1887
Honorific language and linguistic politeness in Korean
  • ISSN 0257-3784
  • E-ISSN: 2212-9731
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

One of the salient features of the Korean language is honorifics. Two kinds of honorifics have been discussed in the literature, subject honorific and addressee honorific. The subject honorific is characterized by honorific markers on the subject and predicate. The addressee honorific is usually marked by formal and/or polite speech style particles at the end of a sentence. The subject honorific is characterized by its optionality which has raised many questions about its nature, whether it is a type of formal feature agreement or not. The addressee honorific, however, has not received much attention from a theoretical perspective in the literature though much descriptive work is available. In this paper, we attempt to discuss the optionality of subject honorific in the context of the nature of honorifics in general, including the addressee honorific. More specifically, we examine how honorific is encoded in the grammar by focusing on embedding of honorifics. Some empirical data show that embedding of honorifics (or politeness) is restricted in certain constructions. Based on examining these constructions, we claim that there is a generalization that prohibits the occurrence of honorific/politeness marker in the embedded CP domain. We further claim that this restriction interacts with subject honorific in such a way that it forces the agreement of honorific to take place obligatorily in certain constructions, thereby making the optionality of the subject honorific to hold only conditionally and circumstantially.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/kl.17.2.01pak
2017-07-24
2019-12-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahn, Sung-Ho
    1994 A Note on Agreement. Explorations in Generative Grammar: A Festschrift for Dong-Whee Yanged. by Young-Sun Kim et al. Seoul: Hankwuk Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2002 Honorification and AgrP. A Talk Delivered at 2002 Winter Conference of Linguistic of Society of Korean , Seoul National University. February 6, 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahn, Hee-Don & Hang-Jin Yoon
    1989 Functional Categories in Korean. Harvard International Studies on Korean Linguistics IIIed. by S. Kuno , et al. 79–88. Seoul: Hanshin.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, Mark C
    2008The Syntax of Agreement and Concord (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics). Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511619830
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619830 [Google Scholar]
  5. Boeckx, Cedric & Fumikazu Niinuma
    2004 Conditions on Agreement in Japanese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory22:3.453–480. doi: 10.1023/B:NALA.0000027669.59667.c5
    https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NALA.0000027669.59667.c5 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brandner, Ellen
    2004 Head-movement in Minimalism, and V2 as Force-marking. Interface Explorations 9: Syntax and Semantics of the Left Peripheryed. by Horst Lohnstein & Susanne Trissler , 97–138. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, Roger & Albert Gilman
    1960 The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity. Style in Languageed. by Thomas A. Sebeok , 253–276. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cheng, Lisa L. S
    1991On the Typology of WH-questions. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Choe, Hyun-Sook
    1988Restructuring Parameters and Complex Predicates. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Choe, Jae-Woong
    2004 Obligatory Honorification and the Honorific Feature. Studies in Generative Grammar14:4.545–559.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chomsky, Noam
    1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2001 Derivation by Phase. Ken Hale: A Life in Languageed. by Michael Kenstowicz , 1–52. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Chomsky, Noam & Howard Lasnik
    1977 Filters and Control. Linguistic Inquiry11.425–504.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Cinque, Guglielmo
    1999Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective.New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Coniglio, Marco & Iulia Zegrean
    2010 Splitting up Force, Evidence from Discourse Particles. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics20ed. by Brugè Laura , 7–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Cormack, Annabel & Neil Smith
    1996 Checking Theory: Features, Functional Heads and Checking Parameters. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics8.1–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. D’Alessandro, Roberta
    2010Eccentric Agreement in Italo-Romance. A Closer Look into Feature- bundles. Syntax Lab Cambridge University.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2011 Eccentric Agreement in Italo-Romance and Parameterized v. Invited Lecture at UQAM , Montreal. May 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Déchaine, Rose-Marie & Martina Wiltschko
