1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Uralic Linguistics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of On morphosyntactic properties of Uralic relational nouns
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

There is a category of “postpositions” in most, if not all, Uralic languages that consists of two types of words: words that take spatial case inflection, and words that do not. These groups also have other morphosyntactic and semantic differences, which suggests that there are actually two distinct word classes instead of one. In this paper, I analyse the morphosyntactic properties of the inflecting “postpositions” that I call relational nouns (RN) and establish a functional prototype of RNs that can be used to distinguish this word class also in other Uralic languages. Regarding the theoretical approach, the study is based on typological research on word classes, which means that the class of RNs is defined based on both semantics and morphosyntax, and the category is seen as having a prototype structure. The aim of this study is to provide a typologically informed description of a newly introduced word class in the Uralic languages.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jul.00046.erk
2026-05-04
2026-06-07

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jul.00046.erk
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alhoniemi, Alho
    1988 Postpositiorakenteiden synkroniaa ja diakroniaa [Synchrony and diachrony of postpositional constructions]. Sananjalka(). –. 10.30673/sja.86503
     https://doi.org/10.30673/sja.86503 [Google Scholar]
  2. Arkhangelskiy, Timofey
    2018a Erzya corpus. erzya.web-corpora.net/index.html
     [Google Scholar]
  3. 2018b Moksha corpus. https://moksha.web-corpora.net/index.html
     [Google Scholar]
  4. 2019a Komi-Zyrian corpus. komi-zyrian.web-corpora.net/index.html
     [Google Scholar]
  5. 2019b Meadow Mari corpus. meadow-mari.web-corpora.net/index_en.html
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Arkhangelskiy, Timofey & Maria Usacheva
    2015 Syntactic and morphosyntactic properties of postpositional phrases in Beserman Udmurt as part-of-speech criteria. SKY Journal of Linguistics. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Arkhangelskiy, Timofey, Maria Usacheva & Maria Cheremisinova
    2026 A grammar of Beserman. (Grammars and Sketches of the World’s Languages 20). Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004757097
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004757097 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bartens, Raija
    1999 Mordvalaiskielten rakenne ja kehitys [The structure and development of Mordvin languages] (Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 232). Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. 2000 Permiläisten kielten rakenne ja kehitys [The structure and development of Permic languages] (Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 238). Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bez, Gitanjali
    2020 The relator noun construction in Assamese. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/jsall‑2020‑2023
     https://doi.org/10.1515/jsall-2020-2023 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bon, Noëllie
    2021 Expression of spontaneous motion events in Stieng. An exploration of source-goal (a)symmetries. Studies in Language(). –. 10.1075/sl.18030.bon
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.18030.bon [Google Scholar]
  12. Brown, Penelope
    1994 The INs and ONs of Tzeltal locative expressions. The semantics of static descriptions of location. Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/ling.1994.32.4‑5.743
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1994.32.4-5.743 [Google Scholar]
  13. Burukina, Irina
    2023 On the syntax of postpositional phrases in Mari. Choosing between two structures. Journal of Uralic Linguistics(). –. 10.1075/jul.00021.bur
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jul.00021.bur [Google Scholar]
  14. Carlson, Laura
    2010 Parsing space around objects. InVyvyan Evans & Paul Chilton (eds.), Language, cognition and space. The state of the art and new directions, –. London: Equinox. 10.3138/9781845535032‑007
     https://doi.org/10.3138/9781845535032-007 [Google Scholar]
  15. Carlson, Laura & Edvin Covell
    2005 Defining functional features for spatial language. InLaura Carlson & Emile van der Zee (eds.), Functional features in language and space. Insights from perception, categorization, and development, – (Explorations in language and space 2). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199264339.003.0012
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199264339.003.0012 [Google Scholar]
  16. Carlson, Laura A. & Eric S. Covey
    2005 How far is near. Inferring distance from spatial descriptions. Language and Cognitive Processes(). –. 10.1080/01690960400023501
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960400023501 [Google Scholar]
  17. City Digital Group
    City Digital Group 2021 Suomi24 virkkeet -korpus 2001–2020, Korp-versio [Suomi24 sentences corpus 2001–2020, Korp version]. Kielipankki. urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:lb-2021101525
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Croft, William
