linguistics2 (1). 2–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. 2017 The Person-Case Constraint and the Inverse Agreement Constraint. The Linguistic Review341. 365–395. 10.1515/tlr‑2017‑0004
     https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2017-0004 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2020 Accusative or possessive? The suffix of pronominal objects in Ob-Ugric. Finno-Ugric Languages and Linguistics9 (1–2). 1–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. 2023 The (non-)finiteness of subordination correlates with basic word order: Evidence from Uralic. Acta Linguistica Academica70 (2). 171–194. 10.1556/2062.2023.00647
     https://doi.org/10.1556/2062.2023.00647 [Google Scholar]
  19. É. Kiss, Katalin & Nikolett Mus
    2022 The reflexive cycle: From reflexive to personal pronoun in Uralic. Journal of Uralic Linguistics1 (1). 43–66. 10.1075/jul.00003.kis
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jul.00003.kis [Google Scholar]
  20. Gerstner, Károly
    (ed.) 2011–2025 Új magyar etimológiai szótár — online kiadás. [A new etymological dictionary of Hungarian — online edition.] Budapest: MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézet/HUN-REN Nyelvtudományi Kutatóközpont. https://uesz.nytud.hu
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Grétsy, László & Miklós Kovalovszky
    1985 Nyelvművelő kézikönyv [A prescriptivist handbook]. Volume21. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Haiman, John
    2017 Exaptation. InAdam Ledgeway & Ian Roberts (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 49–69. 10.1017/9781107279070.004
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107279070.004 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hopper, Paul J.
    1991 On some principles of grammaticalization. InElizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization. Volume I: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 17–35. 10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop [Google Scholar]
  24. Kertész, Manó
    1911 Maga [Oneself]. Magyar Nyelv71. 5–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Keszler, Borbála
    (ed.) 2000 Magyar grammatika [Hungarian grammar]. Budapest: Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Laczkó, Tibor
    1995 The syntax of Hungarian noun phrases: A Lexical-Functional approach. Metalinguistica 2. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Lass, Roger
    1990 How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution. Journal of Linguistics261. 79–102. 10.1017/S0022226700014432
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700014432 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lehmann, Christian
    2015 Thoughts on grammaticalization. Third, updated edition of the 1982 volume. Classics in Linguistics11. Berlin: Language Science Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Preminger, Omer
    2019 The Anaphor Agreement Effect: further evidence against binding-as-agreement. Ms. Version ofOctober 2021. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/004401
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Rákosi, György
    2011 Összetett visszaható névmások a magyarban [Complex reflexives in Hungarian]. Általános Nyelvészeti Tanulmányok231. 351–376.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. 2015 Psych verbs, anaphors, and the configurationality issue in Hungarian. InKatalin É. Kiss, Balázs Surányi & Éva Dékány (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian 14: Papers from the 2013 Piliscsaba Conference, 245–265. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/atoh.14.10rak
     https://doi.org/10.1075/atoh.14.10rak [Google Scholar]
  32. 2019 Something inside myself does not agree: On the Anaphor Agreement Effect in Hungarian. Argumentum151. 602–616.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. 2020 With or without the definite article: On the syntax of anaphoric possessor strategies in Hungarian. InVeronika Hegedűs & Irene Vogel (eds.). Approaches to Hungarian 16. Papers from the 2017 Budapest Conference, 116–136. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/atoh.16.06rak
     https://doi.org/10.1075/atoh.16.06rak [Google Scholar]
  34. 2022 Some notes on the contribution of Hungarian anaphors. InMiriam Butt, Jamie Y. Findlay & Ida Toivonen (eds.), The Proceedings of the LFG’22 Conference, 285–304. CSLI Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. . In prep. Anaphors in Hungarian. Thesis to be submitted to the Hungarian Academy of Sciences for the title Doctor of Science.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Reinhart, Tanya & Eric Reuland