    2012Heterogeneity of Reflexives. University of British Columbia.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Giorgi, Alessandra
    2010About the Speaker (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Grimshaw, Jane
    2000 Locality and Extended Projection. Lexical Specification and Insertion197ed. by Peter Coopmans , Martin Everaert , & Jane Grimshaw , 115–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.197.07gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.197.07gri [Google Scholar]
  23. Haegeman, Liliane & Virginia Hill
    2013 The Syntacticization of Discourse. Syntax and its Limitsed. by Raffaella Folli , Christina Sevdali , & Robert Truswell , 370–390. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0018
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0018 [Google Scholar]
  24. Han, Chung-Hye
    1998The Structure and Interpretation of Imperatives: Mood and Force in Universal Grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Han, Hak-Sung
    1993 Hankwukeui AgrP-wa NegP (AgrP and NegP in Korean). Ene( Language ) 18:2.437–461. Seoul. doi: 10.1016/0360‑5442(93)90022‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(93)90022-6 [Google Scholar]
  26. Harada, Shin-Ichi
    1976 Honorifics. Syntax and Semantics 5: Japanese Generative Grammared. by Masayoshi Shibatani , 499–561. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hasegawa, Nobuko
    2005 Honorifics. The Blackwell Companion to Syntax2ed. by Martin Everaert & Henk Van Riemsdijk , 493–543. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kang, Myung-Yoon
    1988Topics in Korean Syntax: Phrase Structure, Variable Binding and Movement. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Keine, Stefan
    2012 Case Splits and the Order of Elementary Operations. Proceedings of ConSOLE XVII, 163–188. Universiteit Leiden.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kim, Yong-Ha
    2012 Noun Classes and Subject Honorification in Korean. Linguistic Research29:3.563–578. doi: 10.17250/khisli.29.3.201212.005
    https://doi.org/10.17250/khisli.29.3.201212.005 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kim-Renaud, Young-Key
    1990 On Panmal in Korean. Papers from the Seventh International Conference on Korean Linguisticsed. by Eung-Jin Baek , International Circle of Korean Linguistics & Osaka University of Economics and Law , 232–255. University of Toronto.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 1999 Pragmatic Embedding for Honorification and Politeness. Harvard International Studies on Korean LinguisticsVIII.419–435. Seoul: Hanshin.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kim-Renaud, Young-Key & Miok Pak
    2006 Agreement in Korean Syntax: A Case of Sentence Final Particles. Harvard International Symposium on Korean Linguistics XI.548–561. Seoul, Hanshin.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Koopman, Hilda
    2005 Korean (and Japanese) Morphology from a Syntactic Perspective. Linguistic Inquiry36.601–633. doi: 10.1162/002438905774464359
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438905774464359 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kratzer, Angelika
    2009 Making a Pronoun: Fake Indexicals as Windows into the Properties of Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry40:2.187–237. doi: 10.1162/ling.2009.40.2.187
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2009.40.2.187 [Google Scholar]
  36. Lee, Ilsop & S. Robert Ramsey
    2000The Korean Language. Albany: University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Martin, Samuel E
    1992A Reference Grammar of Korean: A Complete Guide to the Grammar and History of the Korean Language. Rutland, Vermont, & Tokyo, Japan: Charles E. Tuttle Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Mauck, Simon , Miok Pak , Paul Portner & Raffaella Zanuttini
    2005 Clause Typing in Imperatives: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguisticsed. by C. Brandstetter & D. Rus , 135–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Miyagawa, Shigeru
    2012 Agreements that Occur Mainly in the Main Clause. Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizonsed. by Lobke Aelbrecht , Liliane Haegeman , & Rachel Nye , 70–112. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.190.04miy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.190.04miy [Google Scholar]
  40. Oyharçabal, Beñat
    1993 Verb Agreement with non Arguments: On Allocutive Agreement. Generative Studies in Basque Linguistics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 105] ed. by José Ignacio Hualde & Jon Ortiz de Urbina , 89–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  doi: 10.1075/cilt.105.04oyh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.105.04oyh [Google Scholar]
  41. Pak, Miok
    2006 Jussive Clauses and Agreement of Sentence Final Particles in Korean. Japanese/Korean Linguistics14ed. by Timothy Vance & Kimberly Jones , 295–306. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 2008 Types of Clauses and Sentence End Particles in Korean. Korean Linguistics14ed. by Young-Key Kim-Renaud et al. , 113–155. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  doi: 10.1075/kl.14.06mdp
