The Finnish definite article

References

1. Abondolo, Daniel
   1998 Finnish. InDaniel Abondolo & Riitta-Liisa Välijärvi, (eds.), The Uralic Languages. London: Routledge. 149–183.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Chesterman, Andrew
   1991 On definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519710
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519710 [Google Scholar]
3. Egedi, Barbara
   2014 The DP-cycle in Hungarian and the functional extension of the noun phrase. InKatalin É. Kiss (ed.): The evolution of functional left peripheries in Hungarian syntax, 56–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198709855.003.0003
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198709855.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
4. Gelderen, Elly van
   2007 The Definiteness Cycle in Germanic. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 191: 275–308. 10.1017/S147054270700013X
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S147054270700013X [Google Scholar]
5. Giusti, Giuliana
   2001 The birth of a functional category: From Latin ILLE to the Romance article and personal pronoun. InGuglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current studies in Italian syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 157–171. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. 10.1163/9780585473949_010
   https://doi.org/10.1163/9780585473949_010 [Google Scholar]
6. Hawkins, John
   1978 Definiteness and indefiniteness: A study in reference and grammaticality prediction. London: Croom Helm.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Heim, Irene
   1982 The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Hint, Helen, Tiina Nahkola & Renate Pajusalu
   2017 With or without articles? A comparison of article-like determiners in Estonian and Finnish. Lähivõrdlusi/Lähivertailuja, 271: 65–106. 10.5128/LV27.02
   https://doi.org/10.5128/LV27.02 [Google Scholar]
9. Juvonen, Päivi
   2000 Grammaticalizing the definite article: A study of adnominal determiners in a genre of spoken Finnish. PhD thesis. Stockholm University.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Karlsson, Fred
    1982 Suomen peruskielioppi [Basic Finnish grammar]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Larjavaara, Matti
    1985 Suomen demonstratiivisysteemin rakenne [The structure of the Finnish demonstrative system]. Sananjalka, 271: 15–31. 10.30673/sja.86477
    https://doi.org/10.30673/sja.86477 [Google Scholar]
12. Larjavaara, Matti
    1990 Suomen deiksis [Finnish deixis]. Helsinki: Suomalainen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Laury, Ritva
    1996 Sen kategoriasta — onko suomessa jo artikkeli? [Regarding the category of se – does Finnish have a definite article yet?]. Virittäjä, 100(2): 162.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Laury, Ritva
    1997 Demonstratives in interaction: The emergence of a definite article in Finnish. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.7
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.7 [Google Scholar]
15. Lyons, Christopher
    1999 Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511605789
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605789 [Google Scholar]
16. Lyons, John
    1975 Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Lyons, John
    1977 Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. McColl Millar, Robert
    2000 Some suggestions for explaining the origin and development of the definite article in English. InOlga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds.), Pathways of change: Grammaticalization in English, 275–310. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.53.14mil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.53.14mil [Google Scholar]
19. Östman, Jan-Ola
    1995 Recasting the deictic foundation. InSandra A. Thompson & Masayoshi Shibatani (eds.), Essays in semantics and pragmatics in honor of Charles Fillmore, 247–278. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.32.13ost
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.32.13ost [Google Scholar]
20. Seppänen, Eeva-Leena
    1995 Pronominit tämä, tuo, se ja hän viittaamassa keskustelun osallistujaan [The pronouns tämä, tuo, se and hän in reference to participants in conversation]. PhD thesis. University of Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Simonenko, Alexandra & Anne Carlier
    2020 Between demonstrative and definite: A grammar competition model of the evolution of French l-determiners. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 651: 393–437. 10.1017/cnj.2020.14
    https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2020.14 [Google Scholar]
22. Skrzypek, Dominka, Alicja Piotrowska & Rafał Jaworski
    2021 The diachrony of definiteness in North Germanic. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004463684
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004463684 [Google Scholar]
23. Smit, Merlijn de & Gwen Eva Janda
    2023 Definiteness in Uralic. InDaniel Abondolo & Riitta-Liisa Välijärvi (eds.), The Uralic languages, 979–1006. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315625096‑22
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315625096-22 [Google Scholar]
24. Sulkala, Helena & Merja Karjalainen
    1992 Finnish. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Vilkuna, Maria
    1992 Referenssi ja määräisyys suomenkielisten tekstien tulkinnassa [Reference and definiteness in the interpretation of Finnish language texts]. Helsinki: Suomen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Vries, Mark de
    2012 The mysterious specific indefinite. InThomas Graf, Denis Paperno, Anna Szabolcsi & Jos Tellings (eds.), Theories of everything: In honor of Ed Keenan (UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 17), 420–426. Los Angeles: UCLA.
    [Google Scholar]