    1993 Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry24 (4). 657–720.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Reuland, Eric
    2001 Primitives of binding. Linguistic Inquiry32 (3). 439–492. 10.1162/002438901750372522
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438901750372522 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2006 Binding Theory: Terms and concepts. InMartin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax. Volume 1. Oxford: Blackwell. 260–283. 10.1002/9780470996591.ch9
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996591.ch9 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2011 Anaphora and language design. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 62. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Schladt, Mathias
    2000 The typology and grammaticalization of reflexives. InZygmunt Frajzyngier & Traci Walker (eds.), Reflexives: Forms and functions. Volume 1, 103–124. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.40.05sch
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.40.05sch [Google Scholar]
  41. Simonenko, Alexandra
    2023 A language change approach to probabilistic universals: case and order. Talk delivered atDiGS 24, Université Paris Cité, July 4–7, 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Szabolcsi, Anna
    1994 The Noun Phrase. InFerenc Kiefer & Katalin É. Kiss (eds.). The syntactic structure of Hungarian. Syntax and Semantics 27, 179–275. New York: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004373174_004
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004373174_004 [Google Scholar]
  43. Old Hungarian Corpus (OHC)
    Old Hungarian Corpus (OHC)oldhungariancorpus.nytud.hu/
  44. Simon, Eszter
    2014 Corpus building from Old Hungarian codices. InKatalin É. Kiss (ed.). The evolution of functional left peripheries in Hungarian syntax, Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics, 224–236. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198709855.005.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198709855.005.0001 [Google Scholar]
  45. The Old and Middle Hungarian Corpus of Informal Language Use (OMHC)
    The Old and Middle Hungarian Corpus of Informal Language Use (OMHC)https://tmk.nytud.hu/
  46. Novák, Attila, Katalin Gugán, Mónika Varga & Adrienne Dömötör
    2018 Creation of an annotated corpus of Old and Middle Hungarian court records and private correspondence. Language Resources and Evaluation521. 1–28. 10.1007/s10579‑017‑9393‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-017-9393-8 [Google Scholar]
  47. Dömötör, Adrienne, Katalin Gugán, Attila Novák & Mónika Varga
    2017 Kiútkeresés a morfológiai labirintusból — korpuszépítés ó- és középmagyar kori magánéleti szövegekből. [Finding the way out of the morphological maze: Building a corpus of Old and Middle Hungarian informal texts.] Nyelvtudományi Közlemények1131. 85–110.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Corpus of Middle Hungarian Memoires and Dramas (CMH)
    Corpus of Middle Hungarian Memoires and Dramas (CMH)https://ked.nytud.hu/
  49. Gugán, Katalin, Enikő Bácsi, Adrienne Dömötör, László Horváth, Zsuzsanna Mohay, Mónika Varga & Bálint Sass
    2023 Középmagyar emlékirat- és drámakorpusz. [Corpus of Middle Hungarian Memoires and Dramas.]
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Hungarian Historical Corpus (HHC)
    Hungarian Historical Corpus (HHC)https://clara.nytud.hu/mtsz/
  51. Hungarian Gigaword Corpus v2.0.5 (HGC)
    Hungarian Gigaword Corpus v2.0.5 (HGC)https://clara.nytud.hu/mnsz2-dev/
  52. Oravecz, Csaba, Tamás Váradi & Bálint Sass
    2014 The Hungarian Gigaword Corpus. InProceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14), 1719–1723. Reykjavik, Iceland: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jul.00036.rak
Loading
Accusative case, possessive structure and grammaticalization
Journal of Uralic Linguistics 4, 79 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1075/jul.00036.rak
/content/journals/10.1075/jul.00036.rak
/content/journals/10.1075/jul.00036.rak
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): accusative case; complex reflexive; corpus study; diachrony; Hungarian; personal pronoun; possessive noun phrase; reflexive anaphor; reflexive cycle; simplex reflexive

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error