    1990 A conceptual framework for grammatical categories (or: A taxonomy of propositional acts). Journal of Semantics(). –. 10.1093/jos/7.3.245
     https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/7.3.245 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2001 Radical construction grammar. Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  20. DeLancey, Scott
    1997 Grammaticalization and the gradience of categories. Relator nouns and postpositions in Tibetan and Burmese. InJoan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on language function and language type. Dedicated to T. Givón, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.82.07del
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.82.07del [Google Scholar]
  21. 2005 Adpositions as a non-universal category. InZygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges & David S. Rood (eds.), Linguistic diversity and language theories, – (Studies in Language. Companion Series 72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.72.10del
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.72.10del [Google Scholar]
  22. Feist, Timothy
    2015 A grammar of Skolt Saami (Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 273). Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura. 10.33341/sus.14
     https://doi.org/10.33341/sus.14 [Google Scholar]
  23. Grenoble, Lenore A.
    2014 Spatial semantics, case and relator nouns in Evenki. InPirkko Suihkonen & Lindsay J. Whaley (eds.), On diversity and complexity of languages spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia, – (Studies in Language. Companion Series 164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.164.04gre
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.164.04gre [Google Scholar]
  24. Grünthal, Riho
    2022 Adpositions and adpositional phrases. InMarianne Bakró-Nagy, Johanna Laakso & Elena Skribnik (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Uralic languages, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198767664.003.0050
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198767664.003.0050 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hagège, Claude
    2010 Adpositions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199575008.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199575008.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  26. Haiman, John
    1980 The iconicity of grammar. Isomorphism and motivation. Language(). –. 10.2307/414448
     https://doi.org/10.2307/414448 [Google Scholar]
  27. 1983 Iconic and economic motivation. Language(). –. 10.2307/413373
     https://doi.org/10.2307/413373 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hakulinen, Auli, Maria Vilkuna, Riitta Korhonen, Vesa Koivisto, Tarja Riitta Heinonen & Irja Alho
    2004 Iso suomen kielioppi [Big grammar of Finnish] (Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seuran Toimituksia 950). Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Haukioja, Timo
    2000 Adpositioista ja relationaalisista substantiiveista [Of adpositions and relational nouns]. InAnneli Pajunen (ed.) Näkökulmia kielitypologiaan [Perspectives on language typology], – (Suomi 186). Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Hegedűs, Veronika
    2006 Hungarian spatial PPs. Nordlyd(). –. 10.7557/12.82
     https://doi.org/10.7557/12.82 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2015 The grammaticalization of postpositions in Old Hungarian. InTheresa Biberauer & George Walkden (eds.), Syntax over time. Lexical, morphological, and information-structural interactions, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199687923.003.0005
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199687923.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  32. Jaakola, Minna & Krista Ojutkangas
    2023 Readymade grammar. Why are Finnish postpositions an open class?InMinna Jaakola & Tiina Onikki-Rantajääskö (eds.), The Finnish case system. Cognitive linguistic perspectives, – (Studia Fennica Linguistica 23). Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura. 10.21435/sflin.23
     https://doi.org/10.21435/sflin.23 [Google Scholar]
  33. Johanson, Lars
    2012 Pyramids of spatial relators in Northeastern Turkic and its neighbors. InPirkko Suihkonen, Bernard Comrie & Valery Solovyev (eds.), Argument structure and grammatical relations. A crosslinguistic typology, – (Studies in Language. Companion Series 126). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.126.09joh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.126.09joh [Google Scholar]
  34. Jännes, Arvi
    1890 Suomen partikkelimuodot [Particles in Finnish]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Kenesei, István & Krisztina Szécsényi
    2022 Hungarian. InMarianne Bakró-Nagy, Johanna Laakso & Elena Skribnik (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Uralic languages, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198767664.003.0033
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198767664.003.0033 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kittilä, Seppo, Johanna Laakso & Jussi Ylikoski
    2022 Case. InMarianne Bakró-Nagy & Johanna Laakso & Elena Skribnik (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Uralic languages, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Lestrade, Sander
