1887
Volume 22, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0257-3784
  • E-ISSN: 2212-9731

Abstract

: This study offers the first systematic orthographic comparison of the two extant (vernacular translation) editions of the (童蒙先習, henceforth TMSS), produced in 1742 and 1797 respectively. Although the is one of the most influential primers in the history of Korean Confucian education, modern scholarship has focused almost exclusively on its Literary Sinitic version and glossing tradition. The vernacular translations — key sources for understanding Early Modern Korean (EMK) phonology, morphology, and spelling — have received significantly less attention.

The study reveals the existence of two distinct but internally consistent orthographic systems. The earlier 1742 edition (Text A) demonstrates a conservative approach, systematically preserving older, phonemic spelling principles characteristic of Middle Korean. Conversely, the 1797 edition (Text B) consistently employs innovative, morphophonemic principles that anticipate the standards of Modern Korean. The analysis covers key diagnostic features such as palatalization, coda neutralization, the realization of sonorant initials, and vowel shifts.

Taken together, the findings demonstrate that EMK spelling variation was not arbitrary, but followed identifiable structural principles shaped by phonological change, editorial conventions, and state-sponsored standardization. While the conclusions cannot be generalized to the entire EMK corpus, the study complicates the prevailing narrative and contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the structured, albeit varied, evolution of the Korean writing system during a critical period of transition and thus represents a first step toward a more nuanced understanding of orthographic practice in the Late Chosŏn period.

Available under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/kl.25003.kon
2026-07-10
2026-08-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/kl.25003.kon.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/kl.25003.kon&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. An Sojin
    An Sojin 2005 “Tongmong sŏnsŭp ŏnhae ŭi sŏji wa ŏnŏ, 7haeng 15chabon kwa 9haeng 16 chabon ŭi ŏnhae yangsik pigyo [Bibliography and Language of the Tongmong sŏnsŭp ŏnhae: A Comparative Study of the 7-line 15-character and 9-line 16-character Editions].” Kwanak ŏmun yŏn’gu301: 67–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chang Hŭigu
    Chang Hŭigu. “Chosŏn sidae ch’odŭng kwajŏng kyojae naeyong punsŏk koch’al: Tongmong sŏnsŭp ŭl chungsim ŭro” [An analysis of Chosŏn-era elementary study material: A focus on Tongmong sŏnsŭp]. Hancha hanmun kyoyuk1 (1994): 197–227.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ch’oe Yŏngsŏng
    Ch’oe Yŏngsŏng 2017 “Tongmong sŏnsŭp chŏja e taehan chaeron [A Re-examination of the Authorship of the Tongmong sŏnsŭp].” Kongjahak321: 135–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dormels, Rainer
    1999Koreanische Reimwörterbücher des 18. Jahrhunderts, List und Tücke bei der Standardisierung der sinokoreanischen Lautungen [Korean rhyme dictionaries of the 18th century, sneaky tricks in the Standardization of Sino-Korean Pronunciation]. Hamburg.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gabelentz, Georg von der
    1892 “Zur Beurteilung des koreanischen Schrift-und Lautwesens.” Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin23 (June-December): 587–600.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Glomb, Vladimir, Elena Kondratyeva
    2020 “Codes of the Korean Primer Tongmong sŏnsŭp.” Bochumer Jahrbuch zur Ostasienforschung [Bochum Yearbook of East Asian Studies] 431: 65–95.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kim Ŭnjŏng
    Kim Ŭnjŏng 2016 “17–18 segi wangseja kyoyuk kwajŏng yŏn’gu [A Study of the Educational Curriculum for Crown Princes in the 17th–18th Centuries].” Hanmun kojŏn yŏn’gu33(1): 517–550.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. King, Ross
    2006 “Korean dialects in the former USSR: Reflections on the current state of research.” Pangenhak31: 127–153.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 2022 “Language.” The Routledge Handbook of Early Modern Korea, edited byMichael J. Seth. London and New York: Routledge: 253–269.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kwŏn Kisŏk
    Kwŏn Kisŏk 2024 “Yŏnjo uy kwanch’an sŏchŏk kanhaeng cŏngch’aek kwa silhaeng pangsik [The Policy and Method of Implementation of King Yeongjo’s Publication of Books Compiled by Government].” Kogun munhwa [Korean Journal of Palace Museum] 171: 7–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Lee, Iksop and S. Robert Ramsey
    2000The Korean Language. Albany: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Martin, Samuel. E.
    1992A Reference Grammar of Korean. Rutland, Vermont and Tokyo: Charles E. Tuttle Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Oh, Young Kyun
    2013Engraving virtue: the printing history of a premodern Korean moral primer. Brill’s Korean studies library series, vol.3.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Pulleyblank, Edwin
    1991Lexicon of Reconstructed Pronunciation in Early Middle Chinese, Late Middle Chinese and Early Mandarin. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press. 10.59962/9780774854597
    https://doi.org/10.59962/9780774854597 [Google Scholar]
  15. Yi, Hyŏnhŭi
    1999 “Changsŏgak sojang-ŭi Yŏngjo-tae han’gŭl munhŏn [The Hangŭl Archives from King Yŏngjo Period in the Changsŏgak Collection].” Changsŏgak21: 25–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Yi Kimun [Lee, Ki-moon
    ] 1972Kwuk.e umwun sa yenkwu [A Study on the History of Korean Phonology]. Seoul: Hankwuk munhwa yenkwu-so.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Yi, Yŏnggyŏng
    2013 “Yŏngjodae ŭi kyohwasŏ kanhaeng kwa Han’gŭl sayong ŭi yangsang” [The publication of books for Confucian Indoctrination and the use of Han’gŭl during the reign of king Yŏngjo]. Han’guk munhwa611: 249–278.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Yu Puhyŏn
    Yu Puhyŏn 1990 “Tongmong sŏnsŭp ibon ŭi muncha idong yŏn’gu [A study on word movement in different versions of Tongmong sŏnsŭp].” Sŏjihak yŏn’gu61: 481–524.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Yu Puhyŏn
    Yu Puhyŏn 1998 “Tongmong sŏnsŭp ibon ŭi muncha idong yŏn’gu” [A study on word movement in different versions of Tongmong sŏnsŭp]. Sŏjihak yŏn’gu151: 77–102.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/kl.25003.kon
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/kl.25003.kon
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error