Epistemic perspective of temporal deictics

References

1. Alhoniemi, Alho
   1986 Marin kielen lukemisto sanastoineen. [A reader of Mari with a vocabulary]. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Egorkina, Elizaveta (Егоркина, Елизавета)
   2012 Ӹлӓ гӹнь шӹдӹр шӱмӹштет… Повесть дон шайыштмаштвлӓ [Let a star live in your heart… Novel and short stories.] Yoshkar-Ola: Мары книгӓ издательство.
   [Google Scholar]
3. KS I. I. Taryanov [Тарьянов И. И.]
   KS = Кырык сирышты. Повесть, лыдышвлӓ, пьесывлӓ, очерк. [At the foot of a hill: Short stories, poems, songs and articles] edited by I. I. Taryanov [Тарьянов И. И.] 1968 Yoshkar-Ola: Книгам лыкшы мары издательство.
   [Google Scholar]
4. KSYTI. Gornyi, A. Kanyushkov, V. Suzy, G. Matyukovskyi & S. Zakharov [Горный, И, А. Канюшков, В. Сузы, Г. Матюковскый & С. Захаров]
   KSYT = Кырык сирышты, Йыл тӹрышты. Лыдышвлӓ, шайыштмашвлӓ, очерквлӓ. (At the foot of a hill, on the bank of Volga. Poems, short stories and articles) edited by I. Gornyi, A. Kanyushkov, V. Suzy, G. Matyukovskyi & S. Zakharov [Горный, И, А. Канюшков, В. Сузы, Г. Матюковскый & С. Захаров] 1967 Кокшы выпуск. Yoshkar-Ola: Книгам лыкшы мары издательство.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Onchyko = Archive of journal
   Onchyko = Archive of journalОнчыко [Onchyko] within the portal of Mari-Lab. Ончыко (PDF) — Mari-Lab (last access2 November 2024).
   [Google Scholar]
6. Petukhov, Vitali [Петухов, Виталий]
   1984 Шӹжвӹк йӱмӹ вӹд. Повесть, шайыштмашвлӓ. [The water a nightingale drinks. A novel and short stories.] Yoshkar-Ola: Мары книгӓ издательство.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Valka, Ondrin [Валька, Ондрин]
   2007 Икӓнӓ Опанас. Масаквлӓ. Шайыштмашвлӓ. Монологвлӓ. [Once upon a time Opanas. Jokes. Short stories. Monologues.] Yoshkar-Ola: Республиканский научно-методический центр народного творчества и культурно-досуговой деятельности.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Agyagási, Klára
   2012 Language contact in the Volga–Kama area. Studia Uralo-Altaica491. 21–37. Szeged: University of Szeged.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
   2004 Evidentiality. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199263882.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199263882.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
10. Alhoniemi, Alho
    1985 Marin kielioppi [A grammar of Mari]. (Apuneuvoja suomalais-ugrilaisten kielten opintoja varten X.) Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Becker, Martin & Jakob Egetenmeyer
    2018 A prominence-based account of temporal discourse structure. Lingua2141. 28–58. 10.1016/j.lingua.2018.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2018.08.002 [Google Scholar]
12. Bereczki, Gábor
    2002 A cseremisz nyelv történeti alaktana [Historical morphology of Mari]. (Studies in Linguistics of the Volga-Region, University of Debrecen Supplementum I.) Debrecen: Debreceni Egyetem Kossuth Egyetemi Kiadója.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bergqvist, Henrik
    2015 Epistemic marking and multiple perspective: An introduction. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung: STUF68(2). 123–141. 10.1515/stuf‑2015‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2015-0007 [Google Scholar]
14. Bergqvist, Henrik
    2017a The role of ‘perspective’ in epistemic marking. Lingua186–1871. 5–20. 10.1016/j.lingua.2015.02.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.02.008 [Google Scholar]
15. Bergqvist, Henrik
    2017b Time and commitment: the grammaticalization of uúch in Lakandon Maya. Journal de la Société des américanistes. Maya times. Hors-série. Tiempos Mayas, 265–289. 10.4000/jsa.15114
    https://doi.org/10.4000/jsa.15114 [Google Scholar]
16. Bergqvist, Henrik
    2018 Intersubjectification revisited: a cross-categorical perspective. InZlatka Guentchéva (ed.), Epistemic modalities and evidentiality in cross-linguistic perspective, 319–345. Germany: De Gruyter, Inc. 10.1515/9783110572261‑015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110572261-015 [Google Scholar]
17. Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
    1994 The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago–London: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Chung, Kyung-Sook
    2007 Spatial deictic tense and evidentials in Korean. Natural Language Semantics151. 187–219. 10.1007/s11050‑007‑9017‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-007-9017-8 [Google Scholar]
