1887
Volume 19, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0257-3784
  • E-ISSN: 2212-9731

Abstract

Abstract

Korean speech styles ( and in particular) are compared with Finnish terms of address from the perspective of KFL learners, focusing on three variables, namely “power”, “distance”, and “imposition” (Brown and Levinson, 1987). The comparison is based on Peterson (2010), which the current study replicates. The data were collected during a Discourse Completion Task: seventy-eight native speakers of Korean were provided with seven scenarios depicting everyday situations. The results underpin the common belief that is the most common speech style in Korean society. On the pedagogical level, therefore, it should be considered unmarked, meaning that no explication such as “informal polite” is required. However, should be introduced as a speech style that may be mixed with , but also as the norm exclusively used in some restricted formal and writing contexts. Other speech styles may be explained in a similar manner in the KFL classroom.

Available under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/kl.20004.kim
2023-06-08
2024-06-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/kl.20004.kim.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/kl.20004.kim&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Brown, Lucien
    2011Korean Honorifics and Politeness in Second Language Learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.206
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.206 [Google Scholar]
  2. 2013 “Mind your own esteemed business”: Sarcastic honorifics use and impoliteness in Korean TV dramas. Journal of Politeness Research, 9:2.159–186. 10.1515/pr‑2013‑0008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2013-0008 [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chang, Sumi
    2014 Korean Honorific Speech Style Shift: Intra-speaker Variables and Context. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawaii.
  5. Cho, Young-Mee, Hyo Sang Lee, Carol Schulz, Ho-Min Sohn & Sung-Ock Sohn
    2010Intergrated Korean: Beginning 1. 2nd ed.Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Choi, Hyun-bae
    1977Ulimalpon [Our Language Pattern]. 6th ed.Seoul: Jeongeumsa.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Choo, Miho
    1999 Teaching Language Styles of Korean. The Korean Language in America31.77–95. www.jstor.org/stable/42922234
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 2006 The Structure and Use of Korean Honorifics. Korean Language in Culture and Societyed. byHo-min Sohn, 132–154. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cook, Haruko Minegishi
    2011 Are honorifics polite? Uses of referent honorifics in a Japanese committee meeting. Journal of Pragmatics431.3655–3672. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.008 [Google Scholar]
  10. Eun, Jong Oh & Susan Strauss
    2004 The primacy of information status in the alternation between deferential and polite forms in Korean public discourse. Language Sciences261.251–272. 10.1016/j.langsci.2003.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2003.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  11. Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa & Lea Laitinen
    2006 Person in Finnish: paradigmatic and syntagmatic relations in interaction. Grammar from the Human Perspective: Case, space and person in Finnished. ByMarja-Liisa Helasvuo & Lyle Campbell, 173–207. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.277.14hel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.277.14hel [Google Scholar]
  12. Hijirida, Kyoko & Ho-Min Sohn
    1986 Cross-cultural patterns of honorifics and sociolinguistics sensitivity to honorific variables: Evidence from English, Japanese, and Korean. Research on Language & Social Interaction19:3.365–401. 10.1080/08351818609389264
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818609389264 [Google Scholar]
  13. Kim, Jeong-Young
    2016 “What Matter in the L2A of -nita and -yo?” Paper presented atNordic Association of Japanese and Korean Studies, Stockholm, August 17–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim, Tae-Yop
    2007Hankwuke Taywupep [Korean Honorifics]. Seoul: Yeklak.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kim-Renaud, Young-Key
    2009Korean: An Essential Grammar. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lee, Chang-Soo
    1996 Variables in the Use of Korean Honorific Verbal Endings: An Interactional Sociolinguistic Study. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Boston University.
  17. Lee, Iksop & S. Robert Ramsey
    2000The Korean Language. Albany: SUNY.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee, Jeong-Bok
    2012Hankwuke Kyengepepui Kinungkwa Sayong Wuenli [The Function and Usage of Korean Honorifics]. Seoul: Sotong.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee, Kiri & Young-mee Yu Cho
    2015 Social meanings of honorific/non-honorific alternations in Korean and Japanese. Korean Linguistics17:2.205–241. 10.1075/kl.17.2.03lee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/kl.17.2.03lee [Google Scholar]
  20. Locher, Miriam
    2006 Polite behavior within relational work. Multilingua251.249–267. 10.1515/MULTI.2006.015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/MULTI.2006.015 [Google Scholar]
  21. Lukoff, Fred
    1982An Introductory Course in Korean. Seoul: Yonsei University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Matsumoto, Yoshiko
    1988 Reexamination of the Universality of Face: Politeness Phenomena in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics121.403–426. 10.1016/0378‑2166(88)90003‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(88)90003-3 [Google Scholar]
  23. Muikku-Werner, Pirkko
    1993 Impositiivisuus ja kielellinen variaatio: julkisten keskustelujen käskyt ja kysymykset kielenopetuksen näkökulmasta [Impositivism and Linguistic Variation: Commands and Questions in Public Debate from a Language Teaching Perspective]. Ph.D. dissertation, Joensuu University.
  24. Obana, Yasuko
    2016 Speech level shifts in Japanese: A different perspective. The application of symbolic interaction role theory. Pragmatics26:2.247–290.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Park, Youngsoon
    1978 Aspects in the Development of Communicative Competence. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois.
  26. Peterson, Elizabeth
    2010 Perspective and Politeness in Finnish Requests. Pragmatics20:3.401–423.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Pettersson, T. & S. Nurmela
    2007Om olika sätt att möta en stor elefant: En jämförande studie av finländsk och svensk kultur [Different Ways of Meeting a Large Elephant: A Comparative Study of Finnish and Swedish Culture]. Esbo and Stockholm: The Swedish Finnish Cultural Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Sohn, Ho-min
    1994Korean. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Sohn, Ho-Min
    1999The Korean Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Song, Sooho
    2012Politeness and Culture in Second Language Acquisition. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137030634
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137030634 [Google Scholar]
  31. Strauss, Susan & Jong Oh Eun
    2005 Indexicality and honorific speech level choice in Korean. Linguistics43:3.611–651. 10.1515/ling.2005.43.3.611
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2005.43.3.611 [Google Scholar]
  32. Suh, Cheong-soo
    1984Contaypepui Yenkwu [Research on Honorifics]. Seoul: Hanshin Munhwasa.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sung, Ky-chull
    1985Hyentay taywupep yenkwu [Research on Contemporary Honorifiecs]. Seoul: Kaymwunsa.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Yeon, Jaehoon & Lucien Brown
    2011Korean: A Comprehensive Grammar. Oxon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Yli-Vakkuri, Valma
    2005 Politeness in Finland: Evasion at All Costs. Politeness in Europeed. byLeo Hickey and Miranda Stewart, 189–202. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853597398‑015
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853597398-015 [Google Scholar]
  36. Yoon, Sang-Seok
    2014 Differences between the Deferential and Polite Styles: In terms of their Indexical Meanings and Discourse Functions. Language Information191.115–144.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Yoon, Sang-Seok & Dong-Eun Lee
    2011 Request and apology speech acts in e-mail discourse of KFL/KSL students. The Journal of Studies in Language27:1.117–145. 10.18627/jslg.27.1.201105.117
    https://doi.org/10.18627/jslg.27.1.201105.117 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/kl.20004.kim
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/kl.20004.kim
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error