    2010 The space of case. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Levinson, Stephen C.
    2003 Space in language and cognition. Explorations in cognitive diversity (Language, Culture and Cognition 5). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613609
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613609 [Google Scholar]
  39. Marácz, László K.
    1986 Dressed or naked. The case of the PP in Hungarian. InWerner Abraham & Sjaak de Meij (eds.), Topic, focus and configurationality. Papers from the 6th Groningen Grammar Talks, Groningen, 1984 (Linguistik Aktuell 4), –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.4.12kar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.4.12kar [Google Scholar]
  40. Muravyova, A. M. & M. A. Kholodilova
    2018 Poslelogi i reljacionnye imena [Postpositions and relational nouns]. InS. Yu. Toldova, M. A. Kholodilova, M. A. Tatevosov, S. G. Kashkin, E. V. Kozlov, A. A. Kozlov, L. S. Kuhto, M. Yu. Privizentseva & I. A. Stenin (eds.), Èlementy mokšanskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii [Elements of the Moksha language from a typological perspective], –. Moskva: Buki Vedi.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Nikolaeva, Irina
    2014 A grammar of Tundra Nenets (Mouton Grammar Library 65). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110320640
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110320640 [Google Scholar]
  42. Ojutkangas, Krista
    2008 Mihin suomessa tarvitaan sisä-grammeja [For what are sisä-grams used in Finnish]. Virittäjä(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Pleshak, Polina Sergeevna & Tatyana Igorevna Davidyuk
    2018 Struktura imennoj i posleložnoj grupp v gornomarijskom jazyke [Structure of the noun and postpositional phrase in the Hill Mari language]. InV. I. Belikov & N. R. Sumbatova (eds.), Malye jazyki v bol’šoj lingvistike. Sbornik trudov konferencii 2017 [Minor languages in big linguistics. Proceedings of the 2017 conference]. Moskva: Buki Vedi.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Rédei, Károly
    1962 Die Postpositionen im Syrjänischen unter Berücksichtigung des Wotjakischen [The postpositions in Komi with consideration of Udmurt]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Saarinen, Sirkka
    2022 Mari. InMarianne Bakró-Nagy, Johanna Laakso & Elena Skribnik (eds.), The Oxford guide to Uralic languages, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198767664.003.0024
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198767664.003.0024 [Google Scholar]
  46. Salminen, Tapani
    1997 Tundra Nenets inflection (Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 227). Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Schön, Zsófia
    2017 Postpositionale Konstruktionen in chantischen Dialekten [Postpositional constructions in the dialects of Khanty] (Dissertationen der LMU 15). München: Universitätsbibliothek der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität.
  48. Starosta, Stanley
    1985 Relator nouns as a source of case inflection. InVeneeta Z. Acson & Richard L. Leed (eds.), For Gordon H. Fairbanks, – (Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication 20). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Svorou, Soteria
    1993 The grammar of space (Typological Studies in Language 25). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.25
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.25 [Google Scholar]
  50. Vandeloise, Claude
    2007 A taxonomy of basic natural entities. InMichel Aurnague, Maya Hickmann & Laure Vieu (eds.), The categorization of spatial entities in language and cognition, – (Human Cognitive Processing 20). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.20.04van
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.20.04van [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jul.00046.erk
Loading
On morphosyntactic properties of Uralic relational nouns
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/jul.00046.erk
/content/journals/10.1075/jul.00046.erk
/content/journals/10.1075/jul.00046.erk
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: relational nouns ; word class typology ; morphosyntax ; postpositions

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error