Representation and processing in bilingual morphology

References

1. Anderson, S.
   (1982) Where’s morphology?Linguistic Inquiry, 13(4), 571–612.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baker, M.
   (1985) The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry, 16(3), 373–415.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bybee, J. L.
   (1985) Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form (Vol.9). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.9
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9 [Google Scholar]
4. Bybee, J. L.
   (2010) Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
5. Chomsky, N.
   (1970) Remarks on nominalization. InR. Jacobs & P. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar. Boston: Ginn, 184–221.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Clahsen, H., Felser, C., Neubauer, K., Sato, M., & Silva, R.
   (2010) Morphological structure in native and nonnative language processing. Language Learning, 60(1), 21–43. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00550.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00550.x [Google Scholar]
7. Culicover, P. & Jackendoff, R.
   (2005) Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271092.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271092.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
8. De Grauwe, S., Lemhöfer, K., Willems, R. M., & Schriefers, H.
   (2014) L2 speakers decompose morphologically complex verbs: fMRI evidence from priming of transparent derived verbs. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 802.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Diependaele, K., Duñabeitia, J. A., Morris, J., & Keuleers, E.
   (2011) Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 64(4), 344–358. 10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.003
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.003 [Google Scholar]
10. Di Sciullo, A. M., & Williams, E.
    (1987) On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Halle, M., & Marantz, A.
    (1993) Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. InK. Hale & S. Keyser (Eds.), The View from Building 20. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 111–176.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gor, K., Chrabaszcz, A., & Cook, S. V.
    (2019) A case for agreement: Processing of case inflection by early and late learners. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism9(1). 10.1075/lab.16017.gor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.16017.gor [Google Scholar]
13. Harley, H. & Ritter, E.
    (2002) Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language78(3), 482–526. 10.1353/lan.2002.0158
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2002.0158 [Google Scholar]
14. Lee, E. & Lardiere, D.
    (2019) Feature reassembly in the acquisition of plural marking by Korean and Indonesian bilinguals: A bidirectional study. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism9(1). 10.1075/lab.16018.lee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.16018.lee [Google Scholar]
15. Liceras, J. M. & Klassen, R.
    (2019) Compounding and derivation: On the ‘promiscuity’ of derivational affixes. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism9(1). 10.1075/lab.16026.lic
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.16026.lic [Google Scholar]
16. Mueller Gathercole, V.
    (2007) Miami and North Wales, so far and yet so near: A constructivist account of morphosyntactic development in bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(3), 224–247. 10.2167/beb442.0
    https://doi.org/10.2167/beb442.0 [Google Scholar]
17. Montrul, S.
    (2004) Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morphosyntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(2), 125–142. 10.1017/S1366728904001464
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728904001464 [Google Scholar]
18. Nicoladis, E., Palmer, A., & Marentette, P.
    (2007) The role of type and token frequency in using past tense morphemes correctly. Developmental Science, 10(2), 237–254. 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2007.00582.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00582.x [Google Scholar]
19. Nicoladis, E., Song, J., & Marentette, P.
    (2012) Do young bilinguals acquire past tense morphology like monolinguals, only later? Evidence from French-English and Chinese-English bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(3), 457–479. 10.1017/S0142716411000439
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000439 [Google Scholar]
20. Paradis, J., Nicoladis, E., Crago, M., & Genesee, F.
    (2011) Bilingual children’s acquisition of the past tense: A usage-based approach. Journal of Child Language, 38(3), 554–578. 10.1017/S0305000910000218
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000910000218 [Google Scholar]
21. Silva, R., & Clahsen, H.
    (2008) Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(2), 245–260. 10.1017/S1366728908003404
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003404 [Google Scholar]
22. Sagarra, N., Sánchez, L., & Bel, A.
    (2019) Processing DOM in relative clauses: Salience and optionality in early and late bilinguals. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 9(1). 10.1075/lab.16020.sag
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.16020.sag [Google Scholar]
23. Unsworth, S.
    (2013) Assessing the role of current and cumulative exposure in simultaneous bilingual acquisition: The case of Dutch gender. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(1), 86–110. 10.1017/S1366728912000284
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000284 [Google Scholar]