19. Clark, Herbert H.
    1996 Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539 [Google Scholar]
20. Clifton, Charles Jr. & Lyn Frazier
    2012 Discourse integration guided by the ‘Question under Discussion’. Cognitive Psychology651. 352–379. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.04.001 [Google Scholar]
21. Evans, Nicholas
    2005 View with a view: Towards a typology of multiple perspective constructions. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society31(1). 93–120. 10.3765/bls.v31i1.3429
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v31i1.3429 [Google Scholar]
22. Evans, Nicholas, Henrik Bergqvist & Lila San Roque
    2017a The grammar of engagement I: Framework and initial exemplification. Language and Cognition101. 110–140.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Evans, Nicholas, Henrik Bergqvist & Lila San Roque
    2017b The grammar of engagement II: typology and diachrony. Language and Cognition101: 141–170.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Faller, Martina
    2004 The deictic core of ‘non-experienced past’ in Cuzco Quechua. Journal of Semantics211. 45–85. 10.1093/jos/21.1.45
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/21.1.45 [Google Scholar]
25. Friedman, Victor A.
    2018 Where do evidentials come from?InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 124–147. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.6
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.6 [Google Scholar]
26. Greed, Teija
    2014 The expression of knowledge in Tatar. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), The grammar of knowledge: A cross-linguistic typology, 69–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701316.003.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701316.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
27. Grzech, Karolina
    2020 Epistemic primacy, Common Ground management and epistemic perspective. InHenrik Bergqvist & Seppo Kittilä (eds.), Evidentiality, egophoricity and engagement, 23–60. (Studies in Diversity Linguistics 30.) Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Haan, Ferdinand de
    2005 Encoding speaker perspective: Evidentials. InZygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges & David S. Rood (eds.), Linguistic diversity and language theories, 379–397. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/slcs.72.18haa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.72.18haa [Google Scholar]
29. Haspelmath, Martin
    1999 Why is grammaticalization irreversible?Linguistics37(6). 1043–1068. 10.1515/ling.37.6.1043
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.37.6.1043 [Google Scholar]
30. Hill, Nathan W.
    2012 Mirativity does not exist: Hdug in Lhasa Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology16(3). 389–433. 10.1515/lity‑2012‑0016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0016 [Google Scholar]
31. Johanson, Lars
    2018 Turkic Indirectivity. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 510–524. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.24
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.24 [Google Scholar]
32. Kamp, Hans & Uwe Reyle
    1993 From discourse to logic: Introduction to modeltheoretic semantics of natural language, formal logic and discourse representation theory. Student Edition. Dordrecht — Boston — London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Kashkin, E. V., M.-E. A. Winkler, T. I. Davidyuk, V. V. Dyachkov, V. A. Ivanov, D. D. Mordashova, P. S. Pleshak & I. A. Khomchenkova [Кашкин Е. В., М.-Э. А Винклер, Т. И. Давидюк, В. В. Дьячков, В. А. Иванов, Д. Д. Мордашова, П. С. Плешак & И. А. Хомченкова.]
    2023 Элементы горномарийского языка в типологическом освещении. [Elements of Hill Mari language in light of typology.] Москва: Буки Веди.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Klein, Wolfgang
    1994 Time in language. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Krasnova, Nadezhda, Timothy Riese, Tatiana Yefremova & Jeremy Bradley
    2017 Reading Hill Mari through Meadow Mari. Vienna. Available at: www.mari-language.com (last access2 November 2024).
    [Google Scholar]
36. Krifka, Manfred
    2007 Basic notions of information structure. InCaroline Fery & Manfred Krifka (eds.) Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 6, 13–56. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam. https://amor.cms.hu-berlin.de/~h2816i3x/Publications/Krifka_InformationStructure.pdf (2 November 2024).