    https://doi.org/10.1075/kl.14.06mdp [Google Scholar]
  43. Pak, Miok , Paul Portner , & Raffaella Zanuttini
    2008 Agreement in Promissive, Imperative, and Exhortative Clauses. Korean Linguisticsed. by14 Young-Key Kim-Renaud et al. , 157–175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/kl.14.07mdp
    https://doi.org/10.1075/kl.14.07mdp [Google Scholar]
  44. 2013 Speech Style in Root and Embedded Imperatives. Paper presented at Workshop on ‘Imperatives, Embeddability, and Politeness’ . October 17, 2013. Yale University, New Haven, CT.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Park, Byung-Soo
    1992The Semantic and Pragmatic Nature of Honorific Agreement in Korean: An Information Based Approach. Unpublished ms., Kyung-Hee University and Stanford University.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego
    2007 The Syntax of Valuation and the Interpretability of Features. Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretationed. by Simin Karimi , Vida Samilan , & Wendy Wilkins , 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  doi: 10.1075/la.101.14pes
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.101.14pes [Google Scholar]
  47. Pollard, Carl & Ivan Sag
    1994Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press and Stanford, CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Pollock, Jean-Yves
    1989 Verb Movement, Universal Grammar and the Structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry20:3.365–424.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Rivero, María Luisa & Arhonto Terzi
    1995 Imperatives, V-movement and Logical Mood. Journal of Linguistics31.301–332. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700015620
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700015620 [Google Scholar]
  50. Rizzi, Luigi
    1997 The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntaxed. by Liliane Haegeman , 281–339. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Ryu, Dong-Seok
    1993Kwueui maykaypyenin mwunpep (Korean parametric grammar). Ph. D. Dissertation, Seoul National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Sells, Peter & Jong-Bok Kim
    2007 Korean Honorification: A Kind of Expressive Meaning. Journal of East Asian Linguistics16.303–336. doi: 10.1007/s10831‑007‑9014‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-007-9014-4 [Google Scholar]
  53. Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann
    2009 Language Quarks. Iberia1:1.169–183.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. 2010 On EPP Effects. Studia Linguistica64:2.159–189.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Speas, Margaret
    2006 Economy, Agreement and the Representation of Null Arguments. Argument and Agreemented. by Peter Ackema , Patrick Brandt , Maaike Schoorlemmer , & Fred Weerman , 35–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Speas, Margaret & Carol T. Tenny
    2004 The Interaction of Clausal Syntax, Discourse Roles, and Information Structure Questions. Proceedings of the Workshop on the Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics of Questions (16th European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information; ESSLLI 16), Nancy, France.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Sohn, Ho-Min
    1999The Korean Language. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Tenny, Carol
    2000 Core Events and Adverbial Modification. Events as Grammatical Objectsed. by Carol Tenny & James Pustejovsky , 285–334. Chicago: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Toribio, Almeida Jacqueline
    1990 Specifier-head Agreement in Japanese. Proceedings of WCCFL 9.535–548.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Ura, Hiroyuki
    1993 L-relatedness and Parametric Variation. Papers on Case and Agreement. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics18ed. by Colin Phillips , .377–399. MIT press.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Uriagereka, Juan
    1999 Multiple Spell-Out. Working Minimalismed. by Samuel D. Epstein & Norbert Hornstein , 251–282. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Yoon, James Hye-Suk
    2005 Non-morphological Determination of Nominal Affix Ordering in Korean. Clitic and Affix Combinations: Theoretical Perspectivesed. by Lorie Heggie & Francisco Ordóñez , 239–282. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.74.10yoo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.74.10yoo [Google Scholar]
  63. Zanuttini, Raffaella , Miok Pak , & Paul Portner
    2012 A Syntactic Analysis of Interpretive Restrictions on Imperative, Promissive, and Exhortative Subjects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory30.1231–1274. doi: 10.1007/s11049‑012‑9176‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-012-9176-2 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/kl.17.2.01pak
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error