1887
Volume 7, Issue 6
  • ISSN 1879-9264
  • E-ISSN: 1879-9272
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.00017.nag
2018-02-01
2024-10-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barbiers, S.
    (2005) Word order variation in three-verb clusters and the division of labour between generative linguistics and sociolinguistics. In L. Cornips & K. Corrigan (Eds.), Syntax and variation. Reconciling the biological and the social (pp.233–264). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.265.14bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.265.14bar [Google Scholar]
  2. De Mulder, W. , & Lamiroy, B.
    (2012) Gradualness of grammaticalization in Romance. The position of French, Spanish and Italian. In K. Davidse , T. Breban , L. Brems & T. Mortelmans (Eds.), Grammaticalization and language change: new reflections (pp.199–226). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.130.08mul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.130.08mul [Google Scholar]
  3. Domínguez, L.
    (2013) Understanding interfaces: second language acquisition and native language attrition of Spanish subject realization and word order variation. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lald.55
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.55 [Google Scholar]
  4. Guy, G.
    (2014) Linking usage and grammar: Generative phonology, exemplar theory, and variable rules. Lingua, 142, 57–65. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.07.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.07.007 [Google Scholar]
  5. Guy, G. , & Boberg, C.
    (1997) The obligatory contour principle and sociolinguistic variation. Language Variation and Change, 9(2), 149–164. doi: 10.1017/S095439450000185X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S095439450000185X [Google Scholar]
  6. Jackson, C. , McDermott, L. , & Schmid, M. S.
    (2011) Changing syntactic preferences in L1 attriters of German. Paper presented at ISB 8 , Oslo, June 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kim, K. , O’Grady, W. , & Schwartz, B. D.
    (2017) Case in heritage Korean. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. doi: 10.1075/lab.16001.kim
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.16001.kim [Google Scholar]
  8. Labov, W.
    (1975) What is a linguistic fact?Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Labov, W. , Ash, S. , Ravindranath, M. , Weldon, T. , Baranowski, M. , & Nagy, N.
    (2011) Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(4), 431–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2011.00504.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00504.x [Google Scholar]
  10. Levon, E. , & Buchstaller, I.
    (2015) Perception, cognition, and linguistic structure: The effect of linguistic modularity and cognitive style on sociolinguistic processing. Language Variation and Change, 27(3), 319–348. doi: 10.1017/S0954394515000149
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394515000149 [Google Scholar]
  11. Nagy, N.
    (2011) A Multilingual corpus to explore variation in language contact situations. Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata, 43, 65–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (2015) A sociolinguistic view of null subjects and VOT in Toronto heritage languages. Lingua, 164B, 309–327. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.04.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.04.012 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2016) Heritage languages as new dialects. In M. Côté , R. Knooihuizen & J. Nerbonne (Eds.), The Future of Dialects: Selected papers from Methods in Dialectology XV (pp.15–34). Berlin: Language Science.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Nagy, N. , Chociej, J. , & Hoffman, M.
    (2014) Analyzing Ethnic Orientation in the quantitative sociolinguistic paradigm. Language and Communication: New perspectives on the concept of ethnic identity in North America, 35, 9–26. doi: 10.1016/j.langcom.2013.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2013.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  15. Schmid, M. , & Köpke, B.
    (2017) The relevance of first language attrition to theories of bilingual development. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 7(6), 637–667. doi: 10.1075/lab.17058.sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.17058.sch [Google Scholar]
  16. Thomason, S. G.
    (2007) Language contact and deliberate change. Journal of Language Contact, 1(1), 41–62. doi: 10.1163/000000007792548387
    https://doi.org/10.1163/000000007792548387 [Google Scholar]
  17. Tse, H.
    (2016) Contact-induced splits in Toronto Heritage Cantonese mid-vowels. Linguistica Atlantica, 35(2), 133–155.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.00017.nag
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.00017.nag
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article Commentary
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error