37. Krifka, Manfred & Renate Musan
    2012 Information structure: Overview and linguistic issues. InManfred Krifka & Renate Musan (eds.), The expression of information structure, 1–44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110261608.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261608.1 [Google Scholar]
38. Kubitsch, Rebeka
    2023 Evidencialitás az udmurt nyelvben. [Evidentiality in the Udmurt language]. Szeged: University of Szeged, Ph.D. dissertation. https://doktori.bibl.u-szeged.hu/id/eprint/11441/2/Ertekezes_tezisei_Kubitsch.pdf (2 November 2024). 10.14232/phd.11441
    https://doi.org/10.14232/phd.11441
39. Kuram, Kadri
    2023 Common ground management via evidential markers in Turkish. Pragmatics and Society, 275–294. 10.1075/ps.21058.kur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21058.kur [Google Scholar]
40. Lazard, Gilbert
    1999 Mirativity, evidentiality, mediativity, or other?Linguistic Typology31. 91–109. 10.1515/lity.1999.3.1.91
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1999.3.1.91 [Google Scholar]
41. Leinonen, Marja
    2000 Evidentiality in Komi Zyryan. InLars Johanson & Bo Utas (eds.), Evidentials: Turkic, Iranian and neighboring languages, 419–440. (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 24.) Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110805284.419
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110805284.419 [Google Scholar]
42. McCawley, James D.
    1971 Tense and time reference in English. InCharles J. Fillmore & D. Terence Langendoen (eds.), Studies in Linguistic Semantics, 97–113. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Mushin, Ilana
    2001 Evidentiality and epistemological stance: Narrative retelling. (Pragmatics and Beyond, New Series 87.) Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/pbns.87
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.87 [Google Scholar]
44. Pengitov, N. T., I. S. Galkin & N. I. Isanbaev [Пенгитов, Н. Т, И. С. Галкин & Н. И. Исанбаев]
    1961 Современный марийский язык. Морфология) [Modern Mari language: Morphology]. Yoshkar-Ola: Марийское книжное издательство.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Plungian, Vladimir A.
    2010 Types of verbal evidentiality marking: an overview. InGabriele Diewald & Elena, Smirnova (eds.), Linguistic realization of evidentiality in European languages, 15–58. (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 49.) Göttingen: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110223972.15
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110223972.15 [Google Scholar]
46. Plungian, Vladimir A. & Johan van der Auwera
    2006 Towards a typology of discontinuous past marking. Language Typology and Universals59(4). 317–349. 10.1524/stuf.2006.59.4.317
    https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2006.59.4.317 [Google Scholar]
47. Saarinen, Sirkka
    2022 Mari. In: Marianne Bakró-Nagy, Johanna Laakso and Elena Skribnik (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Uralic languages, 432–470. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198767664.003.0024
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198767664.003.0024 [Google Scholar]
48. Saraheimo, Mari & Rebeka Kubitsch
    2023 Discourse-interactional functions of Udmurt val and vylem. Linguistica Uralica591. 130–153. 10.3176/lu.2023.2.04
    https://doi.org/10.3176/lu.2023.2.04 [Google Scholar]
49. Skribnik, Elena & Petar Kehayov
    2018 Evidentials in Uralic languages. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 525–553. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.25
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.25 [Google Scholar]
50. Spets, Silja-Maija
    2023 Temporal perspective and its formal background: An explanation for aspectual synonymy between simple and analytic past tenses in Mari. Journal de la Société Finno-Ougrienne991. 275–318. 10.33340/susa.123024
    https://doi.org/10.33340/susa.123024 [Google Scholar]
51. Spets, Silja-Maija
    2025a (De)grammaticalization of Mari retrospectivizing particles. Finnisch-Ugrische Mitteilungen491.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Spets, Silja-Maija
    . 2025b. Encoding discontinuativity by Mari retrospectivizing particle constructions. Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen701.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Stalnaker, Robert
    2002 Common Ground. Linguistics and Philosophy25(5/6). 701–721. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25001871
    [Google Scholar]
54. Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig
    2011 Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction. InTanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada & Jacob Steensig (eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation, 3–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511921674.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921674.002 [Google Scholar]
55. Uchaev, Z. V. [Учаев, З. В.]
    1985 Марий йылме. Кокымшо ужаш. Факультативный занятийым эртарыме учебный пособий. Туныктышо-влаклан. [The Mari language. Second part. Teaching aids for optional classes. For teachers.] Yoshkar-Ola: Марийское книжное издательство.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Wiemer, Björn
    2018 Evidentials and epistemic modality. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 85–108. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.4
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.4 [Google Scholar]
57. Willett, Thomas
    1988 A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language12(1). 51–97. 10.1075/sl.12.1.04wil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.12.1.04wil [Google Scholar]
58. Zimmermann, Malte
    2008 Contrastive focus and emphasis. Acta Linguistica Hungarica551. 347–360. 10.1556/ALing.55.2008.3‑4.9
    https://doi.org/10.1556/ALing.55.2008.3-4.9 [Google Scholar]